Hiatal hernia repair with the use of biologic meshes: A literature review

Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy and Percutaneous Techniques

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 1-9

  Antoniou, Stavros A ^a   Pointner, Rudolph ^b   Granderath, Frank A ^a  

^a Krankenhaus Neuwerk   (Germany)

^b General Public Hospital Zell am See   (Austria)

Author keywords

Biologic mesh; hernia; hiatal; human cadaveric dermis; porcine cross linked collagen; small intestine submucosa

Indexed keywords

ANTIBIOTIC AGENT; COLLAGEN FIBER; COLLAGEN IMPLANT; CORTISONE; GAMMA INTERFERON; INTERLEUKIN 10; INTERSTITIAL COLLAGENASE; POLYPROPYLENE; PORCINE DERMAL COLLAGEN IMPLANT; TRANSFORMING GROWTH FACTOR BETA; TUMOR NECROSIS FACTOR ALPHA ANTIBODY; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ABDOMINAL WALL DEFECT; ABDOMINAL WALL HERNIA; ACELLULAR BOVINE PERICARDIUM IMPLANT; ACELLULAR DERMAL MATRIX; ANGIOGENESIS; ANTIBIOTIC THERAPY; ASTHMA; BIOMECHANICS; BIOPROSTHESIS; BLADDER FISTULA; CELL ADHESION; CELL INFILTRATION; CROSS LINKING; CYSTOCUTANEOSTOMY; DYSPHAGIA; ENDOTHELIUM CELL; FASCIA DISEASE; FIBROSIS; FOLLOW UP; FOREIGN BODY REACTION; GRAFT REJECTION; HEMATOMA; HERNIA; HERNIOPLASTY; HIATUS HERNIA; HUMAN; HUMAN CADAVERIC DERMIS IMPLANT; INCISIONAL HERNIA; INFLAMMATION; LITTRE HERNIA; MEDLINE; MESH SLING; PARASTOMAL HERNIA; PERICARDIUM; POLITEF IMPLANT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS INFECTION; RECURRENCE RISK; RECURRENT DISEASE; REVIEW; SEROMA; SKIN FISTULA; SKIN NECROSIS; SMALL INTESTINE SUBMUCOSA IMPLANT; STOMAL DEFECT; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TENSILE STRENGTH; WOUND DEHISCENCE; WOUND INFECTION;

ANIMALS; CADAVER; COLLAGEN; FIBROSIS; HERNIA, HIATAL; INFLAMMATION; INTESTINE, SMALL; RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGICAL PROCEDURES; SURGICAL MESH; SWINE; TISSUE ADHESIONS;

EID: 79951919916     PISSN: 15304515     EISSN: 15344908     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e31820ad56c     Document Type: Review

References (57)

1. Luostarinen M, Rantalainen M, Helve O, et al. Late results of paraoesophageal hiatus hernia repair wit (Pubitemid 28099957)
2. Stadlhuber RJ, Sherif AE, Mittal SK, et al. Mesh complications after prosthetic reinforcement of hiatal closure: a 28-case series. Surg Endosc. 2009;23:1219-1226.
3. Hiles M, Record Ritchie RD, Altizer AM. Are biologic grafts effective for hernia repair? A systematic review of the literature. Surg Innov. 2009;16:26-37.
4. Oelschlager BK, Barreca M, Chang L, et al. The use of small intestine submucosa in the repair of paraesophageal hernias: initial observations of a new technique. Am J Surg. 2003; 186:4-8. (Pubitemid 36773988)
5. Strange PS. Small intestinal submucosa for laparoscopic repair of large paraesophageal hiatal hernias: a preliminary report. Surg Technol Int. 2003;11:141-143.
6. Oelschlager BK, Pellegrini CA, Hunter J. Biologic prosthesis reduces recurrence after laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair: a multicenter, prospective, randomized trial. Ann Surg. 2006;244:481-490.
7. Jacobs M, Gomez E, Plasencia G, et al. Use of Surgisis mesh in laparoscopic repair of hiatal hernias. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2007;17:365-368. (Pubitemid 351339203)
8. Fumagalli U, Bona S, Caputo M, et al. Are Surgisis biomeshes effective in reducing recurrences after laparoscopic repair of large hiatal hernias? Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2008;18:433-436.
9. Johnson JM, Carmody BJ, Jamal MK, et al. Onlay hiatal reinforcement utilizing human acellular dermal matrix: three case series. Surg Innov. 2005;12:239-241. (Pubitemid 41614528)
10. Ringley CD, Bochkarev V, Ahmed SI, et al. Laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair with human acellular dermal matrix patch: our initial experience. Am J Surg. 2006;192: 767-772. (Pubitemid 44854819)
11. Wisbach G, Peterson T, Thoman D. Earlu results of the use of acellular dermal allograft in type III paraesophageal hernia repair. JSLS. 2006;10:184-187.
12. Lee YK, James E, Bochkarev V, et al. Long-term outcome of cruroplasty reinforcement with human acellular dermal matrix in large paraesophageal hiatal hernia. J Gastrointest Surg. 2008;12:811-815.
13. Lee E, Frisella MM, Mathews BD, et al. Evaluation of acellular human dermis reinforcement of the crural closure in patients with difficult hiatal hernias. Surg Endosc. 2007;21: 641-645. (Pubitemid 46439375)
14. Varela JE, Jacks SP. Laparoscopic circular biomesh hiatoplasty during paraesophageal hernia repair. Surg Innov. 2009; 16:124-128.
15. Jarman-Smith ML, Bodamyali T, Stevens C, et al. Porcine collagen crosslinking, degradation and its capability for fibroblast adhesion and proliferation. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2004;15:925-932. (Pubitemid 39070220)
16. Adedeji OA, Bailey CA, Varma JS. Porcine dermal collagen graft in abdominal-wall reconstruction. Br J Plast Surg. 2002; 55:85-86. (Pubitemid 34071917)
17. Cobb GA, Shaffer J. Cross-linked acellular porcine dermal collagen implant in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: casecontrolled study of operative variables and early complications. Int Surg. 2005;90(3 suppl):S24-S49.
18. Richards SK, Lear PA, Huskisson L, et al. Porcine dermal collagen graft in pediatric renal transplantation. Pediatr Transplant. 2005;9:627-629. (Pubitemid 41413503)
19. Parker DM, Armstrong PJ, Frizzi JD, et al. Porcine dermal collagen (Permacol) for abdominal wall reconstruction. Curr Surg. 2006;63:255-258. (Pubitemid 44028507)
20. Liyanage SH, Purohit GS, Frye JN, et al. Anterior abdominal wall reconstruction with a Permacol implant. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2006;59:553-555.
21. Baillie DR, Stawicki SP, Eustance N, et al. Use of human and porcine dermal-derived bioprostheses in complex abdominal wall reconstructions: a literature review and case report. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2007;53:30-37.
22. Catena F, Ansaloni L, Gazzotti F, et al. Use of porcine dermal collagen graft (Permacol) for hernia repair in contaminated fields. Hernia. 2007;11:57-60. (Pubitemid 46487194)
23. Chuo CB, Thomas SS. Absorbable mesh and topical negative pressure therapy for closure of abdominal dehiscence with exposed bowel. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2008;61: 1378-1381.
24. Inan I, Gervaz P, Hagen M, et al. Multimedia article. Laparoscopic repair of parastomal hernia using a porcine dermal collagen (Permacol) implant. Dis Colon Rectum. 2007;50:1465.
25. Jehle KS, Rohatgi A, Baig MK. Use of porcine dermal collagen graft and topical negative pressure on infected open abdominal wounds. J Wound Care. 2007;16:36-37.
26. Saettele TM, Bachman SL, Costello CR, et al. Use of porcine dermal collagen as a prosthetic mesh in a contaminated field for ventral hernia repair: a case report. Hernia. 2007;11: 279-285. (Pubitemid 46881784)
27. Smart N, Immanuel A, Mercer-Jones M. Laparoscopic repair of a Littre's hernia with porcine dermal collagen implant (Permacol). Hernia. 2007;11:373-376. (Pubitemid 47108494)
28. Shaikh FM, Giri SK, Durrani S, et al. Experience with porcine acellular dermal collagen implant in one-stage tension-free reconstruction of acute and chronic abdominal wall defects. World J Surg. 2007;31:1966-1972. (Pubitemid 47415718)
29. Bounovas A, Antoniou GA, Laftsidis P, et al. Management of abdominal wound dehiscence with porcine dermal collagen implant: report of a case. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2008;54: 44-48.
30. Chaudhry A, Griffiths EA, Shah N, et al. Surgical excision of an abdominal wall granular cell tumour with Permacol mesh reconstruction: a case report. Int Semin Surg Oncol. 2008;5:4.
31. Greenstein AJ, Aldoroty RA. Parastomal hernia repair using cross-linked porcine dermis: report of a case. Surg Today. 2008;38:1048-1051.
32. Hammond TM, Chin-Aleong J, Navsaria H, et al. Human in vivo cellular response to a cross-linked acellular collagen implant. Br J Surg. 2008;95:438-446.
33. Pentlow A, Smart NJ, Richards SK, et al. The use of porcine dermal collagen implants in assisting abdominal wall closure of pediatric renal transplant recipients with donor size discrepancy. Pediatr Transplant. 2008;12:20-23.
34. Canda AE, Karaca A. Incisional hernia in action: the use of vacuum-assisted closure and porcine dermal collagen implant. Hernia 2009. doi:10.1007/s10029-009-0497-y.
35. Hsu PW, Salgado CJ, Kent K, et al. Evaluation of porcine dermal collagen (Permacol) used in abdominal wall reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2009;62:1484-1489.
36. Walker H, Brooker T, Gelman W. Abdominal wall reconstruction following removal of a chronically infected mid-urethral tape. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2009;20: 1273-1275.
37. Wotton FT, Akoh JA. Rejection of Permacol mesh used in abdominal wall repair: a case report. World J Gastroenterol. 2009;15:4331-4333.
38. Karpelowsky JS, Millar AJW. Porcine dermal collagen (Permacol) for chest and abdominal wall reconstruction in thoraco-omphalopagus conjoined twin separation. Pediatr Surg Int. 2009;26:315-318.
39. O'Brien JA, Ignotz R, Montilla R, et al. Long-term histologic and mechanical results of a Permacol abdominal wall explant. Hernia 2010. doi:10.1007/s10029-010-0628-5.
40. Hengirmen S, Cete M, Soran A, et al. Comparison of meshes for the repair of experimental abdominal wall defects. J Invest Surg. 1998;11:315-325. (Pubitemid 28498050)
41. Zheng F, Lin Y, Verbeken E, et al. Host response after reconstruction of abdominal wall defects with porcine dermal collagen in a rat model. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191: 1961-1970. (Pubitemid 39601500)
42. MacLeod TM, Williams G, Sanders R, et al. Histological evaluation of Permacol as a subcutaneous implant over a 20- week period in the rat model. Br J Plast Surg. 2005;58:518-532. (Pubitemid 40645394)
43. Kaleya RN. Evaluation of implant/host tissue interactions following intraperitoneal implantation of porcine dermal collagen prosthesis in the rat. Hernia. 2005;9:269-276. (Pubitemid 43192949)
44. Zheng F, Verbeken E, de Ridder D, et al. Improved surgical outcome by modification of porcine dermal collagen implant in abdominal wall reconstruction in rats. Neurourol Urodyn. 2005;24:362-368. (Pubitemid 40944336)
45. Hilger WS, Walter A, Zobitz ME, et al. Histological and biomechanical evaluation of implanted graft materials in a rabbit vaginal and abdominal model. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;195:1826-1831. (Pubitemid 44792647)
46. Gaertner WB, Bonsack ME, Delaney JP. Experimental evaluation of four biologic prostheses for ventral hernia repair. J Gastrointest Surg. 2007;11:1275-1285.
47. Trabuco EC, Zobitz ME, Klingele CJ, et al. Effect of host response (incorporation, encapsulation, mixed incorporation and encapsulation, or resorption) on the tensile strength of graft-reinforced repair in the rat ventral hernia model. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;197:638.e1-638.e6.
48. Zheng F, Xu L, Verbiest L, et al. Cytokine production following experimental implantation of xenogenic dermal collagen and polypropylene grafts in mice. Neurourol Urodyn. 2007;26: 280-289. (Pubitemid 46595731)
49. Ayubi FS, Armstrong PJ, Mattia MS, et al. Abdominal wall hernia repair: a comparison of Permacol and Surgisis grafts in a rat hernia model. Hernia 2008;12:373-378.
50. Petter-Puchner AH, Fortelny RH, Walder N, et al. Adverse effects associated with the use of porcine cross-linked collagen implants in an experimental model of incisional hernia repair. J Surg Res. 2008;145:105-110. (Pubitemid 351221095)
51. Sandor M, Xu H, Connor J, et al. Host response to implanted porcine-derived biologic materials in a primate model of abdominal wall repair. Tissue Eng Part A. 2008; 14:2021-2031.
52. Ozog Y, Konstantinovic M, Zheng F, et al. Porous acellular porcine dermal collagen implants to repair fascial defects in a rat model: biomechanical evaluation up to 180 days. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2009;68:205-212.
53. Hashemi M, Peters JH, DeMeester TR, et al. Laparoscopic repair of large type III hiatal hernia: objective follow up reveals high recurrence rate. J Am Coll Surg. 2000; 190:553-560.
54. Rathore MA, Andrabi SI, Bhatti MI, et al. Metaanalysis of recurrence after laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hernia. JSLS. 2007;11:456-460.
55. Lubezky N, Sagie B, Keidar A, et al. Prosthetic mesh repair of large and recurrent diaphragmatic hernias. Surg Endosc. 2007;21:737-741. (Pubitemid 46675515)
56. Lantis JC II, Gallivan EK, Hekier R, et al. A comparison of collagen and PTFE patch repair in a rabbit model of congenital diaphragmatic hernia. J Invest Surg. 2000;13:319-325. (Pubitemid 32046809)
57. Mitchell IC, Garcia NM, Barber R, et al. Permacol: a potential biologic patch alternative in congenital diaphragmatic hernia repair. J Pediatr Surg. 2008;43:2161-2164.