Zoned not planned

Planning Theory

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 99-112

  Tarlock, A Dan ^a  

^a IIT Chicago Kent College of Law   (United States)

Author keywords

Growth control; spatial planning; sprawl; takings; zoning

Indexed keywords

LAND USE; LAND USE PLANNING; SPATIAL PLANNING; ZONING;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 84892460912     PISSN: 14730952     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1473095212469942     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Alterman RTakings International: A Comparative Perspective on Land use Regulations and Compensation Rights. American Bar Association Publishing; 2010:.
2. American Law Institute (1976) A Model Land Use Development Code.
3. BenderT (2000) Toward a new metropolitanism and a pluralized public? Available at: http://www2.rz.hu-berlin.de/amerika/projects/newurbanism/nu_pt_bender_a.html.
4. Bosselman F.The commodification of 'Nature's Metropolis: The Historical Context of Illinois' unique zoning standards.Northern Illinois Law Review. 1992;12 527:531.
5. Buchsbaum PA,Smith LJState & Regional Comprehensive Planning: Implementing New Methods for Growth Management. American Bar Association Publishing; 1993:.
6. Buzbee W.Urban sprawl federalism, and the problem of institutional complexity.Fordham Law Review. 1999;68:57.
7. City of Cuyahoga Falls v. Buckeye Community Hope Foundation (2003) 123 S.Ct. 139
8. City of Elmo Lake v. Metropolitan Council, 685 N.W.2d 1 (Minn. 2004).
9. Collard v. Incorporated Village of Flower Hill, 421 N.E.2d 818 (N.Y. 1981).
10. DeBuys WA Great Wilderness: Climate Change and the Future of the American Southwest. New York: Oxford University Press; 2011:177-184.
11. DeGrove JMLand Growth & Politics. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy; 1984:.
12. Dixon v. City of Jacksonville, 774 So.2d 763 (Fla.App. 2000).
13. Dolan v. City of Tigard (1994) 512 U.S.374.
14. Dunay A,Plater-Zyberk E,Speck JNew York: North Point Press; 2000:.
15. Durand v. IDC Bellingham, 793 N.E.2d 359 (Mass. 2004).
16. Durkin Keating ABuilding Chicago: Suburban Developers and the Creation of a Divided Metropolis. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press; 2002:.
17. Ellickson RC,Been VLLand Use Controls: Cases and Materials. New York: Aspen Publishers; 2005:.
18. Elliot DA Better Way to Zone. Washington, DC: Island Press; 2008:.
19. Garnett NSYale Law Journal. 598; 2006:.
20. Glaeser ETriumph of the City: How Our Greatest Invention Makes Us Richer, Smarter, Greener, Healthier and Happier. New York: Penguin Group; 2011:.
21. Glickfeld M,Levine NRegional Growth: Local Reaction: The Enactment of Local Growth Control Management Measures in California. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy; 1992:.
22. Gutkind EAUrban Development in Central Europe. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press of Glencoe; 1964:.
23. Haines v. City of Phoenix (1988) 727 P.2d 339 (Ariz. App. 1988).
24. Hayek FAThe Road to Serfdom. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1944:.
25. Jackson KTThe Crab Grass Frontier: The Suburbanization of the United States. New York: Oxford University Press; 1985:.
26. Juergensmeyer JC,Roberts TELand Use Planning and Development Regulation. 2007) Land Use Planning and Development Regulation. 2nd edn. § 3.24. New York: Thomson/West.New York: Thomson/West; 2007:.
27. Kahan DM.Neutral principles, motivated cognition, and some problems of constitutional law.Harvard Law Review. 2011;125:1 24.
28. Lingle v. Chevron U.S.A. Inc. (2005) 544 U.S. 528.
29. Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council (1992) 505 U.S. 1003.
30. McLean Hospital Corp. V. Town of Belmont, 778 N.E.2d 1016 (Mas.App. 2002).
31. MacPherson v. Department of Administrative Services (2006) 130 P.3d 308.
32. Mandelker DR.The role of the local comprehensive plan in land use regulation.Michigan Law Review. 1976;74:899-973.
33. Martin County v. Section 28 Partnership, 772 So.2d 616 (Fla.App. 2000).
34. MartinottiG and the European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions (1997) Perceiving, Conceiving, Achieving the Sustainable City.
35. Mayor and City Council of Rockville v. Rylyns, 814 A.2d 469 (Md.App. 2002).
36. Md law, Md.Ann. Code 66B, s 4.01.
37. Mihalopoulos D,Becker R,Little D.How, cash, clout transform Chicago's neighborhoods.The Chicago Tribune. 2008;:1.
38. Miliken v. Bradley (1974) 418 U.S. 717.
39. Ministry of Housing.(2006) National Spatial Planning Strategy: Creating Space for Development Summary.
40. Morgan Co. v. Orange County. 818 So.2d 640 (Fla.App. 2002).
41. N.J. Stat.Ann. 40:55D-62a.
42. N.J. Stat. Ann. Ss 52.27D-301 et seq.
43. Oregon, Ore.Rev.Stat. ' 197.010 et seq.
44. Palazzolo v. Rhode Island (2011) 533 U.S. 606.
45. Pelham T.Twenty years later: Three perspectives on the evolution of Florida's 1985 Growth Management Act (First Perspective).Planning & Environmental Law. 2006;58 (7): 3.
46. Pleasant Valley Neighborhood Association v. Planning and Zoning Commission 543 A.2d 296 (Conn. (1988).
47. Public Law 96-551, 94 Stat. 3233 (1980).
48. Rayle v. Town of Cato (2002).
49. N.Y.S.2d 784 (N.Y.App.Div. 2002).
50. Reps JTown Planning in Frontier America. Columbia, MO: University of Missouri Press; 1980:.
51. Sax JLMountains without Handrails. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press; 1981:.
52. Scott MAmerican City Planning Since 1890. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press; 1971:.
53. Smith LJState and Regional Comprehensive Planning: Implementing New Methods for Growth Management. Buchsbaum PASmith LJ, ed. Chicago, IL: American Bar Association; 1993:137.
54. Snohomish County v. Anderson, 868 P.2d 116 (Wash. 1994).
55. Southern Burlington County NAACP v. Township of Mount Laurel (II) (1983) 92 N.J. 158, 456 A.2d 390.
56. Sullivan EJState and Regional Comprehensive Planning: Implementing New Methods for Growth Management. Buchsbaum PASmith LJ, ed. Chicago, IL: American Bar Association; 1993:51.
57. Sullivan EJ.Recent developments in comprehensive planning.Urban Lawyer. 2011;43:823.
58. Sullivan EJ,Richter CA.A taste of ashes - The MacPherson decision and the future of Oregon's planning program.Planning & Environmental Law. 2006;58 (4): 3.
59. Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency (2002) 535 U.S. 302.
60. Twiss RHPlanning and Land Regulation at Lake Tahoe: Five Decades of Experience, Big Places, Big Plans. Surrey: Ashgate Press; 2004:.
61. Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp. (1977) 429 U.S. 252.
62. Village of Belle Terre v. Boraas (1974) 416 U.S. 1.
63. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co. (1926) 272 U.S. 365.
64. Washington State, Wash.Rev. Code ' 36.70A.010.
65. Willoughby v. Wolfson Group, 753 A.2d 162 (N.J. 2000).
66. Ziegler EH.American cities, urban collapse and environmental doom.Planning & Environmental Law. 2008;60:7.
67. Zovanyi GGrowth Management for a Sustainable Future: Ecological Sustainability as the New Growth Focus for the 21st Century 37. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger; 1998:.