Non-renewable and renewable energy consumption and CO2 emissions in OECD countries: A comparative analysis

Energy Policy

Volumn 66, Issue , 2014, Pages 547-556

  Shafiei, Sahar ^a   Salim, Ruhul A ^b  

^a Science and Research Campus ^*  (Iran)

^b CURTIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

CO2 emissions; Non renewable energy consumption; Renewable energy consumption; STIRPAT model; Urbanisation

Indexed keywords

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS; ENVIRONMENTAL KUZNETS CURVES; NON-RENEWABLE ENERGY; NON-RENEWABLE ENERGY USE; OECD COUNTRIES; RENEWABLE ENERGY CONSUMPTION; STIRPAT MODELS; URBANISATION;

CLIMATE CHANGE; ENERGY UTILIZATION; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT;

CARBON DIOXIDE;

ALTERNATIVE ENERGY; CARBON DIOXIDE; CARBON EMISSION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ENERGY USE; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; KUZNETS CURVE; NUMERICAL MODEL; OECD; RENEWABLE RESOURCE; URBANIZATION;

EID: 84892451289     PISSN: 03014215     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.10.064     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Apergis N., Payne J.E., Menyah K., Wolde-Rufael Y. On the causal dynamics between emissions, nuclear energy, renewable energy, and economic growth. Ecol. Econ. 2010, 69:2255-2260.
2. Breitung J. The local power of some unit root tests for panel data. Adv. Econometrics 2000, 15:161-178.
3. Canas A., Ferrao P., Conceicao P. A new environmental Kuznets curveα Relationship between direct material input and income per capita: evidence from industrialized countries. Ecol. Econ. 2003, 46:217-229.
4. Carrión-i-Silvestre J.L., Del Barrio T., López-Bazo E. Breaking the panels. An application to the GDP per capita. Econometrics J. 2005, 8:159-175.
5. Cole M.A., Neumayer E. Examining the impact of demographic factors on air pollution. Popul. Environ. 2004, 26:5-21.
6. Dickey D.A., Fuller W.A. Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. J. Am. Statistical Assoc. 1979, 74:427-431.
7. Diesendorf M. I=PAT or I=PBATα. Ecol. Econ. 2002, 42:3-6.
8. Dietz T., Rosa E.A. Rethinking the environmental impacts of population, affluence and technology. Hum. Ecolo. Rev. 1994, 1:277-300.
9. 2 emissions. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1997, 94:175-179.
10. 2 panel EKC estimations. Environ. Resource Econ. 2005, 32:229-239.
11. Duffour, G. 2012. World Energy Use in 2011: Slowdown in Global Energy Demand, [accessed 22 October 2013] http://www.leonardo-energy.org/.
12. Eberhardt M., Teal F. Econometrics for Grumblers: a new look at the literature on cross-country growth empirics. Econ. Surv. 2011, 25:109-155.
13. Ehrhardt-Martinez K. Social determinants of deforestation in developing countries: a cross-national study. Soc. Forces 1998, 77:567-586.
14. Ehrhardt-Martinez K., Crenshaw E.M., Jenkins J.C. Deforestation and the environmental Kuznets curve: a cross-national investigation of intervening mechanisms. Soc. Sci. 2002, 83:226-243.
15. Ehrlich P., Holdren J. Impact of population growth. Science 1971, 171:1212-1217.
16. Ehrlich P.R., Ehrlich A.H. The Population Explosion 1990, Simon and Schuster, New York.
17. 2 emissions using the STIRPAT model. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 2006, 26:377-395.
18. 2 emissions: a robustness exercise. Ecol. Econ. 2006, 57:152-163.
19. Galeotti M., Lanza A. Richer and cleanerα A study on carbon dioxide emissions by developing countries. Energy Policy 1999, 27:565-573.
20. Grossman G.M., Krueger A.B. Economic growth and the environment. Q. J. Econ. 1995, 112:353-378.
21. 2 emissions, energy consumption, income and foreign trade in Turkey. Energy Policy 2009, 37:1156-1164.
22. Harrison P., Pearce F. AAAS Atlas of Population and Environment 2000, University of California Press, Los Angeles.
23. Holdren J.P., Ehrlich P.R. Human population and the global environment. Am. Sci. 1974, 62:282-292.
24. IEA Energy Balances of OECD Countries 2011, International Energy Agency (IEA), Paris.
25. Im K., Pesaran M.H., Shin Y. Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. J. Econometrics 2003, 115(1):53-74.
26. IPCC. 2001. Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis. In: Technical Summary of the Working Group I Report. New York.
27. 2: a pooled mean group approach. Appl. Energy 2011, 88:1986-1996.
28. Kearsley A., Riddel M. A further inquiry into the pollution haven hypothesis and the environmental Kuznets curve. Ecol. Econ. 2010, 69:905-919.
29. Levin A., Lin C.-F., Chu C.S.J. Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite sample properties. J. Econometrics 2002, 108:1-24.
30. Liddle B. Consumption-driven environmental impact and age structure change in OECD countries: a cointegration-STIRPAT analysis. Demographic Res. 2011, 24:749-770.
31. Liddle B., Lung S. Age-structure, urbanization, and climate change in developed countries: revisiting STIRPAT for disaggregated population and consumption-related environmental impacts. Popul. Environ. 2010, 31:317-343.
32. Lin S., Zhao D., Marinova D. Analysis of the environmental impact of China based on STIRPAT model. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 2009, 29:341-347.
33. 2 emissions and national income-the role of energy consumption. Econ. Lett. 2005, 87:325-328.
34. Maddala G.S., Wu S. A comparative study of unit root tests with panel data and a new simple test. Oxford Bull. Econ. Statist. 1999, 61:631-652.
35. 2 emissions: evidence from European countries. Environ. Resource Econ. 2007, 38:497-512.
36. 2 emissions: evidence from developing countries. Ecol. Econ. 2011, 70:1344-1353.
37. 2. Econ. Lett. 2004, 82:121-126.
38. 2 emissions, nuclear energy, renewable energy and economic growth in the US. Energy Policy 2010, 38:2911-2915.
39. Payne J.E. The causal dynamics between US renewable energy consumption, output, emissions, and oil prices. Energy Sources Part B 2012, 7(4):323-330.
40. Phillips P.C.B., Perron P. Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrika 1988, 75:335-346.
41. 2 emissionsα A cross-country analysis. Ecol. Econ. 2010, 70:434-444.
42. Raskin P.D. Methods for estimating the population contribution to environmental change. Ecol. Econ. 1995, 15:225-233.
43. Richmond A.K., Kaufmann R.K. Is there a turning point in the relationship between income and energy use and/or carbon emissionsα. Ecol. Econ. 2006, 56:176-189.
44. Roca J. The IPAT formula and its limitations. Ecol. Econ. 2002, 42:1-2.
45. Sadorsky P. Renewable energy consumption and income in emerging economies. Energy Policy 2009, 37:4021-4028.
46. Salim R.A., Rafiq S. Why do some emerging economies proactively accelerate the adoption of renewable energyα. Energy Econ. 2012, 34:1051-1057.
47. Schulze Peter C. I=PBAT. Ecol. Econ. 2002, 40:149-150.
48. Selden T.M., Song D. Environmental quality and development: is there a Kuznets curve for air pollutionα. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 1994, 27:147-162.
49. Shi A. The impact of population pressure on global carbon dioxide emissions, 1975-1996: evidence from pooled cross-country data. Ecol. Econ. 2003, 44:24-42.
50. Stern P.C., Young O.R., Druckman D. Global Environmental Change: Understanding the Human Dimensions 1992, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
51. Sul D., Phillips P.C.B., Choi C.-Y. Prewhitening bias in HAC estimation. Oxford Bull. Econ. Stat. 2005, 67(4):517-546.
52. Waggoner P.E., Ausubel J.H. A framework for sustainability science: a renovated IPAT identity. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2002, 99:7860-7865.
53. Westerlund J. Testing for error correction in panel data. Oxford Bull. Econ. Statist. 2007, 69:709-748.
54. York R., Rosa E.A., Dietz T. Bridging environmental science with environmental policy: plasticity of population, affluence, and technology. Soc. Sci. 2002, 83:18-34.
55. York R., Rosa E.A., Dietz T. Footprints on the Earth: the environmental consequences of modernity. Am. Sociol. Rev. 2003, 68:279-300.
56. York R, Rosa E.A., Dietz T. STIRPAT, IPAT and ImPACT: analytic tools for unpacking the driving forces of environmental impacts. Ecol. Econ. 2003, 46:351-365.
57. 2 emissions: a regional analysis in China. Energy Policy 2012, 49:488-498.
58. 2 emissions: a semi-parametric panel data analysis. Econ. Lett. 2012, 117:848-850.