A note on the environmental Kuznets curve for CO2: A pooled mean group approach

Applied Energy

Volumn 88, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 1986-1996

  Iwata, Hiroki ^a   Okada, Keisuke ^b   Samreth, Sovannroeun ^b,c  

^a FUKUOKA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Japan)

^b KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^c JAPAN SOCIETY FOR THE PROMOTION OF SCIENCE   (Japan)

Author keywords

CO2; EKC; Environment; Nuclear power; Panel data

Indexed keywords

CO2; EKC; ENVIRONMENT; NUCLEAR POWER; PANEL DATA;

NUCLEAR ENERGY;

CARBON DIOXIDE; CARBON EMISSION; DATA SET; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; ESTIMATION METHOD; GROWTH RATE; INCOME DISTRIBUTION; KUZNETS CURVE; NUCLEAR POWER; OECD; PANEL DATA;

EID: 79551534845     PISSN: 03062619     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.11.005     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Selden T.M., Song D. Environmental quality and development: Is there a Kuznets curve for air pollution emissions?. J Environ Econ Manage 1994, 27:147-162.
2. Grossman G.M., Krueger A.B. Economic growth and the environment. Quart J Econ 1995, 110:353-377.
3. Martínez-Zarzoso I., Bengochea-Morancho A. Pooled mean group estimation of an environmental Kuznets curve for CO2. Econ Lett 2004, 82:121-126.
4. Richmond A.K., Kaufmann R.K. Is there a turning point in the relationship between income and energy use and/or carbon emissions?. Ecol Econ 2006, 56:176-189.
5. Apergis N., Payne J.E. CO2 emissions, energy usage, and output in Central America. Energy Policy 2009, 37:3282-3286.
6. Apergis N., Payne J.E. The emissions, energy consumption, and growth nexus: Evidence from the commonwealth of independent states. Energy Policy 2010, 38:650-655.
7. Narayan P.K., Narayan S. Carbon dioxide emissions and economic growth: Panel data evidence from developing countries. Energy Policy 2010, 38:661-666.
8. Chang C.-C. A multivariate causality test of carbon dioxide emissions, energy consumption and economic growth in China. Appl Energy 2010, 87:3533-3537.
9. Payne J.E. On the dynamics of energy consumption and output in the US. Appl Energy 2009, 86:575-577.
10. Ozturk I., Acaravci A. The causal relationship between energy consumption and GDP in Albania, Bulgaria, Hungary and Romania: evidence from ARDL bound testing approach. Appl Energy 2010, 87:1938-1943.
11. Narayan P.K., Narayan S., Popp S. Does electricity consumption panel Granger cause GDP? A new global evidence. Appl Energy 2010, 87:3294-3898.
12. Apergis N., Payne J.E. The causal dynamics between coal consumption and growth: Evidence from emerging market economies. Appl Energy 2010, 87:1972-1977.
13. Pesaran M.H., Shin Y., Smith R.P. Pooled mean group estimation of dynamic heterogeneous panels. J Am Stat Assoc 1999, 94:621-634.
14. Pesaran M.H., Smith R. Estimating long-run relationships from dynamic heterogeneous panels. J Econom 1995, 68:79-113.
15. Narayan P.K., Popp S. A new unit root test with two structural breaks in level and slope at unknown time. J Appl Stat 2010, 37:1425-1438.
16. Im K.S., Pesaran M.H., Shin Y. Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. J Econom 2003, 115:53-74.
17. Levin A., Lin C.-F., Chu C.-S.J. Unit root tests in panel data: Asymptotic and finite-sample properties. J Econom 2002, 108:1-24.
18. Breitung J. The local power of some unit root tests for panel data. Adv Econom 2000, 15:161-177.
19. Maddala G.S., Wu S. A comparative study of unit root tests with panel data and a new simple test. Oxford Bull Econ Stat 1999, 61:631-652.
20. Choi I. Unit root tests for panel data. J Int Money Finance 2001, 20:249-272.
21. Hadri K. Testing for stationarity in heterogeneous panel data. Econom J 2000, 3:148-161.
22. Pedroni P. Fully modified OLS for heterogeneous cointegrated panels. Adv Econom 2000, 15:93-130.
23. Pedroni P. Panel cointegration: Asymptotic and finite sample properties of pooled time series tests with an application to the PPP hypothesis. Econom Theory 2004, 20:597-625.
24. Westerlund J. Testing for panel cointegration with multiple structural breaks. Oxford Bull Econ Stat 2006, 68:101-132.
25. Kim D.-H., Lin S.-C., Suen Y.-B. Dynamic effects of trade openness on financial development. Econ Modell 2010, 27:254-261.
26. Goswami G.G., Junayed S.H. Pooled mean group estimation of the bilateral trade balance equation: USA vis-à-vis her trading partners. Int Rev Appl Econ 2006, 20:515-526.
27. Newey W.K., West K.D. Automatic lag selection in covariance matrix estimation. Rev Econ Stud 1994, 61:631-653.