Smoking ban policies and their influence on smoking behaviors among current California smokers: A population-based study

Preventive Medicine

Volumn 59, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 73-78

  Zablocki, Rong W ^a   Edland, Steven D ^a   Myers, Mark G ^a,b   Strong, David R ^a   Hofstetter, C Richard ^c   Al Delaimy, Wael K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b VA SAN DIEGO HEALTHCARE SYSTEM   (United States)

^c SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Health policy; Quitting; Survey sampling; Tobacco smoking ban

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HOME; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PASSIVE SMOKING; PERCEPTION; POPULATION RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SELF REPORT; SMOKING; SMOKING BAN; SMOKING CESSATION; TOBACCO; UNITED STATES; YOUNG ADULT; ADOLESCENT; CLASSIFICATION; DEMOGRAPHY; EPIDEMIOLOGY; ETHNOLOGY; FOLLOW UP; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HEALTH SURVEY; INDOOR AIR POLLUTION; INTERVIEW; LEGISLATION AND JURISPRUDENCE; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; PREVENTION AND CONTROL; PSYCHOLOGY; RISK; SOCIOECONOMICS; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; WORKPLACE;

PASSIVE SMOKING;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AIR POLLUTION, INDOOR; CALIFORNIA; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; LOGISTIC MODELS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ODDS RATIO; POPULATION SURVEILLANCE; RESIDENCE CHARACTERISTICS; SMOKING; SMOKING CESSATION; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; TOBACCO SMOKE POLLUTION; WORKPLACE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84892443682     PISSN: 00917435     EISSN: 10960260     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2013.11.018     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Al-Delaimy W.K., Pierce J.P., Messer K., White M.M., Trinidad D.R., Gilpin E.A. The California tobacco control program's effect on adult smokers (2): daily cigarette consumption levels. Tob. Control. 2007, 16:91-95.
2. Armstrong B.K., White E., Saracci R. Principles of Exposure Measurement in Epidemiology 1992, 59-61. Oxford University Press, New York. 1st ed.
3. Biener L., Hamilton W.L., Siegel M., Sullivan E.M. Individual social-normative and policy predictors of smoking cessation: a multilevel longitudinal analysis. Am. J. Public Health 2010, 100:547-554.
4. Borland R., Chapman S., Owen N., Hill D. Effects of workplace smoking bans on cigarette consumption. Am. J. Public Health 1990, 80:178-180.
5. Borland R., Yong H.H., Cummings K.M., Hyland A., Anderson S., Fong G.T. Determinants and consequences of smoke-free homes: findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey. Tob. Control. 2006, 15:iii42-iii50.
6. California Environmental Protection Agency, Air Resources Board California Tobacco Laws that Reduce ETS Exposure (Last accessed 8/22/2013). http://www.arb.ca.gov/toxics/ets/laws_ets.htm.
7. California Health Interview Survey (CHIS) CHIS 2009 Methodology Series: Report 2 - Data Collection Methods 2011, UCLA Center for Health Policy Research, Los Angeles, CA, (http://healthpolicy.ucla.edu/Documents/Newsroom%20PDF/CHIS2009_method2.pdf, Last accessed 8/26/2013).
8. Centers for Disease Control, Prevention (CDC) Tobacco Control State Highlights, 2010 2010, Department of Health and Human Services.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion Office on Smoking and Health, Atlanta: U.S.
9. Centers for Disease Control, Prevention (CDC) State smoke-free laws for worksites, restaurants, and bars - United States, 2000-2010. MMWR 2011, 60:471-475.
10. Centers for Disease Control, Prevention (CDC) Fact Sheets 2011: Smoke-Free Polices Reduce Second-Hand Smoke Exposure (Last accessed 8/22/2013). http://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/data_statistics/fact_sheets/secondhand_smoke/protection/shs_exposure/index.htm.
11. Farkas A.J., Gilpin E.A., Distefan J.M., Pierce J.P. The effects of household and workplace smoking restrictions on quitting behaviours. Tob. Control. 1999, 8:261-265.
12. Gilpin E.A., White M.M., Farkas A.J., Pierce J.P. Home smoking restrictions: which smokers have them and how they are associated with smoking behavior. Nicotine Tob. Res. 1999, 1:153-162.
13. Jurek A.M., Greenland S., Maldonado G., Church T.R. Proper interpretation of non-differential misclassification effects: expectations vs. observations. Int. J. Epidemiol. 2005, 34:680-687.
14. Levy D.T., Cummings K.M., Hyland A. A simulation of the effects of youth initiation policies on overall cigarette use. Am. J. Public Health 2000, 90:1311-1314.
15. Longo D.R., Johnson J.C., Kruse R.L., Brownson R.C., Hewett J.E. A prospective investigation of the impact of smoking bans on tobacco cessation and relapse. Tob. Control. 2001, 10:267-272.
16. Messer K., Pierce J.P., Zhu S., et al. The California tobacco control program's effect on adult smokers (1): smoking cessation. Tob. Control. 2007, 16:85-90.
17. Messer K., Mills A.L., White M.M., Pierce J.P. The effect of smoke-free homes on smoking behavior in the U.S. Am. J. Prev. Med. 2008, 35:210-216.
18. Mills A.L., Messer K., Gilpin E.A., Pierce J.P. The effect of smoke-free homes on adult smoking behavior: a review. Nicotine Tob. Res. 2009, 11:1131-1141.
19. Naiman A.B., Glazier R.H., Moineddin R. Is there an impact of public smoking bans on self-reported smoking status and exposure to secondhand smoke?. BMC Public Health 2011, 11:146-154.
20. Norman G. 2011 California Tobacco Study: Description of Methodology Vol II: Statistical Methodology (Internal Report from Westat Inc.) 2012.
21. Pizacani B.A., Martin D.P., Stark M.J., Koepsell T.D., Thompson B., Diehr P. A prospective study of household smoking bans and subsequent cessation related behavior: the role of stage of change. Tob. Control. 2004, 13:23-28.
22. Roeseler A., Burns D. The quarter that changed the world. Tob. Control. 2010, 19:i3-i15.
23. SAS Institute Inc. SAS/STAT® 9.3 User's Guide: Introduction to Survey Sampling and Analysis Procedures, Cary, NC, USA (Last accessed 8/26/2013). http://support.sas.com/documentation/onlinedoc/stat/930/introsamp.pdf.
24. Tang H., Abramsohn E., Park H., Cowling D.W., Al-Delaimy W.K. Using a cessation-related outcome index to assess California's cessation progress at the population level. Tob. Control. 2010, 19:i56-i61.
25. U.S.Department of Health and Human Services (USDHHS) How Tobacco Smoke Causes Disease: The Biology and Behavioral Basis for Smoking-Attributable Disease. A Report of the Surgeon General 2010, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health, Atlanta, GA, (http://www.surgeongeneral.gov/library/reports/tobaccosmoke/index.html (Last accessed 8/22/2013)).
26. U.S.Department of Health, Human Service Children and Secondhand Smoke Exposure. Excerpts from The Health Consequences of Involuntary Exposure to Tobacco Smoke: A Report of the Surgeon General 2007, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Coordinating Center for Health Promotion, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health, Atlanta, GA, (http://www.surgeongeneral.gov/library/reports/smokeexposure/index.html (Last accessed 8/22/2013)).
27. Wivagg J. 2011 California Tobacco Study: Description of Methodology Vol I: Data Collection Methodology (Internal Report from Westat Inc.) 2012.
28. Wivagg J., Norman G. 2011 California Tobacco Study: Description of Methodology Vol IV: Report Addendum (Internal Report from Westat Inc.) 2012.