A prospective study of household smoking bans and subsequent cessation related behaviour: The role of stage of change

Tobacco Control

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 23-28

  Pizacani, B A ^a,b   Martin, D P ^d   Stark, M J ^b   Koepsell, T D ^c   Thompson, B ^d   Diehr, P ^c  

^a Office of Disease Prevention and Epidemiology   (United States)

^b OREGON DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^d U S DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEALTH SURVEY; HOUSEHOLD; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; POPULATION RESEARCH; RELAPSE; SMOKING CESSATION; TELEPHONE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AIR POLLUTANTS; FAMILY HEALTH; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ODDS RATIO; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SMOKING CESSATION; TOBACCO SMOKE POLLUTION;

EID: 7644229864     PISSN: 09644563     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/tc.2003.003038     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. US Department of Health and Human Services. Health effects of exposure to environmental tobacco smoke: the report of the California Environmental Protections Agency. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, 1999 (Smoking and Tobacco Control Monograph No 10).
2. Chapman S, Borland R, Scollo M, et al. The impact of smoke-free workplaces on declining cigarette consumption in Australia and the United States. Am J Public Health 1999;89:1018-23.
3. Glasgow RE, Cummings KM, Hyland A. Relationship of worksite smoking policy to changes in employee tobacco use: findings from COMMIT. Tobacco Control 1997;6(suppl 2):S44-8.
4. Gilpin EA, White MM, Farkas AJ, et al. Home smoking restrictions: which smokers have them and how they are associated with smoking behavior. Nicotine Tob Res 1999;1:153-62.
5. Norman GJ, Ribisl KM, Howard-Pitney B, et al. The relationship between home smoking bans and exposure to state tobacco control efforts and smoking behaviors. Am J Health Promot 2000;15:81-8.
6. Farkas AJ, Gilpin EA, Distefan JM, et al. The effects of household and workplace smoking restrictions on quitting behaviours. Tobacco Control 1999;8:261-5.
7. Pierce JP, Farkas AJ, Gilpin EA. Beyond stages of change: the quitting continuum measures progress towards successful smoking cessation. Addiction 1998;93:277-86.
8. Farkas AJ, Pierce JP, Zhu SH, et al. Addiction versus stages of change models in predicting smoking cessation. Addiction 1996;91:1271-80.
9. Hennrikus DJ, Jeffery RW, Lando HA. Occasional smoking in a Minnesota working population. Am J Public Health 1996;86:1260-6.
10. Gilpin EA, Pierce JP, Farkas AJ. Duration of smoking abstinence and success in quitting. J Natl Cancer Inst 1997;89:572-6.
11. Gilpin E, Cavin SW, Pierce JP. Adult smokers who do not smoke daily. Addiction 1997;92:473-80.
12. Hughes JR. Reduced smoking: an introduction and review of the evidence. Addiction 2000;95(suppl 1):S3-7.
13. Pizacani BA, Martin, DP, Stark, MJ, et al. Household smoking bans: which households have them and do they work? Prev Med 2003;36:99-107.
14. Prochaska JO, Velicer WF. The transtheoretical model of health behavior change. Am J Health Promot 1997;12:38-48.
15. DiClemente CC, Prochaska JO, Fairhurst SK, et al. The process of smoking cessation: an analysis of precontemplation, contemplation, and preparation stages of change. J Consult Clin Psychol 1991;59:295-304.
16. Brick JM, Kalton G. Handling missing data in survey research. Stat Methods Med Res 1996;5:215-38.
17. Potter FJ, Iannacchione VG, Mosher WD, et al. Sample design, sampling weights, imputation, and variance estimation in the 1995 National Survey of Family Growth. Vital Health Stat 2 1998:1-63.
18. StataCorp. Stata statistical software: release 6.0. College Station, Texas: Stata Corporation, 1999.
19. US Census Bureau. Comparing response rates for SPD, PSID, and NLSY. http://www.sipp.census.gov/spd/workpaper/spd-comp.htm
20. Current Population Survey. Geographical mobility of people 1 year old and older, by sex, between March 1996 and March 1997. http://www.bls.census.gov/ cps/pub/1997/mobility.htm
21. Psaty BM, Cheadle A, Koepsell TD, et al. Race- and ethnicity-specific characteristics of participants lost to follow-up in a telephone cohort. Am J Epidemiol 1994;140:161-71.
22. Siddiqui O, Flay BR, Hu FB. Factors affecting attrition in a longitudinal smoking prevention study. Prev Med 1996;25:554-560.
23. Shahar E, Folsom AR, Jackson R. The effect of nonresponse on prevalence estimates for a referent population: insights from a population-based cohort study. Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study Investigators. Ann Epidemiol 1996;6:498-506.
24. Benfante R, Reed D, MacLean C, et al. Response bias in the Honolulu Heart Program. Am J Epidemiol 1989;130:1088-100.
25. Patrick DL, Cheadle A, Thompson DC, et al. The validity of self-reported smoking: a review and meta-analysis. Am J Public Health 1994;84:1086-93.
26. Wynder EL, Higgins IT, Harris RE. The wish bias. J Clin Epidemiol 1990;43:619-21.
27. Brownell KD, Glynn TJ, Glasgow R, et al. Interventions to prevent relapse. Health Psychol 1986;5(suppl):53-68.
28. Lichtenstein E, Weiss SM, Hitchcock JL, et al. Patterns of smoking relapse. Health Psychol 1986;5(suppl):29-40.
29. Garvey AJ, Bliss RE, Hitchcock JL, et al. Predictors of smoking relapse among self-quitters: a report from the Normative Aging Study [published erratum appears in Addict Behav 1992 Sep-Oct; 17:513]. Addict Behav 1992;17:367-77.
30. Curry S, Thompson B, Sexton M, et al. Psychosocial predictors of outcome in a worksite smoking cessation program. Am J Prev Med 1989;5:2-7.
31. Marlatt GA, Curry S, Gordon JR. A longitudinal analysis of unaided smoking cessation. J Consult Clin Psychol 1988;56:715-20.
32. Klesges RC, Brown K, Pascale RW, et al. Factors associated with participation, attrition, and outcome in a smoking cessation program at the workplace. Health Psychol 1988;7:575-89.
33. Stevens VJ, Hollis JF. Preventing smoking relapse, using an individually tailored skills-training technique. J Consult Clin Psychol 1989;57:420-4.
34. Horwitz MB, Hindi-Alexander M, Wagner TJ. Psychosocial mediators of abstinence, relapse, and continued smoking: a one-year follow-up of a minimal intervention. Addict Behav 1985;10:29-39.
35. Velicer WF, Prochaska JO, Bellis JM, et al. An expert system intervention for smoking cessation. Addict Behav 1993;18:269-90.
36. Prochaska JO, Goldstein MG. Process of smoking cessation. Implications for clinicians. Clin Chest Med 1991;12:727-35.
37. Strecher VJ, Kreuter M, Den Boer DJ, et al. The effects of computer-tailored smoking cessation messages in family practice settings. J Fam Pract 1994;39:262-70.
38. Wang WD. Feasibility and effectiveness of a stages-of-change model in cigarette smoking cessation counseling. J Formas Med Assoc 1994;93:752-7.
39. Goldberg DN, Hoffman AM, Farinha MF, et al. Physician delivery of smoking-cessation advice based on the stages-of-change model. Am J Prev Med 1994;10:267-74.
40. Fiore MC, Bailey WC, Cohen SJ, et al. Treating tobacco use and dependence. Clinical practice guideline. Rockville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, 2000.
41. Zhu SH, Anderson CM, Johnson CE, et al. A centralised telephone service for tobacco cessation: the California experience. Tobacco Control 2000;9:II48-55.