Regional and Voxel-Wise Comparisons of Blood Flow Measurements Between Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast Magnetic Resonance Imaging (DSC-MRI) and Arterial Spin Labeling (ASL) in Brain Tumors

Journal of Neuroimaging

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 23-30

  White, Carissa M ^a   Pope, Whitney B ^a   Zaw, Taryar ^a   Qiao, Joe ^a   Naeini, Kourosh M ^a   Lai, Albert ^b   Nghiemphu, Phioanh L ^b   Wang, J J ^a,b   Cloughesy, Timothy F ^b   Ellingson, Benjamin M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

ASL; Brain tumor; DSC; Glioblastoma; MRI; Perfusion

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM; GADOLINIUM PENTETATE; SPIN LABELING;

ADULT; ARTERIAL SPIN LABELING; ARTICLE; BRAIN BLOOD FLOW; BRAIN LYMPHOMA; BRAIN METASTASIS; BRAIN TUMOR; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DYNAMIC SUSCEPTIBILITY CONTRAST; FEMALE; GLIOBLASTOMA; GLIOMA; HUMAN; MALE; MEASUREMENT; MIDDLE AGED; PERFUSION WEIGHTED IMAGING; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; BLOOD VOLUME; BRAIN CIRCULATION; BRAIN NEOPLASMS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DIAGNOSTIC USE; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; NEOVASCULARIZATION, PATHOLOGIC; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SPIN LABELING; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TUMOR VOLUME;

BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; BLOOD VOLUME; BLOOD VOLUME DETERMINATION; BRAIN NEOPLASMS; CEREBROVASCULAR CIRCULATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; GADOLINIUM DTPA; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; NEOVASCULARIZATION, PATHOLOGIC; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SPIN LABELS; TUMOR BURDEN;

EID: 84892438882     PISSN: 10512284     EISSN: 15526569     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1552-6569.2012.00703.x     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Warmuth C, Gunther M, Zimmer C. Quantification of blood flow in brain tumors: comparison of arterial spin labeling and dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 2003;228(2):523-532.
2. Boxerman JL, Schmainda KM, Weisskoff RM. Relative cerebral blood volume maps corrected for contrast agent extravasation significantly correlate with glioma tumor grade, whereas uncorrected maps do not. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27(4):859-867.
3. Schramm P, Xyda A, Klotz E, et al. Dynamic CT perfusion imaging of intra-axial brain tumours: differentiation of high-grade gliomas from primary CNS lymphomas. Eur Radiol 2010;20(10):2482-2490.
4. Weber MA, Gunther M, Lichy MP, et al. Comparison of arterial spin-labeling techniques and dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced MRI in perfusion imaging of normal brain tissue. Invest Radiol 2003;38(11):712-718.
5. Kimura H, Takeuchi H, Koshimoto Y, et al. Perfusion imaging of meningioma by using continuous arterial spin-labeling: comparison with dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced MR images and histopathologic features. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27(1):85-93.
6. Lüdemann L, Warmuth C, Plotkin M, et al. Brain tumor perfusion: comparison of dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging using T1, T2, and T2$ contrast, pulsed arterial spin labeling, and H2(15)O positron emission tomography. Eur J Radiol 2009;70(3):465-474.
7. Lehmann P, Monet P, de Marco G, et al. A comparative study of perfusion measurement in brain tumours at 3 Tesla MR: arterial spin labeling versus dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MRI. Eur Neurol 2010;64(1):21-26.
8. Schmainda KM, Rand SD, Joseph AM, et al. Characterization of a first-pass gradient-echo spin-echo method to predict brain tumor grade and angiogenesis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004;25(9):1524-1532.
9. Paulson ES, Schmainda KM. Comparison of dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced MR methods: recommendations for measuring relative cerebral blood volume in brain tumors. Radiology 2008;249(2):601-613.
10. Donahue KM, Krouwer HG, Rand SD, et al. Utility of simultaneously acquired gradient-echo and spin-echo cerebral blood volume and morphology maps in brain tumor patients. Magn Reson Med 2000;43:845-853.
11. Wu WC, M Fernandez-Seara, Detre JA, et al. A theoretical and experimental investigation of the tagging efficiency of pseudocontinuous arterial spin labeling. Magn Reson Med 2007;58(5):1020-1027.
12. Fernandez-Seara MA, Edlow BL, Hoang A, et al. Minimizing acquisition time of arterial spin labeling at 3T. Magn Reson Med 2008;59(6):1467-1471.
13. Wang J, Zhang Y, Wolf RL, et al. Amplitude-modulated continuous arterial spin-labeling 3.0-T perfusion MR imaging with a single coil: feasibility study. Radiology 2005;235(1): 218-228.
14. Herscovitch P, Raichle ME. What is the correct value for the brain-blood partition coefficient for water? J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1985;5(1):65-69.
15. Kelly PJ, Daumas-Duport C, Scheithauer BW, et al. Imaging-based stereotaxic serial biopsies in untreated intracranial glial neoplasms. J Neurosurg 1987;66(6):865-874.
16. Kelly PJ, Daumas-Duport C, Kispert DB, et al. Stereotactic histologic correlations of computed tomography- and magnetic resonance imaging-defined abnormalities in patients with glial neoplasms. Mayo Clin Proc 1987;62(6):450-459.
17. Earnest FT., Kelly PJ, Scheithauer BW, et al. Cerebral astrocytomas: histopathologic correlation of MR and CT contrast enhancement with stereotactic biopsy. Radiology 1988;166(3):823-827.
18. Brant-Zawadzki M, Norman D, Newton TH, et al. Magnetic resonance of the brain: the optimal screening technique. Radiology 1984;152(1):71-77.
19. Tsuchiya K, Mizutani Y, Hachiya J. Preliminary evaluation of fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery MR in the diagnosis of intracranial tumors. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1996;17(6):1081-1086.
20. Essig M, Hawighorst H, Schoenberg SO, et al. Fast fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery (FLAIR) MRI in the assessment of intraaxial brain tumors. J Magn Reson Imaging 1998;8(4):789-798.
21. Ellingson BM, Cloughesy TF, Lai A, et al. Quantitative volumetric analysis of conventional MRI response in recurrent glioblastoma treated with bevacizumab. Neuro Oncol 2011;13(4):401-409.
22. Kimura T, Kusahara H. Reference-based maximum upslope: a CBF quantification method without using arterial input function in dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI. Magn Reson Med Sci 2009;8(3):107-120.
23. Jarnum H, Steffensen, EG, Knutsson L, et al. Perfusion MRI of brain tumours: a comparative study of pseudo-continuous arterial spin labelling and dynamic susceptibility contrast imaging. Neuroradiology 2010;52(4):307-317.
24. Boxerman J. L., Hamberg, LM, Weisskoff RM, et al. MR contrast due to intravascular magnetic susceptibility perturbations. Magn Reson Med 1995;34(4):555-566.
25. Petersen ET, Zimine I, Ho YC, Golay X. Non-invasive measurement of perfusion: a critical review of arterial spin labelling techniques. Br J Radiol 2006;79:688-701.
26. van Gelderen P, de Zward JA, Duyn JH. Pitfalls of MRI measurement of white matter perfusion based on arterial spin labeling. Magn Reson Med 2008;59:788-795.
27. Ye FQ, KF Berman, Ellmore T, et al. H(2)(15)O PET validation of steady-state arterial spin tagging cerebral blood flow measurements in humans. Magn Reson Med 2000;44(3):450-456.