A comparative study of perfusion measurement in brain tumours at 3 tesla MR: Arterial spin labeling versus dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MRI

European Neurology

Volumn 64, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 21-26

  Lehmann, Pierre ^a,d,g   Monet, P ^a   De Marco, G ^b   Saliou, G ^c   Perrin, M ^f   Stoquart Elsankari, S ^h   Bruniau, A ^e   Vallee J N ^a  

^a AMIENS UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ PARIS OUEST NANTERRE LA DÉFENSE   (France)

^c Neuroradiology   (France)

^d Amiens University Medical Center and Jules Verne University of Picardy   (France)

^e Nordpathologie   (France)

^f GE HEALTHCARE   (France)

^g TIMONE HOSPITAL   (France)

^h CLINIQUES UNIVERSITAIRES SAINT LUC   (Belgium)

Author keywords

3T MR; Arterial spin labeling; Cerebral blood flow; Cerebral neoplasm; Perfusion

Indexed keywords

GADOLINIUM PENTETATE; CONTRAST MEDIUM; SPIN LABELING;

ADULT; AGED; ARTERIAL SPIN LABELING; ARTICLE; ASTROCYTOMA; BRAIN BLOOD FLOW; BRAIN MAPPING; BRAIN METASTASIS; BRAIN PERFUSION; BRAIN TUMOR; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DYNAMIC SUSCEPTIBILITY CONTRAST ENHANCED MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; FEMALE; GLIOBLASTOMA; GLIOMA; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE QUALITY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; MENINGIOMA; OLIGODENDROGLIOMA; PERFUSION WEIGHTED IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SPIN LABELING; ARTERY; BRAIN CIRCULATION; BRAIN NEOPLASMS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC USE; IMAGE PROCESSING; MIDDLE AGED; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATHOLOGY; PERFUSION; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; VERY ELDERLY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTERIES; BRAIN NEOPLASMS; CEREBROVASCULAR CIRCULATION; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERFUSION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SPIN LABELS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77953559436     PISSN: 00143022     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000311520     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Folkerth RD: Descriptive analysis and quantification of angiogenesis in human brain tumors. J Neuro-oncol 2000; 50: 165-172.
2. Kleihues P, Louis DN, Scheithauer BW, et al: The WHO classification of tumors of the nervous system. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 2002; 61: 215-225; discussion 226-1219
3. Giese A, Westphal M: Treatment of malignant glioma: a problem beyond the margins of resection. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2001; 127: 217-225.
4. Law M, Young RJ, Babb JS, et al: Gliomas: predicting time to progression or survival with cerebral blood volume measurements at dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrastenhanced perfusion MR imaging. Radiology 2008; 247: 490-498.
5. Schiff D: Single brain metastasis. Curr Treat Options Neurol 2001; 3: 89-99.
6. Wiginton CD, Kelly B, Oto A, et al: Gadolinium- based contrast exposure, nephrogenic systemic fibrosis, and gadolinium detection in tissue. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008; 190: 1060-1068.
7. Golay X, Petersen ET: Arterial spin labeling: benefits and pitfalls of high magnetic field. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 2006; 16: 259-268.
8. Wang J, Alsop DC, Li L, et al: Comparison of quantitative perfusion imaging using arterial spin labeling at 1.5 and 4.0 Tesla. Magn Reson Med 2002; 48: 242-254.
9. Knopp EA, Cha S, Johnson G, et al: Glial neoplasms: dynamic contrast-enhanced T2*- weighted MR imaging. Radiology 1999; 211: 791-798.
10. Detre JA, Leigh JS, Williams DS, Koretsky AP: Perfusion imaging. Magn Reson Med 1992; 23: 37-45.
11. Williams DS, Detre JA, Leigh JS, Koretsky AP: Magnetic resonance imaging of perfusion using spin inversion of arterial water. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1992; 89: 212-216.
12. Edelman RR, Siewert B, Darby DG, et al: Qualitative mapping of cerebral blood flow and functional localization with echo-planar MR imaging and signal targeting with alternating radio frequency. Radiology 1994; 192: 513-520.
13. Kim SG: Quantification of relative cerebral blood flow change by flow-sensitive alternating inversion recovery (FAIR) technique: application to functional mapping. Magn Reson Med 1995; 34: 293-301.
14. Wu WC, Fernandez-Seara M, Detre JA, Wehrli FW, Wang J: A theoretical and experimental investigation of the tagging efficiency of pseudocontinuous arterial spin labeling. Magn Reson Med 2007; 58: 1020-1027.
15. Dai W, Garcia D, de Bazelaire C, Alsop DC: Continuous flow-driven inversion for arterial spin labeling using pulsed radio frequency and gradient fields. Magn Reson Med 2008; 60: 1488-1497.
16. Garcia DM, De Bazelaire C, Alsop DC: Pseudo- continuous Flow Driven Adiabatic Inversion for Arterial Spin Labeling. Miami, ISMRM, 2005.
17. Warmuth C, Gunther M, Zimmer C: Quantification of blood flow in brain tumors: comparison of arterial spin labeling and dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 2003; 228: 523-532.
18. Kimura H, Takeuchi H, Koshimoto Y, et al: Perfusion imaging of meningioma by using continuous arterial spin-labeling: comparison with dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced MR images and histopathologic features. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006; 27: 85-93.
19. Weber MA, Zoubaa S, Schlieter M, et al: Diagnostic performance of spectroscopic and perfusion MRI for distinction of brain tumors. Neurology 2006; 66: 1899-1906.
20. Ludemann L, Warmuth C, Plotkin M, et al: Brain tumor perfusion: comparison of dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging using T1, T2, and T2*contrast, pulsed arterial spin labeling, and H2(15)O positron emission tomography. Eur J Radiol 2009; 70: 465-474.
21. Weber MA, Gunther M, Lichy MP, et al: Comparison of arterial spin-labeling techniques and dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced MRI in perfusion imaging of normal brain tissue. Invest Radiol 2003; 38: 712-718.
22. Jarnum H, Steffensen EG, Knutsson L, et al: Perfusion MRI of brain tumours: a comparative study of pseudo-continuous arterial spin labelling and dynamic susceptibility contrast imaging. Neuroradiology 2010; 52: 307-317.
23. Kim MJ, Kim HS, Kim JH, Cho KG, Kim SY: Diagnostic accuracy and interobserver variability of pulsed arterial spin labeling for glioma grading. Acta Radiol 2008; 49: 450-457.
24. Tourdias T, Rodrigo S, Oppenheim C, et al: Pulsed arterial spin labeling applications in brain tumors: practical review. J Neuroradiol 2008; 35: 79-89.
25. Wolf RL, Wang J, Wang S, et al: Grading of CNS neoplasms using continuous arterial spin labeled perfusion MR imaging at 3 Tesla. J Magn Reson Imaging 2005; 22: 475-482.
26. Wang J, Fernandez-Seara MA, Wang S, St Lawrence KS: When perfusion meets diffusion: in vivo measurement of water permeability in human brain. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2007; 27: 839-849.
27. Petersen ET, Lim T, Golay X: Model-free arterial spin labeling quantification approach for perfusion MRI. Magn Reson Med 2006; 55: 219-232.
28. Wang J, Alsop DC, Song HK, et al: Arterial transit time imaging with flow encoding arterial spin tagging (FEAST). Magn Reson Med 2003; 50: 599-607.
29. Gunther M, Bock M, Schad LR: Arterial spin labeling in combination with a look-locker sampling strategy: inflow turbo-sampling EPI-FAIR (ITS-FAIR). Magn Reson Med 2001; 46: 974-984.
30. Ye FQ, Berman KF, Ellmore T, et al: H(2)(15) O PET validation of steady-state arterial spin tagging cerebral blood flow measurements in humans. Magn Reson Med 2000; 44: 450-456.
31. Parkes LM, Rashid W, Chard DT, Tofts PS: Normal cerebral perfusion measurements using arterial spin labeling: reproducibility, stability, and age and gender effects. Magn Reson Med 2004; 51: 736-743.
32. Alsop DC, Detre JA: Multisection cerebral blood flow MR imaging with continuous arterial spin labeling. Radiology 1998; 208: 410-416.
33. Silva AC, Zhang W, Williams DS, Koretsky AP: Multi-slice MRI of rat brain perfusion during amphetamine stimulation using arterial spin labeling. Magn Reson Med 1995; 33: 209-214.