Noninvasive assessment of osteoarthritis severity in human explants by multicontrast MRI

Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

Volumn 71, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 807-814

  Griebel, Adam J ^a   Trippel, Stephen B ^b   Emery, Nancy C ^c,d   Neu, Corey P ^a  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

deformation and strain; displacements under applied loading with MRI (dualMRI); human articular cartilage; osteoarthritis; quantitative MRI

Indexed keywords

BIOMARKERS; CARTILAGE; DISEASE CONTROL; MEDICAL IMAGING; NONINVASIVE MEDICAL PROCEDURES; STRAIN; TISSUE;

APPLIED LOADING; EXTRACELLULAR MATRICES; HUMAN ARTICULAR CARTILAGE; MULTICONTRAST MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NON-INVASIVE ASSESSMENTS; NONINVASIVE MEASUREMENTS; OSTEOARTHRITIS; QUANTITATIVE MRIS;

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ARTICULAR CARTILAGE; BIOMECHANICS; CARTILAGE EXPLANT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; EXPLANT; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; FEMALE; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NON INVASIVE PROCEDURE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OSTEOARTHRITIS; RADIOLOGICAL PARAMETERS; TISSUE STRUCTURE; YOUNG ADULT; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; ELASTOGRAPHY; IN VITRO STUDY; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; MECHANICAL STRESS; MULTIMODAL IMAGING; PATHOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; TENSILE STRENGTH; WEIGHT BEARING; YOUNG MODULUS;

CONTRAST MEDIUM;

AGED; CARTILAGE, ARTICULAR; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; CONTRAST MEDIA; ELASTIC MODULUS; ELASTICITY IMAGING TECHNIQUES; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IN VITRO TECHNIQUES; MALE; MULTIMODAL IMAGING; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; STRESS, MECHANICAL; TENSILE STRENGTH; WEIGHT-BEARING;

EID: 84892435994     PISSN: 07403194     EISSN: 15222594     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.24725     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Lawrence RC, Felson DT, Helmick CG, et al. Estimates of the prevalence of arthritis and other rheumatic conditions in the United States: Part II. Arthritis Rheum 2008; 58: 26-35.
2. Yelin E, Murphy L, Cisternas MG, Foreman AJ, Pasta DJ, Helmick CG,. Medical care expenditures and earnings losses among person with arthritis and other rheumatic conditions in 2003, and comparisons with 1997. Arthritis Rheum 2007; 56: 1397-1407.
3. Setton LA, Elliott DM, Mow VC,. Altered mechanics of cartilage with osteoarthritis: human osteoarthritis and an experimental model of joint degeneration. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 1999; 7: 2-14.
4. Neu CP, Reddi AH, Komvopoulos K, Schmid TM, Di Cesare PE,. Increased friction coefficient and superficial zone protein expression in patients with advanced osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2010; 62: 2680-2687.
5. Roemer FW, Kwoh CK, Hannon MJ, et al. Risk factors for magnetic resonance imaging-detected patellofemoral and tibiofemoral cartilage loss during a six-month period: the joints on glucosamine study. Arthritis Rheum 2012; 64: 1888-1898.
6. Regatte R, Akella S, Lonner J, Kneeland J, Reddy R,. T1rho relaxation mapping in human osteoarthritis (OA) cartilage: comparison of T1rho with T2. J Magn Reson Imaging 2006; 23: 547-553.
7. Nieminen MT, Töyräs J, Rieppo J, et al. Quantitative MR microscopy of enzymatically degraded articular cartilage. Magn Reson Med 2000; 43: 676-681.
8. Dunn TC, Lu Y, Jin H, Ries MD, Majumdar S,. T2 relaxation time of cartilage at MR imaging: comparison with severity of knee osteoarthritis. Radiology 2004; 232: 592-598.
9. Burstein D, Gray M, Mosher T, Dardzinski B,. Measures of molecular composition and structure in osteoarthritis. Radiol Clin North Am 2009; 47: 675-686.
10. Wheaton AJ, Dodge GR, Elliott DM, Nicoll SB, Reddy R,. Quantification of cartilage biomechanical and biochemical properties via T1rho magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Med 2005; 54: 1087-1093.
11. Li X, Cheng J, Lin K, et al. Quantitative MRI using T1ρ and T2 in human osteoarthritic cartilage specimens: correlation with biochemical measurements and histology. Magn Reson Imaging 2011; 29: 324-334.
12. Neu CP, Walton JH,. Displacement encoding for the measurement of cartilage deformation. Magn Reson Med 2008; 59: 149-155.
13. Chan DD, Neu CP,. Transient and microscale deformations and strains measured under exogenous loading by noninvasive magnetic resonance. PLoS One 2012; 7: e33463.
14. Chan DD, Neu CP, Hull ML,. In situ deformation of cartilage in cyclically loaded tibiofemoral joints by displacement-encoded MRI. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2009; 17: 1461-1468.
15. Neu CP, Arastu HF, Curtiss S, Reddi AH,. Characterization of engineered tissue construct mechanical function by magnetic resonance imaging. J Tissue Eng Regen Med 2009; 3: 477-485.
16. Chan DD, Khan SN, Ye X, et al. Mechanical deformation and glycosaminoglycan content changes in a rabbit annular puncture disc degeneration model. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2011; 36: 1438-1445.
17. Pritzker KP, Gay S, Jimenez SA, et al. Osteoarthritis cartilage histopathology: grading and staging. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2006; 14: 13-29.
18. Liang H, Wu H, Zou G,. A note on conditional AIC for linear mixed-effects models. Biometrika 2008; 95: 773-778.
19. Kim YJ, Bonassar LJ, Grodzinsky AJ,. The role of cartilage streaming potential, fluid flow and pressure in the stimulation of chondrocyte biosynthesis during dynamic compression. J Biomech 1995; 28: 1055-1066.
20. Komistek RD, Kane TR, Mahfouz M, Ochoa JA, Dennis DA,. Knee mechanics: a review of past and present techniques to determine in vivo loads. J Biomech 2005; 38: 215-228.