Seismic risk analysis using Bayesian belief networks

Handbook of Seismic Risk Analysis and Management of Civil Infrastructure Systems

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 175-208

  Tesfamariam, Solomon ^a   Liu, Z ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b TOYOTA TECHNOLOGICAL INSTITUTE   (Japan)

Author keywords

Bayesian belief network (BBN); Decision making; Liquefaction; Risk assessment

Indexed keywords

CHAOS THEORY; CHAOTIC SYSTEMS; COMPLEX NETWORKS; COMPUTATION THEORY; DECISION MAKING; DECISION THEORY; EDUCATION; GENETIC ALGORITHMS; LEARNING ALGORITHMS; LIQUEFACTION; RISK ANALYSIS; RISK ASSESSMENT; SEISMOLOGY; SOFT COMPUTING;

BUILDING LEVELS; COMPUTING TECHNIQUES; CONFIDENCE LEVELS; LEARNING THEORY; PROBABILISTIC REASONING; SEISMIC RISK ASSESSMENT; SOFTCOMPUTING TECHNIQUES; SOURCES OF UNCERTAINTY;

BAYESIAN NETWORKS;

EID: 84892399981     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1533/9780857098986.2.175     Document Type: Chapter

References (108)

1. Abdoun T., Dobry R. Evaluation of pile foundation response to lateral spreading. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 2002, 22(9-12):1051-1058.
2. Andrus R.D., Stokoe K.H. Liquefaction resistance based on shear wave velocity. Proc. NCEER Workshop on Evaluation of liquefaction Resistance of Soils 1997, 89-128. State University of New York at Bu!alo, Bu!alo, NY, Technical Report NCEER-97-0022, National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research. T.L. Youd, I.M. Idriss (Eds.).
3. ATC Earthquake Damage Evaluation Data for California 1985, Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, California, ATC-13 Report.
4. ATC Database on the Performance of Structures Near Strong-Motion Recordings: 1994 Northridge, California, Earthquake 2001, Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, California, ATC-38 Report.
5. Balassanian S.Y., Melkoumian M.G., Arakelyan A.R., Azarian A.R. Seismic risk assessment for the territory of Armenia and strategy of its mitigation. Natural Hazards 1999, 20(1):43-55.
6. Barbat A.H., Carrenĩo M.L., Pujades L.G., Lantada N., Cardona O.D., Marulanda M.C. Seismic vulnerability and risk evaluation methods for urban areas. A review with application to a pilot area. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering 2009, 6(1):17-38.
7. Bartlett S.F., Youd T.L. Empirical Analysis of Horizontal Ground Displacement Generated by Liquefaction-induced Lateral Spreads 1992, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, Technical Report NCEER-92-0021, August 1992.
8. Bartlett S.F., Youd T.L. Empirical prediction of liquefaction-induced lateral spread. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering 1995, 121(4):316-329.
9. Bayraktarli Y.Y., Faber M.H. Bayesian probabilistic network approach for managing earthquake risks of cities. Georisk: Assessment and Management of Risk for Engineered Systems and Geohazards 2011, 5(1):2-24.
10. Bayraktarli Y.Y., Baker J.W., Faber M.H. Uncertainty treatment in earthquake modelling using Bayesian probabilistic networks. Georisk: Assessment and Management of Risk for Engineered Systems and Geohazards 2011, 5(1):44-58.
11. Baziar M.H., Ghorbani A. Evaluation of lateral spreading using artificial neural networks. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 2005, 25(1):1-9.
12. Baziar M.H., Nilipour N. Evaluation of liquefaction potential using neural-networks and CPT results. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 2003, 23:631-636.
13. Bensi M.T., Der Kiureghian A., Straub D. A Bayesian Network framework for post-earthquake infrastructure system performance assessment 2009.
14. Bird J.F., Bommer J.J. Earthquake losses due to ground failure. Engineering Geology 2004, 75:147-179.
15. Bird J.F., Bommer J.J., Crowley H., Pinho R. Modelling liquefaction-induced building damage in earthquake loss estimation. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 2006, 26(1):15-30.
16. Blong R. A review of damage intensity scales. Natural Hazards 2003, 29(1):57-73.
17. Boissonnade A.C., Shah H.C. Use of Patter Recognition and Fuzzy Sets in Seismic Risk Analysis 1985, John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Stanford, California, Report 67.
18. Boone S.J. Ground-movement-related building damage. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering 1996, 122(11):886-896.
19. Bouckaert R.R. Bayesian Belief Networks: from Construction to Inference 1995, University of Utrecht, PhD thesis.
20. Bouckaert R.R., et al. WEKA Manual for Version 3-7-5 2011, October 28, 2011.
21. Bradley B.A., Cubrinovski M., Dhakal R.P., MacRae G.A. Probabilistic seismic performance and loss assessment of a bridge-foundation-soil system. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 2010, 30(5):395-411.
22. Breiman L. Random forests. Machine Learning 2001, 45(1):5-32.
23. Buntine W.L. A guide to the literature on learning probabilistic networks from data. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 1996, 8:195-210.
24. Cabalar A.F., Cevik A., Gokceoglu C. Some applications of Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS) in geotechnical engineering. Computers and Geotechnics 2012, 40:14-33.
25. Cardona O.D., Ordaz M.G., Marulanda M.C., Barbat A.H. Estimation of probabilistic seismic losses and the public economic resilience-an approach for a macroeconomic impact evaluation. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 2008, 12(1):60-70.
26. Carreño M.-L., Cardona O.D., Barbat A.H. Urban seismic risk evaluation: a holistic approach. Natural Hazards 2007, 40(1):137-172.
27. Chan L.S., Chen Y., Chen L., Liu J., Dong W., Shah H. Assessment of global seismic loss based on macroeconomic indicators. Natural Hazards 1998, 17:269-283.
28. Chen K., Blong R., Jacobson C. MCE-RISK: integrating multicriteria evaluation and GIS for risk decision-making in natural hazards. Environmental Modelling & Software 2001, 16(1):387-397.
29. Cheng J., Greiner R. Comparing Bayesian network classifiers. Proceedings UAI 1999, 101-107.
30. Chow C.K., Liu C.N. Approximating discrete probability distributions with dependence trees. IEEE Transaction on Information Theory 1968, IT-14:426-467.
31. Cockburn G., Tesfamariam S. Seismic Risk Index for Canadian Cities 2009.
32. Cockburn G., Tesfamariam S. Seismic Risk Index for Canadian Cities using Bayesian belief networks 2010.
33. Cockburn G., Tesfamariam S. Earthquake disaster risk index for Canadian cities using Bayesian belief networks. Georisk: Assessment and Management of Risk for Engineered Systems and Geohazards 2012, 6(2):128-140.
34. Cooper G., Herskovits E. A Bayesian method for the induction of probabilistic networks from data. Machine Learning 1992, 9:309-347.
35. Davidson R.A., Shah H.C. An Urban Disaster Risk Index 1997, Stanford University, The John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Stanford, CA.
36. Ellingwood B. Earthquake risk assessment in building structures. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 2001, 74:251-262.
37. Ellingwood B.R., Kinali K. Quantifying and communicating uncertainty in seismic risk assessment. Structural Safety 2009, 31:179-187.
38. Faizian M., Schalcher H.-R., Faber M.H. Consequence assessment in earthquake risk management using damage indicators 2004.
39. FEMA-249 Assessment of the state-of-the-art earthquake loss estimation methodologies. Earthquake hazards reduction series 1994, 70. Federal Emergency Management Agency.
40. Finn W.D.L. State of the art for the evaluation of seismic liquefaction potential. Computers and Geotechnics 2002, 29:329-341.
41. Finn W.D.L., Fujita N. Piles in liquefiable soils: seismic analysis and design issues. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 2002, 22(9-12):731-742.
42. Freund Y., Schapire R.E. Experiments with a New Boosting Algorithm. Machine Learning 1996, 148-156. Morgan Kaufman, (ICML 196), Bari, Italy, July 3-6, 1996.
43. Friedman N., Geiger D., Goldszmidt M. Bayesian network classifiers. Machine Learning 1997, 29:131-163.
44. GEER Geotechnical Reconnaissance of the 2011 Christchurch (New Zealand) Earthquake 2011, GEER Association Report. http://www.geerassociation.org/.
45. Gislason P.O., Benediktsson J.A., Sveinsson J.R. Random forests for land cover classification. Pattern Recognition Letters 2006, 27:294-300.
46. Goh A.T.C. Seismic liquefaction potential assessed by neural networks. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering 1994, 120(9):1467-1480.
47. Goh A.T.C. Neural-network modeling of CPT seismic liquefaction data. ASCE Journal of Geotechnical Engineering 1996, 122(1):70-73.
48. Goh A.T.C. Probabilistic neural network for evaluating seismic liquefaction potential. Canadian Geotechnical Journal 2002, 39:219-232.
49. Hall M., Frank E., Holmes G., Pfahringer B., Reutemann P., Witten I.H. The WEKA data mining software: an update. SIGKDD Explorations 2009, 11(1):2009.
50. Hill T., Lewicki P. Statistics: Methods and Applications 2006, StatSoft, Inc.
51. Hwang J.H., Yang C.W., Juang D.S. A practical reliability-based method for assessing soil liquefaction potential. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 2004, 24(9-10):761-770.
52. Idriss I.M., Boulanger R.W. Semi-empirical procedures for evaluating liquefaction potential during earthquakes. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 2006, 26(2-4):115-130.
53. Ismail M.A., Sadiq R., Soleymani H.R., Tesfamariam S. Developing a road performance index using a Bayesian belief network model. Journal of the Franklin Institute 2011, 348(9):2539-2555.
54. Jensen F.V. An Introduction to Bayesian Networks 1996, UCL Press, London.
55. Joseph S.A., Adams B.J., McCabe B. Methodology for Bayesian belief network development to facilitate compliance with water quality regulations. Journal of Infrastructure Systems 2010, 16(1):58-65.
56. Juang C.H., Jiang T., Andrus R.D. Assessing probability-based methods for liquefaction potential evaluation. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenviron-mental Engineering 2002, 128(7):580-589.
57. Kappos A.J., Stylianidis K.C., Pitilakis K. Development of seismic risk scenarios based on a hybrid method of vulnerability assessment. Natural Hazards 1998, 17:177-192.
58. Katsis A., Martzoukos S., Yannacopoulos A. Bayesian statistical expert opinion in option pricing. Journal of Statistical Theory and Applications 2008, 7:33-50.
59. Kiremidjian A. Subjective probabilities for earthquake damage and loss. Structural Safety 1985, 1:309-317.
60. Kramer S.L. Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering 1996, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
61. Lantada N., Pujades L.G., Barbat A.H. Vulnerability index and capacity spectrum based methods for urban seismic risk evaluation, a comparison. Natural Hazards 2009, 51(1):501-524.
62. Li L., Wang J., Leung H., Jiang C. Assessment of catastrophic risk using Bayesian network constructed from domain knowledge and spatial data. Risk Analysis 2010, 30(7):1157-1174.
63. Liyanapathirana D.S., Poulos H.G. A numerical model for dynamic soil liquefaction analysis. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 2002, 22(9-12):1007-1015.
64. Marulanda M.-C., Cardona O.D., Barbat A.H. Robustness of the holistic seismic risk evaluation in urban centers using the USRi. Natural Hazards 2009, 49(3):501-516.
65. McCue K. Assessing earthquake hazard and risk in Australia. Australian Planner 2010, 47(1):52-53.
66. Miura F., Stewart H.E., O'Rourke T.D. The effects of liquefaction-induced lateral spreading on pile foundations. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 1991, 10(5):271-279.
67. Mollamahmutoglu M., Kayabali K., Beyaz T., Kolay E. Liquefaction-related building damage in Adapazari during the Turkey earthquake of August 17, 1999. Engineering Geology 2003, 67(3-4):297-307.
68. Nishijima K., Maes M.A., Goyet J., Faber M.H. Constrained optimization of component reliabilities in complex systems. Structural Safety 2009, 31:168-178.
69. Norsys Software Corp Netica TM Application 2006, downloaded, July 20. http://www.norsys.com.
70. Pearl J. Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems: Networks of Plausible Inference 1988, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Inc, San Francisco, California.
71. Ploeger S.K., Atkinson G.M., Samson C. Applying the HAZUS-MH software tool to assess seismic risk in downtown Ottawa, Canada. Natural Hazards 2010, 53(1):1-20.
72. Prasad A.M., Iversion L.R., Liaw A. Newer classification and regression tree techniques: bagging and random forest for ecological prediction. Ecosystems 2006, 9(2):181-199.
73. Rish I. An empirical study of the naive bayes classifier 2001, 1-6.
74. Roberts N.J., Nadim F., Kalsnes B. Quantification of vulnerability to natural hazards. Georisk: Assessment and Management of Risk for Engineered Systems and Geohazards 2009, 3(3):164-173.
75. Rodriguez J.J., Kuncheva L.I., Alonso C.J. Rotation forest: a new classifier ensemble method. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 2006, 28(10):1619-1630.
76. Ross T.J. Fuzzy Logic With Engineering Applications 2004, John Wiley & Sons, UK. 2nd.
77. Saatcioglu M., Humar J. Dynamic analysis of buildings for earthquake-resistant design. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering 2003, 30:338-359.
78. Schubert M., Faber M.H. Common cause effects in portfolio loss estimation. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering 2011, 10.1080/15732479.2010.539068.
79. Seed H.B., Idriss I.M. Simplified procedure for evaluating soil liquefaction potential. ASCE Journal of the the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division 1971, 97(SM9):1249-1273.
80. Sica S., Santucci de Magistris F., Vinale F. Seismic behaviour of geotechnical structures. Annals of Geophysics 2002, 45(6):799-815.
81. Spiegelhalter D.J., Lauritzen S.L. Sequential updating of conditional probabilities on directed graphical structures. Networks 1990, 20:579-605.
82. Stark T.D., Olson S.M. Liquefaction resistance using CPT and field case histories. ASCE Journal of Geotechnical Engineering 1995, 121(12):856-869.
83. Straub D., Der Kiureghian A. Bayesian network enhanced with structural reliability methods: methodology. Journal of Engineering Mechanics 2010, 136(10):1248-1258.
84. Straub D., Der Kiureghian A. Bayesian network enhanced with structural reliability methods: application. Journal of Engineering Mechanics 2010, 136(10):1259-1270.
85. Takahashi A., Takemura J. Liquefaction-induced large displacement of pile-supported wharf. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 2005, 25(11):811-825.
86. Tamate S., Towhata I. Numerical simulation of ground flow caused by seismic liquefaction. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 1999, 18(7):473-485.
87. Tesfamariam S., Liu Z. Earthquake induced damage classification for reinforced concrete buildings. Structural Safety 2010, 32:154-164.
88. Tesfamariam S., Martín-Pérez B. Bayesian belief network to assess carbonation-induced corrosion in reinforced concrete. ASCE Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering 2008, 20(11):707-717.
89. Tesfamariam S., Saatcioglu M. Seismic risk assessment of reinforced concrete buildings using fuzzy synthetic evaluation. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 2008, 12(7):1157-1184.
90. Tesfamariam S., Sadiq R. Probabilistic risk analysis using ordered weighted averaging (OWA) operators. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment 2008, 22(1):1-15.
91. Tesfamariam S., Saatcioglu M. Seismic vulnerability assessment of reinforced concrete buildings using hierarchical fuzzy rule base modeling. Earthquake Spectra 2010, 26(1):235-256.
92. Tesfamariam S., Wang Y.M. Risk-based seismic retrofit prioritization of reinforced concrete civic infrastructure: case study for state of Oregon schools and emergency facilities. ASCE Natural Hazard Review 2012, 13(3):188-195.
93. Tesfamariam S., Sadiq R., Najjaran H. Decision making under uncertainty-an example for seismic risk management. Risk Analysis 2010, 30(1):78-94.
94. Tesfamariam S., Hurlburt G., Sun J., Siraj T. Seismic induced building damage assessment using Bayesian belief network 2011.
95. Tessem B. Interval probabilities propagation. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 1992, 7:95-120.
96. Tung A.T.Y., Wang Y.Y., Wong F.S. Assessment of liquefaction potential using neural networks. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 1993, 12(6):325-335.
97. Valsamis A.I., Bouckovalas G.D., Papadimitriou A.G. Parametric investigation of lateral spreading of gently sloping liquefied ground. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 2010, 30(6):490-508.
98. Villaverde R. Methods to assess the seismic collapse capacity of buildings structures: state of the art. Journal of Structural Engineering 2007, 133(1):57-66.
99. Weber P., Medina-Oliva G., Simon C., Iung B. Overview on Bayesian networks applications for dependability, risk analysis and maintenance areas. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 2010, 10.1016/j.engappai.2010.06.002.
100. Wen Y.K., Ellingwood B.R., Veneziano D., Bracci J. Uncertainty Modeling in Earthquake Engineering 2003, MAE Center Project FD-2 Report.
101. Witten I.H., Frank E. Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques 2005, 143-185. Elsevier, Burlington, MA.
102. Witten I.H., Frank E., Hall M.A. Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques 2011, Elsevier Inc, Burlington, MA. 3rd.
103. Yong C., Ling C., Guendel F., Kulhanek O., Juan L. Seismic hazard and loss estimation for Central America. Natural Hazards 2002, 25(1):161-175.
104. Youd T.L., Idriss I.M. Liquefaction resistance of soils: summary report from the 1996 NCEER and 1998 NCEER/NSF workshops on evaluation of liquefaction resistance of soils. ASCE Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 2001, 127(4):297-313.
105. Youd T.L., Hansen C.M., Bartlett S.F. Revised multilinear regression equations for prediction of lateral spread displacement. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 2002, 128(12):1007-1017.
106. Zadeh L.A. Fuzzy logic, neural networks and soft computing. Communication of the ACM 1994, 37(3):77-84.
107. Zhang J., Zhao J.X. Empirical models for estimating liquefaction-induced lateral spread displacement. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 2005, 25:439-450.
108. Zobin V.M., Ventura-Ramirez J.F. Hierarchy of factors of seismic danger in four towns in Colima State, Mexico. Natural Hazards 2004, 33(1):427-438.