Mixed-methods research in pharmacy practice: Recommendations for quality reporting (part 2)

International Journal of Pharmacy Practice

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 96-100

  Hadi, Muhammad Abdul ^a   Alldred, David Phillip ^a   Closs, S José ^a   Briggs, Michelle ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

evidence based practice; mixed methods; pharmacy practice; research method

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL RESEARCH; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MIXED METHODS RESEARCH; PHARMACY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS DEVELOPMENT; STUDY DESIGN; TRIANGULATION; METHODOLOGY;

HUMANS; PHARMACEUTICAL SERVICES; RESEARCH DESIGN;

EID: 84892392924     PISSN: 09617671     EISSN: 20427174     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/ijpp.12015     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Greene JC, et al. Toward a conceptual framework for mixed method evaluation designs. Educ Eval Policy Anal 1989; 11: 255-274.
2. Bryman A,. Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: how is it done. Qual Res 2006; 6: 97-113.
3. Guirguis LM,. Mixed methods evaluation: pharmacists' experiences and beliefs toward an interactive communication approach to patient interactions. Patient Educ Couns 2011; 83: 432-442.
4. Pumtong S, et al. A multi-method evaluation of the Pharmacy First Minor Ailments scheme. Int J Clin Pharm 2011; 33: 573-581.
5. Guirguis L,. Exploring pharmacists' understanding and adoption of prescribing in 2 Canadian jurisdictions: design and rationale for a mixed methods approach. Can Pharm J 2011; 144: 240-244.
6. Bruhn H, et al. Pharmacist-led management of chronic pain in primary care: the PIPPC study. Int J Pharm Pract 2011; 19 (Suppl. 1): 22-23.
7. Bond C, et al. Pharmacist-led management of chronic pain in primary care: the experiences of patients, pharmacists and GPs. Int J Pharm Pract 2011; 19 (Suppl. 2): 24-25.
8. Creswell WJ, Plano Clark VL,. Designing and Conduction Mixed Methods Research, 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2011.
9. O'Cathain A, et al. The quality of mixed methods studies in health services research. J Health Serv Res Policy 2008; 13: 92-98.
10. Schifferdecker KD, Reed VA,. Using mixed methods research in medical education: basic guidelines for researchers. Med Educ 2009; 43: 637-644.
11. Moher D, et al. The PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ 2009; 339: b2535.
12. Schulz KF, et al. for the CONSORT Group. CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMC Med 2010; 8: 18.
13. Ivankova NV, et al. Using mixed-methods sequential explanatory design: from theory to practice. Field Methods 2006; 18: 3-20.
14. Johnson RB, Onwuegbuzie AJ,. Mixed methods research: a research paradigm whose time has come. Educ Res 2004; 33: 14-26.
15. Doyle L, et al. An overview of mixed methods research. J Res Nurs 2009; 14: 175-185.