A realist approach to the systematic review

Health Promotion Evaluation Practices in the Americas: Values and Research

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 81-100

  Mercille, Geneviève ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84892322802     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-79733-5_6     Document Type: Chapter

References (65)

1. Armstrong, R., Waters, E., Moore, L., Riggs, E., Cuervo, L. G., Lumbiganon, P., et al. (2008). Improving the reporting of public health intervention research. Advancing TREND and CONSORT. Journal of Public Health, 30, 103-109.
2. Asthana, S., & Halliday, J. (2006). Developing an evidence base for policies and interventions to address health inequalities: The analysis of "Public Health Regimes". The Milbank Quarterly, 84, 577-603.
3. Balk, E.M., Lau, J., & Bonis, P. A. L. (2005). Reading and critically appraising systematic reviews and meta-analyses: A short primer with a focus on hepatology. Journal of Hepatology, 43, 729-726.
4. Callon, M., Lascoumes, P., & Barthe, Y. (2001). L'organisation des forums hybrides. In M. Callon, P. Lacoumes & Y. Barthe. Agir dans un monde incertain. Essai sur la démocratie technique (pp. 209-262). Paris: Seuil.
5. Campostrini, S. (2007). Measurement and effectiveness: Methodological considerations, issues and possible solutions. In D. V. McQueen & C. M. Jones (Eds.), Global perspectives on health promotion effectiveness (pp. 181-200). New-York: Springer.
6. Contandriopoulos, A. P., Champagne, F., Denis, J. L., & Avargues, M. C. (2000). L'évaluation dans le domaine de la santé. Concepts et méthodes. Revue d'épidémiologie et de santé publique, 48, 517-539.
7. Des Jarlais, D. C., Lyles, C., Crepaz, N., & TREND Group. (2004). Improving the reporting quality of non-randomized evaluations of behavioral and public health interventions: The TREND statement. American Journal of Public Health, 94, 361-366.
8. Doak, C. M., Visscher, T. L. S., Renders, C. M., & Seidell, J. C. (2006). The prevention of overweight and obesity in children and adolescents: A review of interventions and programmes. Obesity Reviews, 7, 111-136.
9. Dooris, M., Poland, B., Kolbe, L., De Leeuw, E., McCall, D. S., & Wharf-Higgins, J. (2007). Healthy settings: Building evidence for the effectiveness of whole system health promotion- Challenges and future directions. In D. V. McQueen & C. M. Jones (Eds.), Global perspectives on health promotion effectiveness (pp. 327-352). New York: Springer.
10. Elm, E. von, Altman, D. G., Egger, M., Pocock, S. J., Gotzsche, P. C., & Vanderbroucke, J. P., for the STROBE initiative (2007). Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies. British Medical Journal, 335, 806-808.
11. Evans, L., Hall, M. Jones, C. M., & Neiman, A. (2007). Did the Ottawa Charter play a role in the push to assess the effectiveness of health promotion? Promotion & Education, Suppl. 2, 28-30.
12. Flay, B. R. (1986). Efficacy and effectiveness trials (and other phases of research) in the development of health promotion programs. Preventive Medicine, 15, 451-474.
13. Fortin, M. F. (2006). Fondements et étapes du processus de recherche. Montréal, Québec: Editions de la Chenelière.
14. Glasgow, R. E., & Emmons, K. M. (2007). How can we increase translation of research into practice ? Types of evidence needed. Annual Review of Public Health, 28, 413-433.
15. Glasgow, R. E., Klesges, L. M., Dzewaltowski, D. A., Estabrooks, P. A., & Vogt, T. M. (2006). Evaluating the impact of health promotion programs: Using the RE-AIM framework to form summary measures for decision-making involving complex issues. Health Education Research, 21, 688-694.
16. Glasgow, R. E., Lichtenstein, E., & Marcus, A. C. (2003). Why don't we see more translation of health promotion research to practice? Rethinking the efficacy-to-effectiveness transition. American Journal of Public Health, 93, 1261-1267.
17. Green, L.W. (2006). Public health asks of system science: To advance our evidence-based practice, can you help us get more practice-based evidence? American Journal of Public Health, 96, 406-409.
18. Green, L.W.,& Glasgow, R. E. (2006). Evaluating the relevance, generalization, and transferability of research. Issues in external validation and translation methodology. Evaluation & the Health Professions, 29, 126-153.
19. Greenhalgh, T., Kristanjsson, E., & Robinson, V. (2007). Realist review to understand the efficacy of school feeding programmes. British Medical Journal, 335, 858-861.
20. Hawe, P., Shiell, A., & Riley, T. (2004). Complex interventions: how "out of control" can a randomised controlled trial be? British Medical Journal, 328, 1561-1563.
21. Hawkins, N. G., Sanson-Fisher, R. W., Shakeshaft, A., D'Este, C., & Green, L. W. (2007). The multiple baseline design for evaluating population-based research. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 33, 162-168.
22. International Union for Health Promotion and Education. (1999). The evidence of health promotion effectiveness: Shaping public health in a New Europe. Part two, evidence book. Brussels, Belgium: ECSC-EC-EAEC.
23. Jackson, N., &Waters, E., for the Guidelines for systematic reviews in health promotion and public health taskforce (2005). Criteria for the systematic review of health promotion and public health interventions. Health Promotion International, 20, 367-374.
24. Kristanjsson, E., Robinson, V., Petticrew, M.,Macdonald, B., Krasevec, J., Janzen, L., et al. (2007). School feeding for improving the physical and psychosocial health of disadvantaged elementary school children. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 1, CD 004676.
25. Lobstein, T., & Swinburn, B. (2007). Health promotion to prevent obesity: Evidence and policy needs. In D. V. McQueen & C. M. Jones (Eds.), Global perspectives on health promotion effectiveness (pp. 125-150). New York: Springer.
26. Lohr, K. (2004). Rating the strength of scientific evidence. Relevance for quality improvement programs. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 16, 9-18.
27. Lomas, J., Culyer, T., McCutcheon, C., & McAuley, L., & Law, S. (2005, May). Conceptualizing and combining evidence for health system guidance. Canadian Health Services Research Foundation. http://www.chsrf.ca/other- documents/pdf/evidence-e.pdf
28. McDonald, P. W., & Viehbeck, S. (2007). From evidence-based practice making to practice-based evidence making: Creating communities of (research) and practice. Health Promotion Practice, 8, 140-144.
29. McLaren, L., Ghali, L. M., Lorenzetti, D.,&Rock,M. (2007). Out of context? Translating evidence from the North Karelia project over place and time. Health Education Research, 22, 414-424.
30. McNeil, D. A., & Flynn, M. A. T. (2006). Methods of defining best practice for population health approaches with obesity prevention as an example. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, 65, 403-411.
31. McQueen, D. V. (2007a). Critical issues in theory for health promotion. In D. V. McQueen, I. Kickbush, L. Potvin, J. M. Pelikan, L. Balbo & T. Abel (Eds.), Health and Modernity. The role of theory in health promotion (pp. 21-42). New York: Springer.
32. McQueen, D. V. (2007b). Evidence and theory: Continuing debates on evidence and effectiveness. In D. V. McQueen & C.M. Jones (Eds.), Global perspectives on health promotion effectiveness (pp. 281-304). New York: Springer.
33. McQueen, D. V., & Anderson, L. M. (2001). What counts as evidence: Issues and debates. In I. Rootman, M. Goodstadt, B. Hyndman, D. V. McQueen, L. Potvin, J. Springett & E. Ziglio (Eds.), Evaluation in Health Promotion: Principles and Perspectives (pp. 63-81). Copenhague, Denmark: World Health Organization.
34. McQueen, D. V., & Jones, C. M. (Eds.) (2007). Global perspectives on health promotion effectiveness. New York: Springer.
35. McQueen, D. V., & Kickbusch, I. (2007). Introduction. Health promotion. The origins of the Third public health revolution leading to a new public health. In D. V. McQueen, I. Kickbush, L. Potvin, J. M. Pelikan, L. Balbo & T. Abel (Eds.), Health and Modernity. The role of theory in health promotion (pp. 1-5). New York: Springer.
36. Mullen, P. D., & Ramirez, G. (2006). The promise and pitfalls of systematic reviews. Annual Review of Public Health, 27, 81-102.
37. Moher, D., Schulz, K. F., & Altman, D. G. (2001). The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials. Lancet, 357, 1191-1194. http://www.consort- statement.org/
38. Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine (2001). Levels of evidence and grades of recommendation. Oxford (May, 2001). Downloaded in February 2008 from http://www.cebm.net/index.aspx?o=1025.
39. Pawson, R., Greenhalgh, T., Harvey, G., & Walshe, K. (2005). Realist review. A new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 10, 21-34.
40. Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2003). Evidence, hierarchies, and typologies: Horses for courses. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 57, 527-529.
41. Poland, B., Frohlich, K., & Cargo, M. (2008). Context as a fundamental dimension of healthpromotion program evaluation. In L. Potvin, D. V. McQueen, L. Anderson, Z. Hartz & L. de Salazar (Eds.), Health promotion evaluation practice in the Americas. Research and values. New York: Springer.
42. Potvin, L. (2006). Should we worry about the enthusiasm toward evidence-based health promotion practices? Promotion & Education, 13, 228-229.
43. Potvin, L. (2008). STROBE and the standardization of scientific practice. International Journal of Public Health, 53, 9-10.
44. Potvin, L., Gendron, S., & Bilodeau, A. (2006). Três posturas ontológicas concernentes à natureza dos programas de saúde: Implicaç ões para a avaliaç ão. In M. L. M. Bossi & F. J. Mercado (Eds.), Avaloaç ão qualitative de programas de saúde. Enforques emergentes (pp. 65-86). Petropolis, Brazil: Vozes Editorial.
45. Potvin, L., & Goldberg, C. (2007). Two roles of evaluation in transforming health promotion practice. In M. O'Neill, S. Dupéré, A. Pederson & I. Rootman (Eds.), Health Promotion in Canada. Critical perspectives. (pp. 347-360). Toronto: Canadian Scholar's Press.
46. Potvin, L., & McQueen, D. V. (2007). Modernity, public health and health promotion. A reflexive discourse. In D. V. McQueen, I. Kickbush, L. Potvin, J. M. Pelikan, L. Balbo & T. Abel (Eds.), Health and Modernity. The role of theory in health promotion (pp. 12-20). New York: Springer.
47. Potvin., L., & McQueen, D. V. (2008). Practical dilemmas for health promotion evaluation. In L. Potvin, D. V. McQueen, L. Anderson, Z. Hartz & L. de Salazar (Eds.), Health promotion evaluation practice in the Americas. Research and values. New York: Springer.
48. Raphael, D. (2000). The question of evidence in health promotion. Health Promotion International, 15, 355-367.
49. Ridde, V.,& Guichard. A. (In press). Réduire les inégalités sociales de santé. Aporie, épisté mologie et défis. In C. Niewiadomski & P. Aïach (Eds.), Lutter contre les inégalités sociales de santé. Rennes, France: ENSP Éditions.
50. Rosen, L.,Manor, O., Engelhard, D., & Zucker, D. (2006). In defense of the randomized controlled trial for health promotion research. American Journal of Public Health, 96, 1181-1186.
51. Rychetnik, L., &Wise, M. (2004). Advocating evidence-based health promotion: reflections and a way forward. Health Promotion International, 19, 247-257.
52. Rychetnik, L., Hawe, P., Waters, E., Barratt, A., & Frommer, M. (2004). A glossary for evidencebased public health. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 58, 538-545.
53. Sackett, D. L. Rosenberg, W. M. C., Gray, J. A. M., Brian Haynes, R. B., & Richardson, S. W. (1996). Evidence-based medicine: What it is and what it isn't. British Medical Journal, 312, 71-72.
54. Sanson-Fisher, R. W., Bonevski, B., Green, L. W., & D'Este, C. (2007). Limitations of the randomized controlled trial in evaluating population-based interventions. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 33, 155-161.
55. Sharma,M. (2006). School-based interventions childhood and adolescent obesity. Obesity Reviews, 7, 261-269.
56. Smith, B. J., Tang, K. C., & Nutbeam, D. (2006). WHO health promotion glossary: New terms. Health Promotion International, 21, 340-345.
57. Sterman, J. D. (2006). Learning from evidence in a complex world. American Journal of Public Health, 96, 505-514.
58. Summerbell, C. D., Waters, E., Edmunds, L. D., Kelly, S., Brown, T., & Campbell, K. J. (2005). Interventions for preventing obesity in children. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 3, CD 001871.
59. Tones, K., & Tilford, S. (2001). Evaluation research. In K. Tones & S. Tilford (Eds.), Health promotion. Effectiveness, efficiency and equity. 3rd ed. (pp. 149-192). Cheltenham, U.K.: Nelson Thornes.
60. Victora, C. G., Habicht, JP., & Bryce, J. (2004). Evidence-based public health: Moving beyond randomized trials. American Journal of Public Health, 94, 400-405.
61. Waters, E., Doyle, J., Jackson, N., Howes, F., Brunton, G., & Oakley, A. (2006). Evaluating the effectiveness of public health interventions: The role and activities of the Cochrane Collaboration. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 60, 285-289.
62. Wilkinson, R., & Marmot, M. (2003). Social determinants of health. The solid facts. 2nd ed. Geneva: WHO.
63. Williams, S. J. (2003). Beyond meaning, discourse and the empirical world. Critical realist reflections on health. Social Theory & Health, 1, 42-71.
64. World Cancer Research Fund, & American Institute for Cancer Research (2007). Judging the evidence. In World Cancer Research Fund & American Institute for Cancer Research. Food, Nutrition, Physical Activity, and the Prevention of Cancer: a Global Perspective (pp. 48-62). Washington DC: AICR.
65. World Health Organization. (1986). The Ottawa Charter for health promotion. Downloaded in February 2008 from: http://www.who.int/hpr/NPH/docs/ ottawa-charter-hp.pdf