A multi-trait multi-method validity test of partworth estimates

Conjoint Measurement: Methods and Applications

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 145-166

  Kamakura, Wagner ^a   Ozer, Muammer ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

^b CITY UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84892297226     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-71404-0_9     Document Type: Chapter

References (30)

1. Akaah, I. P. (1991). Predictive Performance of Self-Explicated, Traditional Conjoint and Hybrid Conjoint Models Under Alternative Data Collection Modes. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 19. 309-314.
2. Bagozzi, R. P. and Yi, Y. (1991), Multitrait-Multimethod Matrices in Consumer Research. Journal of Consumer Research, 17, 426-439.
3. Browne, M. W. (1992), MUTMUM User's Guide, Version of April, 1992. The Ohio State University. Department of Psychology, Columbus. Ohio.
4. Browne, M. W. (1984), The Decomposition of Multitrait-Multimethod Matrices, British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology. 37, 1-21.
5. Campbell, D. T. and Fiske, D. F. (1959). Convergent and Discriminant Validation by the Multitrait-Multimethod Matrix, Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81-105.
6. Campbell, D. T. and O'Connell, E. J. (1967), Method Factors Multitrait-Multimethod Matrices: Multiplicative Rather than Additive, Multivariate Behavioral Research, 2, 409-426.
7. Darmon, R. Y. and Rouzies, D, (1991), Internal Validity Assessment of Conjoint Estimated Attribute Importance Weights, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 19, 315- 322.
8. Darmon, R. Y. and Rouzies, D. (1994), Reliability and Internal Validity of Conjoint Esti-mated Utility Functions Under Error-Free Versus Error-Full Conditions, International Journal of Research in Marketing, 11, 465-476.
9. DeSarbo, W. S., WedeL, M., Vriens, M. and Ramaswamy, V. (1992), Latent Class Metric Conjoint Analysis, Marketing Letters, 3, 273-289.
10. Green, P. E. and Hesen, K. (1989), Cross-Validation Assessment of Alternatives to Individual-Level Conjoint Analysis: A Case Study, Journal of Marketing Research, 26, 346-350.
11. Green, P. E., Krieger, A. M. and Agarwal, M. K. (1993), A Cross Test of Four Model sfor Quantifying Multiattribute Preferences, Marketing Letters, 4, 369-380.
12. Green, P. E., Krieger, A. and SchalYer, C. M. (1993), An Empirical Test of Optimal Re-spondent Weighting in Conjoint Analysis, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 2. 345-351.
13. Hagerty, M. R. (1985), Improving the Predictive Power of Conjoint Analysis: The Use of Factor Analysis and Cluster Analysis, Journal of Marketing Research. 22, 168-184.
14. Hagerty, M. R. (1993). Can Segmentation Improve Predictive Accuracy in Conjoint Analysis Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 21, 353-355.
15. Jain, A. K., Acito, F., Malhotra, N. K. and Mahajan, V. (1979), A Comparison of the Internal Validity of Alternative Parameter Estimation Methods in Decompositional Multiat-tribute Preference Models, Journal of Marketing Research, 16, 313-322.
16. Kalleberg, A. L. and Kluegel, J. R. (1975), Analysis of the Multitrait-Multimethod Matrix: Some Limitations and an Alternative. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, 1-9.
17. Kamaknra, W. A. (1988), A Least Squares Procedure for Benefit Segmentation with Conjoint Experiments, Journal of Marketing Research, 25. 157-167.
18. Kamakura, W. A., WedeL, VI. and AgrawaL, J. (1994). Concomitant Variable Latent Class Models for Conjoint Analysis, International Journal of Research in Marketing, 11, 451-464.
19. Krishnamurthi, L. (1989), Conjoint Models of Family Decision Making, International Journal of Research in Marketing. 5, 185-198.
20. Kumar, A. and Dillon, W. R. (1992), An Integrative Look at the use of Additive and Multiplicative Covariance Structure Models in the Analysis of MTMM Data. Journal of Marketing Research. 29. 51 -64.
21. Lastovicka, J. L., Murry, J. P., and Joachimsthaler, E. A. (1990), Evaluating the Measurement Validity of Lifestyle Typologies with Qualitative Measures and Multiplicative Factoring. Journal of Marketing Research, 27. 11-23.
22. Lee, S. Y. (1980), Estimation of Covariance Structure Models with Parameters Subject to Functional Constrains, Psychometrika, 45, 309-324.
23. Leigh, T. W., MacKay, D. B. and Summers, J. O. (1984), Reliability and Validity of Con-joint Analysis and Self-Explicated Weights: A Comparison. Journal of Marketing Research. 21, 456-462.
24. Marsh, H. W. and Hocevar, D. (1983), Confirmatory Factor Analysis of Multimethod- Multitrait Matrices, Journal of Educational Measurement, 20, 231-248.
25. Morwitz, V. G., Johnson, E. and Schmittlein, D. (1993). Does Measuring Intend Change Behavior Journal of Consumer Behavior, 20, 1-16.
26. Ogawa, K. (1987), An Approach to Simultaneous Estimation and Segmentation in Conjoint Analysis, Marketing Science, 6. 66-81.
27. Srinivasan, V. and Park, C. (1997), Surprising Robustness of the Self-Explicated Approach to Consumer Preference Structure Measurement, Journal of Marketing Research, 34, 286-291.
28. Wedel, M. and Steenkamp, J. B. (1989), Fuzzy Clusterwise Regression Approach to Benefit Segmentation, International Journal of Research in Marketing. 6, 241-258.
29. Vriens, M., Wedel, M. and Wilms, T. (1996), Metric Conjoint Segmentation Methods: A Monte Carlo Comparison, Journal of Marketing Research, 33, 73-85.
30. Wothke, W. and Browne, M. W. (1990), The Direct Product Model for the MTMM Matrix Parameterized as a Second Order Factor Analysis Model, Psychometrika. 55. 255-262.