Bayesian methods for tracking and localization

Intelligent Algorithms in Ambient and Biomedical Computing

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 243-258

  Zajdel, Wojciech ^a   Kröse, Ben J A ^a   Vlassis, Nikos ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

dynamic Bayesian networks; multi object tracking; probabilistic inference; robot localization; Time series analysis

Indexed keywords

EID: 84892237660     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/1-4020-4995-1_14     Document Type: Chapter

References (21)

1. Boyen, X., and D. Koller [1998]. Tractable inference for complex stochastic processes, Proc. of Conf. on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence.
2. Cover, T.M., and J.A. Thomas [1991]. Elements of information theory, JohnWiley & Sons, New York.
3. Dellaert, F., D. Fox, W. Burgard, and S. Thrun [1999]. Monte carlo localization for mobile robots, Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation.
4. Doucet, A., N. de Freitas, and N. Gordon (eds.) [2001]. Sequential monte carlo methods in practice, Springer-Verlag.
5. Gelman, A., J.B. Carlin, H.S. Stern, and D.D. Rubin [1995]. Bayesian data analysis, Chapman & Hall.
6. Gordon, N.J., D.J. Salmond, and A.F.M. Smith [1993]. Novel-approach to nonlinear non- Gaussian Bayesian state estimation. IEE Proceedings-F Radar and signal processing, 140 (2): 107-113.
7. Isard, M., and A. Blake [1998]. Condensation conditional density propagation for visual tracking, Int. Journal of Computer Vision, 29(1): 5-28.
8. Jensen, F.V. [2001]. Bayesian networks and decision graphs, Springer-Verlag.
9. Jordan, M.I. (ed.) [1998]. Learning in graphical models, MIT Press.
10. Lerner, U., and R. Parr [2001]. Inference in hybrid networks: Theoretical limits and practical algorithms, Proc. of Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence.
11. Minka, T. [2001]. Expectation propagation for approximate bayesian inference, Proc. of Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence.
12. Murphy, K.P. [2002]. Dynamic Bayesian networks: Representation, inference and learning, Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Berkley.
13. Neal, R. [2000]. Markov chain sampling methods for Dirichlet process mixture models, Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, pages 249-265.
14. Pasula, H., S. Russell, M. Ostland, and Y. Ritov [1999]. Tracking many objects with many sensors, Proc. of Int. Joint Conf. on Artificial Intelligence.
15. Pitt, M.K., and N. Shephard [1999]. Filtering via simulation: Auxiliary particle filters, J. Amer. Statist. Assoc., 94(446): 590-599.
16. Rabiner, L.R. [1990]. A tutorial on hidden Markov models and selected applications in speech recognition, in Reading in Speech Recognition, A. Weibel and K.-F. Lee (eds.), pages 267- 296.
17. Rowies, S., and Z. Ghahramani [1999]. A unifying review of linear gaussian models, Neural Computation, 11: 305-345.
18. Saul, L.K., and M. I. Jordan [1999]. Mixed memory Markov models: Decomposing complex stochastic processes as mixtures of simpler ones, Machine Learning, 37(1): 75-87.
19. Thrun, S., D. Fox, W. Burgard, and F. Dellaert [2001]. Robust Monte Carlo localization for mobile robots, Artificial Intelligence, 128(1-2): 99-141.
20. Vlassis, N., B. Terwijn, and B. Kr̈ose [2002]. Auxiliary particle filter robot localization from high-dimensional sensor observations, Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation.
21. Zajdel, W., A.T. Cemgil, and B. Kr̈ose [2004]. Online multicamera tracking with a switching state-space model, Proc. Int. Conference on Pattern Recognition.