Constructs of justice: Beyond civil litigation

Civil Juries and Civil Justice: Psychological and Legal Perspectives

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 257-272

  Tomkins, Alan J ^a   Applequist, Kimberly ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84892193460     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-74490-2_13     Document Type: Chapter

References (67)

1. Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 267-299). New York: Academic Press.
2. Arvai, J. L. 2003. Communicating the results of participatory decision making: Effects on the perceived acceptability of risk-policy decisions. Risk Analysis, 23, 281-291.
3. Bornstein, B. H., & Poser, S. (in press). Perceptions of procedural and distributive justice in the September 11th Victim Compensation Fund. Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy.
4. Brickman, P. (1977). Crime and punishment in sports and society. Journal of Social Issues, 33(1), 140-164.
5. Court Statistics Project. (2006). State court caseload statistics, 2005. Williamsburg, VA: National Center for State Courts. Available on-line at http://www.ncsconline.org/D-Research/csp/2005-files/ State%20Court%20Caseload%20Statistics%202005.pdf.
6. Cross, F. B. (2005). Law and trust. Georgetown Law Review, 93, 1457-1545.
7. Deutsch, M. (1985). Distributive justice: A social-psychological perspective. New Haven: Yale University Press.
8. Elster, J. (1995). The idea of equality revisited. In J. Altham and R. Harrison (Eds.), World, mind, and ethics: Essays on the ethical philosophy of Bernard Williams (pp. 4-18). New York: Cambridge University Press.
9. Felstiner, W. L. F., Abel, R. L., & Sarat, A. (1980-1981). The emergence and transformation of disputes: Naming, blaming, claiming. Law and Society Review, 15, 631-655.
10. Galanter, M. S. (1983). Reading the landscape of disputes: What we know and don't know (and think we know) about our allegedly contentious and litigious society. UCLA Law Review, 31, 4-71.
11. Galanter, M. S. (1993). News from nowhere: The debased debate on civil justice. Denver University Law Review, 71, 77-103.
12. Galanter, M. S. (1996). Real world torts: An antidote to anecdote. Maryland Law Review, 55, 1093-1160.
13. Gray-Kanatiiosh, B., & Lauderdale, P. (2006). The web of justice: Restorative justice has presented only part of the story. Wicazo Sa Review, 21(1), 29-41.
14. Greene, E. (2007). "Can we talk?" Therapeutic jurisprudence, restorative justice, and tort litigation. [this volume]
15. Hegtvedt, K. A., & Cook, K. S. (2001). Distributive justice: Recent theoretical developments and applications. In J. Sanders & V. L. Hamilton (Eds.), Handbook of justice research in law (pp. 93-132). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
16. Helm, J. P. (2001). Asbestos litigation and the proposed administrative remedy: Between the values of individualism and distributive justice. Emory Law Journal, 50, 631-662.
17. Hersch, J. (2006). Demand for a jury trial and the selection of cases for trial. Journal of Legal Studies, 35, 119-142.
18. Hibbing, J. R., & Theiss-Morse, E. (Eds.) (2001). What is it about government that Americans dislike? New York: Cambridge University Press.
19. Hopkins, S. M., & Weathington, B. L. (2006). The relationships between justice perceptions, trust, and employee attitudes in a downsized organization. Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 140, 477-498.
20. Kritzer, H. M., Vidmar, N., & Bogart, W. A. (1991). To confront or not to confront: Measuring claiming rates in discrimination grievances. Law and Society Review, 25, 875-887.
21. Lerner, M. J. (1975). The justice motive in social behavior: Introduction. Journal of Social Issues, 31(3), 1-19.
22. Lerner, M. J., & Lerner, S. C. (Eds.) (1981). The justice motive in social behavior: Adapting to times of scarcity and change. New York: Plenum.
23. Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum Press.
24. Markell, D. L. (2006). Understanding citizen perspectives on government decision making processes as a way to improve the administrative state. Environmental Law, 36, 651-708.
25. McFarlin, D. B., & Sweeney, P. D. (1992). Distributive and procedural justice as predictors of satisfaction with personal and organizational outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 35, 626-637.
26. Michelbach, P. A., Scott, J. T., Matland, R. E., & Bornstein, B. H. (2003). Doing Rawls justice: An experimental study of income distribution norms. American Journal of Political Science, 47, 523-539.
27. Miller, R. E., & Sarat, A. (1980-1981). Grievances, claims, and disputes: Assessing the adversary culture. Law and Society Review,15, 525-566.
28. Mnookin, R. H., & Kornhauser, L. (1979). Bargaining in the Shadow of the Law: The Case of Divorce, Yale Law Journal, 88, 950-997.
29. Morrison, B., & Ahmed, E. (Eds.) (2006). Restorative justice and civil society. Journal of Social Issues, 62 (2), 209-438.
30. Pleasence, P. (2006). Causes of action: Civil law and social justice (2nd ed.). Norwich, England: The Stationary Office and Legal Services Commission.
31. Robbennolt, J. K. (2003). Apologies and legal settlement. Michigan Law Review, 102, 461-516.
32. Robbennolt, J. K. (2005). What we know and don't know about the role of apologies in health care disputes. Georgia State University Law Review, 21, 1009-1027.
33. Robbennolt, J. K. (2006). Apologies and settlement levers. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 3, 333-373.
34. Robbennolt, J. K. (2007). Apologies and civil justice. [this volume]
35. Roche, D. (2006). Dimensions of restorative justice. Journal of Social Issues, 62(2), 217-238.
36. Rubin, E. (2005). The myth of accountability and the anti-administrative impulse. Michigan Law Review, 103, 2073-2136.
37. Scott, J. T., Matland, R. E., Michelbach, P. A., & Bornstein, B. H. (2001). Just deserts: An experimental approach to distributive justice. American Journal of Political Science, 45, 749-767.
38. Shultz, T. R., & Darley, J. M. (1991). An information-processing model of retributive justice based on "legal reasoning". In W. M. Kurtines & J. L. Gewirtz (Eds.), Handbook of moral behavior and development: Research (Vol. 2, pp. 247-278). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
39. Smith, H. J., & Tyler, T. R. (1996). Justice and power: Can justice motivations and superordinate categorizations encourage the advantaged to support policies which redistribute economic resources and encourage the disadvantaged to willingly obey the law? European Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 171-200.
40. Suk, J. C. (2006). Antidiscrimination law in the administrative state. University of Illinois Law Review, 2006, 405-473.
41. Thibaut, J. W., & Kelley, H. H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. New York: John Wiley.
42. Thibaut, J., & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
43. Thibaut, J., & Walker, L. (1978). A theory of procedure. California Law Review, 66, 541-66.
44. Trubek, D. M., Grossman, J. B., Felstiner, W. L. F., Kritzer, H. M., & Sarat, A. (1983). Civil litigation research project: Final report. Madison: University of Wisconsin Law School.
45. Trubek, D. M., Sarat, A., Felstiner, W. L. F., Kritzer, H. M., & Grossman, J. B. (1983). The costs of ordinary litigation. UCLA Law Review, 31, 72-127.
46. Tyler, T. R. (1988). What is procedural justice?: Criteria used by citizens to assess fairness in legal procedures. Law and Society Review, 22, 103-135.
47. Tyler, T. R. (1991). Using procedures to justify outcomes: Testing the viability of a procedural justice strategy for managing conflict and allocating resources in work organizations. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 12, 259-279.
48. Tyler, T. R. (1992). The psychological consequences of judicial procedures: Implications for civil commitment hearings. Southern Methodist University Law Review, 46, 401-413.
49. Tyler, T. R. (1994a). Governing amid diversity: Can fair decision-making procedures bridge competing public interests and values? Law and Society Review, 28, 701-722.
50. Tyler, T. R. (1994b). Psychological models of the justice motive. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 850-863.
51. Tyler, T. R. (1997b). The psychological of legitimacy: A relational perspective on voluntary deference to authorities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1, 323-345.
52. Tyler, T. R. (2000). Social justice: Outcome and procedure. International Journal of Psychology, 35, 117-125.
53. Tyler, T. R. (2004). Affirmative action in an institutional context: The antecedents of policy preferences and political support. Social Justice Research, 17, 5-24.
54. Tyler, T. R. (2006b). Restorative justice and procedural justice: Dealing with rule breaking. Journal of Social Issues, 62(2), 307-326.
55. Tyler, T. R. (2007). Racial profiling, attributions of motive, and the acceptance of social authority. In R. L. Wiener, B. H. Bornstein, R. Schopp, & S. L. Willborn (Eds.), Social consciousness in legal decision making: Psychological perspectives (pp. 61-74). New York: Springer.
56. Tyler, T. R., Boeckmann, R. J., Smith, H. J., & Huo, Y. J. (1997). Social justice in a diverse society. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
57. Tyler, T. R., & Darley, J. (2000). Building a law-abiding society: Taking public views about morality and the legitimacy of legal authorities into account when formulating substantive law. Hofstra Law Review, 28, 707-739.
58. Tyler, T. R.,& Lind, A. E. (2001). Procedural justice. In J. Sanders and V. L. Hamilton (Eds.), Handbook of justice research in law (pp. 65-92). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
59. Tyler, T. R., Lind, E. A., & Huo, Y. J. (2000). Cultural values and authority relations. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 6, 1138-1163.
60. Tyler, T. R., & Thorisdottir, H. (2003). A psychological perspective on compensation for harm: Examining the September 11th Victim Compensation Fund. DePaul Law Review, 53, 355-391.
61. Umbreit, M. S., & Ritter, R. (2006). Arab offenders meet Jewish victim: Restorative family dialogue in Israel. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 24, 99-109.
62. Umbreit, M. S., Vos, B., Coates, R. B., & Lightfoot, E. (2006). Restorative justice in the twenty-first century: A social movement full of opportunities and pitfalls. Marquette Law Review, 89, 251-304.
63. U.S. Courts. (2007, March 13). Fiscal year 2006 caseloads remain at high levels. On-line at http://www.uscourts.gov/Press-Releases/caseload031307print. html.
64. Vines, P. (2007). The power of apology: Mercy, forgiveness or corrective justice in the civil liability arena? Public Space: The Journal of Law and Social Justice, 1 (1), Art. 5, 1-51.
65. Available on-line at http://epress.lib.uts.edu.au/ojs/index.php/ publicspace/article/viewFile/535/482.
66. Walster, E., Walster, G. W., & Berscheid, E. (1978). Equity: Theory and research. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
67. Weinrib, E. J. (2002). Corrective justice in a nutshell. University of Toronto Law Journal, 52, 349-356.