Performing mathematical operations with metamaterials

Science

Volumn 343, Issue 6167, 2014, Pages 160-163

  Silva, Alexandre ^a   Monticone, Francesco ^b   Castaldi, Giuseppe ^c   Galdi, Vincenzo ^c   Alù, Andrea ^b   Engheta, Nader ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b The University of Texas at Austin   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SANNIO   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATA SET; MAGNITUDE; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; OPERATIONS TECHNOLOGY; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; SPATIAL VARIATION;

ARTICLE; COMPUTER ANALYSIS; DATA PROCESSING; ENGINEERING; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LENS; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MATHEMATICAL PARAMETERS; METAMATERIAL; MOLECULAR MECHANICS; OPTICS; PHYSICAL PARAMETERS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPATIAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 84892163012     PISSN: 00368075     EISSN: 10959203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1126/science.1242818     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. N. Engheta, R. W. Ziolkowski, Eds., Metamaterials-Physics and Engineering Explorations (IEEE-Wiley, New York, 2006).
2. G. V. Eleftheriades, K. G. Balmain, Negative-Refraction Metamaterials (IEEE, New York, 2005).
3. D. R. Smith, J. B. Pendry, M. C. K. Wiltshire, Science 305, 788-792 (2004).
4. C. Caloz, T. Itoh, Electromagnetic Metamaterials-Transmission Line Theory and Microwave Applications (IEEE-Wiley, New York, 2006).
5. W. Cai, V. Shalaev, Optical Metamaterials: Fundamentals and Applications (Springer, New York, 2010).
6. J. B. Pendry, D. Schurig, D. R. Smith, Science 312, 1780-1782 (2006).
7. U. Leonhardt, Science 312, 1777-1780 (2006).
8. A. Alù, N. Engheta, Phys. Rev. E 72, 016623 (2005).
9. A. Vakil, N. Engheta, Science 332, 1291-1294 (2011).
10. E. F. Kuester, M. A. Mohamed, M. Piket-May, C. L. Holloway, IEEE Trans. Antenn. Propag. 51, 2641-2651 (2003).
11. N. Yu et al., Science 334, 333-337 (2011).
12. X. Ni, N. K. Emani, A. V. Kildishev, A. Boltasseva, V. M. Shalaev, Science 335, 427 (2012).
13. Y. Zhao, M. A. Belkin, A. Alù, Nat. Commun. 3, 870 (2012).
14. A. Pandey, N. M. Litchinitser, Opt. Lett. 37, 5238-5240 (2012).
15. Y. Lai et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 253902 (2009).
16. D. de Solla Price, IEEE Micro. 4, 22-52 (1984).
17. A. B. Clymer, IEEE Ann. Hist. Comput. 15, 19 (1993).
18. Computer History Museum, www.computerhistory.org/revolution/analog- computers/3.
19. G. W. Milton, J. Mech. Phys. Solids 61, 1543-1560 (2013).
20. A. B. Kempe, Proc. London Math. Soc. 7, 213 (1876).
21. A. Weiner, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 71, 1929 (2000).
22. D. Casasent, Proc. IEEE 65, 143-157 (1977).
23. J. Goodman, Introduction to Fourier Optics (Roberts & Co., Englewood, CO, ed. 3, 2005).
24. H. M. Ozaktas, D. Mendlovic, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 10, 2522 (1993).
25. J. B. Pendry, S. A. Ramakrishna, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 15, 6345-6364 (2003).
26. G. V. Naik, J. Kim, A. Boltasseva, Opt. Mater. Express 1, 1090 (2011).
27. F. Monticone, N. M. Estakhri, A. Alù, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 203903 (2013).
28. G. Castaldi, V. Galdi, A. Alù, N. Engheta, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 063902 (2012).
29. R. C. Gonzalez, R. E. Woods, Digital Image Processing (Prentice Hall, New York, 2008).