Study design and methodology of the 2012 epidemiological survey of substance abuse;Studiendesign und methodik des epidemiologischen suchtsurveys 2012

Sucht

Volumn 59, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 309-320

  Kraus, Ludwig ^a,b   Piontek, Daniela ^a   Pabst, Alexander ^a   De Matos, Elena Gomes ^a  

^a IFT INSTITUT FÜR THERAPIEFORSCHUNG   (Germany)

^b STOCKHOLM UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

General population survey; Methodology; Non response; Substance use; Substance use disorders

Indexed keywords

CANNABIS; HYPNOTIC AGENT;

ADULT; ALCOHOL CONSUMPTION; CANNABIS USE; DRINKING BEHAVIOR; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MIDDLE AGED; ONLINE QUESTIONNAIRE; PAPER AND PENCIL QUESTIONNAIRE; QUESTIONNAIRE; REVIEW; SAMPLING; SMOKING; STUDY DESIGN; SUBSTANCE ABUSE; TELEPHONE INTERVIEW; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84892159765     PISSN: 09395911     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1024/0939-5911.a000274     Document Type: Review

References (34)

1. Agrawal, A., Heath, A. C. & Lynskey, M. T. (2011). DSM-IV to DSM-5: the impact of proposed revisions on diagnosis of alcohol use disorders. Addiction, 106, 1935-1943.
2. Aquilino, W. S. (1994). Interview mode effects in surveys of drug and alcohol use: A field experiment. Public Opinion Quarterly, 58, 210-240.
3. Aust, F. & Schröder, H. (2009). Sinkende Stichprobenausschö pfung in der Umfrageforschung-ein Bericht aus der Praxis. In M.Weichbold, J. Bacher & C.Wolf (Hrsg.), Umfrageforschung -Herausforderungen und Grenzen (S. 195-212). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
4. Beebe, T. J., McRae, J. A., Harrison, P. A., Davern, M. E. & Quinlan, K. B. (2005). Mail surveys resulted in more reports of substance use than telephone surveys. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 58, 421-424.
5. Biemer, P. & Lyberg, L. (2003). Introduction to survey quality. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
6. Bloomfield, K. & Grittner, U. (2012, Juni). Who harms whom with their drinking? Results from the Danish national alcohol and drug survey. Vortrag auf dem 38th Annual Symposium of the Kettil Bruun Society for Social and Epidemiological Research on Alcohol, Stavanger.
7. Bühringer, G., Augustin, R., Bergmann, E., Bloomfield, K., Funk, W., Junge, B. et al. (2000). Alkoholkonsum und alkoholbezogene Störungen in Deutschland (Schriftenreihe des Bundesministeriums für Gesundheit, Band 128). Baden-Baden: Nomos.
8. Chung, T., Martin, C. S., Maisto, S.A., Cornelius, J. R. & Clark, D. B. (2012). Greater prevalence of proposed DSM-5 nicotine use disorder compared to DSM-IV nicotine dependence in treated adolescents and young adults. Addiction, 107, 810-818.
9. Currivan, D. B., Nyman, A. L., Turner, C. F. & Biener, L. (2004).Does telephone audio computer-assisted self-interviewing improve the accuracy of prevalence estimates of youth smoking: Evidence from the UMASS Tobacco Study? Public Opinion Quarterly, 68, 542-564.
10. Curtin, R., Presser, S. & Singer, E. (2005). Changes in telephone survey nonresponse over the past quarter century. Public Opinion Quarterly, 69, 87-98.
11. Diekmann, A. (2007). Empirische Sozialforschung: Grundlagen, Methoden, Anwendungen. (17. Aufl.). Reinbek: Rowohlt.
12. Gabler, S., Hoffmeyer-Zlotnik, J. & Krebs, D. (1994). Gewichtung in der Umfragepraxis. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
13. Gelman, A. & Carlin, J. (2002). Poststratification and weighting adjustments. In R. M. Groves, J. L. Eltinge & R. J. A. Little (Eds.), Survey nonresponse (pp. 289-203). New York: John Wiley and Sons.
14. Gmel, G. & Rehm, J. (2004). Measuring alcohol consumption. Contemporary Drug Problems, 34, 467-540.
15. Gomes de Matos, E., Kraus, L., Pabst, A. & Piontek, D. (2013). Problembewusstsein und Inanspruchnahme von Hilfe bei substanzbezogenen Problemen. SUCHT, 59, 355-366.
16. Groves, R. M., Fowler, F. J., Couper, M. P., Lepkowski, J. M., Singer, E. & Tourangeau, R. (2009). Survey methodology (2nd ed.). Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
17. Holbrook, A. L., Krosnick, J. A. & Pfent, A. (2008). The causes and consequences of response rates in survey by the news media and government contractor survey research firms. In J. M. Lepkowski, C. Tucker, J. M. Brick, E. De Leeuw, J. Japec, P. J. Lavrakas, M.W. Link & R. L. Sangster (Eds.), Advances in telephone survey methodology (pp. 499-528). New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons.
18. Kessler, R. C., Andrews, G., Colpe, L. J., Hiripi, E., Mroczek, D. K., Normand, S. L. et al. (2002). Short screening scales to monitor population prevalences and trends in non-specific psychological distress. Psychological Medicine, 32, 959-976.
19. Kraus, L., Pabst, A., Piontek, D. & Gomes de Matos, E. (2013). Substanzkonsum und substanzbezogene Störungen: Trends in der deutschen Allgemeinbevölkerung 1980-2012. SUCHT, 59, 333-345.
20. Kraus, L. & Pabst, A. (2010). Studiendesign und Methodik des Epidemiologischen Suchtsurveys 2009. SUCHT, 56, 315-326.
21. Kreuter, F., Presser, S. & Tourangeau, R. (2008). Social desirability bias in CATI, IVR, and web surveys: The effects of mode and question sensitivity. Public Opinion Quarterly, 70, 847-865.
22. Kurth, B.-M. (2012). Erste Ergebnisse aus der "Studie zur Gesundheit Erwachsener in Deutschland" (DEGS). Bundesgesundheitsblatt -Gesundheitsforschung-Gesundheitsschutz, 8, 980-990.
23. Lahaut, V. M., Jansen, H. A., van de Mheen, D., Garretsen, H. F., Verdurmen, J. E. & van Dijk, A. (2003). Estimating non-response bias in a survey on alcohol consumption: Comparison of response waves. Alcohol and Alcoholism, 38, 128-134.
24. Lemmens, P., Tan, E. S. & Knibbe, R. H. (1988). Bias due to nonresponse in a Dutch survey on alcohol Consumption. British Journal of Addiction, 83, 1069-1077.
25. Little, R. J. A., Lewitzky, S., Heeringa, S., Lepkowski, J. & Kessler, R. C. (1997). Assessment of weighting methodology for the National Comorbidity Survey. American Journal of Epidemiology, 146, 439-449.
26. Peer, K., Rennert, L., Lynch, K. G., Farrer, L., Gelernter, J. & Kranzler, H. R. (2013). Prevalence of DSM-IV and DSM-5 alcohol, cocaine, opioid, and cannabis use disorders in a largely substance dependent sample. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 127, 215-219.
27. Piontek, D., Kraus, L., Gomes de Matos, E. & Pabst, A. (2013). Komorbide Substanzstörungen in der erwachsenen Allgemeinbevölkerung. SUCHT, 59, 347-354.
28. Robert Koch-Institut (2012). Daten und Fakten: Ergebnisse der Studie "Gesundheit in Deutschland aktuell 2010". Beiträge zur Gesundheitsberichterstattung des Bundes. Berlin: Robert Koch-Institut.
29. Statistisches Bundesamt (2010). Demographische Standards Ausgabe 2010. (Statistik und Wissenschaft, Band 17).Wiesbaden: Statistisches Bundesamt.
30. Tourangeau, R. & Yan, T. (2007). Sensitive questions in surveys. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 859-883.
31. Wittchen, H.-U., Beloch, E., Garczynski, E., Holly, A., Lachner, G., Perkonigg, A. et al. (1995). Münchener Composite International Diagnostic Interview (M-CIDI, Paper-pencil 2.2, 2/95). München: Max-Planck-Institut für Psychiatrie, Klinisches Institut.
32. World Health Organization (2000). Guide to drug abuse epidemiology. Geneva: World Health Organization.
33. Yang, Y. M., Falcone, A. E. & Milan, L. M. (2009). Survey mode effects in two military surveys. Section on Survey Research Methods-JSM, 4125-4139.
34. Zhao, J., Stockwell, T. & Macdonald S. (2009). Nonresponse bias in alcohol and drug population surveys. Drug and Alcohol Review, 28, 648-657.