Class Monopoly Rent and the Contemporary Neoliberal City

Geography Compass

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 13-24

  Anderson, Matthew B ^a  

^a MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY BILLINGS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ECONOMIC INSTABILITY; LANDSCAPE; MONOPOLY; NEOLIBERALISM; POLITICAL ECONOMY; URBAN AREA; URBAN ECONOMY;

CHICAGO; ILLINOIS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84892149898     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17498198     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/gec3.12107     Document Type: Article

References (92)

1. Aalbers, M. (2007). Geographies of housing finance: the mortgage market in Milan, Italy. Growth and Change 38 (2), pp. 174-99.
2. Aalbers, M. (ed.) (2012). Subprime cities: the political economy of mortgage markets. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
3. Aalbers, M. (2013). Neoliberalism is dead.. long live neoliberalism! International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 37 (3), pp. 1083-1090.
4. Addie, J. (2008). The rhetoric and reality of urban policy in the neoliberal city: implications for social struggle in over-the-Rhine, Cincinnati. Environment and Planning A 40 (11), pp. 2674-2692.
5. Addie, J. (2009). Constructing neoliberal urban democracy in the American inner-city. Local Economy 24 (6-7), pp. 536-554.
6. Amin, S. (1977). Capitalism and ground rent. In: Imperialism and unequal development. New York, NY: Monthly Review Press.
7. Amin, A. and Thrift, N. (eds) (2004). Cultural economy: a reader. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing.
8. Amin, A. and Thrift, N. (2007). Cultural-economy and cities. Progress in Human Geography 31 (2), pp. 143-161.
9. Anderson, M. (2012). The temporal dynamics of neoliberal redevelopment governance and the restructuring of urban space: Chicago's Bronzeville (1989-Present). Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Department of Geography, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois. https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/handle/2142/30919 (accessed October 24, 2012).
10. Anderson, M. and Sternberg, C. (2013). "Non-white" gentrification in Chicago's Bronzeville and Pilsen: racial economy and the intraurban contingency of urban redevelopment. Urban Affairs Review 49(3), pp. 435-467.
11. Ball, M. (1977). Differential rent and the role of landed property. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 1, pp. 380-403.
12. Ball, M. (1983). Housing policy and economic power: the political economy of owner occupation. London, UK: Methuen.
13. Ball, M. (1985a). The urban rent question. Environment and Planning A 17, pp. 503-525.
14. Ball, M. (1985b). Land rent and the construction industry. In: Ball, M., Bentivegna, V., Edwards, M., and Folin, M. (eds) Land rent: housing and urban planning. London, UK: Groom Helm, pp. 71-86.
15. Ball, M. (1987). Rent and social relations: a reply to Clark. Environment and Planning A 19, pp. 503-525.
16. Ball, M., Bentivegna, V., Edwards, M. and Folin, M. (eds) (1985). Land rent: housing and urban planning. London, UK: Groom Helm.
17. Blomley, N. (2005). Remember property? Progress in Human Geography 29, pp. 125-127.
18. Boyd, M. (2008). Jim crow nostalgia: reconstructing race in Bronzeville. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
19. Brenner, N and Theodore, N (eds) (2002). Spaces of neoliberalism. London, UK: Basil Blackwell.
20. Brenner, N., Peck, J. and Theodore, N. (2010). After neoliberalization? Globalizations 7 (3), pp. 327-345.
21. Christophers, B. (2010). On voodoo economies: theorizing relations of property, value and contemporary capitalism. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 35, pp. 94-108.
22. Clark, E. (1987). A critical note on Ball's reformulation of the role of urban land rent. Environment and Planning A 19, pp. 263-267.
23. Duncan, D. and Ley, D. (1982). Structural Marxism and Human Geography: A Critical Assessment. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 72(1), pp. 30-59.
24. Edel, M. (1976). Marx's theory of rent: urban applications. Kaptitalstate 4-5, 100-124.
25. Edel, M. (1982). Home ownership and working class unity. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 6, 205-222.
26. Fine, B. (1982). Theories of the capitalist economy. London, UK: Edward Arnold.
27. Hackworth, J. (2007). The neoliberal city: governance, ideology, and development in American urbanism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
28. Harvey, D. (1973). Social justice and the city. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
29. Harvey, D. (1974). Class monopoly rent, finance capital, and the urban revolution. Regional Studies 8 (3), pp. 239-255.
30. Harvey, D. (1975). Class structure in a capitalist society and the theory of residential differentiation. In: Peel, R., Chisholm, M., and Haggett, P. (eds) Processes in physical and human geography: Bristol essays. London, UK: Heinemann Educational Books, Ltd., pp. 354-369.
31. Harvey, D. (1982). Limits to capital. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
32. Harvey, D. (2001). The art of rent: globalization, monopoly, and cultural production. In: Socialist register, 2002. London, UK: Merlin Press, pp. 93-110.
33. Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
34. Harvey, D. and Chatterjee, L. (1974). Absolute rent and the restructuring of space by government and financial institutions. Antipode 6 (1), pp. 22-36.
35. Hendrikse, R. and Sidaway, J. (2010). Neoliberalism 3.0. Environment and Planning A 42, pp. 2037-2042.
36. Hoffman, A. (2003). House by house, block by block: the rebirth of America's urban neighborhoods. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
37. Hyra, D. (2008). The new urban renewal: the economic transformation of Harlem and Bronzeville. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
38. Jessop, B. (2007). From micro-powers to governmentality: Foucault's work on statehood, state formation, statecraft, and state power. Political Geography 26, pp. 34-40.
39. Keil, R. (2002). "Common-sense" neoliberalism: progressive conservative urbanism in Toronto, Canada. Antipode 34 (3), pp. 578-601.
40. Keil, R. (2009). The urban politics of roll-with-it neoliberalization. CITY 13 (2-3), pp. 230-245.
41. King, R. (1987). Monopoly rent, residential differentiation and the second global crisis of capitalism: the case of Melbourne. Progress in Planning 28 (3), pp. 195-298.
42. King, R. (1989a). Capital switching and the role of ground rent: 1 theoretical problems. Environment and Planning A 21, pp. 445-462.
43. King, R. (1989b). Capital switching and the role of ground rent: 2 switching between circuits and switching between submarkets. Environment and Planning A 21, pp. 771-738.
44. King, R. (1989c). Capital switching and the role of ground rent: 3 switching between circuits, switching between submarkets, and social change. Environment and Planning A 21, pp. 853-880.
45. Kunkel, J. and Mayer, M. (eds) (2012). Neoliberal urbanism and its contestations. London, UK: Pelgrave MacMillan.
46. Krugman, P. (2009). Return to depression economics and the crisis of 2008. New York: W. W. Norton and Company.
47. Larner, W. (2000). Neo-liberalism: policy, ideology, governmentality. Studies in Political Economy 63, pp. 5-26.
48. Lauria, M. (1984). The implications of Marxian rent theory for community-controlled redevelopment strategies. Journal of Planning Education and Research 4 (1), pp. 16-24.
49. Leitner, H., Peck, J. and Sheppard, E. (eds) (2007). Contesting neoliberalism. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
50. Lees, L., Slater, T. and Wyly, E. (2008). Gentrification. New York, NY: Routledge.
51. Logan, J. and Molotch, H. (1987). Urban fortunes: the political economy of place. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
52. MacLeod, G. (2002). From entrepreneurialism to a revanchist city? On the spatial injustices of Glasgow's renaissance. Antipode 34 (3), pp. 602-624.
53. Markusen, A. (1978). Class, rent, and sectoral conflict: uneven development in western US boomtowns. Review of Radical Political Economy 10 (3), 117-129.
54. Marx, K. (1968). Theories of surplus value, part 2. Moscow: Progress Publishers.
55. Marx, K. (1976). Capital, vol. 1. B. Fowkes, translator. New York, NY: Penguin Books.
56. Marx, K. (1981). Capital, vol. 3. D. Fernbach, translator. New York, NY: Penguin Books.
57. McCann, E. (2011). Urban policy mobilities and global circuits of knowledge: toward a research agenda. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 1001 (1), pp. 107-130.
58. Merrifield, A. (2002). Dialectical urbanism: social struggles in the capitalist city. New York, NY: Monthly Review Press.
59. Murray, R. (1977). Value and theory of rent: part one. Capital and Class 3, 100-122.
60. Murray, R. (1978). Value and theory of rent: part two. Capital and Class 4, 11-33.
61. Oosterlynck, S. and Gonzalez, S. (2013). 'Don't waste a crisis': opening up the city yet again for neoliberal experimentation. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 37 (3), pp. 1075-1082.
62. Pattillo, M. (2007). Black on the block: the politics and race in the city. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
63. Peck, J. (2010). Constructions of neoliberal reason. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
64. Peck, J., Theodore, N. and Brenner, N. (2009). Neoliberal urbanism: models, moments, mutations. SAIS Review 29 (1), pp. 49-66.
65. Peck, J., Theodore, N. and Brenner, N. (2010) Postneoliberalism and its malcontents. Antipode 41 (6), pp. 1236-1258.
66. Peck, J., Theodore, N. and Brenner, N. (2012). Neoliberal resurgent: market rule after the great recession. South Atlantic Quarterly 111 (2), pp. 265-288.
67. Peck, J., Theodore, N. and Brenner, N. (2013). Neoliberal urbanism redux? International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 37 (3), pp. 1091-1099.
68. Quintanilla, R. (1994). Aldermen keep firm 'hold' on Bronzeville. Chicago Reporter, January.
69. Ranney, D. (2003). Global decisions, local collisions: urban life in the new world order. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
70. Russell, S. (2009). Vacant lots pose challenge to redevelopment in Bronzeville. Chi-Town Daily News, March 3.
71. Ribera-Fumaz, R. (2009). From urban political economy to cultural political economy: rethinking culture and economy in and beyond the urban. Progress in Human Geography 33 (4), pp. 447-465.
72. Scott, A. (1976). Land and land rent: an interpretative review of the French literature. Progress in Geography 9, pp. 103-145.
73. Scott, A. (1980). The urban land nexus and the state. London, UK: Pion.
74. Sheppard, E. and Leitner, H. (2010). Quo Vadis Neoliberalism? The Remaking of Global Capitalist Governance after the Washington Consensus. Geoforum 41, 185-194.
75. Smith, N. (1979). Toward a theory of gentrification: a back to the city movement by capital, not people. Journal of the American Planning Association 45 (4), pp. 538-548.
76. Smith, N. (1996). The new urban frontier: gentrification and the revanchist city. New York, NY: Routledge.
77. Smith, N. (2000). What happened to class? Environment and Planning A 32 (6), pp. 1011-1032.
78. Smith, N. (2002). New globalism, new urbanism: gentrification as global urban strategy. Antipode 34 (3), pp. 427-450.
79. Smith, N. (2008). Neo-liberalism: dead but dominant. Focaal 51 (Summer), pp. 155-157.
80. Stiglitz, J. (2008). The end of neoliberalism? Project Syndicate. [online]. Retrieved on 7 Jul 2008 from http://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/the-end-of-neo-liberalism-
81. Stiglitz, J. (2010). Freefall: America, free markets, and the shrinking of the world economy. New York: W. W. Norton and Company.
82. Swyngedouw, E. (2000). Authoritarian governance, power and the politics of rescaling. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 18 (2000), pp. 63-76.
83. Tribe, K. (1977). Economic property and the theorization of ground rent. Economy and Society 6, pp. 69-88.
84. Walker, R. (1974). Urban ground rent: building a new conceptual framework. Antipode 6 (1), 51-58.
85. Walker, R. (1975). Contentious issues in Marxian value and rent theory: a second and longer look. Antipode 8, 31-53.
86. Weber, R. (2002). Extracting value from the city: neoliberalism and urban redevelopment. In: Brenner, N., and Theodore, N. (eds) Spaces of neoliberalism. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell, pp. 172-193.
87. Wilson, D. (2004). Toward a contingent urban neoliberalism. Urban Geography 25, pp. 771-783.
88. Wilson, D. (2007). Cities and race: America's new black ghetto. New York, NY: Routledge.
89. Wilson, D. and Sternberg, C. (2012). The new neoliberal growthocracy: Chicago. Urban Geography 33 (7), pp. 979-999.
90. Wyly, E., Atia, M., Foxcroft, H., Hammel, D. and Phillips-Watts, K. (2006). American home: predatory mortgage capital and neighborhood spaces of race and class exploitation in the United States. Geografiska Annaler B 88, pp. 105-132.
91. Wyly, E., Moos, M. and Hammel, D. (2012). Race, class, and rent in America's subprime cities. In: Aalbers, M. (ed.) Subprime cities: the political economy of mortgage markets. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 242-290.
92. Wyly, E., Moos, M., Hammel, D. and Kabahizi, E. (2009). Cartographies of race and class: mapping the class-monopoly rents of America's subprime mortgage capital. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 33, pp. 332-354.