Effect of PAC dosage in a pilot-scale PAC-MBR treating micro-polluted surface water

Bioresource Technology

Volumn 154, Issue , 2014, Pages 290-296

  Hu, Jingyi ^a   Shang, Ran ^a   Deng, Huiping ^b   Heijman, Sebastiaan G J ^a   Rietveld, Luuk C ^a  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^b Tongji University   (China)

Author keywords

MBR; Micro polluted surface water; Optimal dosage; PAC

Indexed keywords

ACTIVATED CARBON; ACTIVATED CARBON TREATMENT; BIOGEOCHEMISTRY; BIOLOGICAL MATERIALS; MEMBRANE FOULING; MOLECULAR WEIGHT DISTRIBUTION; ORGANIC COMPOUNDS;

EXTRACELLULAR POLYMER SUBSTANCE; MBR; MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR; MEMBRANE REJECTION; OPTIMAL DOSAGE; ORGANIC MATTER REMOVAL; PAC; SYNERGISTIC EFFECT;

SURFACE WATERS;

ACTIVATED CARBON; AMMONIA; ORGANIC MATTER; POWDERED ACTIVATED CARBON; SURFACE WATER; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

AMMONIA; BIOFOULING; BIOREACTOR; DRINKING WATER; ORGANIC MATTER; POLLUTANT REMOVAL; POLLUTION EFFECT; POLYMER; SURFACE WATER; WATER TREATMENT;

ADSORPTION; ARTICLE; BIODEGRADATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY; MEMBRANE REACTOR; MOLECULAR WEIGHT; NITRIFYING BACTERIUM; NONHUMAN; PILOT STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; WATER POLLUTION; WATER TREATMENT;

MBR; MICRO-POLLUTED SURFACE WATER; OPTIMAL DOSAGE; PAC;

AMMONIA; BIODEGRADATION, ENVIRONMENTAL; BIOLOGICAL OXYGEN DEMAND ANALYSIS; BIOREACTORS; CHARCOAL; MEMBRANES, ARTIFICIAL; MOLECULAR WEIGHT; ORGANIC CHEMICALS; PERMEABILITY; PILOT PROJECTS; POLYSACCHARIDES; POWDERS; SOLUBILITY; TIME FACTORS; WATER POLLUTANTS, CHEMICAL; WATER PURIFICATION; WATER QUALITY;

EID: 84891898619     PISSN: 09608524     EISSN: 18732976     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.12.075     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Akram A., Stuckey D.C. Flux and performance improvement in a submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactor (SAMBR) using powdered activated carbon (PAC). Process Biochem. 2008, 43(1):93-102.
2. Aktaş Ö., Çeçen F. Bioregeneration of activated carbon: a review. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2007, 59(4):257-272.
3. Chang I.S., Lee C.H. Membrane filtration characteristics in membrane-coupled activated sludge system - the effect of physiological states of activated sludge on membrane fouling. Desalination 1998, 120(3):221-233.
4. Chinese-EPA Water and Wastewater Monitoring Methods 2002, Chinese Environmental Science Publishing House, Beijing, China. fourth ed.
5. Drews A., Vocks M., Bracklow U., Iversen V., Kraume M. Does fouling in MBRs depend on SMP?. Desalination 2008, 231(1-3):141-149.
6. Dubois M., Gilles K.A., Hamilton J.K., Rebers P.A., Smith F. Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Anal. Chem. 1956, 28(3):350-356.
7. Ebie K., Li F., Azuma Y., Yuasa A., Hagishita T. Pore distribution effect of activated carbon in adsorbing organic micropollutants from natural water. Water Res. 2001, 35(1):167-179.
8. Guo W., Vigneswaran S., Ngo H.H., Xing W., Goteti P. Comparison of the performance of submerged membrane bioreactor (SMBR) and submerged membrane adsorption bioreactor (SMABR). Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99(5):1012-1017.
9. Jamal Khan S., Visvanathan C., Jegatheesan V. Effect of powdered activated carbon (PAC) and cationic polymer on biofouling mitigation in hybrid MBRs. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 113:165-168.
10. Janga N., Ren X., Kim G., Ahn C., Cho J., Kim I.S. Characteristics of soluble microbial products and extracellular polymeric substances in the membrane bioreactor for water reuse. Desalination 2007, 202(1-3):90-98.
11. Johir M.A.H., Vigneswaran S., Sathasivan A., Kandasamy J., Chang C.Y. Effect of organic loading rate on organic matter and foulant characteristics in membrane bio-reactor. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 113:154-160.
12. Laspidou C.S., Rittmann B.E. A unified theory for extracellular polymeric substances, soluble microbial products, and active and inert biomass. Water Res. 2002, 36(11):2711-2720.
13. Le-Clech P., Chen V., Fane T.A.G. Fouling in membrane bioreactors used in wastewater treatment. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 284(1-2):17-53.
14. Li L., Zhu W., Zhang P., Zhang Q., Zhang Z. AC/O3-BAC processes for removing refractory and hazardous pollutants in raw water. J. Hazard. Mater. 2006, 135(1-3):129-133.
15. Liu Y., Wang L., Wang B., Cui H., Zhang J. Performance improvement of hybrid membrane bioreactor with PAC addition for water reuse. Water Sci. Technol. 2005, 52(10-11):383-391.
16. Lowry O.H., Rosebrough N.J., Farr A.L., Randall R.J. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J. Biol. Chem. 1951, 193(1):265-275.
17. Ma C., Yu S., Shi W., Tian W., Heijman S.G.J., Rietveld L.C. High concentration powdered activated carbon-membrane bioreactor (PAC-MBR) for slightly polluted surface water treatment at low temperature. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 113:136-142.
18. Ma C., Yu S., Shi W., Heijman S.G.J., Rietveld L.C. Effect of different temperatures on performance and membrane fouling in high concentration PAC-MBR system treating micro-polluted surface water. Bioresour. Technol. 2013, 141:19-24.
19. Malamis S., Andreadakis A. Fractionation of proteins and carbohydrates of extracellular polymeric substances in a membrane bioreactor system. Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 100(13):3350-3357.
20. Ng C.A., Sun D., Fane A.G. Operation of membrane bioreactor with powdered activated carbon addition. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2006, 41(7):1447-1466.
21. Ng C.A., Sun D., Bashir M.J.K., Wai S.H., Wong L.Y., Nisar H., Wu B., Fane A.G. Optimization of membrane bioreactors by the addition of powdered activated carbon. Bioresour. Technol. 2013, 138:38-47.
22. Nielsen P.H., Jahn A., Palmgren R. Conceptual model for production and composition of exopolymers in biofilms. Water Sci. Technol. 1997, 36(1):11-19.
23. Oh H.K., Takizawa S., Ohgaki S., Katayama H., Oguma K., Yu M.J. Removal of organics and viruses using hybrid ceramic MF system without draining PAC. Desalination 2007, 202(1-3):191-198.
24. Pan Z.-H., Tian J.-Y., Xu G.-R., Li J.-J., Li G.-B. Characteristics of adsorbents made from biological, chemical and hybrid sludges and their effect on organics removal in wastewater treatment. Water Res. 2011, 45(2):819-827.
25. Remy M., Potier V., Temmink H., Rulkens W. Why low powdered activated carbon addition reduces membrane fouling in MBRs. Water Res. 2010, 44(3):861-867.
26. Rosenberger S., Laabs C., Lesjean B., Gnirss R., Amy G., Jekel M., Schrotter J.C. Impact of colloidal and soluble organic material on membrane performance in membrane bioreactors for municipal wastewater treatment. Water Res. 2006, 40(4):710-720.
27. Sagbo O., Sun Y., Hao A., Gu P. Effect of PAC addition on MBR process for drinking water treatment. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2008, 58(3):320-327.
28. Thuy Q.T.T., Visvanathan C. Removal of inhibitory phenolic compounds by biological activated carbon coupled membrane bioreactor. Water Sci. Technol. 2006, 53:89-97.
29. Tian J.-Y., Liang H., Yang Y.-L., Tian S., Li G.-B. Membrane adsorption bioreactor (MABR) for treating slightly polluted surface water supplies: as compared to membrane bioreactor (MBR). J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 325(1):262-270.
30. Tian J.-Y., Chen Z.-L., Yang Y.-L., Liang H., Nan J., Wang Z.-Z., Li G.-B. Hybrid process of BAC and sMBR for treating polluted raw water. Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 100(24):6243-6249.
31. Tian J.-Y., Chen Z.-L., Nan J., Liang H., Li G.-B. Integrative membrane coagulation adsorption bioreactor (MCABR) for enhanced organic matter removal in drinking water treatment. J. Membr. Sci. 2010, 352(1-2):205-212.
32. Wu S.C., Lee C.M. Correlation between fouling propensity of soluble extracellular polymeric substances and sludge metabolic activity altered by different starvation conditions. Bioresour. Technol. 2011, 102(9):5375-5380.
33. 3-BAC process. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2007, 57(2):348-355.
34. Ying Z., Ping G. Effect of powdered activated carbon dosage on retarding membrane fouling in MBR. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2006, 52(1):154-160.