High concentration powdered activated carbon-membrane bioreactor (PAC-MBR) for slightly polluted surface water treatment at low temperature

Bioresource Technology

Volumn 113, Issue , 2012, Pages 136-142

  Ma, Cong ^b,c   Yu, Shuili ^a,b   Shi, Wenxin ^b   Tian, Wende ^b,c   Heijman, S G J ^c   Rietveld, L C ^c  

^a TONGJI UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b HARBIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^c DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Low temperature; MBR; Membrane fouling; PAC; Slightly polluted surface water

Indexed keywords

AMMONIA NITROGEN; BIOLOGICAL CARRIERS; DISSOLVED ORGANIC CARBON; EFFLUENT QUALITY; HIGH CONCENTRATION; LOW TEMPERATURES; MBR; OPTIMAL DOSAGE; PAC; PERFORMANCE EFFICIENCY; REMOVAL EFFICIENCIES; SHOCK LOAD;

ACTIVATED CARBON; MEMBRANE FOULING; SURFACE WATERS; WATER QUALITY;

TEMPERATURE;

AMMONIA; NITROGEN; ORGANIC CARBON;

ACTIVATED CARBON; BIOFILTRATION; BIOREACTOR; DISSOLVED ORGANIC CARBON; LOW TEMPERATURE; MEMBRANE; NITRIFICATION; SURFACE WATER; ULTRAVIOLET RADIATION; WASTE TREATMENT; WATER POLLUTION;

ARTICLE; BIOREACTOR; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); EFFLUENT; FOULING CONTROL; LOW TEMPERATURE; NITRIFICATION; POWDERED ACTIVATE CARBON MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PRODUCTIVITY; ULTRAVIOLET RADIATION; WASTE COMPONENT REMOVAL; WATER POLLUTION; WATER TREATMENT;

BIOREACTORS; CARBON; COLD TEMPERATURE; MEMBRANES, ARTIFICIAL; POWDERS; SPECTROPHOTOMETRY, ULTRAVIOLET; WATER POLLUTANTS, CHEMICAL;

EID: 84860243302     PISSN: 09608524     EISSN: 18732976     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.02.007     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Aktas O., Cecen F. Addition of activated carbon to batch activated sludge reactors in the treatment of landfill leachate and domestic wastewater. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2001, 76(8):793-802.
2. Clara M., Kreuzinger N., Strenn B., Gans O., Kroiss H. The solids retention time-a suitable design parameter to evaluate the capacity of wastewater treatment plants to remove micropollutants. Water Res. 2005, 39(1):97-106.
3. Clesscerl L.S., Greenberg A.E., Eaton A.D. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater 1998, American Public Health Association/American Water Works Association/Water Environment Federation, Washington DC, USA. 20th ed.
4. Damayanti A., Ujang Z., Salim M.R. The influenced of PAC, zeolite, and Moringa oleifera as biofouling reducer (BFR) on hybrid membrane bioreactor of palm oil mill effluent (POME). Bioresour. Technol. 2011, 102(6):4341-4346.
5. Howell J.A. Sub-critical flux operation of microfiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 1995, 107(1-2):165-171.
6. Kim H.-S., Katayama H., Takizawa S., Ohgaki S. Development of a microfilter separation system coupled with a high dose of powdered activated carbon for advanced water treatment. Desalination 2005, 186(1-3):215-226.
7. Kim H.-S., Takizawa S., Ohgaki S. Application of microfiltration systems coupled with powdered activated carbon to river water treatment. Desalination 2007, 202(1-3):271-277.
8. Kitis M., Karanfil T., Wigton A., Kilduff J.E. Probing reactivity of dissolved organic matter for disinfection by-product formation using XAD-8 resin adsorption and ultrafiltration fractionation. Water Res. 2002, 36(15):3834-3848.
9. Le-Clech P., Chen V., Fane T.A.G. Fouling in membrane bioreactors used in wastewater treatment. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 284(1-2):17-53.
10. Le Clech P., Jefferson B., Chang I.S., Judd S.J. Critical flux determination by the flux-step method in a submerged membrane bioreactor. J. Membr. Sci. 2003, 227(1-2):81-93.
11. Li X., Hai F.I., Nghiem L.D. Simultaneous activated carbon adsorption within a membrane bioreactor for an enhanced micropollutant removal. Bioresour. Technol. 2011, 102(9):5319-5324.
12. Li X.Y., Chu H.P. Membrane bioreactor for the drinking water treatment of polluted surface water supplies. Water Res. 2003, 37(19):4781-4791.
13. Martinez-Sosa D., Helmreich B., Netter T., Paris S., Bischof F., Horn H. Anaerobic submerged membrane bioreactor (AnSMBR) for municipal wastewater treatment under mesophilic and psychrophilic temperature conditions. Bioresour. Technol. 2011, 102(22):10377-10385.
14. Morin P., Camper A.K. Attachment and fate of carbon fines in simulated drinking water distribution system biofilms. Water Res. 1997, 31(3):399-410.
15. Munz G., Gori R., Mori G., Lubello C. Powdered activated carbon and membrane bioreactors (MBRPAC) for tannery wastewater treatment: long term effect on biological and filtration process performances. Desalination 2007, 207(1-3):349-360.
16. Nagaoka H., Ueda S., Miya A. Influence of bacterial extracellular polymers on the membrane separation activated sludge process. Water Sci. Technol. 1996, 34(9):165-172.
17. Nagaoka H., Yamanishi S., Miya A. Modeling of biofouling by extracellular polymers in a membrane separation activated sludge system. Water Sci. Technol. 1998, 38(4-5):497-504.
18. Pirbazari M., Ravindran V., Badriyha B.N., Kim S.H. Hybrid membrane filtration process for leachate treatment. Water Res. 1996, 30(11):2691-2706.
19. Schwarz A.O., Rittmann B.E., Crawford G.V., Klein A.M., Daigger G.T. Critical review on the effects of mixed liquor suspended solids on membrane bioreactor operation. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2006, 41(7):1489-1511.
20. Seo G., Takizawa S., Ohgaki S. Ammonia oxidation at low temperature in a high concentration powdered activated carbon membrane bioreactor. Water Sci. Technol. 2002, 2(2):169-176.
21. Seo G.T., Moon C.D., Chang S.W., Lee S.H. Long term operation of high concentration powdered activated carbon membrane bio-reactor for advanced water treatment. Water Sci. Technol. 2004, 50(8):81-87.
22. Serrano D., Suárez S., Lema J.M., Omil F. Removal of persistent pharmaceutical micropollutants from sewage by addition of PAC in a sequential membrane bioreactor. Water Res. 2011, 45(16):5323-5333.
23. Sundaresan N., Philip L. Performance evaluation of various aerobic biological systems for the treatment of domestic wastewater at low temperatures. Water Sci. Technol. 2008, 58:819-830.
24. Thuy Q.T.T., Visvanathan C. Removal of inhibitory phenolic compounds by biological activated carbon coupled membrane bioreactor. Water Sci. Technol. 2006, 53:89-97.
25. Tian J.Y., Liang H., Yang Y.L., Tian S., Li G.B. Membrane adsorption bioreactor (MABR) for treating slightly polluted surface water supplies: as compared to membrane bioreactor (MBR). J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 325(1):262-270.
26. Tomaszewska M., Mozia S. Removal of organic matter from water by PAC/UF system. Water Res. 2002, 36(16):4137-4143.
27. Uemura S., Harada H. Treatment of sewage by a UASB reactor under moderate to low temperature conditions. Bioresour. Technol. 2000, 72(3):275-282.
28. Wang Z.S., Liu W.J. Micro-polluted Surface Water Treatment for Drinking Purpose 1999, China Architecture and Building Press, Beijing, pp. 47-49.
29. Williams M.D., Pirbazari M. Membrane bioreactor process for removing biodegradable organic matter from water. Water Res. 2007, 41(17):3880-3893.
30. Xia Q., Chen Y.Q., Wu S.Z., Guo X.Y., Liu J. The Guide for Chinese Surface Water Environment Standard 2000, Chinese Environmental Science Publishing.
31. Ying Z., Ping G. Effect of powdered activated carbon dosage on retarding membrane fouling in MBR. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2006, 52(1):154-160.
32. Yuan Q., Oleszkiewicz J.A. Low temperature biological phosphorus removal and partial nitrification in a pilot sequencing batch reactor system. Water Sci. Technol. 2011, 63(12):2802-2807.
33. Zhang X.J., Wang Z.S., Gu X.S. Simple combination of biodegradation and carbon adsorption-the mechanism of the biological activated carbon process. Water Res. 1991, 25(2):165-172.
34. Zilouei H., Soares A., Murto M., Guieysse B., Mattiasson B. Influence of temperature on process efficiency and microbial community response during the biological removal of chlorophenols in a packed-bed bioreactor. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2006, 72(3):591-599.