Connecting fractional anisotropy from medical images with mechanical anisotropy of a hyperviscoelastic fibre-reinforced constitutive model for brain tissue

Journal of the Royal Society Interface

Volumn 11, Issue 91, 2014, Pages

  Giordano, Chiara ^a   Kleiven, Svein ^a  

^a ROYAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Anisotropy; Brain tissue; Constitutive modelling; Fibre dispersion

Indexed keywords

ANISOTROPY; BRAIN; CONSTITUTIVE MODELS; DEFORMATION; DISPERSIONS; ELASTICITY; FIBERS; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; REINFORCEMENT; STRAIN; STRUCTURAL DESIGN; TENSORS;

BRAIN TISSUE; CONSTITUTIVE RELATIONS; DISPERSION PARAMETERS; FIBRE DISPERSIONS; FINITE-ELEMENT MODELS; FRACTIONAL ANISOTROPY; MAXIMUM PRINCIPAL STRAIN; MECHANICAL ANISOTROPY;

TISSUE;

ELEMENT; VISCOELASTIC SUBSTANCE;

ANISOTROPY; ARTICLE; BRAIN INJURY; BRAIN TISSUE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FRACTIONAL ANISOTROPY; SIMULATION; TENSILE STRENGTH; VALIDITY; VISCOELASTICITY; ALGORITHM; ANATOMIC MODEL; ANATOMY AND HISTOLOGY; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CORPUS CALLOSUM; DIFFUSION TENSOR IMAGING; ELASTICITY; FACTUAL DATABASE; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMAN; MECHANICAL STRESS; MOTION; PATHOLOGY; PROCEDURES; SHEAR STRENGTH; VISCOSITY;

ANISOTROPY; BRAIN TISSUE; CONSTITUTIVE MODELLING; FIBRE DISPERSION;

ALGORITHMS; ANISOTROPY; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CORPUS CALLOSUM; DATABASES, FACTUAL; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIFFUSION TENSOR IMAGING; ELASTICITY; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMANS; MODELS, ANATOMIC; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MOTION; SHEAR STRENGTH; STRESS, MECHANICAL; TENSILE STRENGTH; VISCOSITY;

EID: 84891897481     PISSN: 17425689     EISSN: 17425662     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2013.0914     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Miller K. 1999 Constitutive model of brain tissue suitable for finite element analysis of surgical procedures. J. Biomech. 32, 531-537. (doi:10.1016/S0021-9290(99)00010-X)
2. Takhounts EG, Crandall JR, Darvish K. 2003 On the importance of non-linearity of brain tissue under large deformations. Stapp Car Crash J. 47, 79-92.
3. Brands DWA, Peters GWM, Bovendeerd PHM. 2004 Design and numerical implementation of a 3-D non-linear viscoelastic constitutive model for brain tissue during impact. J. Biomech. 37, 127-134. (doi:10.1016/S0021-9290(03)00243- 4)
4. Deck C, Nicolle S, Willinger R. 2004 Human head FE modeling: improvement of skull geometry and brain constitutive laws. In Proc. 2004 Int. IRCOBI Conf. on the Biomechanics of Impact, Graz, Austria, 22-24 September 2004, pp. 79-92. Bron, France: International Research Council on the Biomechanics of Impact.
5. Kleiven S. 2007 Predictors for traumatic brain injuries evaluated through accident reconstructions. Stapp Car Crash J. 51, 81-114.
6. Cheng S, Bilston L. 2007 Unconfined compression of white matter. J. Biomech. 40, 117-124. (doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.11.004)
7. Pervin F, Chen WW. 2009 Dynamic mechanical response of bovine gray matter and white matter brain tissues under compression. J. Biomech. 42, 731-735. (doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.01.023)
8. Libertiaux V, Pascon F. 2012 Differential versus integral formulation of fractional hyper-viscoelastic constitutive laws for brain tissue modelling. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 234, 2029-2035. (doi:10.1016/j.cam.2009.08.060)
9. Prange MT, Margulies SS. 2002 Regional, directional and age-dependent properties of the brain undergoing large deformation. J. Biomech. Eng. Trans. ASME 124, 244-252. (doi:10.1115/1.1449907)
10. Velardi F, Fraternali F, Angelillo M. 2006 Anisotropic constitutive equations and experimental tensile behavior of brain tissue. Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol. 5, 53-61. (doi:10.1007/s10237-005-0007-9)
11. Nicolle S, Lounis M, Willinger R, Palierne J. 2005 Shear linear behavior of brain tissue over a large frequency range. Biorheology 42, 209-223.
12. Bilston L. 2011 Brain tissue mechanical properties. In Biomechanics of the brain (ed. K Miller), ch. 4, pp. 69-89. New York, NY: Springer.
13. Cloots R, Gervaise HMT, Van Dommelen JAW, Geers MGD. 2008 Biomechanics of traumatic brain injury: influences of the morphologic heterogeneities of the cerebral cortex. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 36, 1203-1215. (doi:10.1007/s10439-008-9510- 3)
14. Miller K, Chinzei K. 2002 Mechanical properties of brain tissue in tension. J. Biomech. 35, 483-490. (doi:10.1016/S0021-9290(01)00234-2)
15. Tamura A, Hayashi S, Watanabe I, Nagayama K, Matsumoto T. 2007 Mechanical characterization of brain tissue in high-rate compression. J. Biomech. Sci. Eng. 2, 115-126. (doi:10.1299/jbse.2.115)
16. Hrapko M, Van Dommelen JAW, Peters GWM, Wismans JSHM. 2006 The mechanical behaviour of brain tissue: large strain response and constitutive modelling. Biorheology 43, 623-636.
17. Shuck L, Advani S. 1972 Rheological response of human brain tissue in shear. J. Basic Eng. 94, 905-911. (doi:10.1115/1.3425588)
18. Zhang LY, Yang KH, King AI. 2001 Comparison of brain responses between frontal and lateral impacts by finite element modeling. J. Neurotrauma 18, 21-30. (doi:10.1089/089771501750055749)
19. Darvish KK, Crandall J. 2001 Non-linear viscoelastic effects in oscillatory shear deformation of brain tissue. Med. Eng. Phys. 23, 633-645. (doi:10.1016/S1350-4533(01)00101-1)
20. Ning X, Zhu Q, Lanir Y, Margulies SS. 2006 A transversely isotropic viscoelastic constitutive equation for brainstem undergoing finite deformation. J. Biomech. Eng. 128, 925-933. (doi:10.1115/1.2354208)
21. Hrapko M, Van Dommelen JAW, Peters GWM, Wismans JSHM. 2008 The influence of test conditions on characterization of the mechanical properties of brain tissue. J. Biomech. Eng. 130. (doi:10.1115/1.2907746)
22. van Dommelen J, van der Sande T, Hrapko M, Peters G. 2010 Mechanical properties of brain tissue by indentation: interregional variation. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 3, 158-166. (doi:10.1016/j.jmbbm.2009.09.001)
23. Bain AC, Meaney DF. 2000 Tissue-level thresholds for axonal damage in an experimental model of central nervous system white matter injury. J. Biomech. Eng. 122, 615-622. (doi:10.1115/1.1324667)
24. Smith D, Meaney D. 2000 Axonal damage in traumatic brain injury. Neuroscientist 6, 483-495. (doi:10.1177/107385840000600611)
25. Bain A, Raghupathi R, Meaney D. 2001 Dynamic stretch correlates to both morphological abnormalities and electrophysiological impairment in a model of traumatic axonal injury. J. Neurotrauma 18, 499-511. (doi:10.1089/ 089771501300227305)
26. Elkin B, Morrison B. 2007 Region-specific tolerance criteria for the living brain. Stapp Car Crash J. 51, 127-138.
27. El Sayed T, Mota A, Fraternali F, Ortiz M. 2008 A variational constitutive model for soft biological tissues. J. Biomech. 41, 1458-1466. (doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.02.023)
28. Cloots R, Van Dommelen JAW, Kleiven S, Geers MGD. 2013 Multi-scale mechanics of traumatic brain injury: predicting axonal strains from head loads. Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol. 12, 137-150. (doi:10.1007/s10237-012-0387-6)
29. Gasser TC, Ogden RW, Holzapfel GA. 2006 Hyperelastic modelling of arterial layers with distributed collagen fibre orientations. J. R. Soc. Interface 3, 15-35. (doi:10.1098/rsif.2005.0073)
30. Cloots R, Nyberg T, Kleiven S, Van Dommelen JAW, Geers MGD. 2011 Micromechanics of diffuse axonal injury: influence of axonal orientation and anisotropy. Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol. 10, 413-422. (doi:10.1007/s10237-010- 0243-5)
31. Mori S, Zhang J. 2006 Principle of diffusion tensor imaging and its applications to basic neuroscience research. Neuron 51, 527-539. (doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2006.08.012)
32. Nolte J. 2002 The human brain: an introduction to its functional anatomy, 5th edn. St Louis, MO: Mosby Inc.
33. Arbogast KB, Margulies SS. 1999 A fiber-reinforced composite model of the viscoelastic behavior of the brainstem in shear. J. Biomech. 32, 865-870. (doi:10.1016/S0021-9290(99)00042-1)
34. Colgan NC, Gilchrist M, Curran K. 2010 Applying DTI white matter orientations to finite element head models to examine diffuse TBI under high rotational accelerations. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 103, 304-309. (doi:10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2010.09.008)
35. Chatelin S, Deck C, Willinger R. In press. An anisotropic viscous hyperelastic constitutive law for brain material finite-element modeling. J. Biorehol. (doi:10.1007/s12573-012-0055-6)
36. Wright RM, Ramesh KT. 2012 An axonal strain injury criterion for traumatic brain injury. Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol. 11, 245-260. (doi:10.1007/s10237-011-0307-1)
37. Sorensen AG et al. 1999 Human acute cerebral ischemia: detection of changes in water diffusion anistropy by using MR imaging. Radiology 212, 785-792. (doi:10.1148/radiology.212.3.r99se24785)
38. Cercignani M, Inglese M, Pagani E, Comi G, Filippi M. 2001 Mean diffusivity and fractional anisotropy histograms of patients with multiple sclerosis. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 22, 952-958.
39. Gefen A, Margulies S. 2004 Are in vivo and in situ brain tissues mechanically similar? J. Biomech. 37, 1339-1352. (doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2003. 12.032)
40. Franceschini G. 2006 The mechanics of human brain tissue. PhD thesis, University of Trento, Trento, Italy.
41. Bozzali M, Falini A, Franceschi M, Cercignani M, Zuff M, Scotti G, Comi G, Filippi M. 2002 White matter damage in Alzheimer's disease assessed in vivo using diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 72, 742-746. (doi:10.1136/jnnp.72.6.742)
42. Lee C, Danielian L, Thomasson D, Baker E. 2009 Normal regional fractional anisotropy and apparent diffusion coefficient of the brain measured on a 3T MR scanner. Neuroradiology 51, 3-9. (doi:10.1007/s00234-008-0441-3)
43. Hardy W, Foster C, Mason M, Yang K, King A, Tashman S. 2001 Investigation of head injury mechanisms using neutral density technology and high-speed biplanar X-ray. Stapp Car Crash J. 45, 337-368.
44. Hrapko M, Van Dommelen JAW, Peters GWM, Wismans JSHM. 2009 On the consequences of non-linear constitutive modelling of brain tissue for injury prediction with numerical head models. Int. J. Crashworthiness 14, 245-257. (doi:10.1080/13588260802440290)