Critical exponents and equation of state of the three-dimensional Heisenberg universality class

Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics

Volumn 65, Issue 14, 2002, Pages 1-21

  Campostrini, Massimo ^a   Hasenbusch, Martin ^b   Pelissetto, Andrea ^c   Rossi, Paolo ^a   Vicari, Ettore ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PISA   (Italy)

^b DESY   (Germany)

^c INFN SEZIONE DI ROMA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84891799250     PISSN: 10980121     EISSN: 1550235X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.65.144520     Document Type: Article

References (144)

1. The isotropic Heisenberg model is a simplified model, and neglects several interactions that are present in real materials. Among them, we should mention the cubic anisotropies due to the lattice structure and the dipolar interactions. Even if, in the renormalization-group language, these effects are relevant perturbations of the Heisenberg fixed point (see Refs. 115116117118), the critical exponents are so close to those of the Heisenberg universality class that the difference is experimentally very difficult to observe, see, e.g., Refs. 119, 118, 120, and 56, and references therein.
2. M. Shaham, J. Barak, U. El-Hanany, and W.W. Warren, Jr., Phys. Rev. B 22, 5400 (1980).
3. M.A. Kobeissi, Phys. Rev. B 24, 2380 (1981).
4. M. Seeger, S.N. Kaul, H. Kronmüller, and R. Reisser, Phys. Rev. B 51, 12 585 (1995).
5. R. Reisser, R.K. Kremer, and A. Simon, Phys. Rev. B 52, 3546 (1995).
6. J.H. Zhao, H.P. Kunkel, X.Z. Zhou, G. Williams, and M.A. Subramanian, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 219 (1999).
7. S.G. Barsov, A.L. Getalov, V.P. Koptev, S.A. Kotov, S.M. Mikirtychyants, G.V. Shcherbatov, A.A. Arsenov, and Ya.M. Mukovskii, Physica B 289-290, 81 (2000).
8. J.H. Zhao, T. Song, H.P. Kunkel, X.Z. Zhou, R.M. Roshko, and G. Williams, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 12, 6903 (2000).
9. C.S. Arnold and D.P. Pappas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 5202 (2000).
10. J. Mira, J. Rivas, A. Butera, L.B. Steren, J.M. García-Beneytez, and M. Vázquez, J. Appl. Phys. 87, 5911 (2000).
11. C. Bührer, M. Bechmann, M. Fähnle, U. Grünewald, and K. Maier, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 212, 211 (2000).
12. T. Brückel, D. Hupfeld, J. Strempfer, W. Caliebe, K. Mettenberger, A. Stunault, N. Bernhoeft, and G.J. McIntyre, Eur. Phys. J. B 19, 475 (2001).
13. F.Y. Yang, C.L. Chien, X.W. Li, G. Xiao, and A. Gupta, Phys. Rev. B 63, 092403 (2001).
14. C.S. Hong, W.S. Kim, and N.H. Hur, Phys. Rev. B 63, 092504 (2001).
15. For some dopings and some divalent cation A, a first-order transition has been observed. Moreover, in systems in which the transition appears to be of second order, mean-field critical exponents have been measured. For instance, for (formula presented), a mean-field value for β was observed in Refs. 121122123, while an estimate compatible with the Heisenberg value was found in Refs. 124125126127. For (formula presented) there also exists (Ref. 94) an estimate of the exponent α, (formula presented), in agreement with the Heisenberg value.
16. In order to observe the correct exponents, it is essential to consider corrections to scaling in the analysis of the experimental data (Ref. 24). All results reported in Table II, except those of Ref. 21, have been obtained by assuming scaling corrections of the form (formula presented), with (formula presented) and (formula presented). Two observations are in order here. First, the results of the present paper provide a precise estimate of (formula presented) (formula presented). Second, the renormalization group also predicts corrections of order (formula presented) (formula presented), etc. which are more relevant than the term (formula presented), and should therefore be taken into account in the analysis of the data.
17. S.N. Kaul and M. Sambasiva Rao, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 6, 7403 (1994).
18. M. Sambasiva Rao and S.N. Kaul, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 140-144, 1567 (1995).
19. M. Sambasiva Rao and S.N. Kaul, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 147, 149 (1995).
20. P.D. Babu and S.N. Kaul, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 9, 7189 (1997).
21. M.R. Said, Y.A. Hamam, I. Abu-Alyarayesh, and S. Mahmood, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 195, 679 (1999).
22. A. Perumal, V. Srinivas, V.V. Rao, and R.A. Dunlap, Physica B 292, 164 (2000).
23. A. Perumal, V. Srinivas, K.S. Kim, S.C. Yu, V.V. Rao, and R.A. Dunlap, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 233, 280 (2001).
24. S.N. Kaul, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 53, 5 (1985).
25. A. Pelissetto and E. Vicari, Phys. Rev. B 62, 6393 (2000).
26. S.N. Kaul, Phys. Rev. B 38, 9178 (1988).
27. O. Källbäck, S.G. Humble, and G. Malmström, Phys. Rev. B 24, 5214 (1981).
28. B. Stroka, J. Wosnitza, E. Scheer, H. von Löhneysen, W. Park, and K. Fischer, Z. Phys. B: Condens. Matter 89, 39 (1992).
29. M. Marinelli, F. Mercuri, S. Foglietta, and D.P. Belanger, Phys. Rev. B 54, 4087 (1996).
30. H.G. Ballesteros, L.A. Fernández, V. Martín-Mayor, and A. Muñoz Sudupe, Phys. Lett. B 441, 330 (1998).
31. H.G. Ballesteros, L.A. Fernández, V. Martín-Mayor, A. Muñoz Sudupe, G. Parisi, and J.J. Ruiz-Lorenzo, J. Phys. A 32, 1 (1999).
32. M. Hasenbusch, K. Pinn, and S. Vinti, Phys. Rev. B 59, 11 471 (1999).
33. M. Hasenbusch, J. Phys. A 32, 4851 (1999).
34. M. Hasenbusch and T. Török, J. Phys. A 32, 6361 (1999).
35. M. Hasenbusch, Habilitationsschrift, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 1999;
36. Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 12, 911 (2001).
37. M. Campostrini, M. Hasenbusch, A. Pelissetto, P. Rossi, and E. Vicari, Phys. Rev. B 63, 214503 (2001).
38. M. Hasenbusch, J. Phys. A 34, 8221 (2001).
39. M. Campostrini, A. Pelissetto, P. Rossi, and E. Vicari, Phys. Rev. E 60, 3526 (1999).
40. M. Campostrini, A. Pelissetto, P. Rossi, and E. Vicari, Phys. Rev. B 61, 5905 (2000).
41. P. Butera and M. Comi, Phys. Rev. B 56, 8212 (1997).
42. A.A. Caparica, A. Bunker, and D.P. Landau, Phys. Rev. B 62, 9458 (2000).
43. H.G. Ballesteros, L.A. Fernández, V. Martín-Mayor, and A. Muñoz Sudupe, Phys. Lett. B 387, 125 (1996).
44. C. Holm and W. Janke, Phys. Rev. B 48, 936 (1993);
45. C. Holm, W. JankePhys. Lett. A 173, 8 (1993);
46. C. Holm, W. JankeJ. Appl. Phys. 73, 5488 (1993).
47. P. Peczak, A.M. Ferrenberg, and D.P. Landau, Phys. Rev. B 43, 6087 (1991).
48. J. Adler, C. Holm, and W. Janke, Physica A 201, 581 (1993).
49. F. Jasch and H. Kleinert, J. Math. Phys. 42, 52 (2001).
50. R. Guida and J. Zinn-Justin, J. Phys. A 31, 8103 (1998).
51. D. B. Murray and B. G. Nickel, Guelph University report, 1991 (unpublished).
52. J.C. Le Guillou and J. Zinn-Justin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 39, 95 (1977);
53. J.C. Le Guillou, J. Zinn-JustinPhys. Rev. B 21, 3976 (1980).
54. V.I. Yukalov and S. Gluzman, Phys. Rev. E 58, 1359 (1998).
55. H. Kleinert, Phys. Lett. A 264, 357 (2000).
56. K.E. Newman and E.K. Riedel, Phys. Rev. B 30, 6615 (1984).
57. O. Bohr, B.-J. Schaefer, and J. Wambach, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 16, 3823 (2001).
58. G.v. Gersdorff and C. Wetterich, Phys. Rev. B 64, 054513 (2001).
59. J. Berges, N. Tetradis, and C. Wetterich, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 873 (1996).
60. A. Pelissetto and E. Vicari, (unpublished).
61. Recently, a model with competing superexchange and double-exchange interactions was studied (Ref. 128). A preliminary analysis for the paramagnetic-ferromagnetic transition gives (formula presented) and (formula presented). While (formula presented) is reasonable agreement with the Heisenberg value, (formula presented) is significantly higher, so that the identification of this transition as a Heisenberg one is in doubt.
62. G.A. Baker, Jr., B.G. Nickel, M.S. Green, and D.I. Meiron, Phys. Rev. Lett. 36, 1351 (1977);
63. G.A. Baker, Jr., B.G. Nickel, and D.I. Meiron, Phys. Rev. B 17, 1365 (1978).
64. K.G. Chetyrkin, S.G. Gorishny, S.A. Larin, and F.V. Tkachov, Phys. Lett. B 132, 351 (1983).
65. H. Kleinert, J. Neu, V. Schulte-Frohlinde, K.G. Chetyrkin, and S.A. Larin, Phys. Lett. B 272, 39 (1991);
66. Phys. Lett. BH. Kleinert, J. Neu, V. Schulte-Frohlinde, K.G. Chetyrkin, S.A. Larin319, 545(E) (1993).
67. S. Hikami and E. Brézin, J. Phys. A 11, 1141 (1978).
68. S. Hikami, Nucl. Phys. B 215, 555 (1983).
69. W. Bernreuther and F.J. Wegner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 1383 (1986).
70. J. Berges, N. Tetradis, and C. Wetterich, (unpublished).
71. P. Butera and M. Comi, Phys. Rev. B 60, 6749 (1999).
72. I.M. Mryglod, I.P. Omelyan, and R. Folk, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 3156 (2001).
73. In the so-called critical-point renormalization method (see Ref. 129, and references therein), given two series (formula presented) and (formula presented) that are singular at the same point (formula presented) (formula presented) and (formula presented), one constructs a series (formula presented). The function (formula presented) is singular at (formula presented), and for (formula presented) behaves as (formula presented), where (formula presented). Therefore, the difference (formula presented) can be obtained by analyzing the expansion of (formula presented) by means of biased approximants with a singularity at (formula presented).
74. E. Brézin and D.J. Wallace, Phys. Rev. B 7, 1967 (1973).
75. E. Brézin and J. Zinn-Justin, Phys. Rev. B 14, 3110 (1976).
76. D.J. Wallace and R.P.K. Zia, Phys. Rev. B 12, 5340 (1975).
77. L. Schäfer and H. Horner, Z. Phys. B: Condens. Matter 29, 251 (1978).
78. I.D. Lawrie, J. Phys. A 14, 2489 (1981).
79. A. Pelissetto and E. Vicari, Nucl. Phys. B 540, 639 (1999).
80. M. Barmatz, P.C. Hohenberg, and A. Kornblit, Phys. Rev. B 12, 1947 (1975).
81. E. Brézin, D.J. Wallace, and K.G. Wilson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 29, 591 (1972);
82. E. Brézin, D.J. Wallace, K.G. WilsonPhys. Rev. B 7, 232 (1973).
83. R. Guida and J. Zinn-Justin, Nucl. Phys. B 489, 626 (1997).
84. M. Caselle, M. Hasenbusch, A. Pelissetto, and E. Vicari, J. Phys. A 34, 2923 (2001).
85. M. Campostrini, A. Pelissetto, P. Rossi, and E. Vicari, Phys. Rev. B 62, 5843 (2000).
86. J. Zinn-Justin, Quantum Field Theory and Critical Phenomena, 3rd ed. (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1996).
87. P. Butera and M. Comi, Phys. Rev. B 58, 11 552 (1998).
88. A. Pelissetto and E. Vicari, Nucl. Phys. B 575, 579 (2000).
89. A. Pelissetto and E. Vicari, Nucl. Phys. B 519, 626 (1998);
90. A. Pelissetto, E. VicariNucl. Phys. B (Proc. Suppl.) 73, 775 (1999).
91. T. Reisz, Phys. Lett. B 360, 77 (1995).
92. A.I. Sokolov, E.V. Orlov, V.A. Ul’kov, and S.S. Kashtanov, Phys. Rev. E 60, 1344 (1999).
93. A. Pelissetto and E. Vicari, Nucl. Phys. B 522, 605 (1998).
94. N. Tetradis and C. Wetterich, Nucl. Phys. B 422, 541 (1994).
95. P. Schofield, Phys. Rev. Lett. 22, 606 (1969).
96. P. Schofield, J.D. Lister, and J.T. Ho, Phys. Rev. Lett. 23, 1098 (1969).
97. B.D. Josephson, J. Phys. C 2, 1113 (1969).
98. In the HT phase (formula presented) (formula presented) where (formula presented) is analytic in the complex (formula presented) plane except possibly for two branch cuts on the imaginary axis, for (formula presented) (Yang-Lee theorem). Thus the convergence radius is at most (formula presented), where k is the normalization of z.
99. S.A. Larin, M. Mönnigmann, M. Strösser, and V. Dohm, Phys. Rev. B 58, 3394 (1998).
100. C. Bervillier, Phys. Rev. B 34, 8141 (1986).
101. H. Kleinert and B. Van den Bossche, Phys. Rev. E 63, 056113 (2001).
102. C.A. Ramos, H.R. Salva, R.D. Sanchez, M. Tovar, F. Rivadulla, J. Mira, J. Rivas, A.M. Lopez-Quintela, L. Hueso, M. Saint-Paul, P. Lejay, and Y. Tokura, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 226-230, 582 (2001).
103. R. Abe and M. Masutani, Prog. Theor. Phys. 59, 672 (1978).
104. M. Stroesser, S.A. Larin, and V. Dohm, Nucl. Phys. B 540, 654 (1999).
105. A. Aharony and P.C. Hohenberg, Phys. Rev. B 13, 3081 (1976).
106. C. Bagnuls and C. Bervillier, Phys. Rev. B 32, 7209 (1985).
107. C. Bervillier, Phys. Rev. B 14, 4964 (1976).
108. C. Bervillier and C. Godrèche, Phys. Rev. B 21, 5427 (1980).
109. The amplitudes B, (formula presented) and (formula presented) were determined in several experiments-see, e.g., Ref. 20-and thus an estimate of the ratio (formula presented) is possible. However, these amplitudes have large systematic uncertainties, and we can only obtain a rough estimate, (formula presented).
110. V. Privman, P. C. Hohenberg, and A. Aharony, in Phase Transitions and Critical Phenomena, edited by C. Domb and J.L. Lebowitz (Academic Press, New York, 1991), Vol. 14.
111. J.S. Kouvel and D.S. Rodbell, Phys. Rev. Lett. 18, 215 (1967).
112. S.F. Fischer, S.N. Kaul, and H. Kronmüller, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 226-230, 540 (2001).
113. A. Arrott and J.E. Noakes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 19, 786 (1967).
114. We have evaluated (formula presented) (the position of the maximum) from Fig. 4 of Ref. 6: (formula presented). The variable u defined in Sec. IV D is related to (formula presented) by (formula presented) Note that the (formula presented) can also be derived from a knowledge of the nonuniversal constants B, (formula presented) and (formula presented), and using the results of Sec. IV D. Indeed, (formula presented)Numerically, using the estimates reported in Sec. IV D, we have (formula presented) (formula presented), and (formula presented).
115. K. Binder, Z. Phys. B: Condens. Matter 43, 119 (1981);
116. K. BinderPhys. Rev. Lett. 47, 693 (1981).
117. M. Hasenbusch, Physica A 197, 423 (1993).
118. A.P. Gottlob and M. Hasenbusch, J. Stat. Phys. 77, 919 (1994).
119. M. Wortis, in Phase Transitions and Critical Phenomena, edited by C. Domb and M.S. Green (Academic Press, London, 1974), Vol. 3.
120. M. Lüscher and P. Weisz, Nucl. Phys. B 300, 325 (1988).
121. M. Campostrini, J. Stat. Phys. 103, 369 (2001).
122. For a review see, e.g., A.J. Guttmann, in Phase Transitions and Critical Phenomena, edited by C. Domb and J. Lebowitz (Academic, New York, 1989), Vol. 13.
123. M.E. Fisher, Philos. Mag. 7, 1731 (1962).
124. M.E. Fisher, Rev. Mod. Phys. 46, 597 (1974).
125. A. Aharony, in Phase Transitions and Critical Phenomena, edited by C. Domb and J. Lebowitz (Academic Press, New York, 1976), Vol. 6, p. 357.
126. A. Aharony and M.E. Fisher, Phys. Rev. B 8, 3323 (1973).
127. J.M. Carmona, A. Pelissetto, and E. Vicari, Phys. Rev. B 61, 15 136 (2000).
128. A.D. Bruce and A. Aharony, Phys. Rev. B 10, 2078 (1974).
129. S. Srinath, S.N. Kaul, and M.-K. Sostarich, Phys. Rev. B 62, 11 649 (2000).
130. S.E. Lofland, V. Ray, P.H. Kim, S.M. Bhagat, M.A. Manheimer, and S.D. Tyagi, Phys. Rev. B 55, 2749 (1997).
131. C.V. Mohan, M. Seeger, H. Kronmüller, P. Murugaraj, and J. Maier, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 83, 348 (1998).
132. A. Schwartz, M. Scheffler, and S.M. Anlage, Phys. Rev. B 61, R870 (2000).
133. M.C. Martin, G. Shirane, Y. Endoh, K. Hirota, Y. Moritomo, and Y. Tokura, Phys. Rev. B 53, 14 285 (1996).
134. R.H. Heffner, L.P. Le, M.F. Hundley, J.J. Neumeier, G.M. Luke, K. Kojima, B. Nachumi, Y.J. Uemura, D.E. MacLaughlin, and S.-W. Cheong, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 1869 (1996).
135. S.E. Lofland, S.M. Bhagat, K. Ghosh, R.L. Greene, S.G. Karabashev, D.A. Shulyatev, A.A. Arsenov, and Y. Mukovskii, Phys. Rev. B 56, 13 705 (1997).
136. K. Ghosh, C.J. Lobb, R.L. Greene, S.G. Karabashev, D.A. Shulyatev, A.A. Arsenov, and Y. Mukovskii, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 4740 (1998).
137. S.-H. Tsai and D.P. Landau, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 226-230, 650 (2001).
138. D.L. Hunter and G.A. Baker, Jr., Phys. Rev. B 7, 3346 (1973);
139. Phys. Rev. BD.L. Hunter, G.A. Baker, Jr.7, 3377 (1973);
140. D.L. Hunter, G.A. Baker, Jr.Phys. Rev. B 19, 3808 (1979);
141. M.E. Fisher and H. Au-Yang, J. Phys. A 12, 1677 (1979);
142. J. Phys. AM.E. Fisher, H. Au-Yang13, 1517(E) (1980);
143. J. Phys. AA.J. Guttmann and G.S. Joyce, 5, L81 (1972);
144. J. Phys. AJ.J. Rehr, A.J. Guttmann, and G.S. Joyce, 13, 1587 (1980).