Three-loop critical exponents, amplitude functions, and amplitude ratios from variational perturbation theory

Physical Review E - Statistical Physics, Plasmas, Fluids, and Related Interdisciplinary Topics

Volumn 63, Issue 5, 2001, Pages

  Kleinert, H ^a   Van den Bossche, B ^a,b  

^a Institut fuer Theoretische Physik der   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LIÈGE   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ASYMPTOTIC STABILITY; CORRELATION THEORY; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PERTURBATION TECHNIQUES;

BOREL RESUMMATION TECHNIQUES;

QUANTUM THEORY;

EID: 0035335674     PISSN: 1063651X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.63.056113     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. H. Kleinert, Path Integrals in Quantum Mechanics, Statistics and Polymer Physics (World Scientific, Singapore, 1995). Variational perturbation theory is developed in Chaps. 5 and 17.
2. H. Kleinert, Phys. Rev. D 57, 2264 (1998);
3. Phys. Rev. DH. Kleinert58, 107702(Addendum) (1998).
4. H. Kleinert, Phys. Rev. D 60, 085001 (1999).
5. F. Jasch and H. Kleinert, cond-mat/9906246.
6. H. Kleinert, Phys. Lett. B 434, 74 (1998);
7. Phys. Lett. BH. Kleinert463, 69 (1999).
8. H. Kleinert and V. Shulte-Frohlinde, cond-mat/9907214.
9. K. Wilson, Phys. Rev. B 4, 3174 (1971).
10. K. Wilson and M. Fisher, Phys. Rev. Lett. 28, 240 (1972);
11. Phys. Rev. Lett.K. Wilson, 28, 548 (1972).
12. E. Brézin, J. C. Le Guillou, and J. Zinn-Justin, in Phase Transition and Critical Phenomana, edited by C. Domb and M. S. Green (Academic Press, New York, 1976), Vol. 6, p. 125.
13. L. N. Lipatov, Leningrad Nuclear Physics Institute Report, 1976 (unpublished).
14. E. Brézin, J. C. Le Guillou, and J. Zinn-Justin, Phys. Rev. D 15, 1544 (1977);
15. Phys. Rev. DE. BrézinJ. C. Le GuillouJ. Zinn-Justin15, 1558 (1977).
16. J. Zinn-Justin, Quantum Field Theory and Critical Phenomena, Oxford Science Publications, 3rd ed. (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1996).
17. H. Kleinert and V. Schulte-Frohlinde, Critical Properties of(Formula presented) Theories (World Scientific, Singapore, 2001), http://www.physik.fu-berlin.de/∼kleinert/b8.
18. K. G. Chetyrkin, S. G. Gorishny, S. A. Larin, and F. V. Tkachov, Phys. Lett. 132B, 351 (1983).
19. H. Kleinert, J. Neu, V. Schulte-Frohlinde, K. G. Chetkyrin, and S. A. Larin, Phys. Lett. 272B, 39 (1991);
20. H. KleinertJ. NeuV. Schulte-FrohlindeK. G. ChetkyrinS. A. LarinPhys. Lett. 319B, 545(E) (1993).
21. D. I. Kazakov and D. V. Shirkov, Fortschr. Phys. 28, 465 (1980);
22. J. Zinn-Justin, Phys. Rep. 70, 3 (1981);
23. Phys. Rep.J. Zinn-Justin70, 109 (1981).
24. J. C. Le Guillou and J. Zinn-Justin, J. Phys. (France) Lett. 46, L137 (1985);
25. J. C. Le GuillouJ. Zinn-JustinJ. Phys. (Paris) 48, 19 (1987).
26. R. Guida and J. Zinn-Justin, J. Phys. A 31, 8103 (1998);
27. R. GuidaJ. Zinn-Justine-print cond-mat/9803240.
28. See also J. Zinn-Justin, e-print hep-th/0002136.
29. G. Parisi, J. Stat. Phys. 23, 49 (1980).
30. G. A. Baker, B. G. Nickel, M. S. Green, and D. I. Meiron, Phys. Rev. Lett. 36, 1351 (1976).
31. G. A. Baker, B. G. Nickel, and D. I. Meiron, Phys. Rev. B 17, 1365 (1978).
32. R. Guida and J. Zinn-Justin, Nucl. Phys. B 489, 626 (1997).
33. G. Münster and J. Heitger, Nucl. Phys. B 424, 582 (1994).
34. C. Gutsfeld, J. Kuüster, and G. Münster, Nucl. Phys. B 479, 654 (1996).
35. C. Bagnuls and C. Bervillier, Phys. Rev. B 32, 7209 (1985).
36. C. Bagnuls, C. Bervillier, D. I. Meiron, and B. G. Nickel, Phys. Rev. B 35, 3585 (1987).
37. P. C. Hohenberg, A. Aharony, B. I. Halperin, and E. D. Siggia, Phys. Rev. B 13, 2986 (1976).
38. C. Bervillier, Phys. Rev. B 14, 4964 (1976).
39. J. A. Lipa, D. R. Swanson, J. A. Nissen, T. C. P. Chui, and U. E. Israelsson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 944 (1996);
40. Phys. Rev. Lett.J. A. Lipa, D. R. Swanson, J. A. Nissen, Z. K. Geng, P. R. Williamson, D. A. Stricker, T. C. P. Chui, U. E. Israelsson, and M. Larson, 84, 4894 (2000). In the second paper, the value of (Formula presented) given in the first paper was corrected to (Formula presented)
41. The presence and origin of confluent singular terms have been first understood from renormalization group analysis by F. J. Wegner, Phys. Rev. B 5, 4529 (1972).
42. Phys. Rev. BFor a determination of the critical behavior of the first confluent singular term for the specific heat to the order (Formula presented), see M.-C. Chang and A. Houghton, 21, 1881 (1980) (The ratio of the leading amplitude ratio for the heat capacity is incorrect in this later reference, as it is in 27.
43. Phys. Rev. BFor the corrected value for (Formula presented), see 31, which also gives other various confluent terms and gives references to other wrong ratios in the literature. For the corrected value of (Formula presented) for all N, see C. Bervillier, 34, 8141 (1986), or Appendix C of Ref. 25.)
44. C. Bagnuls and C. Bervillier, Phys. Rev. B 24, 1226 (1981).
45. J. F. Nicoll and P. C. Albright, Phys. Rev. B 31, 4576 (1985).
46. G. M. Avdeeva and A. A. Migdal, Pis’ma Zh. Éksp. Teor. Fiz. 16, 253 (1972) [JETP Lett. 16, 178 (1972)];
47. E. Brézin, D. J. Wallace, and K. G. Wilson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 29, 591 (1972);
48. E. BrézinD. J. WallaceK. G. WilsonPhys. Rev. B 7, 232 (1972).
49. D. J. Wallace and R. K. P. Zia, Phys. Lett. 46A, 261 (1973);
50. D. J. WallaceR. K. P. ZiaJ. Phys. C 7, 3480 (1974).
51. C. Bervillier and M. Shpot, Phys. Rev. B 46, 955 (1992).
52. A. R. Rajantie, Nucl. Phys. B 480, 729 (1996);
53. Nucl. Phys. BA. R. Rajantie513, 761(Addendum) (1998).
54. V. Dohm, Z. Phys. B: Condens. Matter 60, 61 (1985).
55. R. Schloms and V. Dohm, Nucl. Phys. B 328, 639 (1989).
56. R. Schloms and V. Dohm, Phys. Rev. B 42, 6142 (1990);
57. Phys. Rev. BR. SchlomsV. Dohm46, 5883(Addendum) (1992).
58. See Chang and Houghton in Ref. 29.
59. F. J. Halfkann and V. Dohm, Z. Phys. B: Condens. Matter 89, 79 (1992).
60. S. A. Larin, M. Mönnigmann, M. Strösser, and V. Dohm, Phys. Rev. B 58, 3394 (1998).
61. M. Strösser, L. A. Larin, and V. Dohm, Nucl. Phys. B 540, 654 (1999).
62. B. Kastening, Phys. Rev. D 57, 3567 (1998).
63. J. C. Le Guillou and J. Zinn-Justin, Phys. Rev. B 21, 3976 (1985).
64. H. KLeinert and B. Van den Bossche (unpublished).
65. S. S. C. Burnett, M. Strösser and V. Dohm, Nucl. Phys. B 504, 665 (1997);
66. Nucl. Phys. BS. S. C. BurnettM. StrösserV. Dohm509, 729(Addendum) (1998).
67. J. S. Kang, Phys. Rev. D 13, 851 (1976).
68. H. Kleinert and B. Van den Bossche (unpublished).
69. H. Kleinert, Phys. Lett. B 463, 69 (1999).
70. Note that the calculation we do in this paper are based on the normalization of the coupling constant of Dohm and co-workers 424146 which differ from Kleinert’s 513. The difference in conventions disappears at the level of the exponents, and the value of (Formula presented) is only different by a factor 12, as mentioned after Eq. (11).
71. B. Li, N. Madras, and A. D. Sokal, J. Stat. Phys. 80, 661 (1995).
72. S. A. Antonenko and A. I. Sokolov, Phys. Rev. E 51, 1894 (1995).
73. M. E. Fisher, M. N. Barber, and D. Jasnow, Phys. Rev. A 8, 1111 (1973).
74. I. S. Gradshteyn and I. M. Ryzhik, Table of Integrals, Series and Products, 4th ed. (Academic Press, London, 1965).
75. H. J. Krause, R. Schloms, and V. Dohm, Z. Phys. B: Condens. Matter 79, 287 (1990);
76. Z. Phys. B: Condens. MatterH. J. KrauseR. SchlomsV. Dohm80, 313(Addendum) (1990).
77. V. Privman, P. C. Hohenberg and A. Aharony, in Phase Transition and Critical Phenomana, edited by C. Domb and J. L. Lebowitz (Academic Press, London, 1991), Vol. 14, p. 1, and references therein.
78. I. D. Lawrie, J. Phys. A 14, 2489 (1981).
79. H. Kleinert and B. Van den Bossche (unpublished).