Development and psychometric assessment of the function-neutral health-related quality of life measure

American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Volumn 93, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 56-74

  Krahn, Gloria L ^a,g   Horner Johnson, Willi ^a   Hall, Trevor A ^a   Roid, Gale H ^b   Andresen, Elena M ^c   Fujiura, Glenn T ^d   Nosek, Margaret A ^e   Cardinal, Bradley J ^f   Drum, Charles E ^a   Suzuki, Rie ^a   Peterson, Jana J ^a  

^a OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Warner Pacific College   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

^e BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^f OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^g NATIONAL CENTER ON BIRTH DEFECTS AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES   (United States)

Author keywords

Environment; Health status; Persons with disability; Quality of life; Questionnaires; Reliability; Validity

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONCEPT FORMATION; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MENTAL HEALTH; MIDDLE AGED; PILOT STUDY; PSYCHOMETRY; QUALITY OF LIFE; REPRODUCIBILITY; VERY ELDERLY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CONCEPT FORMATION; FACTOR ANALYSIS, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MENTAL HEALTH; MIDDLE AGED; PILOT PROJECTS; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUALITY OF LIFE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84891782500     PISSN: 08949115     EISSN: 15377385     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e3182a517e6     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Measuring Healthy Days. Atlanta, GA, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2000
2. Fayers P, Hays R (eds): Assessing Quality of Life in Clinical Trials: Methods and Practice, ed 2. New York, NY, Oxford University Press, 2005
3. Heidrich J, Liese AD, Lowel H, et al: Self-rated health and its relation to all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in southern Germany. Results from the MONICA Augsburg cohort study 1984-1995. Ann Epidemiol 2002;12:338-45
4. Idler EL, Russell LB, Davis D: Survival, functional limitations, and self-rated health in the NHANES I epidemiologic follow-up study, 1992. First National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Am J Epidemiol 2000;152:874-83
5. McHorney CA: Health status assessment methods for adults: Past accomplishments and future challenges. Annu Rev Public Health 1999;20:309-35
6. Garratt A, Schmidt L, Mackintosh A, et al: Quality of life measurement: Bibliographic study of patient assessed health outcome measures. BMJ 2002;324:1417-9
7. Burckhardt CS, Anderson KL: The Quality of Life Scale (QOLS): Reliability, validity, and utilization. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2003;1:60. doi:10.1186/1477-7525-1-60
8. Horsman J, Furlong W, Feeny D, et al: The Health Utilities Index (HUI): Concepts, measurement properties and applications. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2003;1:54
9. Hall T, Krahn GL, Horner-Johnson W, et al, and the RRTC Expert Panel on Health Measurement (2011): Examining functional content in widely used health related quality of life measures. Rehabil Psychol 2011;56:94-9
10. Wilson IB, Cleary PD: Linking clinical variables with health-related quality of life: A conceptual model of patient outcomes. JAMA 1995;273:59-65
11. Johnson RJ, Wolinsky FD: The structure of health status among older adults: Disease, disability, functional limitation, and perceived health. J Health Soc Behav 1993;34:105-21
12. Krahn GL, Fujiura G, Drum CE, et al: The dilemma of measuring perceived health status in the context of disability. Disabil Health J 2009;2:49-56
13. United States Department of Health and Human Services: The Surgeon General's Conference Report. Closing the Gap: ANational Blueprint to Improve the Health of Persons with Mental Retardation. Washington, DC, Office of the Surgeon General, USDHHS, 2002
14. United States Department of Health and Human Services: The Surgeon General's Call to Action to Improve the Health and Wellness of Persons with Disabilities. Washington, DC, Office of the Surgeon General, USDHHS, 2005
15. World Health Organization: International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Geneva, Switzerland, World Health Organization, 2001
16. CDC Public Health Grand Rounds. Where in health is disability? Public health practices to include people with disabilities. December 18, 2012. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/about/grand-rounds/archives/2012/December2012. htm. Accessed June 24, 2013
17. Whiteneck GG, Harrison-Felix CL, Mellick DC, et al: Quantifying environmental factors: A measure of physical, attitudinal, service, productivity, and policy barriers. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004;85:1324-35
18. Albrecht GL, Devlieger PJ: The disability paradox: High quality of life against all odds. Soc Sci Med 1999; 48:977-88
19. Drum CE, Horner-Johnson W, Krahn GL: Self-rated health and healthy days: Examining the Bdisability paradox[. Disabil Health J 2008;1:71-8
20. Helmes E: Function and disability or quality of life? Issues illustrated by the Osteoporosis Functional Disability Questionnaire (OFDQ). Qual Life Res 2000; 9(suppl 1):755-61
21. Feeny D, Furlong W, Boyle M, et al: Multi-attribute health status classification systems: Health Utilities Index. Pharmacoeconomics 1995;7:490-502
22. Ware JE, Sherbourne CD: The MOS 36-item Short- Form Health Survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992;30:473-83
23. Schwartz CE, Andresen EM, Nosek MA, et al: Response shift theory: Important implications for measuring quality of life in people with disability. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2007;88:529-36
24. Horner-Johnson W, Krahn GL, Suzuki R, et al: Differential performance of SF-36 items in healthy adults with and without functional limitations. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2010;91:570-5
25. Meyers AR, Andresen EM: Enabling our instruments: Accommodation, universal design, and access to participation in research. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000;81(suppl 2):S5-9
26. Andresen EM: Criteria for assessing the tools of disability outcomes research. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000;81(suppl 2):S15-20
27. Andresen EM, Meyers AR: Health-related quality of life outcomes measures. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000;81(suppl 2):S30-45
28. Tate DG, Kalpakjian CZ, Forchheimer MB: Quality of life issues in individuals with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002;83(suppl 2):S18-25
29. Dudley-Javoroski S, Shields RK: Assessment of physical function and secondary complications after complete spinal cord injury. Disabil Rehabil 2006;28:103-10
30. Froehlich-Grobe K, Andresen E, Caburnay C, et al: Measuring health-related quality of life for persons with mobility impairments: An enabled version of the Short- Form 36 (SF-36E). Qual Life Res 2008;17:751-70
31. Emery MP, Perrier LL, Acquadro C: Patient-Reported Outcome and Quality of Life Instruments Database (PROQOLID): Frequently asked questions. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2005;3:12
32. Preamble to the Constitution of the World Health Organization as adopted by the International Health Conference, New York, June 19-22, 1946; signed on July 22, 1946, by the representatives of 61 states (Official Records of the World Health Organization, no. 2, p. 100) and entered into force on April 7, 1948
33. Lawshe CH: A quantitative approach to content validity. Pers Psychol 1975;28:563-75
34. Moriarty DG, Zack MM, Kobau R: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Healthy Days measures V Population tracking of perceived physical and mental health over time. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2003;1:37. Available at: http://www.hqlo.com/content/1/1/37. Accessed June 24, 2013
35. Microsoft Word 2007 [computer program]. Redmond, WA, Microsoft Corporation, 2006
36. Hakel MD: How often is often? Am Psychol 1968; 23:533-4
37. Pohl NF: Scale considerations in using vague quantifiers. J Exp Educ 1981;49:235-40
38. Rapkin BD, Schwartz CE: Toward a theoretical model of quality-of-life appraisal: Implications of findings from studies of response shift. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2004;2:14
39. Statistics Canada: National Population Health Survey, Household Component. Cycle 6 (2004/2005), Questionnaire. Ottawa, Canada, Statistics Canada, 2006
40. SAS 9.12 for Windows [computer program]. Version 9.12. Cary, NC, SAS Institute Inc, 2004
41. Reynolds CR: Methods for detecting construct and predictive bias, in Berk RA (ed): Handbook of Methods for Detecting Test Bias. Baltimore, MD, Johns Hopkins University Press, 1982, p 199-227
42. Roid GH: Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scales, ed 5. Schaumburg, IL, Riverside, 2003
43. SPSS for Windows [computer program]. Version 16.0. Armonk, NY, SPSS Inc, 2008
44. National Center for Health Statistics: Disability Followback Survey (NHIS Phase II) Adult's Questionnaire. Atlanta, GA, CDC, 1995
45. Seekins T, Smith N, McCleary T, et al: Secondary disability prevention: Involving consumers in the development of a public health surveillance instrument. J Disabil Policy Stud 1990;1:21-36
46. Cahill A, Ravelsoot C: Consortium to evaluate the efficacy of health promotion interventions for people with disabilities, in American Association on Health and Disability (ed); Advancing Health Promotion for People with Disabilities on the Public Health Agenda: Proceedings. Rockville, MD, 2003, p 106. Available at: aahd.webchoices.us/site/static/proceedings/proceedings.pdf. Accessed Aug 19, 2013
47. Linacre JM: WINSTEPS Rasch measurement computer program [computer program]. Beaverton, OR, 2007
48. Jöreskog KG, Sörbom D, : LISREL 8.8 for Windows [computer program]. Lincolnwood, IL, Scientific Software International, Inc, 2006
49. Whiteneck G: Conceptual models of disability: Past, present, & future, in Field MJ, Jette AM, Martin L (eds): Workshop on Disability in America. Washington, DC, National Academics Press, 2005, p 50-66
50. Velozo CA, Seel RT, Magasi S, et al: Improving measurement methods in rehabilitation: Core concepts and recommendations for scale development. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2012;93:S154-63
51. Fujiura GT, for the RRTC Expert Panel on Health Measurement: Self-reported health of people with intellectual disabilities. Intellect Dev Disabil 2012;40:352-69
52. Kreitzberg CB, Stocking ML, Swanson L: Computerized adaptive testing: Principles and directions. Comput Educ 1978;2:319-29