Differential Performance of SF-36 Items in Healthy Adults With and Without Functional Limitations

Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Volumn 91, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 570-575

  Horner Johnson, Willi ^a   Krahn, Gloria L ^b   Suzuki, Rie ^c   Peterson, Jana J ^a   Roid, Gale ^d   Hall, Trevor ^e  

^a OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NATIONAL CENTER ON BIRTH DEFECTS AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN FLINT   (United States)

^d Northwest Neurobehavioral Health ^*

^e Northwest Neurobehavioral Health   (United States)

Author keywords

Bias; Disabled persons; Health surveys; Rehabilitation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BLINDNESS; DISABILITY; EMOTION; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL STATUS; HEALTH SURVEY; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HUMAN; MALE; MENTAL HEALTH; PHYSICAL PERFORMANCE; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; SHORT FORM 36; SPINAL CORD INJURY;

ADULT; BLINDNESS; DISABILITY EVALUATION; DISABLED PERSONS; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS; HEALTH SURVEYS; HEARING LOSS; HUMANS; MALE; MENTAL DISORDERS; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSICAL THERAPY MODALITIES; QUALITY OF LIFE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; SPINAL CORD INJURIES;

EID: 77950491739     PISSN: 00039993     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.12.015     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Leduc B.E., and Lepage Y. Health-related quality of life after spinal cord injury. Disabil Rehabil 24 (2002) 196-202
2. Hall T. Review of existing measures. Proceedings of the State of the Science: Health, Wellness and Disability; Portland, OR; 2008.
3. Hays R., Hahn H., and Marshall G. Use of the SF-36 and other health-related quality of life measures to assess persons with disabilities. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 83 Suppl 2 (2002) S4-S9
4. Meyers A.R., and Andresen E.M. Enabling our instruments: accommodation, universal design, and access to participation in research. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 81 12 Suppl 2 (2000) S5-S9
5. W.H.O. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (2001), World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
6. USDHHS. The Surgeon General's call to action to improve the health and wellness of persons with disabilities (2005), US Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Surgeon General, Washington, DC
7. McHorney C.A. Health status assessment methods for adults: past accomplishments and future challenges. Annual Review of Public Health 20 (1999) 309-335
8. Krahn G., Fujiura G., Drum C.E., Cardinal B.J., Nosek M.A., and RRTC Measurement Panel. The dilemma of measuring perceived health status in the context of disability. Disabil Health 2 (2009) 49-56
9. Ware Jr. J.E., Kosinski M., and Dewey J.E. How to score version 2 of the SF-36 Health Survey (2000), QualityMetric, Inc, Lincoln
10. Meyers A.R., Andresen E.M., and Hagglund K.J. A model of outcomes research: spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 81 12 Suppl 2 (2000) S81-S90
11. Aude T., Hill P.D., and Anderson M.A. Quality of life after participation in a rural phase II cardiac rehabilitation program. J Nurs Care Qual 21 (2006) 56-62
12. Andresen E.M., Fouts B.S., Romeis J.C., and Brownson C.A. Performance of health-related quality-of-life instruments in a spinal cord injured population. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 80 (1999) 877-884
13. Froelich-Grobe K., Andresen E.M., Caburnay C., Roberts J., and White G. Measuring health-related quality of life for persons with physical disabilities: an enabled version of the Short-Form 36 (SF-36E). Qual Life Res 17 (2008) 751-770
14. Luther S.L., Kromrey J., Powell-Cope G., et al. A pilot study to modify the SF-36V physical functioning scale for use with veterans with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 87 (2006) 1059-1066
15. Tate D.G., Kalpakjian C.Z., and Forchheimer M.B. Quality of life issues in individuals with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 83 12 Suppl 2 (2002) S18-S25
16. Krahn G., Suzuki R., and Horner-Johnson W. Self-rated health in persons with spinal cord injury: relationship of secondary conditions, function and health status. Qual Life Res 18 (2009) 575-584
17. Mallinson S. Listening to respondents: a qualitative assessment of the Short-Form 36 Health Status Questionnaire. Soc Sci Med 54 (2002) 11-21
18. Statistics Canada. National Population Health Survey Household Component Cycle 6 (2004-2005) Questionnaire 2004. http://www.statcan.ca/english/concepts/nphs/quest04e.pdf Accessed May 1, 2007
19. Ware J.E., and Sherbourne C.D. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 30 (1992) 473-483
20. Reynolds C.R. Methods for detecting construct and predictive bias. In: Berk R.A. (Ed). Handbook of methods for detecting test bias (1982), Johns Hopkins Univ Pr, Baltimore 199-227
21. Roid G.H. Stanford-Binet intelligence scales. 5th ed. (2003), Riverside, Schaumburg
22. McHorney C., Ware J.E., and Raczek A.B. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs. Med Care 31 (1993) 247-263
23. Ware J.E., and Kosinski M. Interpreting SF-36 summary health measures: a response. Qual Life Res 10 (2001) 405-413
24. Beebe K., Song K.J., Ross E., Tuy B., Patterson F., and Benevenia J. Functional outcomes after limb-salvage surgery and endoprosthetic reconstruction with an expandable prosthesis: a report of 4 cases. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 90 (2009) 1039-1047
25. Latham N.K., Mehta V., Nguyen A.M., et al. Performance-based or self-report measures of physical function: which should be used in clinical trials of hip fracture patients?. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 89 (2008) 2146-2155
26. Haran M.J., Lee B.B., King M.T., Marial O., and Stockler M.R. Health status rated with the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey after spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 86 (2005) 2290-2295
27. Noonan V.K., Kopec J.A., Zhang H., and Dvorak M.F. Impact of associated conditions resulting from spinal cord injury on health status and quality of life in people with traumatic central cord syndrome. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 89 (2008) 1074-1082
28. Garland S.J., Ivanova T.D., and Mochizuki G. Recovery of standing balance and health-related quality of life after mild or moderately severe stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 88 (2007) 218-227
29. Middleton J., Tran Y., and Craig A. Relationship between quality of life and self-efficacy in persons with spinal cord injuries. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 88 (2007) 1643-1648
30. Dudley-Javoroski S., and Shields R.K. Assessment of physical function and secondary complications after complete spinal cord injury. Disabil Rehabil 28 (2006) 103-110