Care coordination to enhance management of long-term enteral tube feeding: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition

Volumn 38, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 40-52

  Majka, Andrew J ^a   Wang, Zhen ^a   Schmitz, Kristine R ^a   Niesen, Cynthia R ^a   Larsen, Ruth A ^a   Kinsey, Gail C ^a   Murad, Angela L ^a   Prokop, Larry J ^a   Murad, M Hassan ^a  

^a MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

care coordination; long term enteral tube feeding; meta analysis; systematic review

Indexed keywords

CARE COORDINATION; CAREGIVER; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; DIETITIAN; ENTERIC FEEDING; FAMILY; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HEALTH CARE CONCEPTS; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HOSPITAL ADMISSION; HOSPITAL COST; HUMAN; INFECTION; LONG TERM CARE; MEDICAL SPECIALIST; META ANALYSIS; NURSE; PATIENT EDUCATION; PHYSICIAN; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; STAFF TRAINING; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TEAMWORK;

CARE COORDINATION; LONG-TERM ENTERAL TUBE FEEDING; META-ANALYSIS; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW;

COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ENTERAL NUTRITION; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMANS; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY AS TOPIC; PATIENT CARE MANAGEMENT; PATIENT CARE TEAM; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84891767469     PISSN: 01486071     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0148607113482000     Document Type: Review

References (48)

1. Schols AM, Mostert R, Soeters PB, Greve LH, Wouters EF. Nutritional state and exercise performance in patients with chronic obstructive lung disease. Thorax. 1989 ; 44 (11). 937-941
2. Jagoe RT, Goodship TH, Gibson GJ. Nutritional status of patients undergoing lung cancer operations. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001 ; 71 (3). 929-935
3. Unsal D, Mentes B, Akmansu M, Uner A, Oguz M, Pak Y. Evaluation of nutritional status in cancer patients receiving radiotherapy: a prospective study. Am J Clin Oncol. 2006 ; 29 (2). 183-188
4. Finestone HM, Greene-Finestone LS, Wilson ES, Teasell RW. Malnutrition in stroke patients on the rehabilitation service and at follow-up: prevalence and predictors. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1995 ; 76 (4). 310-316
5. Davalos A, Ricart W, Gonzalez-Huix F, et al. Effect of malnutrition after acute stroke on clinical outcome. Stroke. 1996 ; 27 (6). 1028-1032
6. Wigmore SJ, Plester CE, Richardson RA, Fearon KC. Changes in nutritional status associated with unresectable pancreatic cancer. Br J Cancer. 1997 ; 75 (1). 106-109
7. HCUP Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS). Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality ; 2006 :
8. Fregnan S, Regano N, Mazzuoli S, et al. Long-term home enteral nutrition: incidence of complications in cancer and non-cancer patients. Nutr Ther Metab. 2012 ; 30 (3). 154-160
9. Hull MA, Rawlings J, Murray FE, et al. Audit of outcome of long-term enteral nutrition by percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. Lancet. 1993 ; 341 (8849). 869-872
10. Jones B, Holden C, Stratton R, Micklewright A, Dalzell M Annual BANS Report, 2008: Artificial Nutrition Support in the UK 2000-2007. Redditch, UK: BAPEN ; 2008:
11. Cuerda C, Planas M, Gomez Candela C, Luengo LM. Trends in home enteral nutrition in Spain: analysis of the NADYA registry 1992-2007. Nutr Hosp. 2009 ; 24 (3). 347-353
12. de Luis DA, Aller R, Izaola O, Terroba MC, Cabezas G, Cuellar LA. Experience of 6 years with home enteral nutrition in an area of Spain. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2006 ; 60 (4). 553-557
13. Annual Report With Outcome Profiles 1985-1990. Albany, NY: The Oley Foundation ; 1992:
14. Hebuterne X, Bozzetti F, Moreno Villares JM, et al. Home enteral nutrition in adults: a European multicentre survey. Clin Nutr. 2003 ; 22 (3). 261-266
15. Haddad RY, Thomas DR. Enteral nutrition and enteral tube feeding: review of the evidence. Clin Geriatr Med. 2002 ; 18 (4). 867-881
16. Alivizatos V, Gavala V, Alexopoulos P, Apostolopoulos A, Bajrucevic S. Feeding tube-related complications and problems in patients receiving long-term home enteral nutrition. Indian J Palliat Care. 2012 ; 18 (1). 31-33
17. Crosby J, Duerksen DR. A prospective study of tube- and feeding-related complications in patients receiving long-term home enteral nutrition. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2007 ; 31 (4). 274-277
18. Nutrition Support for Adults: Oral Nutrition Support, Enteral Tube Feeding and Parenteral Nutrition. London, UK: National Collaborating Centre for Acute Care ; 2006:
19. Parker T, Neale G, Elia M. Home enteral tube feeding in East Anglia. Eur J Clin Nutr. 1996 ; 50 (1). 47-53
20. Ehrsson YT, Langius-Eklof A, Bark T, Laurell G. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) - a long-term follow-up study in head and neck cancer patients. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 2004 ; 29 (6). 740-746
21. Kurien M, White S, Simpson G, Grant J, Sanders DS, McAlindon ME. Managing patients with gastrostomy tubes in the community: can a dedicated enteral feed dietetic service reduce hospital readmissions?. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2012 ; 66 (6). 757-760
22. van den Bemt PM, Cusell MB, Overbeeke PW, et al. Quality improvement of oral medication administration in patients with enteral feeding tubes. Qual Saf Health Care. 2006 ; 15 (1). 44-47
23. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009 ; 151 (4). 264 W264-269
24. Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Group. Suggested risk of bias criteria for EPOC reviews. http://epoc.cochrane.org/sites/epoc. cochrane.org/files/uploads/ Suggested%20risk%20of%20bias%20criteria%20for%20EPOC%20reviews.pdf. Accessed December 3, 2012.
25. Wells G, Shea B, O'connell D, et al. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. Presented at: 3rd Symposium on Systematic Reviews: Beyond the Basics ; Oxford, UK ;
26. DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1986 ; 7 (3). 177-188
27. Fisher RA, Genetiker S, Genetician S, Britain G, Généticien S Statistical Methods for Research Workers. Edinburgh, UK: Oliver and Boyd ; 1970:
28. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003 ; 327 (7414). 557-560
29. Kurien M, White S, Simpson G, Grant J, Sanders DS, McAlindon ME. Managing patients with gastrostomy tubes in the community: can a dedicated enteral feed dietetic service reduce hospital readmissions?. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2012 ; 66 (6). 757-760
30. Basset JA, Tapuska B, Ford P, Barbe J. Enteral nutrition: hospital to home a collaborative approach to education and care. Perspectives. 1997 ; 21 (3). 2-6
31. Tanswell I, Barrett D, Emm C, et al. Assessment by a multidisciplinary clinical nutrition team before percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy placement reduces early postprocedure mortality. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2007 ; 31 (3). 205-211
32. Koulentaki M, Reynolds N, Steinke D, et al. Eight years' experience of gastrostomy tube management. Endoscopy. 2002 ; 34 (12). 941-945
33. Matthewson K, White S, Torrance A, Clark S, Bottrill P. A prospective study of the workload of a newly formed PEG advice team. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2001 ; 14 (1). 21-23
34. Dollard K, Dunn S. Development and evaluation of an innovative community-based PEG support service. Gastroenterol Nurs. 2004 ; 27 (4). 156-162
35. Klek S, Szybinski P, Sierzega M, et al. Commercial enteral formulas and nutrition support teams improve the outcome of home enteral tube feeding. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2011 ; 35 (3). 380-385
36. Scott F, Beech R, Smedley F, et al. Prospective, randomized, controlled, single-blind trial of the costs and consequences of systematic nutrition team follow-up over 12 mo after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. Nutrition. 2005 ; 21 (11-12). 1071-1077
37. Allison SP, Micklewright A, Rawlings J, Hull M. Organisation and evaluation of home enteral nutrition services. Clin Nutr. 1993 ; 12: 38-43
38. Ioannidis JP, Trikalinos TA. The appropriateness of asymmetry tests for publication bias in meta-analyses: a large survey. CMAJ. 2007 ; 176 (8). 1091-1096
39. Atkins D, Best D, Briss PA, et al. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2004 1490 ; 328 ( 7454 ):
40. Glasziou P, Ogrinc G, Goodman S. Can evidence-based medicine and clinical quality improvement learn from each other?. BMJ Qual Saf. 2011 ; 20: 113-117
41. Shojania KG, Grimshaw JM. Evidence-based quality improvement: the state of the science. Health Affairs. 2005 ; 24 (1). 138-150
42. Nabhan M, Elraiyah T, Murad M. Teaching the contrasting paradigms of evidence-based medicine and quality improvement in residency. Newsletter Int Soc Evidence Based Health Care. 2011 ; 4: 5-6
43. Boisseau N, Burde A, Bachmann P, Senesse P, Hebuterne X. A telephone-linked computer system for home enteral nutrition. J Telemed Telecare. 2010 ; 16 (7). 363-367
44. Haboubi H, El-Hasan H, Davies J, et al. Two-year audit of PEG patient follow-up. Gastrointest Nurs. 2005 ; 3 (3). 25-30
45. Sayce HA, Rowe PA, McGonigle RJS. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy feeding in haemodialysis out-patients. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2000 ; 13 (5). 333-341
46. Belda O, Serrano P, Bozada JM, et al. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: reality in the intra- and extra-community clinical nutritional practice [in Spanish]. Rev Clin Esp. 2005 ; 205 (10). 472-477
47. Sanders DS, Carter MJ, D'Silva J, McAlindon ME, Willemse PJ, Bardham KD. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: a prospective analysis of hospital support required and complications following discharge to the community. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2001 ; 55 (7). 610-614
48. Attanasio A, Bedin M, Stocco S, et al. Clinical outcomes and complications of enteral nutrition among older adults. Minerva Med. 2009 ; 100 (2). 159-166