The ironic fate of the personality disorders in DSM-5

Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment

Volumn 4, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 342-349

  Skodol, Andrew E ^a,b   Morey, Leslie C ^c   Bender, Donna S ^a   Oldham, John M ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b College of Physicians and Surgeons ^*  (United States)

^c TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Classification; Diagnosis; Dimensions and categories; DSM 5; Personality disorders

Indexed keywords

ADVISORY COMMITTEE; ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; CONSENSUS; DIAGNOSTIC AND STATISTICAL MANUAL OF MENTAL DISORDERS; HUMAN; MEDICAL SOCIETY; PERSONALITY DISORDER; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL;

ADVISORY COMMITTEES; CONSENSUS; DIAGNOSTIC AND STATISTICAL MANUAL OF MENTAL DISORDERS; HUMANS; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PERSONALITY DISORDERS; SOCIETIES, MEDICAL;

EID: 84891754439     PISSN: 19492715     EISSN: 19492723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/per0000029     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Bernstein, D. P., Iscan, C., Maser, J., & the Boards of Directors of the Association for Research on Personality Disorders and the International Society for the Study of Personality Disorders. (2007). Opinions of personality disorder experts regarding the DSM-IV personality disorders classification system. Journal of Personality Disorders, 21, 536-551. doi:10.1521/pedi.2007.21. 5.536
2. Clark, L. A. (2007). Assessment and diagnosis of personality disorder: Perennial issues and an emerging reconceptualization. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 227-257. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904 .190200
3. Clark, L. A., Livesley, W. J., & Morey, L. (1997). Personality disorder assessment: The challenge of construct validity. Journal of Personality Disorders, 11, 205-231. doi:10.1521/pedi.1997.11.3.205
4. Clarke, D. E., Narrow, W. E., Regier, D. A., Kuramoto, S. J., Kupfer, D. J., Kuhl, E. A., . . . Kraemer, H. C. (2013). DSM-5 field trials in the United States and Canada, part I: Study design, sampling strategy, implementation, and analytic approaches. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 170, 43-58. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2012.12070998
5. First, M. B. (2005). Clinical utility: A prerequisite for the adoption of a dimensional approach in DSM. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 114, 560-564. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.114.4.560
6. Frances, A. (1980). The DSM-III personality disorders section: A commentary. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 137, 1050-1054
7. Gunderson, J. G. (2010). Revising the borderline diagnosis for DSM-5: An alternative proposal. Journal of Personality Disorders, 24, 694-708. doi:10.1521/pedi.2010.24.6.694
8. Helzer, J. E., Kraemer, H. C., Krueger, R. K., Wittchen, H.-U., Sirovatka, P. J., & Regier, D. A. (Eds.). (2008). Dimensional Approaches in Diagnostic Classification: Refining the Research Agenda for DSM-V. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Association
9. Hyman, S. E. (2010). The diagnosis of mental disorders: The problem of reification. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 6, 155-179. doi: 10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.3.022806.091532
10. Krueger, R. F., Skodol, A. E., Livesley, W. J., Shrout, P. E., & Huang, Y. (2007). Synthesizing dimensional and categorical approaches to personality disorders: Refining the research agenda for DSM-V Axis II. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 16(Suppl. 1), S65-S73. doi:10.1002/mpr.212
11. Kupfer, D. J., First, M. B., & Regier, D. E. (Eds.). (2002). A research agenda for DSM-V. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association
12. Kupfer, D. J., & Regier, D. A. (2011). Neuroscience, clinical evidence, and the future of psychiatric classification in DSM-5. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 168, 672-674. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2011.11020219
13. Kupfer, D. J., Regier, D. A., & Kuhl, E. A. (2008). On the road to DSM-V and ICD-11. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 258(Suppl. 5), 2-6. doi:10.1007/s00406-008-5002-6
14. Livesley, W. J. (2011). An empirically-based classification of personality disorder. Journal of Personality Disorders, 25, 397-420. doi:10.1521/ pedi.2011.25.3.397
15. Morey, L. C. (1988). Personality disorders in DSM-III and DSM-III-R: Convergence, coverage, and internal consistency. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 145, 573-577
16. Morey, L. C., Bender, D. S., & Skodol, A. E. (2013). Validating the proposed diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 5th edition, severity indicator for personality disorder. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 201, 729-735. doi:10.1097/NMD.0b013e3182a20ea8
17. Morey, L. C., Berghuis, H., Bender, D. S., Verheul, R., Krueger, R. F., & Skodol, A. E. (2011). Toward a model for assessing personality functioning in DSM-5, part II: Empirical articulation of a core dimension of personality pathology. Journal of Personality Assessment, 93, 347-353. doi:10.1080/00223891. 2011.577853
18. Morey, L. C., Hopwood, C. J., Markowitz, J. C., Gunderson, J. G., Grilo, C. M., McGlashan, T. H., . . . Skodol, A. E. (2012). Comparison of alternative models for personality disorders, II: 6-, 8- and 10-year follow-up. Psychological Medicine, 42, 1705-1713. doi:10.1017/ S0033291711002601
19. Morey, L. C., Krueger, R. F., & Skodol, A. E. (2013). The hierarchical structure of clinician ratings of proposed DSM-5 pathological personality traits. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 122, 836-841. doi:10.1037/ a0034003
20. Morey, L. C., & Skodol, A. E. (2013). Convergence between DSM-IV and DSM-5 diagnostic models for personality disorder: Evaluation of strategies for establishing diagnostic thresholds. Journal of Psychiatric Practice, 19, 179-193. doi:10.1097/01.pra.0000430502.78833.06
21. Narrow, W. E., Clarke, D. E., Kuramoto, S. J., Kraemer, H. C., Kupfer, D. J., Greiner, L., & Regier, D. A. (2013). DSM-5 field trials in the United States and Canada, part III: Development and reliability testing of a cross-cutting symptom assessment for DSM-5. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 170, 71-82. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2012.12071000
22. Regier, D. A., Narrow, W. E., Clarke, D. E., Kraemer, H. C., Kuramoto, S. J., Kuhl, E. A., & Kupfer, D. J. (2013). DSM-5 field trials in the United States and Canada, part II: Test-retest reliability of selected categorical diagnoses. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 170, 59-70. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp. 2012.12070999
23. Regier, D. A., Narrow, W. E., Kuhl, E. A., & Kupfer, D. J. (2009). The conceptual development of DSM-V. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 166, 645-650. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2009.09020279
24. Robins, E., & Guze, S. B. (1970). Establishment of diagnostic validity in psychiatric illness: Its application to schizophrenia. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 126, 983-987
25. Rounsaville, B. J., Alarcon, R. D., Andrews, G., Jackson, K. S., Kendell, R. E., & Kendler, K. S. (2002). Basic nomenclature issues for DSM-V. In D. J. Kupfer, M. B. First, & D. E. Regier (Eds.), A research agenda for DSM-V (pp. 1-29). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association
26. Sanislow, C. A., Pine, D. S., Quinn, K. J., Kozak, M. J., Garvey, M. A., Heinssen, R. K., . . . Cuthbert, B. N. (2010). Developing constructs for psychopathology research: Research Domain Criteria. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 119, 631-639. doi:10.1037/a0020909
27. Skodol, A. E. (2012a). Diagnosis and DSM-5: Work in progress. In T. A. Widiger (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of personality disorders. (pp. 35-57). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/ oxfordhb/9780199735013.013.0003
28. Skodol, A. E. (2012b). Personality disorders in DSM-5. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 8, 317-344. doi:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032511- 143131
29. Skodol, A. E., Bender, D. S., & Oldham, J. O. (in press). An Alternative Model for Personality Disorders: DSM-5 section III and beyond. In J. O. Oldham, A. E. Skodol, & D. S. Bender (Eds.), American psychiatric publishing textbook of personality disorders, 2nd edition. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing
30. Skodol, A. E., Clark, L. A., Bender, D. S., Krueger, R. F., Morey, L. C., Verheul, R., . . . Oldham, J. M. (2011). Proposed changes in personality and personality disorder assessment and diagnosis for DSM-5, part I: Description and rationale. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 2, 4-22. doi:10.1037/a0021891
31. Skodol, A. E., Krueger, R. F., Bender, D. S., Morey, L. C., Clark, L. A., Bell, C. C., . . . Oldham, J. O. (2013). Personality disorders in DSM-5 section III. Focus, 11, 187-203. doi:10.1176/appi.focus.11.2.187
32. Trull, T. J., & Widiger, T. A. (2008). Geology 102: More thought on a shift to a dimensional model of personality disorders. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 949-967. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007 .00074.x
33. Verheul, R. (in press). Personality disorder proposal for DSM-5: A heroic and innovative, but nevertheless fundamentally flawed attempt to improve DSM-IV. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy
34. Widiger, T. A., & Simonsen, E. (2005). Alternative dimensional models of personality disorder: Finding a common ground. Journal of Personality Disorders, 19, 110-130. doi:10.1521/pedi.19.2.110.62628
35. Widiger, T. A., Simonsen, E., Sirovatka, P. J., & Regier, D. A. (Eds.). (2006). Dimensional models of personality disorders: Refining the research agenda for DSM-V. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Association
36. Widiger, T. A., & Trull, T. J. (2008). Plate tectonics in the classification of personality disorder: Shifting to a dimensional model. American Psychologist, 62, 71-83. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.62.2.71