Smart pricing scheme: A multi-layered scoring rule application

Expert Systems with Applications

Volumn 41, Issue 8, 2014, Pages 3726-3735

  Chakraborty, Shantanu ^a   Ito, Takayuki ^a   Senjyu, Tomonobu ^b  

^a NAGOYA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Japan)

^b UNIVERSITY OF THE RYUKYUS   (Japan)

Author keywords

Demand response; Energy management; Incentive design; Scoring rule; Smart grid

Indexed keywords

CONTINUOUS RANKED PROBABILITY SCORES; DEMAND RESPONSE; DEMAND RESPONSE PROGRAMS; GENERATION COMPANIES; INCENTIVE DESIGN; REDUCE ENERGY CONSUMPTION; SCORING RULES; SMART GRID;

DISTRIBUTION FUNCTIONS; DOMESTIC APPLIANCES; ELECTRIC UTILITIES; ENERGY MANAGEMENT; ENERGY UTILIZATION; FORECASTING; PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS;

COSTS;

EID: 84891752379     PISSN: 09574174     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2013.12.002     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. M. Albadi, and E. El-Saadany A summary of demand response in electricity markets Electric Power Systems Research 78 11 2008 1989 1996
2. M. Alonso, H. Amaris, and C. Alvarez-Ortega Integration of renewable energy sources in smart grids by means of evolutionary optimization algorithms Expert Systems with Applications 39 5 2012 5513 5522 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j.eswa.2011.11.069
3. Boutilier, C. (2012). Eliciting forecasts from self-interested experts: scoring rules for decision makers. In AAMAS '12: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems.
4. G.W. Brier Verification of forecasts expressed in terms of probability Monthly Weather Review 1950 1 3
5. Chen, L., Li, L., Low, S., & Doyle, J. (2010). Two market models for demand response in power networks. In Smart Grid Communications (SmartGridComm), 2010 First IEEE International Conference on (pp. 397-402). http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1109/SMARTGRID.2010.5622076.
6. M. Doostizadeh, and H. Ghasemi A day-ahead electricity pricing model based on smart metering and demand-side management Energy 46 1 2012 221 230
7. Faruqui, A., & Wood, L. (2008). Quantifying the benefits of dynamic pricing in the mass market, Edison Electric Institute, Tech. Rep.
8. T. Gneiting, and A. Raftery Strictly proper scoring rules, prediction and estimation Journal of the American Statistical Association 102 477 2007 359 378
9. Harry, R., Rogers, A., & Gerding, E. H. (2012). A scoring rule-based mechanism for aggregate demand prediction in the smart grid. In AAMAS '12: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems.
10. Ianovski, E., Yu, L., Elkind, E., & Wilson, M. C. (2011). The complexity of safe manipulation under scoring rules., In International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence.
11. Kim, H., Kim, Y.-J., Yang, K., Thottan, M. (2011). Cloud-based demand response for smart grid: Architecture and distributed algorithms. In Smart Grid Communications (SmartGridComm), 2011 IEEE International Conference on (pp. 398-403). doi:10.1109/SmartGridComm.2011.6102355.
12. LG. Lg smart appliance with thinq technology. http://www.lgnewsroom.com/ newsroom/contents/6741.
13. Li, D., Jayaweera, S., Naseri, A. (2011). Auctioning game based demand response scheduling in smart grid. In: Online Conference on Green Communications (GreenCom), 2011 IEEE, 2011, pp. 58-63. doi:10.1109/GreenCom.2011.6082508.
14. G. Masters Renewable and efficient electric power systems 2004 Wiley Online Library
15. J.E. Matheson, and R.L. Winkler Scoring rules for continuous probability distributions Management Science 22 1976 1087 1095
16. Mohsenian-Rad, A.H., Wong, J.J.V.W.S., Schober, R. (2010). Optimal and autonomous incentive-based energy consumption scheduling algorithm for smart grid. In IEEE Innovative Smart Grid Technologies (pp. 1-6).
17. J. Morgan Comparing energy costs of nuclear, coal, gas, wind and solar 2010 155 212 http://nuclearfissionary.com/2010/04/02/comparing-energycosts-of- nuclear-coa% l-gas-wind-and-solar/
18. I. Ontario Market data 2011 155 212 http://www.ieso.ca/imoweb/marketdata/ marketData.asp
19. B. Ramachandran, S.K. Srivastava, and D.A. Cartes Intelligent power management in micro grids with EV penetration Expert Systems with Applications 0 2013 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2013.06.007
20. Robu, V., Kota, R., Chalkiadakis, G., Rogers, A., & Jennings, N. R. (2012). Cooperative virtual power plant formation using scoring rules. In Twenty-Sixth Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI
21. Samadi, P., Mohsenian-Rad, A., Schober, R., Wong, V.W.S., & Jatskevich, J. (2010). Optimal real-time pricing algorithm based on utility maximization for smart grid. In IEEE Conference on Smart Grid Communications.
22. Xia, L., & Conitzer, L. (2009). Finite local consistency characterizes generalized scoring rules. In International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence.