Co-authorship pair distribution patterns by gender

Scientometrics

Volumn 98, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 703-723

  Ozel, Bulent ^a,b   Kretschmer, Hildrun ^c,d   Kretschmer, Theo ^d  

^a ISTANBUL BILGI UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b REYKJAVIK UNIVERSITY   (Iceland)

^c DALIAN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^d COLLNET Center Borgsdorfer ^*  (Germany)

Author keywords

Co authorship networks; Collaboration in sciences; Gender; Interpersonal attraction; Social Gestalt model

Indexed keywords

EID: 84891745336     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-013-1145-y     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Anderson, T. W. (1994). An introduction to multivariate statistical analysis. New York: Wiley.
2. Carr, P. L., Pololi, L., Knight, S. & Conrad, P. (2009). Collaboration in academic medicine: Reflections on gender and advancement. Academic Medicine, 84 (10), 1447-1453.
3. de Solla Price, D. (1963). Little science, big science. New York: Columbia University Press.
4. Egghe, L., Goovaerts, M. & Kretschmer, H. (2008). Collaboration and productivity. COLLNET Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management, 2, 83-89.
5. European Commission. (2009). She figures 2009: Statistics and indicators on gender equality in science. Brussels: European Commission.
6. Guo H., Kretschmer, H. & Liu, Z. (2008). Distribution of co-author pairs' frequencies of the Journal of Information Technology. COLLNET Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management, 2, 73-81.
7. Kretschmer, H. & Kretschmer, T. (2007). Lotka's distribution and distribution of co-author pairs' frequencies. Journal of Informetrics, 1, 308-337.
8. Kretschmer, H. & Kretschmer, T. (2008). Varying shapes of co-author pairs distributions. COLLNET Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management, 2, 45-61.
9. Kretschmer, H. & Kretschmer, T. (2009, Invited Keynote Speech). Who is collaborating with whom? Explanation of a fundamental principle: In H. Hou, B. Wang, S. Liu, Z. Hu, X. Zhang, M. Li (Eds.), Proceedings of the 5th international conference on webometrics, informetrics and scientometrics and 10th COLLNET meeting, 13-16 September 2009, Dalian, China (CD-ROM, unpublished).
10. Kretschmer, H. & Kretschmer, T. (2012): Who is collaborating with whom in science? Explanation of a fundamental principle. Social Networking, Scientific Research Publishing.
11. Kretschmer, H., Hoffmann, U. & Kretschmer, T. (2006). Collaboration structures between German immunology institutions, and gender visibility, as reflected in the Web. Research Evaluation, 15(2), 117-126.
12. Kretschmer, H., Kundra, R., de Beaver, B. D. & Kretschmer, T. (2012). Gender bias in journals of gender studies. Scientometrics, 93(1), 135-150.
13. Kretschmer H. & Isidro F. A. (2005). New indicators for gender studies in Web networks. Information Processing and Management, 41(6).
14. Kyvik, S. & Teigen, M. (1996). Child care, research collaboration, and gender differences in scientific productivity. Science Technology and Human Values, 21 (6), 54-71.
15. Lotka, A. J. (1926). The frequency distribution of scientific production. Journal of the Washington Academy of Science, 16, 317-323.
16. Melin, G. (2000). Pragmatism and self-organization: Research collaboration on the individual level. Research Policy, 29 (1), 31-40.
17. Miller, B. P., Duque, R. & Shrum, W. (2012). Gender, ICTs, and productivity in low-income countries: Panel study. Science Technology Human Values, 37.
18. Naldi, F., Luzi, D., Valente, A. & Parenti, I. V. (2004). Scientific and technological performance by gender. In H. F. Moed, et al. (Ed.). Handbook of quantitative science and technology research (pp. 299-314). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
19. Newman, M. E. J. (2001). Scientific collaboration networks. I. Network construction and fundamental results. Physical Review E, 64, 016131.
20. Newman, M. E. J. (2004). Coauthorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 101, 5200-5205.
21. Newman, M. E. J. (2005). Power laws, pareto distributions and Zipf's law. Contemporary Physics, 46(5), 323-351.
22. Morris, S. A. & Goldstein, M. L. (2007). Manifestation of research teams in journal literature: a growth model of papers, authors, collaboration, coauthorship, weak ties, and Lotka's law. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(12), 1764-1782.
23. Ozbilgin, M. & Healy, G. (2004). The gendered nature of career development of university professors: The case of Turkey. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 64, 358-371.
24. Ozel, B. (2012). Link and node analysis of gender based collaborations in Turkish social sciences. In Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (pp. 15-19). New York: IEEE/ACM.
25. Pololi, L. H., Civian, J. T., Brennan, R. T., Dottolo, A. L. & Krupat, E. (2013). Experiencing the culture of academic medicine: Gender matters. A national study. Journal of General Internal Medicine February, 28 (2), 201-207.
26. Wadhwa, N. K., Kretschmer, H. & Kretschmer, T. (2009). Co-author pairs' frequencies of the National Physical Laboratory India. COLLNET Proceedings 2009.
27. Woodward, D. & Ozbilgin, M. (1999), Sex equality in the financial services sector in Turkey and the UK. Women in Management Review, 14(8), 325-332.