Conventional audiometry, extended high-frequency audiometry, and dpoae for early diagnosis of NIHL

Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2014, Pages

  Mehrparvar, Amir Houshang ^a   Mirmohammadi, Seyyed Jalil ^a   Davari, Mohammad Hossein ^a   Mostaghaci, Mehrdad ^a   Mollasadeghi, Abolfazl ^a   Bahaloo, Maryam ^a   Hashemi, Seyyed Hesam ^a  

^a SHAHID SADOUGHI UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

Author keywords

Hazardous noise compared with conventional audiometry and distortion product otoacoustic

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDIOMETER; AUDIOMETRY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; DISTORTION PRODUCT OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; EARPHONE CUSHION; HIGH-FREQUENCY AUDIOMETRY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INDUSTRIAL WORKER; MALE; NOISE INJURY; OTOSCOPY; QUESTIONNAIRE;

EID: 84891720587     PISSN: 20741804     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5812/ircmj.9628     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Guida Heraldo Lorena, Morini Renata Graziele, Cardoso Ana Cláudia Vieira. Audiologic and Otoacoustic Emission Evaluation in Individuals Exposed to Noise and Plaguecides. 2009.
2. Naqvi F, Haider S, Batool Z, Perveen T, Haleem DJ. Sub-chronic exposure to noise afects locomotor activity and produces anx-iogenic and depressive like behavior in rats. Pharmacol Rep. 2012;64(1):64-69.
3. Schindler DN, Jackler RK, Robinson ST. Hearing loss. In: LaDou J editor. CURRENT Occupational & Environmental Medicine: Fourth Edition. New York: Mcgraw-hill; 2007. p. 104-120.
4. Robinowitz PM, Rees TS. Occupational hearing loss. In: Rosen-stock L editor. Textbook Of Clinical Occupational And Environmental Medicine. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders; 2004. p. 426-435.
5. Buchler M, Kompis M, Hotz MA. Extended frequency range hearing thresholds and otoacoustic emissions in acute acoustic trauma. Otol Neurotol. 2012;33(8):1315-1322.
6. Lopes AndréaCintra, Otubo KarinaAki, Basso TalitaCosta, Mari-Nelli ÉricaJulianaInnocenti, Lauris JoséRobertoPereira. Occupational Hearing Loss: Tonal Audiometry X High Frequencies Audi-ometry. Int Arch Otolaryngol. 2009;3:293-302.
7. Singh R, Saxena RK, Varshney S. Early detection of noise induced hearing loss by using ultra high frequency audiometry. Int J Oto-rhinolaryngol. 2009;10(2):1-5.
8. Wang Y, Yang B, Li Y, Hou L, Hu Y, Han Y. [Application of extended high frequency audiometry in the early diagnosis of noise induced hearing loss]. Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi. 2000;35(1):26-8.
9. Jansen EJ, Helleman HW, Dreschler WA, De Laat JA. Noise induced hearing loss and other hearing complaints among musicians of symphony orchestras. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2009;82(2):153-64.
10. Job A, Raynal M, Kossowski M, Studler M, Ghernaouti C, Bafoni-Venturi A, et al. Otoacoustic detection of risk of early hearing loss in ears with normal audiograms: a 3-year follow-up study. Hear Res. 2009;251(1-2):10-6.
11. Beahan N, Kei J, Driscoll C, Charles B, Khan A. High-frequency pure-tone audiometry in children: a test-retest reliability study relative to ototoxic criteria. Ear Hear. 2012;33(1):104-111.
12. Mehrparvar AH, Mirmohammadi SJ, Ghoreyshi A, Mollasade-ghi A, Loukzadeh Z. High-frequency audiometry: a means for early diagnosis of noise-induced hearing loss. Noise Health. 2011;13(55):402-406.
13. Porto MA, Gahyva DL, Lauris JR, Lopes AC. [Audiometric evaluation in extended high frequencies of individuals exposed to occupational noise]. Pro Fono. 2004;16(3):237-250.
14. Somma G, Pietroiusti A, Magrini A, Coppeta L, Ancona C, Gardi S, et al. Extended high-frequency audiometry and noise induced hearing loss in cement workers. Am J Ind Med. 2008;51(6):452-462.
15. Turkkahraman S, Gok U, Karlidag T, Keles E, Ozturk A. [Findings of standard and high-frequency audiometry in workers exposed to occupational noise for long durations]. Kulak Burun Bogaz Ihtis Derg. 2003;10(4):137-142.
16. Balatsouras DG, Homsioglou E, Danielidis V. Extended high-frequency audiometry in patients with acoustic trauma. Clin Oto-laryngol. 2005;30(3):249-254.
17. Kuronen P, Sorri MJ, Paakkonen R, Muhli A. Temporary threshold shift in military pilots measured using conventional and extended high-frequency audiometry after one fight. Int J Audiol. 2003;42(1):29-33.
18. De Sa LC, de Lima MA, Tomita S, Frota SM, Santos Gde A, Garcia TR. Analisys of high frequency auditory thresholds in individuals aged between 18 and 29 years with no otological complaints. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2007;73(2):215-225.
19. Kemp DT. Stimulated acoustic emissions from within the human auditory system. J Acoust Soc Am. 1978;64(5):1386-1391.
20. Vinck BM, Van Cauwenberge PB, Leroy L, Corthals P. Sensitivity of transient evoked and distortion product otoacoustic emissions to the direct efects of noise on the human cochlea. Audiology. 1999;38(1):44-52.
21. Al-Malky G, Suri R, Dawson SJ, Sirimanna T, Kemp D. Aminogly-coside antibiotics cochleotoxicity in paediatric cystic fbrosis (CF) patients: A study using extended high-frequency audiom-etry and distortion product otoacoustic emissions. Int J Audiol. 2011;50(2):112-122.
22. Knight KR, Kraemer DF, Winter C, Neuwelt EA. Early changes in auditory function as a result of platinum chemotherapy: use of extended high-frequency audiometry and evoked distortion product otoacoustic emissions. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(10):1190-1195.
23. Oeken J, Menz D. [Amplitude changes in distortion products of otoacoustic emissions after acute noise exposure]. Laryngorhi-nootologie. 1996;75(5):265-269.
24. Plinkert PK, Hemmert W, Wagner W, Just K, Zenner HP. Monitor- ing noise susceptibility: sensitivity of otoacoustic emissions and subjective audiometry. Br J Audiol. 1999;33(6):367-382.
25. Korres GS, Balatsouras DG, Tzagaroulakis A, Kandiloros D, Fereki-dou E, Korres S. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions in an industrial setting. Noise Health. 2009;11(43):103-110.
26. Baradarnfar MH, Karamifar K, Mehrparvar AH, Mollasadeghi A, Gharavi M, Karimi G, et al. Amplitude changes in otoacous-tic emissions after exposure to industrial noise. Noise Health. 2012;14(56):28-31.
27. Lapsley Miller JA, Marshall L, Heller LM, Hughes LM. Low-level otoacoustic emissions may predict susceptibility to noise-induced hearing loss. J Acoust Soc Am. 2006;120(1):280-296.
28. Marques FP, da Costa EA. Exposure to occupational noise: oto-acoustic emissions test alterations. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2006;72(3):362-366.
29. Shupak A, Tal D, Sharoni Z, Oren M, Ravid A, Pratt H. Otoacous-tic emissions in early noise-induced hearing loss. Otol Neurotol. 2007;28(6):745-752.
30. Sliwinska-Kowalska M, Kotylo P. Occupational exposure to noise decreases otoacoustic emission eferent suppression. Int J Audiol. 2002;41(2):113-119.
31. Han J, Li F, Zhao C, Zhang Z, Ni D. [Study on distortion product otoacoustic emissions and expanded high frequency audiom-etry in noise exposure workers]. Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi. 2003;17(1):16-19.
32. American National Standard Specifcation for Audiometers.New York: Acoustical Society of America; 1996.
33. Guidelines for manual pure-tone threshold audiometry.: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association; 2005. Available from: www.asha.org/policy.
34. Glattke T, Robinette M. Otoacustic emission. In: Roeser R, Valente M editors. AUDIOLOGY, 3-Volume Set: Diagnosis, Treatment and Practice Management. 2nd ed. New York: Thieme New York; 2007.
35. Attias J, Horovitz G, El-Hatib N, Nageris B. Detection and Clinical Diagnosis of Noise-Induced Hearing Loss by Otoacoustic Emissions. Noise Health. 2001;3(12):19-31.