Process analysis study of integrated gasification combined-cycle with CO2 capture

Procedia Engineering

Volumn 42, Issue , 2012, Pages 1502-1513

  Chen, P Ch ^a   Chiu, H M ^a   Chyou, Y P ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF NUCLEAR ENERGY RESEARCH   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Gasification; Integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC); Process simulation

Indexed keywords

EID: 84891710594     PISSN: 18777058     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2012.07.543     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (34)

1. Bureau of Energy. Energy Statistical Hand Book 2010. Bureau of Energy, R.O.C. (in Chinese) ; 2011.
2. Ko FK, Huang CB, Zheng BY. Sensitivity study of energy prices for CO2 abatement scenarios in Taiwan. International Energy Workshop, Stockholm; 2010.
3. http://yosemite.epa.gov/opa/admpress.nsf/ d0cf6618525a9efb85257359003fb69d/9b4e8033d7e641d9852579ce005ae957! OpenDocument. [accessed in Apr. 10, 2012]
4. Wender I. Reactions of Synthesis Gas. Fuel Process Technol 1996;48:189-297.
5. Frey CH, Akunuri N. Prepared by North Carolina State University for Carnegie Mellon University and U.S. Department of Energy. Pittsburgh; 2001. http://www4.ncsu.edu/~frey/reports/Frey-Akunuri-2001.pdf; [accessed Dec. 27, 2010]
6. Brown D, Fuchino T, Maréchal F. In 16th European Symposium on Computer Aided Process Engineering and 9th International Symposium on Process Systems Engineering (Eds.: W. Marquardt, C. Pantelides). Londin: Elservier; 2006, p.1661-1666.
7. Chen PC, Chiu HM, Chyou YP. In Proceedings of the 2008 Taiwan/Korea/Japan Chemical Engineering Conference and 55th Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers Annual Conference. Taipei; 2008. No. OS7004.
8. Robinson PJ, Luyben WL. Simple Dynamic Gasifier Model That Runs in Aspen Dynamics. Ind Eng Chem Res 2008; 47:7784-7792.
9. Zheng L, Furinsky E. Comparison of Shell, Texaco, BGL and KRW gasifiers as part of IGCC plant computer simulations. Energy Convers Manage 2005;46:1767-1779.
10. Zhao Y, Wen H, Xu X. Conceptual design and simulation study of a co-gasification technology. Energy Convers Manage 2006;47:1416-1428.
11. Jensen JH, Poulsen JM and Andersen NU. From Coal to Clean Energy. Nitrogen+Syngas 2010;310.
12. Duret A, Friedli C, Marechal F. Process design of synthetic natural gas (SNG) production using wood gasification. J cleaner Production 2005;13:1434-46.
13. Heyne S, SeeMann MC, Harvey S. Integration study for alternative methanation technologies for production of synthetic natural gas from gasified biomass. Chem Eng Trans 2010;21:409-14.
14. Kuchonthara P, Bhattacharya S, Tsutsumi A. Fuel 2005;84:1019-1021.
15. Chen HJ, Hsu JW, Chyou YP, Chen PC. In Proceedings of the 2008 Taiwan/Korea/Japan Chemical Engineering Conference and 55th Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers Annual Conference. Taipei; 2008. No. OS5001.
16. Chen PC, Chiu HM, Chyou YP, Yu CS. In Proceedings of World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 65, Tokyo; 2010, p. 655-663.
17. Chyou YP, Lee WB, Chen PC, Chiu HM, Ko FK. In Proceedings of the 9th Annual Conference on Carbon Capture & Sequestration. Pittsburgh; 2010, No. 964.
18. Chen PC, Chiu HM, Chyou YP, Yu CS. In Proceedings of the ASME 2010 4th International Conference on Energy Sustainability. Phoenix; 2010, No. 90120.
19. Chen PC, Yu CS, Chiu HM, Chyou YP and Chen HJ. Process simulation study of coal gasification-based multi-product plant with electricity and chemical products. Asia-Pac. J Chem Eng 2012; 7 (Suppl. 1): S101-S111.
20. Smith AR, Klosek J. A review of air separation technologies and their integration with energy conversion processes. Fuel Process Technol 2001;70:115-134.
21. Higman C, van der Burgt M. Gasification. Elsevier, Burlington (USA); 2003, p.35.
22. Nathen SV, Kirkpatrick RD, Young BR. Energy Fuel 2008; 22:2687-2692.
23. Ribhi EB, Haimour N. Fuel Process Technol 2004; 86:245-260.
24. Lammers JNJJ, Haringa J, Little RJ. Chem Eng J 1995; 60:123-129.
25. Chakma A. Studies on DEA and MDEA degradation. University of British Columbia, Canada ;1987, p.161
26. Davison J. COAL POWER PLANTS WITH CO2 CAPTURE: THE IGCC OPTIONGASIFICATION TECHNOLOGIES. S. Francisco, U.S.A. ; 2003.
27. Honeywill UOP. UOP Selexol™ Technology for Acid Gas Removal. 2009. http://www.uop.com/wpcontent/uploads/2011/02/UOP-Selexol-Technology-for-Acid- Gas-Removal-tech-presentation.pdf
28. Monnery WD, Hawboldt KA, Pollock A, Svrcek WY. Chem Eng Sci 2000;55:5141-5148.
29. Shell Global Solutions. Shell Claus Off-gas Treatment Process, 2008.www.shell.com/static//globalsolutionsen/downloads/industries/gas-and-lng/ brochures/claus-off-gas-treatment.pdf [accessed in Oct. 3, 2008]
30. General Electric Company. Gas Turbine and Combined Cycle Products Brochure. 2009. http://gepower.com/prod-serv/products/gas-turbines-cc/en/ downloads/GEA12985H.pdf [accessed Dec. 27, 2010]
31. Duke Energy. http://www.duke-energy.com/about-us/edwardsport-overview.asp [accessed in Dec. 16, 2009]
32. National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL). Cost and Performance of PC and IGCC Plants for a Range of Carbon Dioxide Capture. NETL U.S. Department of Energy (DOE); 2011. (DOE/NETL-2011/1498)
33. Mohamed HA. Energy Fuel 2003;17(6):1492-1500.
34. Hornick MJ, McDaniel JE. Tampa Electric Polk Power Station Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle Project Final Technical Report. Tampa Electric Company Polk Power Station, U. S.;2002.