Analyzing latent state-trait and multiple-indicator latent growth curve models as multilevel structural equation models

Frontiers in Psychology

Volumn 4, Issue DEC, 2013, Pages

  Geiser, Christian ^a   Bishop, Jacob ^a   Lockhart, Ginger ^a   Shiffman, Saul ^b   Grenard, Jerry L ^c  

^a UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c CLAREMONT GRADUATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Ecological momentary assessment data; Individually varying and unequally spaced time points; Intensive longitudinal data; Latent state trait analysis; Mixed effects models; Multilevel structural equation models; Multiple indicator latent growth curve models

Indexed keywords

EID: 84891697873     PISSN: None     EISSN: 16641078     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00975     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Bollen, K. A., and Curran, P. J. (2006). Latent Curve Models: A Structural Equation Approach. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
2. Box, G. E. P., and Jenkins, G. M. (1970). Time Series Analysis-Forecasting and Control. San Francisco, CA: Holden Day.
3. Bryk, A. S., and Raudenbush, S. W. (1987). Application of hierarchical linear models to assessing change. Psychol. Bull. 101, 147-158. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.101.1.147
4. Cole, D. A., Martin, N. M., and Steiger, J. H. (2005). Empirical and conceptual problems with longitudinal trait-state models: introducing a trait-state-occasion model. Psychol. Methods 10, 3-20. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.10.1.3
5. Csikszentmihalyi, M., and Hunter, J. (2003). Happiness in everyday life: the uses of experience sampling. J. Happiness Stud. 4, 185-199. doi: 10.1023/A:1024409732742
6. Duncan, T. E., Duncan, S. C., and Strycker, L. A. (2006). An Introduction to Latent Variable Growth Curve Modeling: Concepts, Issues, and Applications, 2nd Edn. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
7. Eid, M. (2007). "Latent class models for analyzing variability and change," in Handbook of Methods in Positive Psychology, eds A. Ong and M. van Dulmen (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 591-607.
8. Eid, M., Courvoisier, D. S., and Lischetzke, T. (2012). "Structural equation modeling of ambulatory assessment data," in Handbook of Research Methods for Studying Daily Life, eds M. R. Mehl and T. S. Connor (New York, NY: Guilford), 384-406.
9. Eid, M., Nussbeck, F. W., Geiser, C., Cole, D. A., Gollwitzer, M., and Lischetzke, T. (2008). Structural equation modeling of multitrait-multimethod data: different models for different types of methods. Psychol. Methods 13, 230-253. doi: 10.1037/a0013219
10. Eid, M., Schneider, C., and Schwenkmezger, P. (1999). Do you feel better or worse? The validity of perceived deviations of mood states from mood traits. Eur. J. Pers. 13, 283-306. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0984(199907/08)13:4<283::AID-PER341>3.0.CO;2-0
11. Enders, C. K. (2010). Applied Missing Data Analysis. New York, NY: mGuilford Publications
12. Enders, C. K. (2011). Missing not at random models for latent growth curve analyses. Psychol. Methods 16, 1-16. doi: 10.1037/a0022640
13. Ferrer, E., Balluerka, N., and Widaman, K. F. (2008). Factorial invariance and the specification of second-order growth models. Methodology 4, 22-36. doi: 10.1027/1614-2241.4.1.22
14. Geiser, C., Keller, B., and Lockhart, G. (2013). First-versus second-order latent growth curve models: some insights from latent state-trait theory. Struct. Equat. Model. 20, 479-503. doi: 10.1080/10705511.2013.797832
15. Geiser, C., and Lockhart, G. (2012). A comparison of four approaches to account for method effects in latent state trait analyses. Psychol. Methods 17, 255-283. doi: 10.1037/a0026977
16. Grenard, J. L., Stacy, A. W., Shiffman, S., Baraldi, A. N., MacKinnon, D. P., Lockhart, G., et al. (2013). Sweetened drink and snacking cues in adolescents. A study using ecological momentary assessment. Appetite 67, 61-73. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2013.03.016
17. Hancock, G., Kuo, W., and Lawrence, F. (2001). An illustration of second-order latent growth models. Struct. Equat. Model. 8, 470-489. doi: 10.1207/S15328007SEM0803_7
18. Hox, J. J. (2002). Multilevel Analysis: Techniques and Applications. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
19. Hu, L., and Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoffcriteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct. Equat. Model. 6, 1-55. doi: 10.1080/10705519909540118
20. Kenny, D. A., and Zautra, A. (1995). The trait-state-error model for multiwave data. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 63, 52-59. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.63.1.52
21. Kreft, I., and de Leeuw, J. (1998). Introducing Multilevel Modeling. London: Sage.
22. Leite, W. L. (2007). A comparison of latent growth models for constructs measured by multiple items. Struct. Equat. Model. 14, 581-610. doi: 10.1080/10705510701575438
23. Luke, D. A. (2004). Multilevel Modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24. McArdle, J. J. (1988). "Dynamic but structural equation modeling of repeated measures data," in Handbook of Multivariate Experimental Psychology, 2nd Edn., eds R. B. Cattell and J. Nesselroade (New York, NY: Plenum Press), 561-614. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4613-0893-5_17
25. McArdle, J. J., and Epstein, D. (1987). Latent growth curves within developmental structural equation models. Child Dev. 58, 110-133. doi: 10.2307/1130295
26. Mehta, P. D., and Neale, M. C. (2005). People are variables too: multilevel structural equations modeling. Psychol. Methods 10, 259-284. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.10.3.259
27. Mehta, P. D., and West, S. G. (2000). Putting the individual back into individual growth curves. Psychol. Methods 5, 23-43. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.5.1.23
28. Meredith, W. (1993). Measurement invariance, factor analysis, and factorial invariance. Psychometrika 58, 525-543. doi: 10.1007/BF02294825
29. Meredith, W., and Tisak, J. (1990). Latent curve analysis. Psychometrika 55, 107-122. doi: 10.1007/BF02294746
30. Millsap, R. E. (2011). Statistical Approaches to Measurement Invariance. New York, NY: Routledge.
31. Muthén, B. O. (1994). Multilevel covariance structure analysis. Sociol. Methods Res. 22, 376-398. doi: 10.1177/0049124194022003006
32. Muthén, B. O. (2004). "Latent variable analysis: growth mixture modeling and related techniques for longitudinal data," in Handbook of Quantitative Methodology for the Social Sciences, ed D. Kaplan (Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications), 345-368.
33. Muthén, L. K., and Muthén, B. O. (1998-2012). Mplus User's Guide. 7th Edn. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén and Muthén.
34. Nussbeck, F. W., Eid, M., Geiser, C., Courvoisier, D. S., and Lischetzke, T. (2009). A CTC(M-1) model for different types of raters. Methodology 5, 88-98. doi: 10.1027/1614-2241.5.3.88
35. Plewis, I. (2005). Modelling behaviour with multivariate multilevel growth curves. Methodology 1, 71-80. doi: 10.1027/1614-1881.1.2.71
36. Sayer, A. G., and Cumsille, P. E. (2001). "Second-order latent growth curve models," in New Methods for the Analysis of Change, eds L. Collins and A. Sayer (Washington, DC: American Psychological Association), 179-200.
37. Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., and Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: test of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods Psychol. Res. 8, 23-74. Available online at: http://www.dgps.de/fachgruppen/methoden/mpr-online/issue20/art2/mpr130_13.pdf
38. Shiffman, S., Stone, A. A., and Hufford, M. (2008). Ecological momentary assessment. Annu. Rev. Clin. Psychol. 4, 1-32. doi: 10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.3.022806.091415
39. Snijders, T. A. B., and Bosker, R. J. (1999). Multilevel Analysis: An Introduction to Basic and Advanced Multilevel Modeling. London: Sage.
40. Steyer, R., Ferring, D., and Schmitt, M. J. (1992). States and traits in psychological assessment. Eur. J. Psychol. Assess. 8, 79-98.
41. Steyer, R., Geiser, C., and Fiege, C. (2012). "Latent state-trait models," in Handbook of Research Methods in Psychology, ed H. Cooper (Washington, DC: APA), 291-308.
42. Steyer, R., Schmitt, M., and Eid, M. (1999). Latent state-trait theory and research in personality and individual differences. Eur. J. Pers. 13, 389-408. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0984(199909/10)13:5<389::AID-PER361>3.0.CO;2-A
43. von Oerzen, T., Hertzog, C., Lindenberger, U., and Ghisletta, P. (2010). The effect of multiple indicators on the power to detect inter-individual differences in change. Br. J. Math. Stat. Psychol. 63, 627-646. doi: 10.1348/000711010X486633
44. Widaman, K. F., and Reise, S. P. (1997). "Exploring the measurement invariance of psychological instruments: applications in the substance use domain," in The Science of Prevention: Methodological Advances From Alcohol and Substance Abuse Research, eds K. J. Bryant, M. Windle, and S. G. West (Washington, DC: American Psychological Association), 281-324. doi: 10.1037/10222-009