Expected utility or prospect theory maximisers? Assessing farmers' risk behaviour from field-experiment data

European Review of Agricultural Economics

Volumn 41, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 135-172

  Bocquého, Géraldine ^a,d   Jacquet, Florence ^b   Reynaud, Arnaud ^c  

^a INRA ALISS   (France)

^b UMR MOISA   (France)

^c TOULOUSE SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (France)

^d INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR APPLIED SYSTEMS ANALYSIS   (Austria)

Author keywords

experimental economics; France; loss aversion; probability weighting; risk preferences

Indexed keywords

EUROPEAN UNION; FARMERS KNOWLEDGE; FARMING SYSTEM; PROBABILITY; RISK ASSESSMENT;

FRANCE;

EID: 84891688675     PISSN: 01651587     EISSN: 14643618     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/erae/jbt006     Document Type: Article

References (91)

1. Abadi Ghadim, A. K., Pannell, D. J. and Burton, M. P. (2005). Risk, uncertainty, and learning in adoption of a crop innovation. Agricultural Economics 33: 1-9. (Pubitemid 43906683)
2. Abdellaoui, M., Barrios, C. and Wakker, P. P. (2007). Reconciling introspective utility with revealed preference: experimental arguments based on prospect theory. Journal of Econometrics 138: 356-378. (Pubitemid 46452999)
3. Abdellaoui, M., Bleichrodt, H. and L'Haridon, O. (2008). A tractable method to measure utility and loss aversion under prospect theory. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 36: 245-266.
4. Alexander, C., Ivanic, R., Rosch, S., Tyner, W., Wu, S. Y. and Yoder, J. R. (2012). Contract theory and implications for perennial energy crop contracting. Energy Economics 34: 970-979.
5. Allais, M. (1953). Le comportement de l'homme rationnel devant le risque, critique des postulats et axiomes de l'école américaine. Econometrica 21: 503-546.
6. Antle, J. M. (1987). Econometric estimation of producers' risk attitudes. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 69: 509-522.
7. Antle, J. M. (1989). Non structural risk attitude estimation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 71: 774-784.
8. Battisti, D. S. and Naylor, R. L. (2009). Historical warnings of future food insecurity with unprecedented seasonal heat. Science 323: 240-244.
9. Binswanger, H. P. (1980). Attitudes toward risk: experimental measurement in rural India. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 62: 395-407.
10. Binswanger, H. P. (1981). Attitudes toward risk: theoretical implications of an experiment in rural India. Economic Journal 91: 867-890.
11. Bocquého, G. and Jacquet, F. (2010). The adoption of switchgrass and miscanthus by farmers: impact of liquidity constraints and risk preferences. Energy Policy 38: 2598-2607.
12. Boussard, J. (1969). The introduction of risk into a programming model: different criteria and the actual behavior of farmers. European Economic Review 1: 92-121.
13. Boussard, J.-M. and Petit, M. (1967). Representation of farmers' behavior under uncertainty with a focus-loss constraint. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 49: 869-880.
14. Bruhin, A., Fehr-Duda, H. and Epper, T. (2010). Risk and rationality: uncovering heterogeneity in probability distortion. Econometrica 78: 1375-1412.
15. Camerer, C. F. (1998). Bounded rationality in individual decision making. Experimental Economics 1: 163-183.
16. Chavas, J.-P., Chambers, R. G. and Pope, R. D. (2010). Production economics and farm management: a century of contributions. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 92: 356-375.
17. Chavas, J.-P. and Holt, M. T. (1996). Economic behavior under uncertainty: a joint analysis of risk preferences and technology. The Review of Economics and Statistics 78: 329-335.
18. Christensen, T., Pedersen, A. B., Nielsen, H. O., Mørkbak, M. R., Hasler, B. and Denver, S. (2011). Determinants of farmers' willingness to participate in subsidy schemes for pesticide-free buffer zones - a choice experiment study. Ecological Economics 70: 1558-1564.
19. Coble, K. H. (2004). The joint effect of government crop insurance and loan programmes on the demand for futures hedging. European Review of Agricultural Economics 31: 309-330. (Pubitemid 40144928)
20. Collins, A., Musser, W. N. and Mason, R. (1991). Prospect theory and risk preferences of Oregon seed producers. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 73: 429-435.
21. Dubois, P. and Vukina, T. (2009). Optimal incentives under moral hazard and heterogeneous agents: evidence from production contracts data. International Journal of Industrial Organization 27: 489-500.
22. Eales, J. S., Engel, B. K., Hauser, R. J. and Thompson, S. R. (1990). Grain price expectations of Illinois farmers and grain merchandisers. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 72: 701-708.
23. Ellsberg, D. (1961). Risk, ambiguity, and the savage axioms. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 75: 643-669.
24. Enjolras, G. and Sentis, P. (2011). Crop insurance policies and purchases in France. Agricultural Economics 42: 475-486.
25. Espinosa-Goded, M., Barreiro-Hurlé, J. and Ruto, E. (2010). What do farmers want from agri-environmental scheme design? A choice experiment approach. Journal of Agricultural Economics 61: 259-273.
26. Galarza, F. B. (2009). Choices under risk in rural Peru, Staff Paper No. 542. Madison: University of Wisconsin.
27. Garcia, P. and Leuthold, R. M. (2004). A selected review of agricultural commodity futures and options markets. European Review of Agricultural Economics 31: 235-272. (Pubitemid 40144925)
28. Glauber, J. W. (2004). Crop insurance reconsidered. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 86: 1179-1195. (Pubitemid 40019953)
29. Gollier, C. (2001). What does classical theory have to say about household portfolios? In: L. Guiso, M. Haliassos and T. Jappelli (eds), Household Portfolios, Household Portfolios. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
30. Gollier, C. and Pratt, J. W. (1996). Risk vulnerability and the tempering effect of background risk. Econometrica 64: 1109-1123. (Pubitemid 126463656)
31. Guiso, L. and Paiella, M. (2008). Risk aversion, wealth and background risk. Journal of the European Economic Association 6: 1109-1150.
32. Hardaker, J. B. and Gudbrand, L. (2010). Probabilities for decision analysis in agricultural and rural resource economics: the need for a paradigm change. Agricultural Systems 103: 345-350.
33. Harless, D. W. (1992). Predictions about indifference curves inside the unit triangle: a test of variants of expected utility theory. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 18: 391-414.
34. Harless, D. W. and Camerer, C. F. (1994). The predictive utility of generalized expected utility theories. Econometrica 62: 1251-1289.
35. Harrison, G. and Rutström, E. (2008). Risk aversion in the laboratory. In: J. C. Cox and G. Harrison (eds), Risk Aversion in Experiments. Research in Experimental Economics, vol. 12. Bingley, UK: JAI Press, 41-196.
36. Harrison, G. and Rutström, E. (2009). Expected utility theory and prospect theory: one wedding and a decent funeral. Experimental Economics 12: 133-158.
37. Harrison, G. W., Morten, I. L. and Rutström, E. E. (2007). Estimating risk attitudes in Denmark: a field experiment. Scandinavian Journal of Economics 109: 341-368. (Pubitemid 47343315)
38. Harrison, G. W., Humphrey, S. J. and Verschoor, A. (2010). Choice under uncertainty: evidence from Ethiopia, India and Uganda. Economic Journal 120: 80-104.
39. Harrison, G. W. and List, J. A. (2004). Field experiments. Journal of Economic Literature 42: 1009-1055. (Pubitemid 40406044)
40. Hellerstein, D., Higgins, N. and Horowitz, J. (2013). The predictive power of risk preference measures for farming decisions. European Review of Agricultural Economics. doi: 10.1093/erae/jbs043.
41. Herberich, D. H. and List, J. (2012). Digging into background risk: experiments with farmers and students. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 94: 457-463.
42. Hey, J. D. and Orme, C. (1994). Investigating generalizations of expected-utility theory using experimental data. Econometrica 62: 1291-1326.
43. Holt, C. A. and Laury, S. K. (2002). Risk aversion and incentive effects. American Economic Review 92: 1644-1655.
44. Huijps, K., Hogeveen, H., Antonides, G., Valeeva, N. I., Lam, T. J. and Oude Lansink, A. G. (2010). Sub-optimal economic behaviour with respect to mastitis management. European Review of Agricultural Economics 37: 553-568.
45. Just, D. and Wu, S. (2005). Loss aversion and reference points in contracts. In SCC-76 Annual Meeting, Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, 31 March-2 April 2005.
46. Just, D. R. and Peterson, H. H. (2010). Is expected utility theory applicable? A revealed preference test. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 92: 16-27.
47. Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L. and Thaler, R. H. (1991). Anomalies: the endowment effect, loss aversion, and status quo bias. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 5: 193-206.
48. Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47: 263-291.
49. Kallas, Z., Serra, T. and Gil, J. M. (2010). Farmers' objectives as determinants of organic farming adoption: the case of Catalonian vineyard production. Agricultural Economics 41: 409-423.
50. Kataoka, S. (1963). A stochastic programming model. Econometrica 31: 181-196.
51. Kim, H. S., Brorsen, B. W. and Anderson, K. B. (2010). Profit margin hedging. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 92: 638-653.
52. Köszegi, B. and Rabin, M. (2006). A model of reference-dependent preferences. Quarterly Journal of Economics 121: 1133-65. (Pubitemid 44888170)
53. Liu, E. (2013). Time to change what to sow: Risk preferences and technology adoption decisions of cotton farmers in China. The Review of Economics and Statistics. doi: 10.1162/REST-a-00295.
54. Liu, E. M. and Huang, J. (2013). Risk preferences and pesticide use by cotton farmers in China. Journal of Development Economics 103: 202-215.
55. Loomes, G., Moffatt, P. G. and Sugden, R. (2002). A microeconometric test of alternative stochastic theories of risky choice. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 24: 103-130. (Pubitemid 37131158)
56. Loomes, G. and Sugden, R. (1998). Testing different stochastic specifications of risky choice. Economica 65: 581-98. (Pubitemid 29081447)
57. Lusk, J. L. and Coble, K. H. (2008). Risk aversion in the presence of background risk: evidence from an economic experiment. In: J. C. Cox and G. Harrison (eds), Risk Aversion in Experiments. Research in Experimental Economics, vol. 12. Bingley, UK: JAI Press, 315-340.
58. Mahul, O. (2000). The output decision of a risk-neutral producer under risk of liquidation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 82: 49-58.
59. Mahul, O. (2003). Hedging price risk in the presence of crop yield and revenue insurance. European Review of Agricultural Economics 30: 217-239. (Pubitemid 37446027)
60. Manski, C. F. and Lerman, S. R. (1977). The estimation of choice probabilities from choice based samples. Econometrica 45: 1977-1988.
61. Mason, C., Shogren, J., Settle, C. and List, J. (2005). Investigating risky choices over losses using experimental data. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 31: 187-215. (Pubitemid 41361114)
62. Mattos, F., Garcia, P. and Pennings, J. M. E. (2008). Probability weighting and loss aversion in futures hedging. Journal of Financial Markets 11: 433-452.
63. Menapace, L., Colson, G. and Raffaelli, R. (2012). Risk aversion, subjective beliefs, and farmer risk management strategies. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 95: 384-389.
64. Moscardi, E. and de Janvry, A. (1977). Attitudes toward risk among peasants: an econometric approach. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 59: 710-716.
65. Nguyen, Q. (2011). Does nurture matter: theory and experimental investigation on the effect of working environment on risk and time preferences. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 43: 245-270.
66. Nguyen, Q. D. and Leung, P. (2009). Do fishermen have different attitudes toward risk? An application of prospect theory to the study of Vietnamese fishermen. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 34: 518-538.
67. Pennings, J. M. E. and Smidts, A. (2003). The shape of utility functions and organizational behavior. Management Science 49: 1251-1263.
68. Prelec, D. (1998). The probability weighting function. Econometrica 66: 497-528.
69. Qiu, Z., Prato, T. and McCamley, F. (2001). Evaluating environmental risks using safetyfirst constraints. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 83: 402-413. (Pubitemid 32459538)
70. Quiggin, J. (1982). A theory of anticipated utility. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 3: 323-343.
71. Quiggin, J. (2003). Background risk in generalized expected utility theory. Economic Theory 22: 607-611. (Pubitemid 37395229)
72. Rabin, M. (2000). Risk aversion and expected-utility theory: a calibration theorem. Econometrica 68: 1281-1292.
73. Reynaud, A. and Couture, S. (2012). Stability of risk preference measures: results from a field experiment on French farmers. Theory and Decision 73: 203-221.
74. Roy, A. D. (1952). Safety-first and the holding of assets. Econometrica 20: 431-449.
75. Saha, A. (1993). Expo-power utility: a 'flexible' form for absolute and relative risk aversion. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 75: 905-913.
76. Samuelson, W. and Zeckhauser, R. (1988). Status quo bias in decision making. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 1: 7-59.
77. Savage, L. J. (1954). The Foundations of Statistics. New York City, NY: Dover Publications.
78. Serra, T., Zilberman, D., Gil, J. M. and Featherstone, A. (2009). The effects of decoupling on land allocation. Applied Economics 41: 2323-2333.
79. Starmer, C. (1992). Testing new theories of choice under uncertainty using the common consequence effect. Review of Economic Studies 59: 813-30.
80. Starmer, C. (2000). Developments in non-expected utility theory: the hunt for a descriptive theory of choice under risk. Journal of Economic Literature 38: 332-382.
81. Tanaka, T., Camerer, C. F. and Nguyen, Q. (2010). Risk and time preferences: linking experimental and household survey data from Vietnam. American Economic Review 100: 557-571.
82. Thaler, R. (1980). Toward a positive theory of consumer choice. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 1: 39-60.
83. Tuthill, J. and Frechette, D. L. (2004). Optimism and pessimism in commodity price hedging. European Review of Agricultural Economics 31: 289-307. (Pubitemid 40144927)
84. Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. (1992). Advances in prospect theory: cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 5: 297-323.
85. von Neumann, J. and Morgenstern, O. (1947). Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton, USA: Princeton University Press.
86. Wakker, P. (2008). Explaining the characteristics of the power (CRRA) utility family. Health Economics 17: 1329-1344.
87. Wakker, P., Thaler, R. and Tversky, A. (1997). Probabilistic insurance. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 15: 7-28.
88. Wakker, P. P. (2010). Prospect Theory: For Risk and Ambiguity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
89. Wossink, A. and Swinton, S. M. (2007). Jointness in production and farmers' willingness to supply non-marketed ecosystem services. Ecological Economics 64: 297-304. (Pubitemid 350186224)
90. Yaari, M. E. (1987). The dual theory of choice under risk. Econometrica 55: 95-115.
91. Zheng, X., Vukina, T. and Shin, C. (2008). The role of farmers' risk aversion for contract choice in the US hog industry. Journal of Agricultural and Food Industrial Organization 6: 1-22.