18F-FDG PET study reveals brain functional changes during attention in rats

Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Volumn 54, Issue 11, 2013, Pages 1969-1973

  Xi, Wang ^a,b,c   Su, Danting ^d   Nie, Binbin ^e   Yu, Yanqin ^f   Shan, Baoci ^e   Chen, Qiaozhen ^a,b,c   Tian, Mei ^a,b,c   Zhang, Hong ^a,b,c  

^a THE SECOND AFFILIATED HOSPITAL OF ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (China)

^b ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c Key Laboratory of Medical Molecular Imaging of Zhejiang Province   (China)

^d ZHEJIANG PROVINCIAL CENTER FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION   (China)

^e INSTITUTE OF HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS   (China)

^f ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (China)

Author keywords

Attention; Neurology; Positron emission tomography (PET); Rat model

Indexed keywords

FLUORODEOXYGLUCOSE F 18; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT;

ACCURACY; ADULT; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; BRAIN METABOLISM; CINGULATE GYRUS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENTORHINAL CORTEX; FUNCTIONAL NEUROIMAGING; GLUCOSE METABOLISM; IMAGE ANALYSIS; LATENT PERIOD; LATERAL HYPOTHALAMUS; LEARNING; MALE; MEDIAL ENTORHINAL CORTEX; MEDIAL GENICULATE BODY; NEUROPHYSIOLOGICAL MONITORING; NONHUMAN; NUCLEUS ACCUMBENS; OLFACTORY BULB; PARAMETRIC TEST; PET SCANNER; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PYRIFORM CORTEX; RAT; REACTION TIME; RETROSPLENIAL CORTEX; STATISTICAL PARAMETRIC MAPPING; TASK PERFORMANCE; THALAMUS ANTERIOR NUCLEUS; THALAMUS DORSOMEDIAL NUCLEUS; VISUAL STIMULATION; ANIMAL; ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; BRAIN; DIAGNOSTIC USE; METABOLISM; PHYSIOLOGY; SCINTISCANNING; SPRAGUE DAWLEY RAT; TRANSPORT AT THE CELLULAR LEVEL; 18F-FDG; NEUROLOGY; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY (PET); RAT MODEL;

ANIMALS; ATTENTION; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL TRANSPORT; BRAIN; FLUORODEOXYGLUCOSE F18; LEARNING; MALE; POSITRON-EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; RATS; RATS, SPRAGUE-DAWLEY; REACTION TIME;

18F-FDG; ATTENTION; NEUROLOGY; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY (PET); RAT MODEL;

EID: 84891672751     PISSN: 01615505     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.113.123000     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Bush G, Valera EM, Seidman LJ. Functional neuroimaging of attention-deficit/ hyperactivity disorder: a review and suggested future directions. Biol Psychiatry. 2005;57:1273-1284.
2. Jones T, Rabiner EA. The development, past achievements, and future directions of brain PET. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2012;32:1426-1454.
3. Nugent AC, Milham MP, Bain EE, et al. Cortical abnormalities in bipolar disorder investigated with MRI and voxel-based morphometry. Neuroimage. 2006;30:485-497.
4. Small GW, Bookheimer SY, Thompson PM, et al. Current and future uses of neuroimaging for cognitively impaired patients. Lancet Neurol. 2008;7: 161-172.
5. Kornblum HI, Araujo DM, Annala AJ, Tatsukawa KJ, Phelps ME, Cherry SR. In vivo imaging of neuronal activation and plasticity in the rat brain by high resolution positron emission tomography (microPET). Nat Biotechnol. 2000;18: 655-660.
6. 18F]fluorodeoxyglucose micro positron emission tomography study. J Neurosci. 2010;30:9708-9714.
7. Bari A, Dalley JW, Robbins TW. The application of the 5-choice serial reaction time task for the assessment of visual attentional processes and impulse control in rats. Nat Protoc. 2008;3:759-767.
8. Robbins TW. The 5-choice serial reaction time task: behavioural pharmacology and functional neurochemistry. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2002;163:362-380.
9. Nie B, Chen K, Zhao S, et al. A rat brain MRI template with digital stereotaxic atlas of fine anatomical delineations in paxinos space and its automated application in voxel-wise analysis. Hum Brain Mapp. 2013;34:1306-1318.
10. Pothuizen HH, Davies M, Aggleton JP, Vann SD. Effects of selective granular retrosplenial cortex lesions on spatial working memory in rats. Behav Brain Res. 2010;208:566-575.
11. Vann SD, Aggleton JP, Maguire EA. What does the retrosplenial cortex do? Nat Rev Neurosci. 2009;10:792-802.
12. Mesulam MM, Nobre AC, Kim YH, Parrish TB, Gitelman DR. Heterogeneity of cingulate contributions to spatial attention. Neuroimage. 2001;13:1065-1072.
13. Ahveninen J, Jaaskelainen IP, Belliveau JW, Hamalainen M, Lin FH, Raij T. Dissociable influences of auditory object vs. spatial attention on visual system oscillatory activity. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e38511.
14. Mitelman SA, Shihabuddin L, Brickman AM, Hazlett EA, Buchsbaum MS. Volume of the cingulate and outcome in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 2005; 72:91-108.
15. Minoshima S, Giordani B, Berent S, Frey KA, Foster NL, Kuhl DE. Metabolic reduction in the posterior cingulate cortex in very early Alzheimer's disease. Ann Neurol. 1997;42:85-94.
16. Su YY, Luo B, Jin Y, et al. Altered neuronal intrinsic properties and reduced synaptic transmission of the rat's medial geniculate body in salicylate-induced tinnitus. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e46969.
17. Mozolic JL, Joyner D, Hugenschmidt CE, et al. Cross-modal deactivations during modality-specific selective attention. BMC Neurol. 2008;8:35-45.
18. Elmquist JK, Elias CF, Saper CB. From lesions to leptin: hypothalamic control of food intake and body weight. Neuron. 1999;22:221-232.
19. Petrovich GD. Learning and the motivation to eat: forebrain circuitry. Physiol Behav. 2011;104:582-589.
20. Joseph MH, Datla K, Young AM. The interpretation of the measurement of nucleus accumbens dopamine by in vivo dialysis: the kick, the craving or the cognition? Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2003;27:527-541.