Comparison on colonoscopic parameters according to length of adult-colonoscope

Chinese Medical Journal

Volumn 127, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 85-91

  Lee, Seung Hwa ^a   Lee, Duck Joo ^a  

^a Ajou University School of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Colonoscope length; Colonoscopy; Intubation rate; Intubation time

Indexed keywords

ALGIRON; CIMETROPIUM; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ADENOMA; ADULT; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; CECUM; COLONOSCOPY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIGESTIVE TRACT INTUBATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; ILEOCECAL VALVE; ILEUM; INTERMEDIATE ADULT COLONOSCOPY; IRRITABLE COLON; LONG ADULT COLONOSCOPY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NORMAL HUMAN; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE;

ADULT; AGE FACTORS; COLONOSCOPES; COLONOSCOPY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC;

EID: 84891669079     PISSN: 03666999     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0366-6999.20130929     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Ye YJ, Shen ZL, Sun XT, Wang ZF, Shen DH, Liu HJ, et al. Impact of multidisciplinary team working on the management of colorectal cancer. Chin Med J 2012; 125: 172-177.
2. Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2013. CA Cancer J Clin 2013; 63: 11-30.
3. Alexiusdottir KK, Moller PH, Snaebjornsson P, Jonasson L, Olafsdottir EJ, Bjornsson ES, et al. Association of symptoms of colon cancer patients with tumor location and TNM tumor stage. Scand J Gastroenterol 2012; 47: 795-801.
4. Li S, Nie Z, Li N, Li J, Zhang P, Yang Z, et al. Colorectal cancer screening for the natural population of Beijing with sequential fecal occult blood test: a multicenter study. Chin Med J 2003; 116: 200-202.
5. Sung JJ, Lau JY, Goh KL, Leung WK. Increasing incidence of colorectal cancer in Asia: implications for screening. Lancet Oncol 2005; 6: 871-876.
6. Jung KW, Won YJ, Kong HJ, Oh CM, Seo HG, Lee JS. Cancer statistics in korea: incidence, mortality, survival and prevalence in 2010. Cancer Res Treat 2013; 45: 1-14.
7. Kim YJ. What is a reasonable screening test for colorectal cancer. J Korean Soc Coloproctol 2010; 26: 375.
8. Atkin W. Options for screening for colorectal cancer. Scandinavian J Gastroenterol 2003; 38: 13-16.
9. Levy BT, Xu Y, Daly JM, Ely JW. A randomized controlled trial to improve colon cancer screening in rural family medicine: an Iowa Research Network (IRENE) study. J Am Board Fam Med 2013; 26: 486-497.
10. Zuber-Jerger I, Endlicher E, Gelbmann CM. Factors affecting cecal and ileal intubation time in colonoscopy. Med Klin (Munich) 2008; 103: 477-481.
11. Bernstein C, Thorn M, Monsees K, Spell R, O'Connor JB. A prospective study of factors that determine cecal intubation time at colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2005; 61: 72-75.
12. Hsu CM, Lin WP, Su MY, Chiu CT, Ho YP, Chen PC. Factors that influence cecal intubation rate during colonoscopy in deeply sedated patients. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012; 27: 76-80.
13. Arcovedo R, Larsen C, Reyes HS. Patient factors associated with a faster insertion of the colonoscope. Surg Endosc 2007; 21: 885-888.
14. Hsieh YH, Kuo CS, Tseng KC, Lin HJ. Factors that predict cecal insertion time during sedated colonoscopy: the role of waist circumference. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008; 23: 215-217.
15. Xie Q, Chen B, Liu L, Gan H. Does the variable-stiffness colonoscope makes colonoscopy easier? A meta-analysis of the efficacy of the variable stiffness colonoscope compared with the standard adult colonoscope. BMC Gastroenterol 2012; 12: 151.
16. Othman MO, Bradley AG, Choudhary A, Hoffman RM, Roy PK. Variable stiffness colonoscope versus regular adult colonoscope: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Endoscopy 2009; 41: 17-24.
17. Rex DK. Effect of variable stiffness colonoscopes on cecal intubation times for routine colonoscopy by an experienced examiner in sedated patients. Endoscopy 2001; 33: 60-64.
18. Hsieh YH, Zhou AL, Lin HJ. Long pediatric colonoscope versus intermediate length adult colonoscope for colonoscopy. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008; 23: e7-e10.
19. Marshall JB. Use of a pediatric colonoscope improves the success of total colonoscopy in selected adult patients. Gastrointest Endosc 1996; 44: 675-678.
20. Lee HL, Eun CS, Lee OY, Jeon YC, Han DS, Sohn JH, et al. Significance of colonoscope length in cecal insertion time. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 69: 503-508.
21. De Silva AP, Kumarasena RS, Perera Keragala SD, Kalubowila U, Niriella M, Dassanayake AS, et al. The prone 12 o'clock position reduces ileal intubation time during colonoscopy compared to the left lateral 6 o'clock (standard) position. BMC Gastroenterol 2011; 11: 89.
22. Powell N, Hayee BH, Yeoh DP, Rowbotham DS, Saxena V, McNair A. Terminal ileal photography or biopsy to verify total colonoscopy: does the endoscope agree with the microscope? Gastrointest Endosc 2007; 66: 320-325.
23. Rex DK, Petrini JL, Baron TH, Chak A, Cohen J, Deal SE, et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101: 873-885.
24. Barthel J, Hinojosa T, Shah N. Colonoscope length and procedure efficiency. J Clin Gastroenterol 1995; 21: 30-32.
25. Dickey W, Garrett D. Colonoscope length and procedure efficiency. Am J Gastroenterol 2002; 97: 79-82.
26. Saifuddin T, Trivedi M, King PD, Madsen R, Marshall JB. Usefulness of a pediatric colonoscope for colonoscopy in adults. Gastrointest Endosc 2000; 51: 314-317.
27. Jover R, Zapater P, Polania E, Bujanda L, Lanas A, Hermo JA, et al. Modifiable endoscopic factors that influence the adenoma detection rate in colorectal cancer screening colonoscopies. Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 77: 381-389.
28. Komeda Y, Suzuki N, Sarah M, Thomas-Gibson S, Vance M, Fraser C, et al. Factors associated with failed polyp retrieval at screening colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 77: 395-400.
29. Adler A, Wegscheider K, Lieberman D, Aminalai A, Aschenbeck J, Drossel R, et al. Factors determining the quality of screening colonoscopy: A prospective study on adenoma detection rates, from 12 134 examinations (Berlin colonoscopy project 3, BECOP-3). Gut 2013; 62: 236-241.
30. Barclay RL, Vicari JJ, Doughty AS, Johanson JF, Greenlaw RL. Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy. N Engl J Med 2006; 355: 2533-2541.
31. Kim WH, Cho YJ, Park JY, Min PK, Kang JK, Park IS. Factors affecting insertion time and patient discomfort during colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2000; 52: 600-605.
32. Krishnan P, Sofi AA, Dempsey R, Alaradi O, Nawras A. Body mass index predicts cecal insertion time: the higher, the better. Dig Endosc 2012; 24: 439-442.
33. Kennedy G, Larson D, Wolff B, Winter D, Petersen B, Larson M. Routine ileal intubation during screening colonoscopy: a useful maneuver? Surg Endosc 2008; 22: 2606-2608.
34. Jeong SH, Lee KJ, Kim YB, Kwon HC, Sin SJ, Chung JY. Diagnostic value of terminal ileum intubation during colonoscopy. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008; 23: 51-55.
35. Makkar R, Lopez R, Shen B. Clinical utility of retrograde terminal ileum intubation in the evaluation of chronic non-bloody diarrhea. J Dig Dis 2013; 14: 536-542.
36. Samuel S, Bruining DH, Loftus EV Jr, Becker B, Fletcher JG, Mandrekar JN, et al. Endoscopic skipping of the distal terminal ileum in Crohn's disease can lead to negative results from ileocolonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012; 10: 1253-1259.
37. Marshall JB, Brown DN. Photodocumentation of total colonoscopy: how successful are endoscopists? Do reviewers agree? Gastrointest Endosc 1996; 44: 243-248.
38. Thomas-Gibson S. The caecum or not the caecum? Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008; 20: 500-502.