Novel porous Al2O3-SiO2-TiO2 bone grafting materials: Formation and characterization

Journal of Biomaterials Applications

Volumn 28, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 813-824

  Naga, Salma M ^a   El Kady, Abeer M ^a   El Maghraby, Hesham F ^a   Awaad, Mohamed ^a   Detsch, Rainer ^b   Boccaccini, Aldo R ^b  

^a NATIONAL RESEARCH CENTRE   (Egypt)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ERLANGEN NUREMBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

bioceramics; Bone grafting; in vitro; in vivo; porous materials

Indexed keywords

BONE GRAFTING; BONE GRAFTING MATERIALS; HISTOLOGICAL ANALYSIS; IN-VITRO; IN-VIVO; OSTEOBLAST-LIKE CELLS; POLYETHYLENE NON-WOVEN; THREE-POINT BENDING TEST;

BIOCERAMICS; BONE; DEFECTS; DEGRADATION; POROUS MATERIALS; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SILICA; SOLS; X RAY DIFFRACTION;

SCAFFOLDS (BIOLOGY);

ALUMINUM OXIDE; DOCUSATE CALCIUM; POLYETHYLENE; SILICON DIOXIDE; TITANIUM DIOXIDE;

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL ACTIVITY; BONE DEFECT; BONE FILLER; BONE GRAFT; BONE MATURATION; BONE PROSTHESIS; BONE STRENGTH; BONE TISSUE; CELL ADHESION; CELL GROWTH; COMPOSITE GRAFT; IN VITRO STUDY; IN VIVO STUDY; INFLAMMATION; MALE; NONHUMAN; OSSIFICATION; OSTEOBLAST; POROSITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SURFACE PROPERTY; X RAY DIFFRACTION;

BIOCERAMICS; BONE GRAFTING; IN VITRO; IN VIVO; POROUS MATERIALS;

ALUMINUM OXIDE; ANIMALS; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; BONE TRANSPLANTATION; CELL LINE; MALE; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; RATS; RATS, SPRAGUE-DAWLEY; SILICON DIOXIDE; TISSUE SCAFFOLDS; TITANIUM; X-RAY DIFFRACTION;

EID: 84891621255     PISSN: 08853282     EISSN: 15308022     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0885328213483634     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Goyle WJ, Simonet WS, Lacey DL. Differentiation and activation. Nature. 2003 ; 423: 337-342
2. Hulbert SF, Young FA, Mathews RS, et al. Potential of ceramic materials as permanently implantable skeletal prostheses. J Biomed Mater Res. 1970 ; 4 (3). 433-456
3. Heimke G, Leen S, Willmann G. Knee arthoplasty: recently developed ceramic offer new solutions. Biomaterials. 2002 ; 23 (7). 1539-1551
4. Ignatius A, Perous M, Schorlemmer S, et al. Osseointergration of alumina with a bioactive coating under load-bearing and unloaded conditions. Biomaterials. 2005 ; 26: 2325-2332
5. Chang YS, Oka M, Kobayashi M, et al. Significance of interstitial bone ingrowth under load-bearing conditions: a comparison between solid and porous implant materials. Biomaterials. 1996 ; 17 (11). 1141-1148
6. Hench LL. Biomaterials: a forecast for the future. Biomaterials. 1998 ; 19 (16). 1419-1423
7. Wilson J, Yli-Urpo A and Pekka, HR. Bioactive glasses: clinical applications. In: LL Hench and J Wilson (eds) An introduction to bioceramics. Singapore: World Scientific, 1993, pp.63-73.
8. Hench LL, Wilson J. Surface-active biomaterials. Science. 1984 ; 226: 630-636
9. Richardson WC, Klawitter JJ, Sauer BW, et al. Soft tissue response to four dense ceramic materials and two clinically used biomaterials. J Biomed Mater Res. 1975 ; 91: 73-80
10. Leivo J, MMeretoja V, Vippola M, et al. Sol-gel derived aluminosilicate coatings on alumina substrate for osteoblasts. Acta Mater. 2006 ; 2: 659-668
11. Todea M, Frentiu B, Turcu RFV, et al. Surface structure changes on aluminosilicate microspheres at the interface with simulated body fluid. Corros Sci. 2012 ; 54: 299-306
12. Ylanen H, Karlsson KH, Itala A, et al. Effect of immersion in SBF on porous bioactive bodies made by sintering bioactive glass microspheres. J Non-Cryst Solids. 2000 ; 25: 107-115
13. Pelmenschikov A, Strandh H, Pettersson LGM, et al. Lattice resistance to hydrolysis of Si-O-Si bonds of silicate minerals Ab initio calculations of a single water attack onto the (001) and (111) β-cristobalite surfaces. J Phys Chem B. 2000 ; 104: 5779-5783
14. Cacaina D, Ylanen H, Simon S, et al. The behavior of selected yttrium containing bioactive glass microspheres in simulated body environments. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2008 ; 19: 1225-1233
15. Sultan P, Das S, Bhattacharya A, et al. Novel utilization of bauxite - treated fly ash - based ceramics for its antibacterial activity. Int J Appl Ceram Technol. 2012 ; 9 (3). 550-560
16. Murthy MK, Hummel FA. X-ray study of the solid solution of TiO2, Fe2O3, and Cr2O3 in mullite (3Al2O3ċ2SiO2). Am Ceram Soc. 1960 ; 43: 267-267
17. Baudin C, Moya JS. Influence of titanium dioxide on the sintering and microstructural evolution of mullite. J Am Ceram Soc. 1984 ; 67: C - 134-136
18. Schneider H, Rager H. Occurrence of Ti3+ and Fe2+ in mullite. J Am Ceram Soc. 1984 ; 67: C - 248-250
19. Tkalčec E, Navala D, Ćosić. Distribution of titanium and aluminium in sintered mullite. J Mater Sci. 1990 ; 25: 1816-1820
20. Boccaccini AR, Gerhardt LC, Rebeling S and Blaker JJ. Fabrication, characterisation and assessment of bioactivity of poly (D, L Lactic acid) (PDLLA)/TiO2 nanocomposite films. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 2005; 36: 721-727.
21. Kim HW. Biomedical nanocomposites of hydroxyapatite/ polycaprolactone obtained by surfactant mediation. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2007 ; 83 (1). 169-177
22. Li R, Nie K, Pang W, et al. Morphology and properties of organic-inorganic hybrid materials involving TiO2 and poly(e-caprolactone), a biodegradable aliphatic polyester. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2007 ; 83 (1). 114-122
23. Boccaccini AR, Blaker JJ, Maquet V, et al. Poly(D,L-lactide) (PDLLA) foams with TiO2 nanoparticles and PDLLA/TiO2-Bioglass® foam composites for tissue engineering scaffolds. J Mater Sci. 2006 ; 41: 3999-4008
24. Torres FG, Nazhat SN, Sheikh Md, et al. Mechanical properties and bioactivity of porous PLGA/TiO2 nanoparticle-filled composites for tissue engineering scaffolds. Compos Sci Technol. 2007 ; 67: 1139-1147
25. Tamjid E, Bagheri R, Vossoughi M, et al. Effect of TiO2 morphology on in vitro bioactivity of polycaprolactone/TiO2 nanocomposites. Mater Lett. 2011 ; 65: 2530-2533
26. Li P, Ohtsuki C, Kokubo T, et al. The role of hydrated silica, titania, and alumina in inducing apatite on implants. J Biomed Mater Res. 1994 ; 28 (1). 7-15
27. Tripathi HS, Banerjee G. Synthesis and mechanical properties of mullite from beach sand sillimanite: Effect of TiO2. J Eur Ceram Soc. 1998 ; 18: 2081-2087
28. Sacks MD, Bozkurt N, Scheiffele GW. Fabrication of mullite and mullite -matrix composites by transient viscous sintering of composite powders. J Am Ceram Soc. 1991 ; 74: 2428-2437
29. Rana APS, Aiko O, Pask JA. Sintering of α-Al2O3/ quartz, and α-Al2O3/ cristobalite related to mullte formation. Ceram Int. 1982 ; 8: 151-153
30. Bouzidi N, Bouzidi A, Gaudon P, et al. Porcelain containing anatase and rutile nanocrystals. Ceram Int 2013; 39: 489-495.
31. Hong SH, Messing GL. Anisotropic grain growth in diphasic-gel-derived titania-doped mullite. J Amer Ceram Soc. 1998 ; 81: 1269-1277
32. Kokubo T, Kim HM, Miyaji F, et al. Ceramic-metal and ceramic-polymer composites prepared by a biomimetic process. Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manuf. 1999 ; 30 (4). 405-409
33. Kokubo T, Kim HM, Kawasgita M. Novel bioactive materials with different mechanical properties. Biomaterials. 2003 ; 24 (13). 2161-2175
34. Miyata N, Fuke K-i, Chen Q, et al. Apatite - forming ability and mechanical properties of PTMO - modified CaO - SiO2 - TiO2 hybrids derived from sol-gel processing. Biomaterials. 2004 ; 25: 1-7
35. Beherei HH, Mohamed KhR, El-Bassyouni GT. Fabrication and characterization of bioactive glass (45S5)/titania biocomposites. Ceram Int. 2009 ; 35 (5). 1991-1997
36. Kokubo T, Kushitani H, Sakka S, et al. Solutions able to reproduce in vivo surface - structure changes in bioactive glass - ceramic A-W3. J Biomed Mater Res. 1990 ; 24 (6). 721-734
37. Hench LL. Bioceramics. J Am Ceram Soc. 1998 ; 81 (7). 1705-1728
38. Christodoulou I, Buttery LD, Saravanapavan P, et al. Dose - and time - dependent effect of bioactive gel-glass ionic - dissolution products on human fetal osteoblast - specific gene expression. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2005 ; 74B (1). 529-537
39. Christodoulou I, Buttery LD, Tai G, et al. Characterization of human fetal osteoblasts by microarray analysis following stimulation with 58S gel-glass ionic dissolution products. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2006 ; 77B (2). 431-446
40. Bielby RC, Christodoulou IS, Pryce RS, et al. Time - and concentration - dependent effects of dissolution products of 58S sol-gel bioactive glass on proliferation and differentiation of murine and human osteoblasts. Tissue Eng. 2004 ; 10 (7-8). 1018-1026
41. Hench LL, Xynos ID, Polak JM. Bioactive glasses for in situ tissue regeneration. J Biomater Sci Polymer Edn. 2004 ; 15 (4). 543-562
42. Arcos D, Vallet-Regí M. Sol-gel silica- based biomaterials and bone tissue regeneration. Acta Biomaterialia. 2010 ; 6 (8). 2874-2888