Co2 exchange rate in cotton does not explain negative associations between lint yield and fiber quality

Journal of Cotton Science

Volumn 17, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 270-278

  Clement, Jenny D ^a   Constable, Greg A ^a   Conaty, Warren C ^a  

^a ACSIRO Plant Industry   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMMERCIAL CHECKS; CONTROL CULTIVARS; COTTON (GOSSYPIUM HIRSUTUM L.); EXCHANGE RATES; FIBER QUALITY; HARVEST INDEX; HIGH QUALITY; STOMATAL CONDUCTANCE;

CARBON DIOXIDE; COTTON; FINANCE; PLANTS (BOTANY);

FIBERS;

CARBON DIOXIDE; COTTON; FIBERS; FINANCE; PLANTS;

EID: 84891593197     PISSN: 15236919     EISSN: 15243303     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Bange, M.P., and S.P. Milroy. 2004. Growth and dry matter partitioning of diverse cotton genotypes. Field Crops Res. 87:73-87.
2. Clement, J.D., G.A. Constable, W.N. Stiller, and S.M. Liu. 2012. Negative associations still exist between yield and fibre quality in cotton breeding programs in Australia and USA. Field Crops Res. 128:1-7.
3. nd ed. John Wiley and Sons. New York, NY.
4. Constable, G.A. 1976. Temperature effects on the early field development of cotton. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. Anim. Husb. 16:905-910.
5. Constable, G.A., and A.B. Hearn. 1981. Irrigation for crops in a sub-humid environment. VI. Effect of irrigation and nitrogen fertilizer on growth, yield and quality of cotton. Irrigation Sci. 3:17-28.
6. Constable, G.A., P.E. Reid, and N.J. Thomson. 2001. Approaches utilized in breeding and development of cotton cultivars in Australia. p. 1-16. In J.N. Jenkins and S.Saha (eds.). Genetic Improvement of Cotton: EmergingTechnologies. Sci. Publ. Inc., Enfield, NH.
7. Cornish, K., J.W. Radin, E.L. Turcotte, Z. Lu, and E. Zeiger. 1991. Enhanced photosynthesis and stomatal conductance of Pima cotton (Gossypium barbadense L.). Plant Physiol. 97:484-489.
8. Culp, T.W., and D.C. Harrell, 1973. Breeding methods for improving yield and fiber quality of upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L). Crop Sci. 13:686-689.
9. Davis, D.D., N.R. Malm, C.R. Roberts, C.F. Chew, C.E. Barnes, G. Staten, and R.L. Wood. 1978. Registration of Acala 1517-70 cotton. Crop Sci. 18:164.
10. Dong, H.Z., W.J. Li, W. Tang, Z.H. Li, and D.M. Zhang. 2006. Effects of genotypes and plant density on yield, yield components and photosynthesis in Bt transgenic cotton. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 192:132-139.
11. Hay, R.K.M. 1995. Harvest index: a review and its use in plant breeding and crop physiology. Ann. Appl. Biol. 126:197-216.
12. Hsieh, Y-L. 1999. Structural development of cotton fibers and linkages to fiber quality. p.137-165. In A.S. Basra, (ed.) Cotton Fibers: Developmental Biology, Quality Improvement, and Textile Processing. Hawthorne Press. New York, NY.
13. Isbell, R. 1996. The Australian soil classification. CSIRO Publ., Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
14. El-Sharkawy, M., J.D. Hesketh, and H. Muramoto. 1965. Leaf photosynthetic rates and other growth characteristics among 26 species of Gossypium. Crop Sci. 5:173-175.
15. Lawson, T., D.M. Kramer, and C.A. Raines. 2012. Improving yield by exploiting mechanisms underlying natural variation in photosynthesis. Curr. Opin. Biotech. 23:215-220.
16. Li-COR. 2004. Using the LI-6400/LI-6400XT portable photosynthesis system. LI-COR Biosciences. Lincoln, NE.
17. Liu, G., S. Gordon, S. Yang, G. Constable. 2010. Meeting growing demand for high quality cotton from Chinese mills. Aust. Cottongrower 31:40-43.
18. Lopez, J.M., E.O. Leidi, M. Lopez, and J.C. Gutierrez. 1993. Photosynthesis, stomatal conductance, water use efficiency, and leaf temperature of cotton cultivars under water stress. Invest. Agr. Prod. Prot. Veg. 2:157-166.
19. Lu, Z., J. Chen, R.G. Percy, and E. Zeiger. 1997. Photosynthetic rate, stomatal conductance and leaf area in two cotton species (Gossypium barbadense and Gossypium hirsutum) and their relation with heat resistance and yield. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 24:693-700.
20. May, O.L. 2002. Quality improvement of upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). J. Crop Prod. 5:371-394.
21. Meredith, W.R. 1984. Quantitative genetics in cotton. p. 132-150. In: Kohel, R.J., and C.F. Lewis, (Eds.) Cotton. Agronomy Series. ASA-CSSA-SSSA, Madison, WI.
22. Meredith, W.R. 2005. Minimum number of genes controlling cotton fiber strength in a backcross population. Crop Sci. 45:1114-1119.
23. Meredith, W.R., and R.R. Bridge. 1971. Breakup of linkage blocks in cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L. Crop Sci. 11:695-698.
24. Miller, P.A., and J.O. Rawlings. 1967. Breakup of initial linkage blocks through intermating in a cotton breeding population. Crop Sci. 7:199-204.
25. Montalvo, J.G. 2005. Relationships between micronaire, fineness, and maturity. Part I Fundamentals. J. Cotton Sci. 9: 81-88.
26. th ed. VSN International, Hemel Hempstead, UK.
27. Pendergast, L. 2010. Crop water use. p. 58-61. In: Australian Cotton Production Manual. Cotton CRC. Narrabri, New South Wales, Aus.
28. Peng, S., and D.R. Krieg. 1991. Single leaf and canopy photosynthesis response to plant age in cotton. Agron. J. 83:704-708.
29. Pettigrew, W.T. 1995. Source-to-sink manipulation effects on cotton fiber quality. Agron. J. 87:947-952.
30. Pettigrew, W.T. 2001. Environmental effects on cotton fiber carbohydrate concentration and quality. Crop Sci. 41:1108-1113.
31. Pettigrew, W.T. 2004. Cotton genotypic variation in the photosynthetic response to irradiance. Photosynthetica 42:567-571.
32. Pettigrew, W.T. 2008. The effect of high temperatures on cotton lint yield production and fiber quality. Crop Sci. 48:278-285.
33. Pettigrew, W.T., and W.R. Meredith. 2012. Genotypic variation in physiological strategies for attaining cotton lint yield production. J. Cotton Sci. 16:179-189.
34. Pettigrew, W.T., and W.R. Meredith, Jr. 1994. Leaf gas exchange parameters vary among cotton genotypes. Crop Sci. 34:700-705.
35. Pettigrew, W.T., and R.B. Turley. 1998. Variation in photosynthetic components among photosynthetically diverse cotton genotypes. Photosynthesis research. 56:15-25.
36. Quisenberry, J.E., L.D. McDonald, and B.L. McMichael. 1994. Responses of photosynthetic rates to genotypic differences in sink-to-source ratios in upland cotton. Environ. Exp. Bot. 34:245-252.
37. Radin, J.W., Z. Lu, R.G. Percy, and E. Zeiger. 1994. Genetic variability for stomatal conductance in Pima cotton and its relation to improvements of heat adaptation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:7217-7221.
38. Reid, P. 2003. Sicot 71. Plant Varieties J. 16:35-36.
39. Smith, C.W., and G.G. Coyle. 1997. Association of fiber parameters and within-boll yield components in upland cotton. Crop Sci. 16:780-783.
40. Stiller, W. 2008. Sipima 280. Plant Varieties J. 21:336-339.
41. Stiller, W.N., J.J. Read, G.A. Constable, and P.E. Reid. 2005. Selection for water use efficiency traits in a cotton breeding program: cultivar differences. Crop Sci. 45:1107-1113.
42. Ullah, I., M. Rahman, M. Ashraf, and Y. Zafar. 2008. Genotypic variation for drought tolerance in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.): Leaf gas exchange and productivity. Flora. 203:105-115.
43. USDA. 2010. Soil Taxonomy Keys to soil taxonomy. Available at ftp://ftp-fc.sc.egov.usda.gov/NSSC/Soil_Taxonomy/tax.pdf (Verified 13 Oct 2013).
44. Wells, R., and W.R. Meredith. 1984. Comparative growth of obsolete and modern cotton cultivars. III. Relationship of yield to observed growth characteristics. Crop Sci. 24:868-872.
45. Williams, E.R., 1986. Row and column designs with contiguous replicates. Aust. J. Stat. 28:154-163.
46. Wise, R.R., A.J. Olsen, S.M. Schrader, and T.D. Sharkey. 2004. Electron transport is the functional limitation of photosynthesis in field grown Pima cotton plants at high temperature. Plant, Cell, Environ. 27:717-724.
47. Wise, R.R., G. Sassenrath-Cole, and R. Percy. 2000. A comparison of leaf anatomy in field-grown Gossypium hirsutum and G. barbadense. Ann. Bot. 86:731-738.
48. Yeates, S.J, G.A. Constable, and T. McCumstie. 2010a. Irrigated cotton in the tropical dry season. I: Yield, its components and crop development. Field Crops Res. 116:278-289.
49. Yeates, S.J., G.A. Constable, and T. McCumstie. 2010b. Irrigated cotton in the tropical dry season. II: Biomass accumulation, partitioning and RUE. Field Crops Res. 116:290-299.