Molecular biology and physiology genotypic variation in physiological strategies for attaining cotton lint yield production

Journal of Cotton Science

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 179-189

  Pettigrew, William T ^a   Meredith, William R ^a  

^a AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CARBON; COTTON; FIBERS; MOLECULAR BIOLOGY; PLANTS (BOTANY);

COMPLEX TRAITS; COTTON (GOSSYPIUM HIRSUTUM L.); COTTON LINTS; FIBER QUALITY; GENOTYPIC VARIATIONS; LINT YIELD; MULTIPLE PROCESS; QUALITY VARIATION; YIELD PRODUCTION; YIELD QUALITY;

PHYSIOLOGY;

BIOLOGY; COTTON; FIBERS; GENETIC ENGINEERING; PHYSIOLOGY;

ABELMOSCHUS; GOSSYPIUM HIRSUTUM;

EID: 84867168982     PISSN: 15236919     EISSN: 15243303     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. 14C-labled photosynthate translocation and utilization in cotton plants. Crop Sci. 12:69-74
2. Constable, G.A. 1986. Growth and light receipt by mainstem cotton leaves in relation to plant density in the field. Agric. For. Meteorol. 37:279-292.
3. Cornish, K., J.W. Radin, E.L. Turcotte, Z. Lu, and E. Zeiger. 1991. Enhanced photosynthesis and stomatal conductance of Pima cotton (Gossypium barbadense) bred for increased yield. Plant Physiol. 97:484-489.
4. Holden, M. 1976. Chlorophylls. p. 1-37. In T.W. Goodwin (ed.) Chemistry and biochemistry of plant pigments. Academic Press, New York.
5. Lu, Z., and E. Zeiger. 1994. Selection for higher yields and heat resistance in Pima cotton caused genetically determined changes in stomatal conductances. Physiol. Plant. 92:273-278.
6. Lu, Z., J.W. Radin, E.L. Turcotte, R.G. Percy, and E. Zeiger. 1994. High yields in advanced lines of Pima cotton are associated with higher stomatal conductance, reduced leaf area, and lower leaf temperature. Physiol. Plant. 92:266-272.
7. Meredith, W.T., Jr. 1993. Registration of 'MD51ne' cotton. Crop Sci. 33:1415.
8. Meredith, W.R., Jr. 2000. Continued progress for breeding for yield in the USA. p 97-101 In F.M. Gillham (ed.) Proceedings of World Cotton Research Conference II. 6-12 Sept., 1998. Athens, Greece. Pub. P. Petridas, Thessaloniki, Greece.
9. Meredith, W.R., Jr. 2006a. Obsolete conventional vs modern transgenic cultivars performance evaluations. p. 836-844. In Proceedings Beltwide Cotton Conf., San Antonio, TX 6-10 Jan. 2006. Natl. Cotton Counc. Am., Memphis, TN.
10. Meredith, W.R., Jr. 2006b. Registration of MD 15 upland cotton germplasm. Crop Sci. 46:2722.
11. Meredith, W.R., Jr., and W.S. Nokes. 2011. Registration of MD 9ne and MD 25 high-fiber-quality germplasm lines of cotton. J. of Plant Registrations 5:202-206.
12. Miller, P.A. and J.O. Rawlings. 1967. Selection for increased lint yield and correlated responses in Upland cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L. Crop Sci. 7:634-640.
13. Pettigrew, W.T. 1995. Source-to-sink manipulation effects on cotton fiber quality. Agron. J. 87:947-952.
14. Pettigrew, W.T. 2001. Environmental effects on cotton fiber carbohydrate concentration and quality. Crop Sci. 41:1108-1113.
15. Pettigrew, W.T. 2002. Improved yield potential with an early planting cotton production system. Agron. J. 94:997-1003.
16. Pettigrew, W.T., and W.R. Meredith, Jr. 1994. Leaf gas exchange parameters vary among cotton genotypes. Crop Sci. 34:700-705.
17. Pettigrew, W.T., J.J. Heitholt, and K.C. Vaughn. 1993. Gas exchange differences and comparative anatomy among cotton leaf-type isolines. Crop Sci. 33:1295-1299.
18. Pettigrew, W.T., J.C. McCarty, and K.C. Vaughn. 2000. Leaf senescence-like characteristics contribute to cotton's premature photosynthetic decline. Photosynthesis Res. 65:187-195.
19. Pettigrew, W.T., W.T. Molin, and S.R. Stetina. 2009. Impact of varying planting dates and tillage systems on cotton growth and lint yield production. Agron. J. 101:1131-1138.
20. Quisenberry, J.E., L.D. McDonald, and B.L. McMichael. 1994. Response of photosynthetic rates to genotypic differences in sink-to-source ratios in upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Environ. Exp. Bot. 34:245-252.
21. Radin, J.W., Z. Lu, R.G. Percy, and E. Zeiger. 1994. Genetic variability for stomatal conductance in Pima cotton and its relation to improvements of heat adaptation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:7217-7221.
22. Rosenthal, W.D., and T.J. Gerik. 1991. Radiation use efficiency among cotton cultivars. Agron. J. 83:655-658.
23. Sadras, V.O., and L.J. Wilson. 1997. Growth analysis of cotton crops infested with spider mites: I. Light interception and radiation-use efficiency. Crop Sci. 37:481-491.
24. SAS Institute. 1996. SAS systems for mixed models. SAS Inst., Cary, NC.
25. USDA, National Cotton Variety Trials. 2010. Available at http://www.ars.usda.gov/SP2UserFiles/ Place/64021500/2010NCVT.pdf (Verified 10 January 2012).
26. Wells, R., and W.R. Meredith, Jr. 1984. Comparative growth of obsolete and modern cotton cultivars. II. Reproductive dry matter partitioning. Crop Sci. 24:863-868.