Are we re-marginalizing distance education students and teachers?

Online Learning Journal

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2019, Pages 97-106

  Thompson, Melody M ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Blended Learning; Distance Education; E Learning; Language; Online Learning

Indexed keywords

EID: 84891585733     PISSN: 24725749     EISSN: 24725730     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.24059/olj.v11i1.1740     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Dziuban, C., P. Moskal and L. Futch. Student Satisfaction with Asynchronous Learning. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 11(1): April 2007.
2. Vignare, K. Review of literature on blended learning: Using ALN to change the classroom—Will it work? Paper for the Sloan-C Summer Invitational Workshop, Baltimore, MD, August 2006.
3. Garrison, D. R. Online community of inquiry review: Social, cognitive, and teaching presence issues. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 11(1): April 2007.
4. Arbaugh, B. An empirical verification of the Community of Inquiry framework. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 11(1): April 2007.
5. Thompson, M. M. From distance education to e-learning. Handbook of E-learning Research, London: Sage, (in press for August 2007).
6. Fairclough, N. Language and Power. New York: Longman, 1989.
7. Bazerman, C. and J. Paradis. Textual Dynamics of the Professions. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press, 1990.
8. Thompson, M. M. An historical and linguistic analysis of women in the histories and the early literature of adult education, 1926–1962: Toward a balanced historiography of the field. Doctoral dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University, 1996.
9. Anderson, T. and F. Elloumi. Introduction. In: T. Anderson and F. Elloumi (Eds.), Theory and Practice of Online Learning, xiii–xxii. Athabasca, Canada: Athabasca University, 2004. http://www.cde.athabascau.ca/online_book.
10. Thompson, M. M. and M. Irele. Evaluating distance education programs. In: M. Moore, and W. Anderson (Eds.), Handbook of Distance Education, 567–584. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2003.
11. Katz, R. and D. Ohlinger. The “E” is for Everything. San Franciso: Jossey-Bass, 2000.
12. Kanuka, H. and D. Conrad. The name of the game: Why “distance education” says it all. Quarterly Review of Distance Education 4(4): 385–393, 2003.
13. Saba, F. Distance education theory, methodology, and epistemology: A pragmatic paradigm. In: M. Moore and W. Anderson (Eds.), Handbook of Distance Education, 3–20. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2003.
14. th Annual Conference on Distance Teaching and Learning, Madison, WI, August 3–5, 2005.
15. Cairncross, F. The Death of Distance: How the Communications Revolution Will Change Our Lives. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1997.
16. Oliver, M. and K. Trigwell. Can ‘blended learning’ be redeemed? E-Learning 2(1): 17–26, 2005.
17. Moore, M. G. The individual adult learner. In: M. Tight (Ed.), Adult Learning and Education, 153– 168. London: Croom Helm, 1983.
18. Saba, F. and R. L. Shearer. Verifying key theoretical concepts in a dynamic model of distance education. American Journal of Distance Education 8(1): 36–59, 1994. Retrieved May 4, 2006 from ERIC Database.
19. Vella, J. Learning to Listen, Learning to Teach: The Power of Dialogue in Educating Adults. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2002.
20. Porter, J. Intertextuality and the discourse community. Rhetoric Review 5(1): 38–39, 1986.
21. National Center for Education Statistics. Distance education at degree-granting postsecondary institutions: 2000–2001. Washington, DC: US Department of Education, 2003. http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2003017.
22. Taylor, M. L. Generation NeXt comes to college: 2006 updates and emerging issues. 2006. http://www.taylorprograms.org/images/Gen_NeXt_article_HLC_06.pdf.
23. Bates, A. Cultural and ethical issues in international distance education. Paper presented at the Engaging Partnerships: Collaboration and Partnership in Distance Education UBC/CREAD Conference, Vancouver, Canada, September 21–23, 1999. http://bates.cstudies.ubc.ca/pdf/CREAD.pdf.
24. Tait, A. The convergence of distance and conventional education. Some implications for policy. In: A. Tait and R. Mills (Eds.), The Convergence of Distance & Traditional Education, 141–160. New York: Routledge, 1999.
25. Frederickson, E., A. Pickett, K. Swan, W. Pelz and P. Shea. Factors influencing faculty satisfaction with asynchronous teaching and learning in the SUNY learning network. Online Education, Vol. 1: Learning Effectiveness and Faculty Satisfaction, Needham, MA: Sloan-C, 1999.
26. Hartman, J. and B. Truman-Davis. Factors relating to the satisfaction of faculty teaching online courses at the University of Central Florida. Online Education, Vol. 2: Learning Effectiveness, Faculty Satisfaction, and Cost Effectiveness, 109-128. Needham, MA: Sloan-C, 2001.
27. National Education Association. A Survey of Traditional and Distance Learning Higher Education Members. Washington: NEA, 2000.
28. Thompson, M. Faculty satisfaction in Penn State’s World Campus. Online Education, Vol. 2: Learning Effectiveness, Faculty Satisfaction, and Cost Effectiveness, 129–144. Needham, MA: Sloan-C, 2001.
29. deJager, P. The danger of the “early adopter” myth. 2005. http://technobility.com/docs/article032.htm.
30. Bower, B. Distance Education: Facing the faculty challenge. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration 4(2): Summer 2001. http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/summer42/bower42.htm.
31. Schifter, C. Perception Differences about Participating in Distance Education. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration 5(1): 2002.
32. Brabazon, T. Internet teaching and the administration of knowledge. First Monday 6(6): 2001. http://firstmonday.dk/issues/issue6_6/brabazkon/index.html.
33. Jaffee, D. Institutionalized resistance to asynchronous learning networks. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 2(2): 1998. http://www.sloan-c.org/publications/jaln/v2n2/v2n2_jaffee.asp.
34. Shedletsky, L. J. and J. E. Aitken. The paradoxes of online academic work. Communication Education 50(3): 206–17, 2001.
35. hooks, b. Teaching to Transgress. Education as the Practice of Freedom. New York: Routledge, 1994.
36. Thompson, M. M. Faculty satisfaction in the online environment. In: J. R. Bourne and J. Moore (Eds.), Elements of Quality Online Education: Practice and Direction, 189–212. Needham, MA: Sloan-C, 2003.