Can the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System (SART CORS) be used to accurately report clinic total reproductive potential (TRP)?

Fertility and Sterility

Volumn 97, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 886-889

  Stern, Judy E ^a   Hickman, Timothy N ^b   Kinzer, Donna ^c   Penzias, Alan S ^c   Ball, G David ^d   Gibbons, William E ^e  

^a DARTMOUTH HITCHCOCK MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b Houston IVF   (United States)

^c BOSTON IVF   (United States)

^d Seattle Reproductive Medicine   (United States)

^e BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

ART outcome; cumulative delivery rate; SART database; Total reproductive potential

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; AGE; ARTICLE; CALCULATION; EMBRYO; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFERTILITY THERAPY; LIVE BIRTH; MEDICAL RECORD; PILOT STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REFERENCE DATABASE; REPRODUCTION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SOCIETY FOR ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGY CLINIC OUTCOME REPORTING SYSTEM; TOTAL REPRODUCTIVE POTENTIAL;

ADULT; CRYOPRESERVATION; DATABASES AS TOPIC; EMBRYO TRANSFER; FEMALE; HUMANS; LIVE BIRTH; MALE; OUTCOME AND PROCESS ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY, MULTIPLE; QUALITY INDICATORS, HEALTH CARE; REPRODUCTIVE TECHNIQUES, ASSISTED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTORS; SOCIETIES, MEDICAL; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84859155586     PISSN: 00150282     EISSN: 15565653     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.01.091     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. J.E. Stern, M.I. Cedars, T. Jain, N.A. Klein, C.M. Beaird, and D.A. Grainger Assisted reproductive technology practice patterns and the impact of embryo transfer guidelines in the United States Fertil Steril 88 2007 275 282
2. K.L. Armour, and L. Clark Callister Prevention of triplets and higher order multiples: trends in reproductive medicine J Perinat Neonat Nurs 19 2005 103 111
3. H.W. Jones Jr., D. Jones, and P. Kolm Cryopreservation: a simplified method of evaluation Hum Reprod 12 1997 548 553
4. H.W. Jones Jr. Total reproductive potential of a single cycle - to include fresh and frozen embryos [author reply]? Fertil Steril 79 2003 1044
5. A. Thurin, J. Hausken, T. Hillensjo, B. Jablonowska, A. Pinborg, and A. Strandell Elective single-embryo transfer versus double-embryo transfer in in vitro fertilization N Engl J Med 351 2004 2392 2402
6. B. Malizia, M. Hacker, and A. Penzias Cumulative live-birth rates after in vitro fertilization N Engl J Med 360 2009 236 243
7. Stern J, MB B, Luke B, Wantman E, Lederman A, Missmer S et al. Calculating cumulative live-birth rates from linked cycles of Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART): data from the Massachusetts SART CORS. Fertil Steril 2010;94:1334-40.
8. W. Gibbons, E. Surrey, M. Cedars, D. Grainger, T. Jain, and N. Klein Continuous quality improvement and ART multiple gestations: some progress, some answers, more questions Fertil Steril 88 2007 301 304
9. M.A. Damario, D.G. Hammitt, D.R. Session, and D.A. Dumesic Embryo cryopreservation at the pronuclear stage and efficient embryo use optimizes the chance for a liveborn infant from a single oocyte retrieval Fertil Steril 73 2000 767 773
10. M. Germond, F. Urner, A. Chanson, M.-P. Primi, D. Wirthner, and A. Senn What is the most relevant standard of success in assisted reproduction?: The cumulated singleton/twin delivery rates per oocyte pick-up: the CUSIDERA and CUTWIDERA Hum Reprod 19 2004 2442 2444
11. A. Tiitinen, C. Hyden-Granskog, and M. Gissler What is the most relevant standard of success in assisted reproduction? The value of cryopreservation on cumulative pregnancy rates per single oocyte retrieval should not be forgotten Hum Reprod 19 2004 2439 2441
12. J. Fukuda, J. Kumagai, H. Kodama, M. Murata, K. Kawamura, and T. Tanaka Upper limit of the number of IVF-ET treatment cycles in different age groups, predicted by cumulative take-home baby rate Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 80 2001 71 73
13. M.G. Hull, H.A. Eddowes, U. Fahy, M.I. Abuzeid, M.S. Mills, and D.J. Cahill Expectations of assisted conception for infertility Bmj 304 1992 1465 1469
14. A.M. Stolwijk, C.J. Hamilton, J.M. Hollanders, L.A. Bastiaans, and G.A. Zielhuis A more realistic approach to the cumulative pregnancy rate after in-vitro fertilization Hum Reprod 11 1996 660 663
15. A.M. Stolwijk, A.M. Wetzels, and D.D. Braat Cumulative probability of achieving an ongoing pregnancy after in-vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection according to a woman's age, subfertility diagnosis and primary or secondary subfertility Hum Reprod 15 2000 203 209
16. S.L. Tan, N. Maconochie, P. Doyle, S. Campbell, A. Balen, and J. Bekir Cumulative conception and live-birth rates after in vitro fertilization with and without the use of long, short, and ultrashort regimens of the gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist buserelin Am J Obstet Gynecol 171 1994 513 520