The superior temporal sulcus and the N170 during face processing: Single trial analysis of concurrent EEG-fMRI

NeuroImage

Volumn 86, Issue , 2014, Pages 492-502

  Nguyen, Vinh T ^a   Cunnington, Ross ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

Concurrent EEG fMRI; Face processing; Multimodal neuroimaging; Single trial ERP analysis

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BOLD SIGNAL; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FACE PERCEPTION; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; FUSIFORM FACE AREA; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; N170 AMPLITUDE; NERVE POTENTIAL; NORMAL HUMAN; OCCIPITAL FACE AREA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SUPERIOR TEMPORAL SULCUS; TEMPORAL LOBE; VISION; ACCURACY; BRAIN REGION; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EYE FIXATION; FACE; FACIES; FUSIFORM GYRUS; INFORMATION PROCESSING; PERCEPTION; RESPONSE TIME; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL STIMULATION; VOLUNTEER; YOUNG ADULT;

CONCURRENT EEG-FMRI; FACE PROCESSING; MULTIMODAL NEUROIMAGING; SINGLE-TRIAL ERP ANALYSIS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ALGORITHMS; BRAIN MAPPING; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; FACE; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MULTIMODAL IMAGING; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TEMPORAL LOBE;

EID: 84891557255     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: 10959572     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.10.047     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Aguirre G.K., Singh R., D'Esposito M. Stimulus inversion and the responses of face and object-sensitive cortical areas. Neuroreport 1999, 10:189-194.
2. Allen P.J., Josephs O., Turner R. A method for removing imaging artifact from continuous EEG recorded during functional MRI. Neuroimage 2000, 12:230-239.
3. Allison T., Puce A., Spencer D.D., McCarthy G. Electrophysiological studies of human face perception. I: Potentials generated in occipitotemporal cortex by face and non-face stimuli. Cereb. Cortex 1999, 9:415-430.
4. Bentin S., Allison T., Puce A., Perez E., McCarthy G. Electrophysiological studies of face perception in humans. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 1996, 8:551-565.
5. Bötzel K., Schulze S., Stodieck S.R. Scalp topography and analysis of intracranial sources of face-evoked potentials. Exp. Brain Res. 1995, 104:135-143.
6. Brett M., Anton J.L., Valabregue R., Poline J.B. Region of interest analysis using the MarsBar toolbox for SPM 99. Neuroimage 2002, 16:S497.
7. Calder A.J., Young A.W. Understanding the recognition of facial identity and facial expression. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2005, 6:641-651.
8. Cerutti S., Baselli G., Liberati D., Pavesi G. Single sweep analysis of visual evoked potentials through a model of parametric identification. Biol. Cybern. 1987, 56:111-120.
9. Debener S., Ullsperger M., Siegel M., Engel A.K. Single-trial EEG-fMRI reveals the dynamics of cognitive function. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2006, 10:558-563.
10. Debener S., Strobel A., Sorger B., Peters J., Kranczioch C., Engel A.K., Goebel R. Improved quality of auditory event-related potentials recorded simultaneously with 3-T fMRI: removal of the ballistocardiogram artefact. Neuroimage 2007, 34:587-597.
11. Deffke I., Sander T., Heidenreich J., Sommer W., Curio G., Trahms L., Lueschow A. MEG/EEG sources of the 170-ms response to faces are co-localized in the fusiform gyrus. Neuroimage 2007, 35:1495-1501.
12. Delorme A., Makeig S. EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. J. Neurosci. Methods 2004, 134:9-21.
13. Dima D., Stephan K.E., Roiser J.P., Friston K.J., Frangou S. Effective connectivity during processing of facial affect: evidence for multiple parallel pathways. J. Neurosci. 2011, 31:14378-14385.
14. Eichele T., Specht K., Moosmann M., Jongsma M.L.A., Quiroga R.Q., Nordby H., Hugdahl K. Assessing the spatiotemporal evolution of neuronal activation with single-trial event-related potentials and functional MRI. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2005, 102:17798-17803.
15. Eichele T., Calhoun V.D., Debener S. Mining EEG-fMRI using independent component analysis. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 2009, 73:53-61.
16. Eickhoff S.B., Stephan K.E., Mohlberg H., Grefkes C., Fink G.R., Amunts K., Zilles K. A new SPM toolbox for combining probabilistic cytoarchitectonic maps and functional imaging data. Neuroimage 2005, 25:1325-1335.
17. Eimer M. Effects of face inversion on the structural encoding and recognition of faces. Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res. 2000, 10:145-158.
18. Fairhall S.L., Ishai A. Effective connectivity within the distributed cortical network for face perception. Cereb. Cortex 2007, 17:2400-2406.
19. George N., Evans J., Fiori N., Davidoff J., Renault B. Brain events related to normal and moderately scrambled faces. Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res. 1996, 4:65-76.
20. Halgren E., Raij T., Marinkovic K., Jousmäki V., Hari R. Cognitive response profile of the human fusiform face area as determined by MEG. Cereb. Cortex 2000, 10:69-81.
21. Haxby J.V., Ungerleider L.G., Clark V.P., Schouten J.L., Hoffman E.A., Martin A. The effect of face inversion on activity in human neural systems for face and object perception. Neuron 1999, 22:189-199.
22. Haxby, Hoffman, Gobbini The distributed human neural system for face perception. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2000, 4:223-233.
23. Henson R.N., Goshen-Gottstein Y., Ganel T., Otten L.J., Quayle A., Rugg M.D. Electrophysiological and haemodynamic correlates of face perception, recognition and priming. Cereb. Cortex 2003, 13:793-805.
24. Herrington J.D., Taylor J.M., Grupe D.W., Curby K.M., Schultz R.T. Bidirectional communication between amygdala and fusiform gyrus during facial recognition. Neuroimage 2011, 56:2348-2355.
25. Herrmann M.J., Ehlis A.-C., Muehlberger A., Fallgatter A.J. Source localization of early stages of face processing. Brain Topogr. 2005, 18:77-85.
26. Horovitz S.G., Rossion B., Skudlarski P., Gore J.C. Parametric design and correlational analyses help integrating fMRI and electrophysiological data during face processing. Neuroimage 2004, 22:1587-1595.
27. Huster R.J., Debener S., Eichele T., Herrmann C.S. Methods for simultaneous EEG-fMRI: an introductory review. J. Neurosci. 2012, 32:6053-6060.
28. Ishai A., Ungerleider L.G., Martin A., Schouten J.L., Haxby J.V. Distributed representation of objects in the human ventral visual pathway. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1999, 96:9379-9384.
29. Itier R.J., Taylor M.J. Source analysis of the N170 to faces and objects. Neuroreport 2004, 15:1261-1265.
30. Jung T.P., Makeig S., Humphries C., Lee T.W., Mckeown M.J., Iragui V., Sejnowski T.J. Removing electroencephalographic artifacts by blind source separation. Psychophysiology 2000, 37:163-178.
31. Kanwisher N., McDermott J., Chun M.M. The fusiform face area: a module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception. J. Neurosci. 1997, 17:4302-4311.
32. Kanwisher N., Tong F., Nakayama K. The effect of face inversion on the human fusiform face area. Cognition 1998, 68:B1-B11.
33. Kriegeskorte N., Simmons W.K., Bellgowan P.S., Baker C.I. Circular analysis in systems neuroscience: the dangers of double dipping. Nat. Neurosci. 2009, 12:535-540.
34. Li J., Liu J., Liang J., Zhang H., Zhao J., Rieth C.A., Huber D.E., Li W., Shi G., Ai L., Tian J., Lee K. Effective connectivities of cortical regions for top-down face processing: a dynamic causal modeling study. Brain Res. 2010, 1340:40-51.
35. Makeig S., Bell A.J., Jung T.P., Sejnowski T.J., et al. Independent component analysis of electroencephalographic data. Advances in neural information processing systemsprocessing systems 1996, 145-151.
36. Mnatsakanian E.V., Tarkka I.M. Familiar-face recognition and comparison: source analysis of scalp-recorded event-related potentials. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2004, 115:880-886.
37. Moosmann M., Schönfelder V.H., Specht K., Scheeringa R., Nordby H., Hugdahl K. Realignment parameter-informed artefact correction for simultaneous EEG-fMRI recordings. Neuroimage 2009, 45:1144-1150.
38. Mulert C., Seifert C., Leicht G., Kirsch V., Ertl M., Karch S., Moosmann M., Lutz J., Moller H.-J., Hegerl U., Pogarell O., Jager L. Single-trial coupling of EEG and fMRI reveals the involvement of early anterior cingulate cortex activation in effortful decision making. Neuroimage 2008, 42:158-168.
39. Niazy R.K., Beckmann C.F., Iannetti G.D., Brady J.M., Smith S.M. Removal of FMRI environment artifacts from EEG data using optimal basis sets. Neuroimage 2005, 28:720-737.
40. Nummenmaa L., Passamonti L., Rowe J., Engell A.D., Calder A.J. Connectivity analysis reveals a cortical network for eye gaze perception. Cereb. Cortex 2010, 20:1780-1787.
41. Quiroga R.Q., Garcia H. Single-trial event-related potentials with wavelet denoising. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2003, 114:376-390.
42. Rhodes G., Brake S., Atkinson A.P. What's lost in inverted facesα. Cognition 1993, 47:25-57.
43. Rossion B., Gauthier I. How does the brain process upright and inverted facesα. Behav. Cogn. Neurosci. Rev. 2002, 1:63-75.
44. Rossion B., Jacques C. Does physical interstimulus variance account for early electrophysiological face sensitive responses in the human brainα Ten lessons on the N170. Neuroimage 2008, 39:1959-1979.
45. Rossion B., Gauthier I., Tarr M.J., Despland P., Bruyer R., Linotte S., Crommelinck M. The N170 occipito-temporal component is delayed and enhanced to inverted faces but not to inverted objects: an electrophysiological account of face-specific processes in the human brain. Neuroreport 2000, 11:69-74.
46. Rossion B., Joyce C.A., Cottrell G.W., Tarr M.J. Early lateralization and orientation tuning for face, word, and object processing in the visual cortex. Neuroimage 2003, 20:1609-1624.
47. Sabatinelli D., Fortune E.E., Li Q., Siddiqui A., Krafft C., Oliver W.T., Beck S., Jeffries J. Emotional perception: meta-analyses of face and natural scene processing. Neuroimage 2011, 54:2524-2533.
48. Sadeh B., Yovel G. Why is the N170 enhanced for inverted facesα An ERP competition experiment. Neuroimage 2010, 53:782-789.
49. Sadeh B., Podlipsky I., Zhdanov A., Yovel G. Event-related potential and functional MRI measures of face-selectivity are highly correlated: A simultaneous ERP-fMRI investigation. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2010, 31:1490-1501.
50. Sato W., Kochiyama T., Uono S., Yoshikawa S. Time course of superior temporal sulcus activity in response to eye gaze: a combined fMRI and MEG study. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 2008, 3:224-232.
51. Schweinberger S.R., Pickering E.C., Jentzsch I., Burton A.M., Kaufmann J.M. Event-related brain potential evidence for a response of inferior temporal cortex to familiar face repetitions. Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res. 2002, 14:398-409.
52. Shibata T., Nishijo H., Tamura R., Miyamoto K., Eifuku S., Endo S., Ono T. Generators of visual evoked potentials for faces and eyes in the human brain as determined by dipole localization. Brain Topogr. 2002, 15:51-63.
53. Sladky R., Friston K.J., Tröstl J., Cunnington R., Moser E., Windischberger C. Slice-timing effects and their correction in functional MRI. Neuroimage 2011, 58:588-594.
54. Turk-Browne N.B., Norman-Haignere S.V., McCarthy G. Face-specific resting functional connectivity between the fusiform gyrus and posterior superior temporal sulcus. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2010, 4:176.
55. Tzourio-Mazoyer N., Landeau B., Papathanassiou D., Crivello F., Etard O., Delcroix N., Mazoyer B., Joliot M. Automated anatomical labeling of activations in SPM using a macroscopic anatomical parcellation of the MNI MRI single-subject brain. Neuroimage 2002, 15:273-289.
56. Yovel G., Kanwisher N. The neural basis of the behavioral face-inversion effect. Curr. Biol. 2005, 15:2256-2262.