Correlations between 18F-FDG PET/CT parameters and pathological findings in patients with rectal cancer

Clinical Nuclear Medicine

Volumn 39, Issue 1, 2014, Pages

  Liao, Chih Ying ^a   Chen, Shang Wen ^b,c,d   Wu, Yi Chen ^e   Chen, William Tzu Liang ^b   Yen, Kuo Yang ^b,f   Hsieh, Te Chun ^b,f   Chen, Pin Jie ^b   Kao, Chia Hung ^b,c  

^a Taichung Hospital   (Taiwan)

^b CHINA MEDICAL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

^c CHINA MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^d TAIPEI MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^e E DA HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

^f CHINA MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Automatic contours; Pathology correlation; PET CT; Rectal cancer

Indexed keywords

FLUORODEOXYGLUCOSE F 18; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER SIZE; CANCER STAGING; COMPUTER ASSISTED EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATIONAL STUDY; FEMALE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PET-CT SCANNER; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; RECTUM CANCER; VERY ELDERLY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; MULTIMODAL IMAGING; PATHOLOGY; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; RADIOGRAPHY; RECTUM TUMOR; SCINTISCANNING;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; FEMALE; FLUORODEOXYGLUCOSE F18; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIMODAL IMAGING; NEOPLASM STAGING; POSITRON-EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; RECTAL NEOPLASMS; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 84891525338     PISSN: 03639762     EISSN: 15360229     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/RLU.0b013e318292f0f6     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, et al. Global cancer statistics. Ca Cancer J Clin. 2011;61:69-90
2. Bosset JF, Collette L, Calais G, et al. Chemotherapy with preoperative radiotherapy in rectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:1114-1123
3. Sauer R, Liersch T, Merkel S, et al. Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: Results of the German CAO/ ARO/AIO-94 randomized phase III trial after a median follow-up of 11 years. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:1926-1933
4. Petersen SH, Harling H, Kirkeby LT, et al. Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy in rectal cancer operated for cure. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012; 3:CD004078
5. Samee A, Selvasekar CR. Current trends in staging rectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2011;17:828-834
6. Hunerbein M, Pegios W, Rau B, et al. Prospective comparison of endorectal ultrasound, three-dimensional endorectal ultrasound, and endorectal MRI in the preoperative evaluation of rectal tumors. Preliminary results. Surg Endosc. 2000;14:1005-1009
7. Muthusamy VR, Chang KJ. Optimal methods for staging rectal cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13:6877sY6884s.
8. Heriot AG, Hicks RJ, Drummond EG, et al. Does positron emission tomography change management in primary rectal cancer? A prospective assessment. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004;47:451-458
9. Davey K, Heriot AG, Mackay J, et al. The impact of 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomographyYcomputed tomography on the staging and management of primary rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2008;51:997-1003
10. Ciernik IF, Huser M, Burger C, et al. Automated functional image-guided radiation treatment planning for rectal cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005;62:893-900
11. Buijsen J, van den Bogaard J, Janssen MH, et al. FDG-PET provides the best correlation with the tumor specimen compared to MRI and CT in rectal cancer. Radiother Oncol. 2011;98:270-276
12. Patel DA, Chang ST, Goodman KA, et al. Impact of integrated PET/CT on variability of target volume delineation in rectal cancer. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2007;6:31-36
13. Larson SM, Erdi Y, Akhurst T, et al. Tumor Treatment response based on visual and quantitative changes in global tumor glycolysis using PET-FDG imaging. The visual response score and the change in total lesion glycolysis. Clin Positron Imaging. 1999;2:159-171
14. Kao CH, Lin SC, Hsieh TC, et al. Use of pretreatment metabolic tumour volumes to predict the outcome of pharyngeal cancer treated by definitive radiotherapy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2012;39:1297-1305
15. van Baardwijk A, Bosmans G, Boersma L, et al. PET-CTYbased auto-contouring in nonYsmall-cell lung cancer correlates with pathology and reduces interobserver variability in the delineation of the primary tumor and involved nodal volumes. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007;68:771-778
16. Lin SC, Liao CY, Kao CH, et al. Pretreatment maximal standardized uptake value of the primary tumor predicts outcome to radiotherapy in patients with pharyngeal cancer. J Radiat Res. 2012;53:462-468
17. Heron DE, Andrade RS, Flickinger J, et al. Hybrid PET-CT simulation for radiation treatment planning in head-And-neck cancers: A brief technical report. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004;60:1419-1424
18. Schinagl DA, Span PN, Oyen WJ, et al. Can FDG PET predict radiation treatment outcome in head and neck cancer? Results of a prospective study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2011;38:1449-1458
19. Hatt M, van Stiphout R, le Pogam A, et al. Early prediction of pathological response in locally advanced rectal cancer based on sequential (18)F-FDG PET. Acta Oncol. 2013;52:619-626
20. Goldberg N, Kundel Y, Purim O, et al. Early prediction of histopathological response of rectal tumors after one week of preoperative radiochemotherapy using 18F-FDG PET-CT imaging. A prospective clinical study. Radiat Oncol. 2012;7:124
21. Gagliardi G, Bayar S, Smith R, et al. Preoperative staging of rectal cancer using magnetic resonance imaging with external phase-Arrayed coils. Arch Surg. 2002;137:447-451
22. Vliegen RF, Beets-Tan RG, Vanhauten B, et al. Can FDG-PET/CT predict tumor clearance of the mesorectal fascia after preoperative chemoradiation of locally advanced rectal cancer?Strahlenther Onkol. 2008;184:457-464
23. Kantorova I, Lipska L, Belohlavek O, et al. Routine (18)F-FDG PET preoperative staging of colorectal cancer: Comparison with conventional staging and its impact on treatment decision making. J Nucl Med. 2003;44:1784-1788
24. Goldstein NS, Soman A, Sacksner J. Disparate surgical margin lengths of colorectal resection specimens between in vivo and in vitro measurements. The effects of surgical resection and formalin fixation on organ shrinkage. Am J Clin Pathol. 1999;111:349-351
25. Jonmarker S, Valdman A, Lindberg A, et al. Tissue shrinkage after fixation with formalin injection of prostatectomy specimens. Virchows Arch. 2006; 449:297-301
26. Soret M, Bacharach SL, Buvat I. Partial-volume effect in PET tumor imaging. J Nucl Med. 2007;48:932-945
27. Wigmore SJ, Redhead DN, Yan XJ, et al. Virtual hepatic resection using threedimensional reconstruction of helical computed tomography angioportograms. Ann Surg. 2001;233:221-226