Benchmarking of decision-support tools used for tiered sustainable remediation appraisal topical collection on remediation of site contamination

Water, Air, and Soil Pollution

Volumn 224, Issue 12, 2013, Pages

  Smith, Jonathan W N ^a   Kerrison, Gavin ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

^b SHELL GLOBAL SOLUTIONS INTERNATIONAL B V   (United States)

Author keywords

Benchmarking; Groundwater; Soil; SuRF UK framework; Sustainable remediation

Indexed keywords

BENCHMARKING; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; GASOLINE; GROUNDWATER; HEALTH RISKS; POLLUTION; RISK MANAGEMENT; SOILS; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

DECISION SUPPORT TOOLS; ECONOMIC BENEFITS; LAND CONTAMINATION; MANAGEMENT DECISION-MAKING; POTENTIAL DIFFERENCE; REMEDIATION PROJECTS; SURF-UK FRAMEWORK; SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL;

DECISION MAKING;

GROUND WATER;

BENCHMARKING; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; GROUNDWATER POLLUTION; REMEDIATION; RISK ASSESSMENT; SOIL POLLUTION; SUSTAINABILITY;

ARTICLE; BIOREMEDIATION; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; ECONOMIC ASPECT; ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY; HEALTH STATUS; OIL SPILL; QUALITY CONTROL; SOIL ANALYSIS; SOIL POLLUTION; UNITED KINGDOM; WATER ANALYSIS; WATER SUPPLY;

ENGLAND; UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 84891487302     PISSN: 00496979     EISSN: 15732932     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11270-013-1706-y     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Bardos, R. P., Bone, B. D., Boyle, R., Ellis, D., Evans, F., Harries, N., et al. (2011). Applying sustainable development principles to contaminated land management using the SuRF-UK framework. Remediation. doi: 10.1002/rem.20283.
2. British Geological Survey (BGS) & Environment Agency (EA), 2007. The natural (baseline) quality of groundwater in England and Wales. BGS Research Report RR/07/06. Environment Agency Technical Report NC/99/74/24. British Geological Survey, Keyworth, UK. Available at: http://www.bgs.ac.uk/research/ groundwater/UKbaseline/baseline-study-results.html
3. Bleicher, A., & Gross, M. (2010). Sustainability assessment and the revitalization of contaminated sites: operationalizing sustainable development for local problems. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 17(1), 57-66.
4. Busset, G., Sangely, M., Montrejaud-Vignoles, M., Thannberger, L., & Sablayrolles, C. (2012). Life cycle assessment of polychlorinated biphenyl contaminated soil remediation processes. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 17(3), 325-336. doi: 10.1007/s11367-011-0366-7.
5. CL:AIRE 2010. A framework for assessing the sustainability of soil and groundwater remediation. SuRF-UK report, March 2010. CL:AIRE, London. Available at www.claire.co.uk/surfuk
6. CL:AIRE 2011. SuRF-UK indicator set for sustainable remediation. SuRF-UK report, November 2011. CL:AIRE, London. Available at www.claire.co.uk/surfuk
7. Environment Agency, 1999. Costs and benefits associated with remediation of contaminated groundwater: A review of the issues. Environment Agency R&D Technical Report P278. Environment Agency, Bristol.
8. Environment Agency, 2000. Costs and benefits associated with remediation of contaminated groundwater: A framework for assessment. Environment Agency R&D Technical Report P279. Environment Agency, Bristol.
9. Environment Agency, 2006. Groundwater Protection: Policy and Practice (GP3). Environment Agency, Bristol.
10. Fortuna, M. E., Simion, I. M., & Gavrilescu, M. (2011). Sustainability in environmental remediation. Environmental Engineering and Management Journal, 10, 1987-1996.
11. Harbottle, M. J., Al-Tabbaa, A., & Evans, C. W. (2008a). Sustainability of land remediation, Part 1: overall analysis. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers Geotechnical Engineering, 161, 75-92.
12. Harbottle, M. J., Al-Tabbaa, A., & Evans, C. W. (2008b). Sustainability of land remediation, Part 2: impact assessment. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers Geotechnical Engineering, 161, 117-127.
13. Hardisty PE, Dottridge J, Wallace S, Smith JWN & Fisher J. 2001. Taking account of costs and benefits in groundwater remediation. In: Sixth International In Situ and On-Site Bioremediation Symposium, San Diego, CA, 4-7 June 2001. Battelle, Columbus, Ohio
14. Hardisty, P. E., Ozdemiroglu, E., & Arch, S. (2008). Sustainable remediation: including the external costs of remediation. Land Contamination and Reclamation, 16, 307-317. (Pubitemid 352843217)
15. Holland, K. S., Lewis, R. E., Tipton, K., Karnis, S., Dona, C., Petrovskis, E., et al. (2011). Framework for integrating sustainability into remediation projects. Remediation. doi: 10.1002/rem.20288.
16. Interstate Technology and Regulatory Council (ITRC), 2011. Green and sustainable remediation: A practical framework. ITRC report GSR-2. ITRC, Washington, DC. Available at: http://www.itrcweb.org/Documents/GSR-2.pdf
17. Morio M, Schädler S, Finkel M, Justen A, Bleicher A, Bartke S & Gross M. 2011. Megasite Management Toolsuite. User's guide, version 1.2.0, March 2011. Available: http://www.safira-mmt.de/
18. Network of Industrially Contaminated Land in Europe (NICOLE), 2010. NICOLE Sustainable remediation roadmap. Available at: http://www.nicole.org/ documents/DocumentList.aspx?w=SR
19. Petruzzi, N. M. (2011). A case study on the evaluation and implementation of green and sustainable remediation principles and practices during a RCRA corrective action cleanup. Ground Water Monitoring & Review, 31, 63-71. doi: 10.1111/j1745-6592.2011.01331.x.
20. Rivett, M. O., Smith, J. W. N., Buss, S. R., & Morgan, P. (2007). Nitrate occurrence and attenuation in the major aquifers of England and Wales. Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology & Hydrogeology, 40, 335-352. (Pubitemid 350153325)
21. Sanscartier, D., Margni, M., Reimer, K., & Zeeb, B. (2010). Comparison of the secondary environmental impacts of three remediation alternatives for a diesel-contaminated site in northern Canada. Soil and Sediment Contamination, 19, 338-355.
22. Schädler, S., Morio, M., Bartke, S., Rohr-Zänker, R., & Finkel, M. (2011). Designing sustainable and economically attractive Brownfield revitalization options using an integrated assessment model. Journal of Environmental Management, 92(3), 827-837.
23. Sparrevik, M., Barton, D. N., Bates, M. E., & Linkov, I. (2012). Use of stochastic multi-criteria decision analysis to support sustainable management of contaminated sediments. Environmental Science & Technology, 46, 1326-1334.
24. Sustainable Remediation Forum (SURF). (2009). Integrating sustainable principles, practices, and metrics into remediation projects. Remediation, 19(3), 5-114.
25. US EPA, 2008. Green remediation: Incorporating sustainable environmental practices into remediation of contaminated sites. US EPA Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response (OSWER). Report EPA 542-R-08-002. Available at http://www.clu-in.org/download/remed/green-remediation-primer.pdf
26. Worrall, R., Neil, D., Brereton, D., & Mulligan, D. (2009). Towards a sustainability criteria and indicators framework for legacy mine land. Journal of Cleaner Production, 17, 1426-1434.