Analysis of the characteristics of slot design affecting resistance to sliding during active archwire configurations

Progress in Orthodontics

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2013, Pages

  Nucera, Riccardo ^a   Lo Giudice, Antonino ^a   Matarese, Giovanni ^a   Artemisia, Alessandro ^a   Cordasco, Giancarlo ^a   Bramanti, Ennio ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MESSINA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Bracket design; Resistance to slide; Self ligating

Indexed keywords

STAINLESS STEEL;

ARTICLE; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; EVALUATION STUDY; EXPERIMENTAL MODEL; FORCE; IN VITRO STUDY; KINETICS; MECHANICS; ORTHODONTIC BRACKET; ORTHODONTIC WIRE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPRODUCIBILITY; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SYSTEMATIC ERROR; TEMPERATURE;

EID: 84891428790     PISSN: 17237785     EISSN: 21961042     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/2196-1042-14-35     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Dowling PA, Jones WB, Lagerstrom L, Sandham JA. An investigation into the behavioural characteristics of orthodontic elastomeric modules. Br J Orthod. 1998; 25:197-202.
2. Kusy RP, Whitley JQ. Friction between different wire-bracket configurations and materials. Semin Orthod. 1997; 3:166-77.
3. Cordasco G, Lo Giudice A, Militi A, Nucera R, Triolo G, Matarese G. In vitro evaluation of resistance to sliding produced by self-ligating and conventional ligation methods during dental alignment. Korean J Orthod. 2012; 42(4):218-24.
4. Kusy RP. Ongoing innovations in biomechanics and materials for the new millennium. Angle Orthod. 2000; 70:366-76.
5. Yeh CL, Kusnoto B, Viana G, Evans CA, Drummond JL. In-vitro evaluation of frictional resistance between brackets with passive-ligation designs. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007; 131:704. e 11-e22.
6. Thorstenson GA, Kusy RP. Effect of archwire size and material on the resistance to sliding of self-ligating brackets with second-order angulation in the dry state. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2002; 122:295-305.
7. Tecco S, Festa F, Caputi S, Traini T, Di Iorio D, D'Attilio M. Friction of conventional and self-ligating brackets using a 10 bracket model. Angle Orthod. 2005; 75:1041-45.
8. Fleming PS, DiBiase AT, Sarri G, Lee RT. Efficiency of mandibular arch alignment with 2 preadjusted edgewise appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009; 135:597-602.
9. Hain M, Dhopatkar A, Rock P. The effect of ligation method on friction in sliding mechanics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003; 123:416-22.
10. Kahlon S, Rinchuse Robison JM, Close JMD. In-vitro evaluation of frictional resistance with 5 ligation methods and Gianelly-type working wires. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010; 138(1):67-71.
11. Doshi UH, Bhad-Patil WA. Static frictional force and surface roughness of various bracket and wire combinations. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011; 139(1):74-9.
12. Kapila S, Angolkar PV, Duncanson M, Nanda RS. Evaluation of friction between edgewise stainless steel brackets and orthodontic wires of four alloys. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1990; 98:117-26.
13. Kusy RP, Whitley JQ, Mayhew MJ, Buckthal JE. Surface roughness of orthodontic arch wire via laser spectroscopy. Angle Orthod. 1988; 58:33-45.
14. Thorstenson GA, Kusy RP. Comparison of resistance to sliding between different selfligating brackets with second-order angulation in the dry and saliva states. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2002; 121:472-82.
15. Frank CA, Nikolai RJ. A comparative study of frictional resistances between orthodontic bracket and arch wire. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1980; 78:593-609.
16. Huffman D, Way DC. A clinical evaluation of tooth movement along archwires of two different sizes. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1983; 83:453-59.
17. Drescher D, Bourauel D, Schumacher HA. Frictional forces between bracket and arch wire. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1989; 96:397-404.
18. Moore RJ, Watts JTF, Hood JAA, Burritt DJ. Intra-oral temperature variation over 24 hours. Eur J Orthod. 1999; 21:1-13.
19. Matarese G, Nucera R, Militi A, Mazza M, Portelli M, Festa F, Cordasco G. Evaluation of frictional forces during dental alignment: an experimental model with 3 nonleveled brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008; 133:708-15.
20. Moore MM, Harrington E, Rock WP. Factors affecting friction in the pre-adjusted appliance. Eur J Orthod. 2004; 26:579-83.
21. Cacciafesta V, Sfondrini MF, Ricciardi A, Scribante A, Klersy C, Auricchio F. Evaluation of friction of stainless steel and esthetic self-ligating brackets in various bracket-archwire combinations. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003; 124:395-402.
22. Proffit WR. The soft tissue paradigm in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning: a new view for a new century. J Esthet Dent. 2000; 12:46-9.
23. Voudouris JC, Schismenos C, Lackovic K, Kuftinec MM. Self-Ligation esthetic brackets with low frictional resistance. Angle Orthod. 2010; 80:188-94.
24. Pandis N, Eliades T, Partowi S, Bourauel C. Moments generated during simulated rotational correction with self-ligating and conventional brackets. Angle Orthod. 2008; 78(6):1030-34.
25. Pandis N, Eliades T, Partowi S, Bourauel C. Forces exerted by conventional and selfligating brackets during simulated first-and second-order corrections. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008; 133:738-42.
26. Kim TK, Kim KD, Baek SH. Comparison of frictional forces during the initial leveling stage in various combinations of self-ligating brackets and archwires with a custom-designed typodont system. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008; 133:187. e15-24.
27. Aversa R, Apicella D, Perillo L, Sorrentino R, Zarone F, Ferrari M, Apicella A. Nonlinear elastic three-dimensional finite element analysis on the effect of endocrown material rigidity on alveolar bone remodeling process. Dent Mater. 2009; 25(5):678-90.