Relationship between occlusal force and mandibular condyle morphology

Angle Orthodontist

Volumn 79, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 1063-1069

  Kurusu, Aya ^a   Horiuchi, Mariko ^a   Soma, Kunimichi ^a  

^a TOKYO MEDICAL AND DENTAL UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Limited cone beam computed tomography; Mandibular condyle morphology; Occlusal force

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CEPHALOMETRY; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; MALOCCLUSION; MANDIBLE; MANDIBLE CONDYLE; MASTICATION; METHODOLOGY; PATHOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; RADIOGRAPHY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TOOTH OCCLUSION;

BITE FORCE; CEPHALOMETRY; CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MALOCCLUSION; MALOCCLUSION, ANGLE CLASS I; MALOCCLUSION, ANGLE CLASS II; MALOCCLUSION, ANGLE CLASS III; MANDIBLE; MANDIBULAR CONDYLE; VERTICAL DIMENSION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 68349105105     PISSN: 00033219     EISSN: 00033219     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2319/120908-620R.1     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Kreiborg S, Jensen BL, Møller E, Björk A. Craniofacial growth in a case of congenital muscular dystrophy. Am J Orthod. 1978;74:207-215.
2. Ingervall B, Bitsanis E. A pilot study of the effect of masticatory muscle training on facial growth in long-face children. Eur J Orthod. 1987;9:15-23.
3. Weijs WA, Hillen B. Relationship between masticatory muscle cross-section and skull shape. J Dent Res. 1984;63: 1154-1157.
4. Gionhaku N, Lowe AA. Relationship between jaw muscle volume and craniofacial form. J Dent Res. 1989;68:805-809.
5. Sassouni V. A classification of skeletal facial types. Am J Orthod. 1969;55:109-123.
6. Ringqvist M. Isometric bite force and its relation to dimensions of facial skeleton. Acta Odontol Scand. 1973;31:35-42.
7. Throckmorton GS, Finn RA, Bell WH. Biomechanics of differences in lower facial height. Am J Orthod. 1980;77:410-420.
8. Proffit WR, Fields HW. Occlusal forces in normal-and longface children. J Dent Res. 1983;62:571-574.
9. Scott JH. Dentofacial Development and Growth. 1st ed. London, England: Pergamon Press; 1967;165-173.
10. Tsolakis AI, Spyropoulos MN, Katsavrias E, Alexandridis K. Effects of altered mandibular function on mandibular growth after condylectomy. Eur J Orthod. 1997;19:9-19.
11. Pirttiniemi P, Peltomäki T, Müller L, Luder HU. Abnormal mandibular growth and the condylar cartilage. Eur J Orthod. 2009;31:1-11.
12. ++ in mandibular condylar growth and adaptation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1991;99:418-426.
13. Yonemitsu I, Muramoto T, Soma K. The influence of masseter activity on rat mandibular growth. Arch Oral Biol. 2007; 52:487-493.
14. Yale SH, Allison BD, Hauptfuehrer JD. An epidemiological assessment of mandibular condyle morphology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1996;21:169-177.
15. Wedel A, Carlsson GE, Sagne S. Temporomandibular joint morphology in a medieval skull material. Swed Dent J. 1978;2:177-187.
16. Toller PA. Osteoarthrosis of the mandibular condyle. Br Dent J. 1973;134:223-230.
17. Yamada K, Hanada K, Hayashi T, Ito J. Condylar bony change, disk displacement, and signs and symptoms of TMJ disorders in orthognathic surgery patients. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2001;91:603-610.
18. Christiansen EL, Thompson JR, Kopp S, Hasso AN, Hinshaw DB Jr. Radiographic signs of temporomandibular joint disease: an investigation utilizing X-ray computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1985;14:83-92.
19. Kijima N, Honda K, Kuroki Y, Sakabe J, Ejima K, Nakajima I. Relationship between patient characteristics, mandibular head morphology and thickness of the roof of the glenoid fossa in symptomatic temporomandibular joints. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2007;36:277-281.
20. Honda K, Larheim TA, Maruhashi K, Matsumoto K, Iwai K. Osseous abnormalities of the mandibular condyle: diagnostic reliability of cone beam computed tomography compared with helical computed tomography based on an autopsy material. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2006;35:152-157.
21. Takenoshita Y. Development with age of the human mandibular condyle. Part I: Gross anatomy and inner architecture. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1982;11:5-15.
22. Akahane Y, Deguchi T. Morphology of the temporomandibular joint in skeletal Class III symmetrical and asymmetrical cases: a study by cephalometric laminography. J Orthod. 2001;28:119-127.
23. Harada K, Watanabe M, Ohkura K, Enomoto S. Measure of bite force and occlusal contact area before and after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy of the mandible using a new pressure-sensitive device: a preliminary report. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2000;58:370-374.
24. Saito S, Tanaka N, Kurabayashi H, Shibasaki Y. Cross-sectional comparative analysis of occlusal contact areas and occlusal force before and after orthodontic treatment using pressure sensitive occlusal sheets for various types of malocclusion. Orthod Waves Jpn Ed. 2002;61:263-271.
25. Sato C, Muramoto T, Soma K. Functional lateral deviation of the mandible and its positional recovery on the rat condylar cartilage during the growth period. Angle Orthod. 2006;76:591-597.
26. Michiyasu O. An experimental study on the growth of the rat mandibular condyle by means of subcutaneous transplantation. J Osaka Univ Dent Sch. 1977;22:21-45.
27. Kopp S. Topographical distribution of sulfated glycosaminoglycans in the surface layers of the human temporomandibular joint. J Oral Pathol. 1978;7:283-294.
28. Koolstra JH, van Eijden TM. Combined finite-element and rigid-body analysis of human jaw joint dynamics. J Biomech. 2005;38:2431-2439.
29. Meikle MC. In vivo transplantation of the mandibular joint of the rat: an autoradiographic investigation into cellular changes at the condyle. Arch Oral Biol. 1973;18:1011-1020.
30. Meikle MC. The role of the condyle in the postnatal growth of the mandible. Am J Orthod. 1973;64:50-62.
31. Katsavrias EG, Halazonetis DJ. Condyle and fossa shape in class II and class III skeletal patterns: a morphometric tomographic study. Am J Orthod. 2006;129:470-47