Digital media and intellectual property: Management of rights and consumer protection in a comparative analysis

Digital Media and Intellectual Property: Management of Rights and Consumer Protection in a Comparative Analysis

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 1-170

  Lucchi, Nicola ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FERRARA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84891401208     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-36543-5     Document Type: Book

References (421)

1. Abbott FM, Gerber DJ (1997) Public policy and global technological integration. Kluwer Law International, London Boston.
2. Abrams F (1987) First Amendment and Copyright. 35 Journal of the Copyright Society of the USA p 1.
3. Adam KW (2001) Self-help in the Digital Jungle. In: Dreyfuss RC, Zimmerman DL, First H (eds) Expanding the Boundaries of Intellectual Property: Innovation Policy for the Knowledge Society. Oxford University Press, Oxford New York, p 103.
4. Eaton-Salners A (2004) DVD Copy Control Association v. Bunner: Freedom of Speech and Trade Secrets. 19 Berkeley Technology Law Joutnal p 269.
5. Alderman J (2002) Sonic Boom-Napster, MP3, and the New Pioneers of Music.: Perseus Publishing, Cambridge (Massachusetts).
6. Arrow KJ (1962) Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention. In: R.R. Nelson (ed) The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors. Princeton University Press, Princeton, p 609.
7. Ascarelli T (1960) Teoria della Concorrenza e dei Beni Materiali, 3rd edn. Giuffrè, Milano.
8. Association of American Publishers Copyright Committee (2000) Contractual Licensing, Technological Measures and Copyright Law., Association of American Publishers, Washington DC at http://www.publishers.org/home/abouta/co py/plicens.htm.
9. Auteri P (1996) Internet ed il Contenuto del Diritto d'Autore. 5 Annali Italiani del Diritto d'Autore p 83.
10. Bainbridge DI (2002) Intellectual Property, 5th edn. Longman, Harlow (England) New York.
11. Balkin JM (2004) Digital Speech and Democratic Culture: A Theory of Freedom of Expression for the Information Society. 79 New York University Law Review p 1.
12. Band J (1999) The Digital Millennium Copyright Act: A Balanced Result. 21 European Intellectual Property Review p 92.
13. Barceló RJ, Koelman KJ (2000) Intermediary Liability in The E-Commerce Directive: So Far So Good, But It's Not Enough. 4 Computer Law & Security Report p 231.
14. Barlow JP (2002) Intellectual Property, Information Age. In: Thierer A, Crews CW Jr (eds) Copyfights: The future of intellectual property in the information age. Cato Institute, Washington DC, p 37.
15. Barlow JP (1994) The Economy of Ideas. 2.03 WIRED p 84.
16. Barrett (2000) Intellectual Property: Patents, Trademarks & Copyright, 3rd edn.: Emanuel Publishing, Larchmont NY.
17. Bates R (2004) Communication Breakdown: the Recording Industry's Pursuit of the Individual Music User, a Comparison of US and EU Copyright Protections for Internet Music File Sharing. 25 Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business p 229.
18. Bechtold S (2004) Digital Rights Management in the United States and Europe. 52 American Journal of Comparative Law p 323.
19. Bechtold S (2003) The Present and Future of Digital Rights Management: Musings on Emerging Legal Problems. In: Becker E, Buhse W, Günnewig D, Rump N (eds) Digital Rights Management: Technological, Economic, Legal and Political Aspects. Springer, Berlin New York, p 597.
20. Becker E, Buhse W, Günnewig D, Rump N (eds) (2003) Digital Rights Management: Technological, Economic, Legal and Political Aspects. Springer, Berlin New York.
21. Bell TW (1998) Fair use v. Fared Use: the Impact of Automated Rights Managements on Copyright's Fair Use Doctrince. 76 North Carolina Law Review p 557.
22. Benkler Y (2002) Intellectual Property and the Organization of Information Production. 22 International Review of Law & Economics p 81.
23. Benkler Y (2000) From Consumers to Users: Shifting the Deeper Structures of Regulation Toward Sustainable Commons and User Access. 52 Federal Communications Law Journal p 561.
24. Benkler Y (2000) Net Regulation: Taking Stock and Looking Forward. 71 University of Colorado Law Review p 1203.
25. Benkler Y(1999) Free as the Air to Common Use: First Amendment Constraints on Enclosure of the Public Domain. 74 New York University Law Review p 354.
26. Benoliel D (2004) Technological Standards, Inc.: Rethinking Cyberspace Regulatory Epistemology. 92 California Law Review p 1069.
27. Benoliel D (2003) Cyberspace Technological Standardization: an institutional theory retrospective. 18 Berkeley Technology Law Journal p 1259.
28. Bern RC (2004) "Terms Later" Contracting: Bad Economics, Bad Morals, and a Bad Idea for a Uniform Law, Judge Easterbrook Notwithstanding. 12 Journal of Law and Policy p 641.
29. Besek JM (2004) Anti-Circumvention Laws and Copyright: A Report from the Kernochan Center for Law, Media and the Arts. 27 Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts p 385.
30. Bettig (1996) Copyright Culture: The Political Economy of Intellectual Property. Westview Press, Boulder.
31. Biddle P, England P, Peinado M, Willman B (2003) The Darknet and the Future of Content Protection. In: Becker E, Buhse W, Günnewig D, Rump N (eds) Digital Rights Management: Technological, Economic, Legal and Political Aspects. Springer, Berlin New York, p 344.
32. Bin R (2004) Lo Stato di Diritto. Come Imporre Regole al Potere. Il Mulino, Bologna.
33. Blair DR, Cotter FT (1998) An Economic Analysis of Damages in Intellectual Property Law. 39 William and Mary Law Review p 1585.
34. Boucher R The Future of Intellectual Property in the Information Age. In: Thierer A, Crews CW Jr (eds) Copyfights: The future of intellectual property in the information age. Cato Institute, Washington DC, p 95.
35. Brandner HE, Ulmer P (1991) The Community Directive on Unfair Consumer Contracts: Some Critical Remarks on the Proposal Submitted by the EC Commission. 28 Common Market Law Review p 647.
36. Braucher J (2003) The Failed Promise of the UCITA Mass-Market Concept and Its Lessons for Policing of Standard Form Contracts. 7 The Journal of Small and Emerging Business Law p 393.
37. Breyer S (1972) Copyright: A Rejoinder. 20 UCLA Law Review p 75.
38. Breyer S (1970) The Uneasy Case for Copyright: A Study of Copyright in Books, Photocopies, and Computer Programs. 84 Harvard Law Review p 281.
39. Brown K (2003) Digital Rights Management: Trafficking in Technology that Can be Used to Circumvent the Intellectual Property Clause. 40 Houston Law Review p 803.
40. Brown I (2003) Implementing the European Union Copyright Directive. Available at http://www.fipr.org/copyright/guide/eucd-guide.pdf.
41. Braun N (2003) The Interface Between the Protection of Technological Measures and the Exercise of Exceptions to Copyright and Related Rights: Comparing the Situation in the United States and the European. 25 European Intellectual Property Review p 496.
42. Bunk AP (2002) Validity, Construction and Application of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. 179 Amercan Law Reports Federal 2nd ed p 319.
43. Burk DL (2004) DNA Rules: Legal and Conceptual Implications of Biological "Lock-Out" Systems. 92 California Law Review p 1553.
44. Burk DL (2002) Anticircumvention Misuse. 50 UCLA Law Review p 1095.
45. Burk DL, Cohen JE (2001) Fair Use Infrastructure for Rights Management Systems. 15 Harvard Journal of Law & Technology p 41.
46. Burke JJA (2003) Reinventing Contract. 10 Murdoch University Electronic Journal of Law p 2.
47. Burkitt D (2001) Copyrighting Culture: The History and Cultural Specificity of the Western Model of Copyright. 2 Intellectual Property Quarterly p 146.
48. Burrell R, Coleman A (2005) Copyright Exceptions: the Digital Impact. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
49. Bygrave LA (2003) DRM and Privacy. Legal Aspects in the European Union, in Digital Rights Management. In: Becker E, Buhse W, Günnewig D, Rump N (eds) Digital Rights Management: Technological, Economic, Legal and Political Aspects. Springer, Berlin New York, p 344.
50. Calamari M, Ciurcina M, Glorioso A. (2004) Commenti sul Rapporto Finale del "High Level Group on Digital Rights Management" available at https://gforge .miu-ft.org/download.php/225/High.Level.Group.on.Digital.Rights. Management.Final.Report.0.4.it.pdf.
51. Calleja R (2004) The IP Enforcement Directive. 10 Computer and Telecommunications Law Review p 55.
52. Calovi F, Lucchi N (2004) Pirateria Musicale: Tecnologia e Diritto, 7/8 Studium Iuris p 1027.
53. Cordera M (2001) E-consumer Protection: A Comparative Analysis of EU and US Consumer Protection on the Internet. 27 Rutgers Computer & Technology Law Journal p 231.
54. Carroll MW (2004) Whose Music is it Anyway?: How We Came to View Musical Expression as a Form of Property. 72 University of Cincinnati Law Review p 1405.
55. Casamiquela RJ (2002) Business Law: A. Electronic Commerce: Contractual Assent and Enforceability in Cyberspace. 17 Berkeley Technology Law Journal p 475.
56. Casellati AM (2001) The Evolution of Article 6.4 of the European Information Society Copyright Directive. 24 Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts p 369.
57. Casellati AM (2003) Protezione Legale delle Misure Tecnologiche ed Usi Legittimi. L'articolo 6.4 della Direttiva Europea e sua Attuazione in Italia. 74 Il Diritto di Autore p 360.
58. Caso R (2004) Digital Rights Management: Il Commercio delle Informazioni Digitali tra Contratto e Diritto d'Autore. Cedam, Padova.
59. Castells M (2002) The Rise of the Network Society, 2nd edn. Blackwell Publishers, Oxford Malden.
60. Castells M (2001) The Internet Galaxy: Reflections on the Internet, Business, and Society. Oxford University Press, Oxford New York.
61. Chiariglione L (2003) The Digital Media Manifesto, at http://www.chiariglione.or g/manifesto/dmm.htm.
62. Chircu AM, Kauffman RJ (1999) Strategies for Internet Middlemen in the Intermediation/ Disintermediation/Reintermediation Cycle. 9 Electronic Markets p 109.
63. Cicoria C (2003) The Protection of the Weak Contractual Party in Italy vs. United States Doctrine of Unconscionability. A Comparative Analysis. 3 Global Jurist available at http://www.bepress.com/gj/advances/vol3/iss3/art2.
64. Clark C (1996) The Answer To the Machine Is In the Machine. In: Hugenholtz PB (ed) The Future of Copyright in a Digital Environment. Kluwer Law International, The Hague Boston, p 139.
65. Cohen JE (2003) DRM and Privacy. 18 Berkeley Technology Law Journal p 575
66. Cohen JE (2001) Information rights and Intellectual Freedom. In: Vedder A. (ed) Ethics and the Internet. Intersentia, Antwerpen, pp 11-32.
67. Cohen JE (1998) Copyrigh and the Jurisprudence of Self-Help. 13 Berkeley Technology Law Journal p 1089.
68. Cohen JE (1998) Lochner in Cyberspace: The New Economic Orthodoxy of Rights Management. 97 Michigan Law Review p 462.
69. Collins H (2004) The Forthcoming EC Directive on Unfair Commercial Practices. Kluwer Law International, The Hague New York.
70. Collins H (1999) Regulating Contracts. Oxford University Press, Oxford New York.
71. Collovà C (1999) Sui Recenti Sviluppi in Materia di Compressione Audio Digitale e di tutela dei diritti degli autori, degli interpreti o esecutori e dei produttori nella Distribuzione On-line di Brani Musicali. 70 Il Diritto di Autore p 561.
72. Commission of the European Communities (2004) European Union High Level Group on Digital Rights Mgmts: Final Report. Available at http://europa.eu.in t/information-society/eeurope/2005/all-about/digital-rights-man/doc/040709 -hlg-drm-2nd-meeting-final-report.pdf.
73. Committee on Intellectual Property Rights and the Emerging Information Infrastructure, National Research Council (2000) The Digital Dilemma: Intellectual Property in the Information Age. National Academy Press, Washington DC.
74. Congressional Budget Office (2004) U.S. Congress, Copyright Issues in Digital Media.At http://www.cbo.gov/showdoc.cfm?index=5738&sequence=0.
75. ContentGuard (2000) XrML: The Technology Standard for Trusted Systems in the eContent Marketplace. Available at http://www.xpert.co.kr/1com/2network/p2 p/pds/0-WhitePaper.pdf#search='The%20Technology%20Standard%20for%2 0trusted.
76. Coteanu C (2005) Cyber Consumer Law and Unfair Trading Practice. Ashgate, Aldershot Hants (England) Burlington (Vermont).
77. Coyle K (2004) Rights Expression Languages: A Report for the Library of Congress. Available at http://www.loc.gov/standards/Coylereport-final1single.pdf
78. Craswell R (1993) Property Rules and Liability Rules in Unconscionability and Related Doctrines. 60 University of Chicago Law Review p 1.
79. Davies G (1995) The Convergence of Copyright and Authors' Rights - Reality or Chimera?. 26 International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law p. 964.
80. Davis S, Meyer C (1998) Blur: The Speed of Change in the Connected Economy. Addison-Wesley, Reading (Mass).
81. Gillian D (2002) Copyright and the Public Interest, 2nd edn. Sweet & Maxwell, London.
82. Ginsburg JC (1999) Copyright Legislation for the "Digital Millennium". 23 Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts p 137.
83. Davies JR (1998) On Self-Enforcing Contracts, the Right to Hack, and Willfully Ignorant Agents, 13 Berkeley Technology Law Journal p 1145.
84. Denicola RC (1979) Copyright and Free Speech: Constitutional Limitations on the Protection of Expression. 67 California Law Review p 283.
85. De Nova G (1994) Criteri generali di determinazione dell'abusività di clausole ed elenco di clausole abusive. 48 Rivista Trimestrale di Diritto e Procedura Civile p 691.
86. de Werra J (2003) Moving Beyond the Conflict Between Freedom of Contract and Copyright Policies. In Search of a New Global Policy for On-line Information Licensing Transaction: A Comparative Analysis Between US Law and European Law. 25 Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts p 239.
87. de Werra J (2002) The Legal System of Technological Protection Measures under the WIPO Treaties, the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, the European Directives and other National Laws (Japan, Australia). In: Ginsburg JC, Besek JM (eds) Adjuncts and Alternatives to Copyright: Proceedings of the ALAI Congress, New York, June 13-17, 2001. Columbia School of Law, New York p 198.
88. de Werra J (2005) Acces Control or Freedom of Access?. In: Graber BC, Govoni C, Girsberger M, Nenova M (eds) Digital Rights Management: The End of Collecting Societies? Staempfli, Bern - Juris Publishing Inc, New York p 111.
89. De Wolf RC (1986) An Outline of Copyright Law. F.B. Rothman, Littleton.
90. Dickie J (2005) Producers and Consumers in EU e-Commerce Law. Hart Publishing, Oxford Portland.
91. Dietz A (1998) The Protection of Intellectual Property in the Information Age: the Draft EU Copyright Directive of November 1997. 4 Intellectual Property Quarterly p 335.
92. Dmytrenko O, Dempsey JX (2004) Copyright & the Internet: Building national legislative frameworks based on international copyright law. Global Internet Policy Initiative Papers (Dec. 2004) available at http://www. internetpolicy.net /practices/20041200copyright.pdf.
93. Dodes JL (2003) Beyond Napster, Beyond the United States: The Technological and International Legal Barriers to on-line Copyright Enforcement. 46 New York Law School Law Review p 279.
94. Dreyfuss RC (2000) UCITA in the International Marketplace: Are We About To Export Bad Innovation Policy?. 26 Brooklyn Journal International Law p 49.
95. Dreyfuss RC (1996) We Are Symbols and Inhabit Symbols, So Should We Be Paying Rent? Deconstructing the Lanham Act and Rights of Publicity. 20 Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts p 123.
96. Dusollier S (2003) Exceptions and Technological Measures in the European Copyright Directive of 2001 - An Empty Promise. 34 International Review of Intellectual Property & Copetition Law p 62.
97. Dussollier S (2003) Fair Use by Design in the European Copyright Directive of 2001, 46 Communications of the ACM p 51.
98. Dusollier S (2003) Tipping the Scale in Favor of the Right Holders: the European Anti-Circumvention Provisions. In: Becker E, Buhse W, Günnewig D, Rump N (eds) Digital Rights Management: Technological, Economic, Legal and Political Aspects. Springer, Berlin New York, p 462.
99. Dusollier S (2002) Some Reflections on Copyright Management Information and Moral Rights. 25 Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts p 377.
100. Dusollier S (1999) Electrifying the Fence: The Legal Protection of Technological Measures for Protecting Copyright. 21 European Intellectual Property Review p 285.
101. Edwards L, Waelde C (1997) Law and the Internet : Regulating Cyberspace. Hart Publishing, Oxford.
102. Eisenstein E (1979) The Printing Press as an Agent of Change: Communications and Cultural Transformations in Early-Modern Europe. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge New York.
103. Elkin-Koren N (2002) It's All About Control: Rethinking Copyright in the New Information Landscape. In: Elkin-Koren N, Netanel NW (eds) The Commodification of Information. Kluwer Law International, The Hague New York p 79.
104. Elkin-Koren N (2001) A Public Regarding Approach to Contracting over Copyright. In: Dreyfuss RC, Zimmerman DL, First H (eds) Expanding the Boundaries of Intellectual Property: Innovation Policy for the Knowledge Society. Oxford University Press, Oxford New York, p 191.
105. Elkin-Koren N (1997) Copyright Policy and the Limits of Freedom of Contract. 12 Berkeley Technology Law Journal p 93.
106. Elkin-Koren N, Netanel NW (eds) (2002) The Commodification of Information. Kluwer Law International, The Hague New York.
107. Ellard D (2004) The EU's IPR Enforcement Directive. 3 Computer Law Review International p 65.
108. Emilianides AC (2004) The Author Revived: Harmonisation without Justification. 26 European Intellectual Property Review p 538.
109. Epstein RA (2005) Liberty Versus Property? Cracks in the Foundations of Copyright Law. 42 San Diego Law Review p 1.
110. Epstein RA (1975) Unconscionability: A Critical Reappraisal. 18 Journal of Law & Economics p 293.
111. European Consumers' Organisation (2004) Digital Rights Management, BEUC/X/025/2004 available at http://europa.eu.int/information-society/eeuro pe/2005/all-about/digital-rights-man/doc/beuc.pdf.
112. Fabiani M (2003) L'attuazione della Direttiva CE su Diritto di Autore nella Società dell'Informazione - Una Analisi Comparativa. 74 Il Diritto di Autore p 331.
113. Fabiani M (2004) Nuove Tecnologie di Telecomunicazione, Antitrust e Protezione della Proprietà Intellettuale. 75 Il Diritto di Autore p 78.
114. Fagin M, Pasquale F, Weatherall K (2002) Beyond Napster: Using Antitrust Law to Advance and Enhance Online Music Distribution. 8 Boston University Journal of Science & Technology Law p 450.
115. Farnsworth EA (2004) Contracts, 4th edn. Aspen Publishers, New York.
116. Falce V (2003) Diritto d'Autore e Innovazione Derivata nelle Information Technologics. 52 Rivista di Diritto Industriale p 74.
117. Feldman T (1997) An introduction to Digital Media. Routledge, London New York.
118. Felten E (2003) A Skeptical View of DRM and Fair Use. 46 (4) Communications of the ACM p 57.
119. Ficsor M. (2002) The Law of Copyright and the Internet: The 1996 WIPO Treaties their Interpretation and Implementation. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
120. Fisher WW III (2006) Conference speech: The Future Digital Economy. Digital Content - Creation, Distribution and Access, organized by the Italian Minister for Innovation and Technologies and the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, 30-31 January 2006, Rome, Italy at http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/16/44/36138608.pdf.
121. Fisher WW III (2004) Promises to Keep : Technology, Law, and the Future of Entertainment. Stanford Law and Politics, Stanford.
122. Fisher WW III (2001) Theories of Intellectual Property. In: Munzer SR (ed) New Essays in the Legal and Political Theory of Property. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge New York, p 168.
123. Fisher WW III (1998) Property and Contract on the Internet.73 Chicago-Kent Law Review p 1203.
124. Fisher WW III (1998) Reconstructing the Fair Use Doctrine. 101 Harvard Law Review p 1659.
125. Foged T (2002) U.S. v. E.U. Anti-Circumvention Legislation: Preserving the Public's Privileges in the Digital Age?. 24 European Intellectual Property Review p 525.
126. Fong IK (1991) Law and New Technology: The Virtues of Muddling Through the Digital Dilemma: Intellectual Property in the Information Age. 19 Yale Law & Policy Review p 443.
127. Friedman D (1998) In Defense of Private Orderings. 13 Berkeley Technology Law Journal p 1151.
128. Fry R (2002) Copyright Infringement and Collective Enforcement. 24 European Intellectual Property Review p 516.
129. Gaja G (2005) Introduzione al Diritto Comunitario. Laterza, Roma Bari.
130. Galgano F (2005) La Globalizzazione nello specchio del diritto. Il Mulino, Bologna.
131. Galgano F (2000) Diritto ed economia alle soglie del nuovo millennio, 16 Contratto e Impresa p 189.
132. Gallaugher JM, Auger P, Anat B (2001) Revenue Streams and Digital Content Providers: An Empirical Investigation. 38 Information & Management p 473.
133. Garrote FD (2001) El Derecho de Autor en Internet: la Directiva Sobre Derechos de Autor y Derechos Afines en la Sociedad de la Información. Editorial Comares, Granada.
134. Gasser U (2004) iTunes: How Copyright, Contract, and Technology Shape the Business of Digital Media - A Case Study (Berkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard Law School Research Publ'n No. 7, 2004), available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=556802.
135. Gasser U, Girsberger M (2004) Transposing the Copyright Directive: Legal Protection of Technological Measures in E.U.-Member States. A Genie Stuck in the Bottle? (Berkman Working Paper No. 2004-10) available at http://ssrn.co m/abstract=628007.
136. Gasser U, Palfrey J (2005) Catch-As-Catch-Can: A Case Note on Grokster, Berkman Center Research Publication Series 2005 available at http://papers.ssrn.co m/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract-id=869030.
137. Geller PE (1992) New Dynamics in International Copyright. 16 Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts p 461.
138. Gerber DJ (1997) Global Technological Integration, Intellectual Property Rights and Competition Law: Some Introductory Comments. In: Abbott FM, Gerber DJ (eds) Public policy and global technological integration. Kluwer Law International, London Boston, p 3.
139. Ghosh S (2003) Deprivatizing Copyright. 54 Case Western Reserve Law Review p 387.
140. Giaglis G, Klein SM, OKeefe RM (1999) Disintermediation, Reintermediation, or Cybermediation? The Future of Intermediaries in Electronic Marketplaces. In: Klein S, Gricar J, Pucihar A (eds) Proceedings of the Twelfth International Bled Electronic Commerce Conference. Bled, Slovenia June 7-9 pp 389-407.
141. Giaglis G, Klein SM, OKeefe RM (2002) The Role of Intermediaries in Electronic Marketplaces: Developing a Contingency Model. 12 Information Systems Journal p 231.
142. Gillen M (2004) Copyrights and Copywrongs: The Rise of Intellectual Property and How it Threatens Creativity. 12 International Journal of Law & Information Technology p 242.
143. Gillette CP (1998) Lock-In Effects in Law and Norms. 78 Boston University Law Review p 813.
144. Ginsburg JC (2003) From Having Copies to Experiencing Works: The Development of an Access Right in U.S. Copyright Law. 50 Journal of the Copyright Society of the U.S.A. p 113.
145. Ginsburg JC (1999) Il 'Digital Millennium Copyright Act' ed il 'Sony Bono Copyright Term Extension Act': Due Novità dagli Stati Uniti. 97 Rivista del Diritto Commerciale p 625.
146. Ginsburg JC (1999) Copyright Legislation for the Digital Millennium. 23 Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts p 137.
147. Ginsburg JC (1996) Diritto di Autore e Trasmissione Digitale e Diritti Protetti negli Stati Uniti: uno Sguardo d'Insieme, 94 Rivista del Diritto Commerciale p 1141.
148. Goldberg HP (2002) Note, A Proposal for an International Licensing Body to Combat File Sharing and Digital Copyright Infringement. 8 Boston University Journal of Science & Technology Law p 272.
149. Goldring J (1998) Consumer Protection, Globalization and Democracy. 6 Cardozo Journal of International & Comparative Law p 1.
150. Goldstein P (1997) Copyright and its Substitutes, Wisconsin Law Review p 865.
151. Goldstein P (1983) Derivative Rights and Derivative Works in Copyright. 30 Journal of the Copyright Society of the U.S.A p 209.
152. Goldstein P (1989) Copyright: Principles, Law and Practice. Little, Brown, Boston.
153. Goldstein P (1970) Copyright and the First Amendment. 70 Columbia Law Review p 983.
154. Gomulkiewicz RW, Williamson ML (1996) A Brief Defense of Mass Market Software License Agreements. 22 Rutgers Computer & Technology Law Journal p 335.
155. Gordon WJ (2002) Excuse and Justification in the Law of Fair Use: Commodification and Market Perspectives. In: Elkin-Koren N, Netanel NW (eds) The Commodification of Information. Kluwer Law International, The Hague New York, p 149.
156. Gordon WJ (2002) Market Failure and Intellectual Property: A Response to Professor Lunney. 82 Boston University Law Review p 1031.
157. Gordon WJ (1998) Intellectual Property as Price Discrimination: Implications for Contract, 73 Chicago-Kent Law Review p 1367.
158. Gordon WJ (1982) Fair Use as Market Failure: A Structural and Economic Analysis of the Betamax Case and its Predecessors. 82 Columbia Law Review p 1600.
159. Gordon WJ (1989) An Inquiry into the Merits of Copyright: The Challenges of Consistency, Consent, and Encouragement Theory. 41 Stanford Law Review p 1343.
160. Greenberg MH (2003) A Return to Lilliput: The LICRA v. Yahoo! Case and the Regulation of On-line Content in the World Market. 18 Berkeley Technology Law Journal p 1191.
161. Grendler PF (1997) The Roman Inquisition and the Venetian Press. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
162. Grosheide WF (2001) Copyright law from a user's perspective: access rights for users, 23 European Intellectual Property Review p 321.
163. Grøndal L (2006) DRM and contract terms, at http://www.indicare. org/tikiread- article.php?articleId=177.
164. Gross RD (2002) Copyright Zealotry in a Digital World: Can Freedom of Speech Survive?. In: Thierer A, Crews CW Jr (eds) Copyfights: The future of intellectual property in the information age. Cato Institute, Washington DC, p 189.
165. Groves P (2004) The proposed EC Directive on Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights. 25 Business Law Review p 149.
166. Guibauld LMCR (2002) Copyright limitations and contracts: an analysis of the contractual overridability of limitations on copyright. Kluwer Law International, The Hague Boston.
167. Guibault LMCR (2000) Contracts and Copyright Exemptions. In: Hugenholtz PB (ed) Copyright and Electronic Commerce: Legal Aspects of Electronic Copyright Management. Kluwer Law, The Hague London Boston, p 125.
168. Guibault LMCR (1998) Pre-emption Issues in the Digital Environment: Can Copyright Limitations be Overriden by Contractual Agreements under European Law. In: Grosheide FW, Boele-Woelki K (eds) Molengrafica n. 11. Europees Privaatrecht. Opstellen over Internationale Transacties en Intellectuele Eigendom. Intersentia, Antwerp New York : p 225.
169. Guibault LMCR, Helberger N (2005) Consumer protection and Copyright Law, available. European Consumer Law Group, available at http://www.ivir.nl/pub lications/other/copyrightlawconsumerprotection.pdf.
170. Haber S, Horne B, Pato J, Sander T, Tarjan RE (2003) If Piracy is the Problem, is DRM the Answer?. In: Becker E, Buhse W, Günnewig D, Rump N (eds) Digital Rights Management: Technological, Economic, Legal and Political Aspects. Springer, Berlin New York, p 224.
171. Hadfield GK (1992) The Economics of Copyright: An Historical Perspective. 38 Copyright Law Symposium p 1.
172. Helberger N (2005) Digital Rights Management from a Consumer's Perspective, 8 IRIS plus, available at http://www.obs.coe.int/oea-publ/iris/ iris-plus/iplus8-2 005.pdf.en.
173. Halbert DJ (1999) Intellectual Property in the Information Age: The Politics of Expanding Ownership Rights. Quorum, Westport (Conn).
174. Hallin DC, Mancini P (2004) Comparing Media Systems: Three Models of Media and Politics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge New York.
175. Hamilton MA (1996) The TRIPS Agreement: Imperialistic, Outdated, and Overprotective, 29 Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law p 613.
176. Hanbidge N (2001) DRM: Can it Deliver. 12 Entertainment Law Review p 138.
177. Hardy IT (1996) Property (and Copyright) in Cyberspace.1996 University of Chi cago Legal Forum p 217.
178. Hardy IT (1995) Contracts, Copyright, and Preemption in a Digital World. 1 Richmond Journal of Law and Technology p 2.
179. Hardy IT (1994) The Proper Legal Regime for "Cyberspace". 55 University of Pittsburgh Law Review p 993.
180. Hart M (2002) The Copyright in the Information Society Directive: An Overview. 24 European Intellectual Property Review p 58.
181. Hart M (1998) The Proposed Directive for Copyright in the Information Society: Nice Rights, Shame about Exceptions. 5 European Intellectual Property Review p 169.
182. Hassett R (1998) Online contracting. Available at http://www. internetlegal.com/ar ticles/online.htm.
183. Heide T (2003) Copyright, Contract and the Legal Protection of Technological Measures - Not "the Old Fashioned Way": Providing a Rationale to the "Copyright Exceptions Interface". 50 Journal of the Copyright Society of the U.S.A. p 315.
184. Heide T (2001) Copyright in the EU and U.S.: What "Access- Right". 48 Journal of the Copyright Society of the U.S.A. p 363.
185. Heide T (2000) The Approach to Innovation Under the Proposed Copyright Directive: Time for Mandatory Exceptions. 3 Intellectual Property Quarterly p 215
186. Hillman RA, Rachlinski JJ (2002) Standard-Form Contracting in the Electronic Age.77 New York University Law Review p 429.
187. Hillman RA (2002) Rolling Contracts. 71 Fordham Law Review p 743.
188. Howells GG, Weatherill S (2005) Consumer protection law, 2nd edn. Ashgate, Aldershot Hants Burlington.
189. Howells GG, Wilhelmsson T (1997) EC Consumer Law. Ashgate, Dartmouth.
190. Hugenholtz PB (2001) Copyright and Freedom of Expression in Europe. In: Dreyfuss RC, Zimmerman DL, First H (eds) Expanding the Boundaries of Intellectual Property: Innovation Policy for the Knowledge Society. Oxford University Press, Oxford New York, p 343.
191. Hugenholtz PB (2000) Copyright, Contract and Code: What Will Remain of the Public Domain?. 26 Brooklyn Journal of International Law p 77.
192. Hugenholtz PB (ed)(2000) Copyright and Electronic Commerce: Legal Aspects of Electronic Copyright Management Kluwer Law, The Hague, London Boston
193. Hugenholtz PB (2000) Why the Copyright Directive is Unimportant, and Possibly Invalid. 22 European Intellectual Property Review p 499.
194. Higenholtz PB (ed)(1996) The Future of Copyright in a Digital Environment. Kluwer Law International, The Hague Boston.
195. Hugenholtz PB, Guibault LMCR, van Geffen S (2003)The Future of Levies in the Digital Environment, available at http://www.ivir.nl/publications/other/DRM &levies-report.pdf.
196. Hunt G (2000) In a Digital Age: the Musical Revolution Will Be Digitalized. 11 Albany Law Journal Science & Technology p 181.
197. Hunter D (2003) Cyberspace as a Place and the Tragedy of the Digital Anticommons. 91 California Law Review p 439.
198. Huppertz MT (2003) The Point of View of Software Industry. In: Gotzen F (ed) The Future of Intellectual Property in the Global Market of the Information Society: Who is Going to Shape the IPR System in the New Millennium?. Bruylant, Bruxelles, p 70.
199. Idris K (2003) International Intellectual Property: Introduction. 26 Fordham International Law Journal p 209.
200. International Federation of the Phonographic Industry (2005) IFPI:05. Digital Music Report. Available at http://www.ifpi.com/site-content/library/ digital-music -report-2005.pdf.
201. Italian Minister of Innovation and Technologies: Department for Innovation and Technology (2005) Report of the Interministerial Committee on Digital Content in the Internet Age. Available at http://www.mininnovazione.it/ eng/interv ento/allegati/rap-cont-dig.pdf.
202. Jackson M (2001) Using Technology to Circumvent the Law: The DMCA's Push to Privatize Copyright. 23 Hastings Communications & Entertainment Law Journal p 607.
203. Joerges C (1995) The Europeanization of Private Law as a Rationalization Process and as a Contest of Disciplines - an Analysis of the Directive on Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts. 3 European Review of Private Law p 175.
204. Kao A (2004) RIAA v. Verizon: Applying the Subpoena Provision of the DMCA19 Berkeley Technology Law Journal p 405.
205. Katsh E (1993) Law in a Digital World: Computer Networks and Cyberspace. 38 Villanova Law Review 403, 415 (1993).
206. Keeling DT (2003) Intellectual Property Rights in EU Law: Free Movement and Competition Law. Oxford University Press, Oxford New York.
207. Kemp B (2003) Copyright's Digital Reformulation 6 Yale Journal of Law & Technology p 174.
208. Kerr I, Bailey J (2004) The Implications of Digital Rights Management for Privacy and Freedom of Expression. 2 Journal of Information, Communication & Ethics in Society p 87.
209. Kerr OS (2002) A Lukewarm Defense of the DMCA. In: Thierer A, Crews CW Jr
210. Knapp CL (2002) Taking Contracts Private: The Quiet Revolution in Contract Law. 71 Fordham Law Review p 761.
211. Kilbey I (2003) Copyright duration? Too Long. 25 European Intellectual Property Review p 105.
212. Kingston W (2004) Why Harmonisation is a Trojan Horse. 26 European Intellectual Property Review p 447.
213. Kleiner K (2001) Free Speech, Liberty, Pornography: The Internet and Peer to Peer Networking. 169 New Scientist p 32.
214. Koelman KJ (2002) The Protection of Technological Measures vs. the Copyright Limitations In: Ginsburg JC, Besek JM (eds) Adjuncts and Alternatives to Copyright: Proceedings of the ALAI Congress, New York, June 13-17, 2001. Columbia School of Law, New York p 448.
215. Koelman KJ (2004) Copyright Law and Economics in the EU Copyright Directive: Is the Droit d'Auteur Passe?. 35 International Review of Intellectual Property & Competition Law p 603.
216. Koelman KJ, Helberger N (2000) Protection of Technological Measures. In: Hugenholtz PB (ed) Copyright and Electronic Commerce: Legal Aspects of Electronic Copyright Management. Kluwer Law, The Hague London Boston, p165.
217. Kornhauser LA (1976) Unconscionability in Standard Forms. 64 California Law Review p 1151.
218. Korobkin R (2003) Bounded Rationality, Standard Form Contracts, and Unconscionability. 70 University of Chicago Law Review p 1203.
219. Kretschmer M (2003) Digital Copyright: The End of an Era. 25 European Intellectual Property Review p 333.
220. Ku RSR (2002) The Creative Destruction of Copyright: Napster and the New Economics of Digital Technology. 69 University Chicago Law Review p 263
221. Kur A (2004) The Enforcement Directive - Rough start, happy landing?, 35 International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law p 821.
222. Lackman EM (2003) Slowing Down the Speed of Sound: A Transatlantic Race to Head off Digital Copyright Infringement. 13 Fordham Intellectual Property Media & Entertainment Law Journal p 1161.
223. Landes WM, Posner RA (2003) Indefinitely Renewable Copyright. 70 University of Chicago Law Review p 471.
224. Landes WM, Posner RA (2003) The Economic Structure of intellectual Property Law. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (Mass).
225. Landes WM, Posner RA (1989) An Economic Analysis of Copyright Law. 18 Journal of Legal Studies p 325.
226. Lattanzi R (2004) Protezione dei Dati Personali e Diritti di Proprietà Intellettuale: alla Ricerca di un Difficile Equilibrio, relazione al convegno "Nuovi Media e Regole: Orizzonti e Rischi per la Proprietà Intellettuale", Roma 25 marzo 2004. available at http://europa.eu.int/information-society/eeurope/2005/all-a bout/digital-rights- man/doc/lattanzi-roberto-it.pdf.
227. Leff AA (1967) Unconscionability and the Code-The Emperor's New Clause. 115 University of Pennsylvania Law Review p 485
228. Lemley MA (2003) Place and Cyberspace. 91 California Law Review p 521
229. Lemley MA (1999) Beyond Preemption: The Law and Policy of Intellectual Property Licensing. 87 California Law Review p 111.
230. Lemley MA (1998) Symposium on the Internet and Legal Theory: The Law and Economics of Internet Norms. 73 Chicago- Kent Law Review p 1257.
231. Lemley MA (1997) The Economics of Improvement in Intellectual Property Law. 75 Texas Law Review p 989.
232. Lemley MA (1997) Romantic Authorship and the Rhetoric of Property. 75 Texas Law Review p 873.
233. Lemley (1995) Intellectual Property and Shrinkwrap Licenses. 68 Southern California Law Review p 1239.
234. Lemley MA, Reese RA (2005) A Quick and Inexpensive System for Resolving Digital Copyright Disputes. 21 Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal p 1.
235. Lemley MA, Reese RA (2004) Reducing Digital Copyright Infringement Without Restricting Innovation. 56 Stanford Law Review p 1345.
236. Lessig L. (1999) Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace. Basic Books, New York.
237. Lessig L (1999) The limits in open code: regulatory standard and the future of the net. 14 Berkeley Technology Law Journal p 759.
238. Lessig L (1999) Keynote address: commons and code. 9 Fordham Intellectual Property Media & Entertainment Law Journal p 405.
239. Lessig L (2004) Free Culture: How Big Media Uses Technology and the Law to Lock Down Culture and Control Creativity. Penguin Press, New York.
240. Levin SJ (1986) Examining Restraints on Freedom to Contract as an Approach to Purchaser Dissatisfaction in the Computer Industry. 74 California Law Review p 2101.
241. Lichtman D, Landes W (2003) Indirect Liability for Copyright Infringement: an Economic Prospective. 16 Harvard Journal of. Law & Technology p 395.
242. Liestøl G, Morrison A, Rasmussen T (eds) (2003) Digital Media Revisited: Theoretical and Conceptual Innovation in Digital Domains. MIT Press, Cambridge (Mass.)
243. Litman J (2001) Digital Copyright: protecting intellectual property on the Internet. Prometheus Books, Amherst N.Y.
244. Litman J (1998) The Tales that Article 2B Tells. 13 Berkeley Technology Law Journal p 931.
245. Liu J (2003) The DMCA and the Regulation of Scientific Research. 18 Berkeley Technology Law Journal p 501.
246. Lloyd IJ (2004) Information Technology Law. 4th edn Butterworths, London.
247. Lu CS (2005) Multimedia Security: Steganography and Digital Watermarking Techniques for Protection of Intellectual Property. Idea Group Publishing, Hershey.
248. Lucchi N (2005) Intellectual Property Rights in Digital Media: A Comparative Analysis of Legal Protection, Technological Measures and New Business Models under EU and U.S. Law. 53 Buffalo Law Review p 1111.
249. Lucchi N (2002) Il Caso DeCSS: Tra Libertà di Manifestazione del Pensiero e Diritto d'Autore. 3 Studium Iuris p 381.
250. Macmillan F. (2006) New Directions in Copyright Law. E. Elgar, Cheltenham UK Northampton (Massachusetts).
251. MacQueen HL (2000) Copyright and the Internet. In: Edwards L., Waelde C. (eds) Law and the Internet: A Framework for Electronic Commerce. 2nd edn Hart Publishing, Oxford (England) Portland (Oregon), p 181.
252. Madison MJ (1998) Legal-ware: Contract and Copyright in Digital Age, Fordham Law Review p 1025.
253. Marks DS, Turnbull BH (2000) Technical Protection Measures: The Intersection of Technology, Law and Commercial Licenses. 22 European Intellectual Property Review p 198.
254. Marret P (2002) Information Law in Practice. 2nd edn Ashgate, Aldershot Hants Burlington.
255. Martin-Prat M (2002), The Relationship Between Protection and Exceptions in the EU "Information Society" Directive. In: Ginsburg JC, Besek JM (eds) Adjuncts and Alternatives to Copyright: Proceedings of the ALAI Congress, New York, June 13-17, 2001. Columbia School of Law, New York, p 466.
256. Massa CH (2004) The Scope of the Proposed IP Enforcement Directive: Torn Between the Desire to Harmonise Remedies and the Need to Combat Piracy, 26 European Intellectual Property Review p 244.
257. Massa CH, Strowel A (2004) The Scope of the Proposed IP Enforcement Directive: Torn between the Desire to Harmonise Remedies and the Need to Combat Piracy. 26 European Intellectual Property Review p 244.
258. Matesky MP(2005) The Digital Millennium Copyright Act and Non-Infringing Use: Can Mandatory Labeling of Digital Media Products Keep the Sky from Falling?. 80 Chicago-Kent Law Review p 515.
259. Maxeiner JR (2003) Standard-Terms Contracting in the Global Electronic Age: European Alternatives. 28 Yale Journal of International Law p 109.
260. May C (2003) Digital Rights Management and the Breakdown of Social Norms. 8 FirstMonday at http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue8-11/may/index.html
261. May C (2002) The Venetian Moment: New Technologies, Legal Innovation and the Institutional Origins of Intellectual Property. 20 Prometheus p 159 at http://taylorandfrancis.metapress.com/index/QAAXAY05786CLA16.pdf.
262. Mazziotti G (2005) Did Apple's Refusal to License Proprietary Information enabling Interoperability with its iPod Music Player Constitute an Abuse under Article 82 of the EC Treaty?. 28 World Competition p 235.
263. Mazziotti G (2004) Monopoli Elettronici e Utilizzazioni Libere nel Diritto d'Autore Comunitario. 75 Il Diritto di Autore p 150.
264. McNealy P, McGuire M (2001) Digital Content Sales Hinge on Standardized Protection. Gartner Group, available at http://www.gartner.com/resources/100500 /100543/digital-content.pdf.
265. Mefford A (1997) Lex Informatica: Foundation of Law on the Internet, 5 Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies p 211.
266. Menozzi L (1999) Dove Va il Diritto d'Autore? Profezie Buone e Cattive di una Trasformazione. Il Diritto d' Autore p 400.
267. Merges RP, Menell PS, Lemley MA (2003) Intellectual Property in the New Technological Age, 3rd edn. Aspen Publishers, New York.
268. Merriden T (2001) Irresistible Forces: The Business Legacy of Napster & the Growth of the Underground Internet. Capstone Publishing, Milford.
269. Metthews D (2002) Globalising Intellectual Property Rights: The TRIPs Agreement. Routledge, London New York.
270. Micklitz HW, Kessler J (eds) (2002) Marketing Practices Regulation and Consumer Protection in the EC Member States and the US. Nomos, Baden-Baden
271. Moretti M (2004) Misure Tecnologiche di Protezione delle Opere e Tutela del Consumatore, 75 Il Diritto d' Autore p 43.
272. Morganstern S (1978) Legal protection for the consumer, 2nd edn. Oceana Publications, Dobbs Ferry N.Y.
273. Murray JE Jr (1982) The Standardized Agreement Phenomena in the Restatement (Second) of Contracts. 67 Cornell Law Review p 735.
274. Neboyskey DAP (2000) A Leap Forward: Why States Should Ratify the Uniform Computer Information Transactions Act. 52 Federal Communications Law Journal p 793.
275. Negroponte N (1995) Being Digital. Alfred A Knopf, New York.
276. Netanel WN (2003) Impose a Non-Commercial Use Levy to Allow Free Peer-to- Peer File Sharing.17 Harvard Journal Law & Technology p 1.
277. Netanel NW (2001) Locating Copyright Within the First Amendment Skein. 54 Stanford Law Review p 1.
278. Netanel NW (1999) Recent Developments in Copyright Law. 7 Texas Intellectual Property Law Journal p 331.
279. Netanel NW (1996) Copyright and Democratic Civil Society. 106 Yale Law Journal p 283.
280. Netanel WN (1994) Alienability Restrictions and the Enhancement of Author Autonomy in United States and Continental Copyright law. 12 Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal p 1.
281. Niederman M (2005) The Changing Narrative Paradigm Analog to Digital and What that Means. 2 International Digital Media and Arts Association Journal p 45.
282. Nimmer RT (2004) UCITA and the Continuing Evolution of Digital Licensing Law. Computer & Internet Lawyer p 10.
283. Nimmer RT (2000) Contract Law in Electronic Commerce. 587 Practicing Law. Institute p 1127.
284. Nimmer RT (2000) UCITA: A Commercial Contract Code. 17 Computer Lawyer p 3.
285. Nimmer RT (1998) Breaking Barriers: the Relation Between Contract and Intellectual Property Law.13 Berkeley Technology Law Journal p 827.
286. Nimmer RT (1997) The Law of Computer Technology: Rights, Licenses, Liabilities, 3rd edn. West Group, St. Paul.
287. Nimmer RT (1994) Intangibles Contracts: Thoughts of Hubs, Spokes, and Reinvigorating Article 2. 35 William & Mary Law Review p 1337.
288. Nimmer D (2000) A Riff on Fair Use in the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, 148 University of Pennsylvania Law Review p 673.
289. Nimmer M, Nimmer D (2005) Nimmer on Copyright: A Treatise on the Law of Literary, Musical and Artistic Property, and the Protection of Ideas. Matthew Bender, New York.
290. Nivarra L (2005) L'Enforcement dei Diritti di Proprietà Intellettuale dopo la Direttiva 2004/48/CE, 54 Rivista di Diritto Industriale p 33.
291. Noam E (2004) Will Internet TV Be American?. In: Noam E, Groebel J, Gerbarg D (eds) Internet Television. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ p 235.
292. Oakley RL (2005) Fairness in Electronic Contracting: Minimum Standards for Non-Negotiated Contracts. 42 Houston Law Review p 1041.
293. O'Hara R (2004) You Say you Want a Revolution: Music & Technology - Evolution or Destruction?. 39 Gonzaga Law Review p 247.
294. Olson S (2005) Digital Deontology. 2 International Digital Media and Arts Association Journal p 53.
295. Olswang S (1995) Accessright: an Evolutionary Path for Copyright into the Digital Era. 17 European Intellectual Property Review p 215.
296. Opderbeck DW (2005) Peer-to-Peer Networks, Technological Evolution, and Intellectual Property Reverse Private Attorney General Litigation. 20 Berkeley Technology Law Journal p 1685.
297. O'Rourke MA (1997) Copyright Preemption After the ProCD Case: A Market- Based Approach. 12 Berkeley Technology Law Journal p 53.
298. O'Rourke MA (1998) Striking a Delicate Balance: Intellectual Property, Antitrust, Contract and Standardization in the Computer Industry. 12 Harvard Journal of Law & Technology p 1.
299. Ottolia A (2004) Preserving Users' Rights in DRM: Dealing with "Juridical Particularism" in the Information Society. 35 International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law p 491.
300. Ottolia A, Wielsch D (2004) Mapping the Information Environment: Legal Aspects of Modularization and Digitalization. 6 Yale Journal of Law & Technology p 174.
301. Palmer TG (1989) Intellectual Property: A Non-Posnerian Law and Economics Approach. 12 Hamline Law Review p 261.
302. Palmer TG (1989) Intellectual Property: A Non-Posnerian Law and Economics Approach.12 Hamline Law Review p 261.
303. Palmieri A, Pardolesi R (2002) Gli Access Contracts: Una Nuova Categoria per il Diritto dell'Età Digitale. 7 Rivista di Diritto Privato p 265.
304. Pardolesi R (1994) Clausole Abusive (nei contratti dei consumatori): Una Direttiva Abusata?. 119 Il Foro Italiano p 137 V.
305. Pascuzzi G (2002) Il Diritto nell'Era Digitale. Tecnologie Informatiche e Regole Privatistiche. Il Mulino, Bologna.
306. Pascuzzi G, Caso R (2002) I Diritti sulle Opere Digitali: Copyright Statunitense e Diritto d'Autore Italiano. Cedam, Padova.
307. Patry WF (1994) Copyright Law and Practice. Bureau of National Affairs, Washington DC.
308. Patterson LR (1987) Free Speech, Copyright, and Fair Use. 40 Vanderbilt Law Review p 1.
309. Patterson LR (1968) Copyright in Historical Perspective. Vanderbilt University Press, Nashville.
310. Pearson H, Smith G (2005) Internet Filesharing. A European Perspective on Grokster. 10 Cyberspace Lawyer p11.
311. Perritt J (2003) Protecting Technology over Copyright: A Step Too Far. 14 Entertainment Law Review p 1.
312. Ploeger L, Brown MD, Armon O, An Overview of MGM Studios Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd.. 34 The Colorado Lawyer 89.
313. Posner EA (1998) Efficient Norms. In: Newman P (ed) The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics and the Law. Macmillan Reference, London p 19.
314. Posner EA (1995) Contract Law in the Welfare State: A Defense of the Unconscionability Doctrine, Usury Laws, and Related Limitations On The Freedom to Contract. 24 Journal of Legal Studies p 283.
315. Prime T (2000) European Intellectual Property. Ashgate, Aldershot Brookfield.
316. Putnam GH (1962) Books and Their Makers During the Middle Ages; A Study of the Conditions of the Production and Distribution of Literature from the Fall of the Roman Empire to the Close of the Seventeenth Century. Hillary house publishers, New York.
317. Radin MJ (2004) Regulation by Contract, Regulation by Machine. 160 Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics p 1.
318. Radin MJ (2000) Humans, Computers and Binding Commitment. 75 Indiana Law Journal p 1125.
319. Radin MJ (2002) On-line Standardization and the Integration of Text and Machine. 70 Fordham Law Review p 1125.
320. Ramello GB (2005) Intellectual Property and the Markets of Ideas. In: Backhaus JG (ed) The Elgar Companion to Law and Economics. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham Northampton.
321. Ramello G (2003) Il Diritto d'Autore nella Prospettiva Law and Economics. Economia della cultura p 207.
322. Ramello G (2001) Il Diritto d'Autore tra Creatività e Mercato. Economia pubblica p 37.
323. Ramello G (1997) Copyright e Pirateria nel Mercato Fonografico. L'industria p 317.
324. Reese RA (2003) Will Merging Access Controls and Rights Controls Undermine the Structure of Anticircumvention Law?. 18 Berkeley Technology Law Journal p 619.
325. Reese RA (2003) Legal Incentives for Adopting Digital Rights Management Systems: Will Merging Access Controls and Rights Controls Undermine the Structure of Anticircumvention Law?.18 Berkeley Technology Law Journal p 619.
326. Reese RA (2003) The First Sale Doctrine in the Era of Digital Networks. 44 Boston College Law Review p 577.
327. Reese RA (2001) Copyright and Internet Music Transmissions: Existing Law, Major Controversies, Possible Solutions. 55 University of Miami Law Review p 237.
328. Reichman JH, Franklin JA (1999) Privately Legislated Intellectual Property Rights: Reconciling Freedom of Contract with Public Good Uses of Information. 147 University of Pennsylvania Law Review p 875.
329. Reichman JH, Uhlir PF (2003) A Contractually Reconstructed Research Commons for Scientific Data in a Highly Protectionist Intellectual Property Environment. 66 SPG Law & Contemporary Problems p 315.
330. Reidemberg J (1998) Lex Informatica: The Formulation of Information Policy Rules Through Technology. 76 Texas Law Review p 553.
331. Reinbothe J (2003) European Copyright - Yesterday, Today, Tomorrow. In: Becker E, Buhse W, Günnewig D, Rump N (eds) Digital Rights Management: Technological, Economic, Legal and Political Aspects. Springer, Berlin New York, p 416.
332. Rice DA (1997) Digital Information As Property And Product: U.C.C. Article 2B, 22 University of Dayton Law Review p 621.
333. Ricolfi M (2001) Intellectual Property Rights and Legal Order. 72 Il Diritto di Autore p 123.
334. Ricolfi M (2002) La Tutela della Proprietà Intellettuale: Fra Incentivo all'Innovazi -one e Scambio Ineguale. 51 Rivista di Diritto Industriale p 511.
335. Rifkin J (2000) The Age of Access: The New Culture of Hypercapitalism, Where All of Life is a Paid-for Experience. J.P. Tarcher/Putnam, New York.
336. Ritchie A (2000) Hanging in the Balance: Fair Use for Digital Works. 9 University of Baltimore Intellectual Property Law Journal p 29.
337. Romer P (1986) Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth, 94 Journal of Political Economy p 1002.
338. Roppo V (1994) La nuova disciplina delle clausole abusive nei contratti fra imprese e consumatori. 40 Rivista di Diritto Civile p 277.
339. Rose M (1994) The Author as Proprietor: Donaldson v. Beckett and the Genealogy of Modern Authorship. In: Sherman B, Strowel A (eds) Of authors and origins : essays on copyright law. Oxford University Press, Oxford New York.
340. Rose M (1993) Authors and Owners: The Invention of Copyright. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (Mass.).
341. Rossini M, Helberger N (2005) Fair DRM Use. Report on the 3rd INDICARE Workshop Held on 28 May 2005 in Amsterdam. Available at http://www.indi care.org/tiki-download-file.php?fileId=146.
342. Rosenblatt W, Trippe W, Mooney S (2002) Digital rights management: business and technology. M&T Books, New York.
343. Rosenblatt B, Dykstra G (2003) Integrating Content Management with Digital Rights Management at http://www.xrml.org/reference/CM-DRMwhitepaper.pdf.
344. Rosenfield HN (1975) The Constitutional Dimensions of "Fair Use" in Copyright Law. 50 Notre Dame Law Review p 790.
345. Rustad ML (1999) Making UCITA More Consumer-Friendly. 18 John Marshall Journal of Computer & Information Law p 547.
346. Samuelson P (2003) DRM {and, or, vs.} the law. 46 Communications of the ACM p 41.
347. Samuelson P (1999) Intellectual Property and the Digital Economy: Why the Anti- Circumvention Regulations Need to be Revised. 14 Berkeley Technology Law Journal p 519.
348. Samuelson P (1999) Challenges for the World Intellectual Property Organization and the Trade-related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights Council in Regulating Intellectual Property Rights in the Information Age. 21 European Intellectual Property Review p 578.
349. Samuelson P (1998) Foreword, Symposium on Intellectual Property and Contract Law for the Information Age. 13 Berkeley Technology Law Journal p 809.
350. Samuelson P (1997) The U.S. Digital Agenda at WIPO. 37 Virginia Journal of International Law p 369.
351. Samuelson P (1994) Will the Copyright Office be Obsolete in the Twenty-First Century?. 13 Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal p 55.
352. Samuelson P (1991) Digital Media and the Law. 34 Communications of the ACM p 23.
353. Samuelson P (1990) Digital Media and the Changing Face of Intellectual Property Law.16 Rutgers Computer and Technology Law Journal p 323.
354. Samuelson P (1989) Information as Property: Do Ruckelshaus and Carpenter Signal a Changing Direction in Intellectual Property Law?. 38 Catholic University Law Review p 365.
355. Samuelson P, Glushko RJ (1993) Intellectual Property Rights for Digital Library and Hypertext Publishing Systems. 6 Harvard Journal of Law & Technology p 237.
356. Samuelson P, Scotchmer S (2002) The Law and Economics of Reverse Engineering. 111 Yale Law Journal p 1575.
357. Satta G (2002) Copyright/Copyleft, Note sull'Ipertrofia della Proprietà Intellettuale su Certi Paradossi e su Alcune Strategie di Resistenza. 28 Parolechiave p 121.
358. Sawhney M (2000) Hand in Hand. Context Magazine available at http://www.cont extmag.com/setFrameRedirect.asp?src=/archives/200004/ DigitalStrategy.asp.
359. Scassellati Sforzolini MT (2003) La Direttiva Comunitaria del 22 maggio 2001 n. 29 sull'Armonizzazione di Taluni Aspetti del Diritto d'Autore nella Società dell'Informazione. 74 Il Diritto di Autore p 65.
360. Sell SK (2003) Private Power, Public Law : The Globalization of Intellectual Property Rights. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge New York.
361. Sell SK (2002) TRIPs and the Access to Medicines Campaign. 20 Wisconsin International Law Journal p 481.
362. Sell SK, May C (2001) Moments in Law: Contestation and Settlement in the History of Intellectual Property. 8 Review of International Political Economy p 467.
363. Sellars C (2003) Digital Rights Management Systems: Recent European Issues. 14 Entertainment Law Review p 5.
364. Shah PA (2000) The Uniform Computer Information Transactions Act. 15 Berkeley Technology Law Journal p 85.
365. Shapiro AL (1999) The Control Revolution: How the Internet is Putting Individuals in Charge and Changing the World We Know. PublicAffairs, New York.
366. Shapiro C, Varian HR (1999) Information Rules: A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy.Harvard Business School Press, Boston (Massachusetts).
367. Sherman B, Bently L (1999) The Making of Modern Intellectual Property Law. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (England) New York.
368. Sieber A (2003) The Constitutionality of the DMCA Explored: Universal City Studios, Inc. v. Corley & United States v. Elcom Ltd.. 18 Berkeley Technology Law Journal p 7.
369. Simon D (2001) Le Système Juridique Communautaire, 3rd edn. Presses Universitaires de France, Paris.
370. Simon E (2002) The DMCA: Providing Locks for Digital Doors. In: Thierer A, Crews CW Jr (eds) Copyfights: The future of intellectual property in the information age. Cato Institute, Washington DC, p 171.
371. Sirinelli P (2002) The scope of the prohibition on circumvention of technological measures: exceptions in Adjuncts and Alternatives to Copyright. In: Ginsburg JC, Besek JM (eds) Adjuncts and Alternatives to Copyright: Proceedings of the ALAI Congress, New York, June 13-17, 2001. Columbia School of Law, New York, p 384.
372. Slawson DW (1996) Binding Promises: The Late 20th- Century Reformation of Contract Law. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
373. Smith MD, Bailey J, Brynjolfsson E (2000) Understanding Digital Markets: Review and Assessment. In: Brynjolfsson E, Kahin B (eds) Understanding the Digital Economy. MIT Press, Cambridge (Massachusetts) p 99.
374. Sobel LS (2003) DRM as an Enabler of Business Models: ISPs as Digital Retailers. 18 Berkeley Technology Law Journal p 667.
375. Sobel LS (1971) Copyright and the First Amendment: A Gathering Storm?, 19 Copyright Law Symposium p 43.
376. Spada P (1998) La Proprietà Intellettuale nelle Reti Telematiche. 44 Rivista di Diritto Civile p 635.
377. Spada P (2000) La Proprietà Intellettuale su Internet. Temi romana p 128.
378. Spada P (2002) Copia Privata e Opere Sottochiave. 51 Rivista di Diritto d'Autore p 591.
379. Spanogle JA (1969) Analyzing Unconscionability Problems. 117 University of Pennsylvania. Law Review p 931.
380. Stamatoudi IA (2002) Copyright and Multimedia Works. A Comparative Analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (Massachusetts) New York.
381. Stefik M (1997) Shifting the Possible: How Trusted Systems and Digital Property Rights Challenge Us to Rethink Digital Publishing. 12 Berkeley Technology Law Journal p 137.
382. Sterling JAL (1998) Creator's Right and the Bridge Between Author's Right and Copyright. 29 International Review of Intellectual Property and Competion Law p 302.
383. Stokes S (2002) Digital Copyright: Law and Practice. Butterworths, London.
384. Sunstein CR (1997) Free Markets and Social Justice. Oxford University Press, New York Oxford.
385. Swanson CB (2001) Unconscionable Quandary: U.C.C. Article 2 and the Unconscionability Doctrine. 31 New Mexico Law Review p 359.
386. Tebbel J (1972) A History of Book Publishing in the United States. R. R. Bowker Co, New York.
387. Terrell TP, Smith JS (1985) Publicity, Liberty, and Intellectual Property: A Conceptual and Economic Analysis of the Inheritability Issue. 34 Emory Law Journal p 1.
388. Thierer A, Crews W (eds) (2002) Copy Fights: The Future of Intellectual Property in the Information Age. Cato Institute, Washington DC.
389. Therien JR (2001) Exorcising the Spectre of a "Pay per Use" Society: Towards Preserving Fair Use and the Public Domain in the Digital Age. 16 Berkeley Technology Law Journal p 979.
390. Trebilcock MJ (1997) The Limits of Freedom of Contract: Harvard University Press, Cambridge (Massachusetts).
391. Tremml B (1997) The EU Directive on Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts, 3 International contract advisor p 18.
392. Ulmer-Eilfort C ( Private Copying and Levies for Information- and Communication - Technologies and Storage Media in Europe. In: Becker E, Buhse W, Günnewig D, Rump N (eds) Digital Rights Management: Technological, Economic, Legal and Political Aspects. Springer, Berlin New York, p 447.
393. United States Copyright Office (2001) Executive Summary Digital Millennium Copyright Act Section 104 Report. Available at http://www.loc.gov/ copyright/reports/studies/dmca/dmca-executive.html.
394. Vaidhyanathan S (2001) Copyrights and Copywrongs: The Rise of Intellectual Property and How It Threatens Creativity. New York University Press, New York.
395. van Dijk J. (1999) The Network Society: Social Aspects of New Media (Leontine Spoorenberg trans.). Thousand Oaks, London.
396. Vanzetti A, Di Cataldo V (2000) Manuale di Diritto Industriale, 3rd edn. A. Giuffrè, Milano.
397. Varian HR (1996) Pricing Information Goods. In: Hughes C (ed.) Scholarship in the new information environment: proceedings from an Research Libraries Group Symposium held May 1-3, 1995 at Harvard University. Research Libraries Group, Mountain View (California) p 5.
398. Vaver D (1998) Internationalizing Copyright Law: Implementing the WIPO Treaties. OIPRC Electronic Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, http://www.oip rc.ox.ac.uk/EJWP0199.html.
399. Veddern M (2004) The Enforcement Directive 2004/48/EC-A Further Step in the Harmonization of IP Laws in Europe. 16 IPR Helpdesk Bulletin p 4 at http://w ww.ipr-helpdesk.org/newsletter/16/pdf/EN/N16-EN.pdf.
400. Vinje TC (2000) Should We Begin Digging Copyright's Grave?. 22 European Intellectual Property Review p 551.
401. Vinje TC (1997) The new WIPO Copyright Treaty: A Happy Result in Geneva. 5 European Intellectual Property Review p 230.
402. Visser DJG, Copyright Exemptions Old and New: Learning from Old Media Experiences. In: In: Hugenholtz PB (ed) The Future of Copyright in a Digital Environment. Kluwer Law International, The Hague Boston, p 49.
403. von Lewinski S (2004) Rights Management Information and Technical Protection Measures as Implemented in EC Member States. 35 International Review of Intellectual Property & Competition Law p 844.
404. von Lewinski S (1997) WIPO Diplomatic Conference Results in Two New Treaties. 28 International Review of Intellectual Property & Competition Law p 203.
405. von Lohmann F. (2002) Fair Use and Digital Rights Management: Preliminary Thoughts on the (Irreconcilable?) Tension Between Them. Available at http://www.eff.org/IP/DRM/cfp-fair-use-and-drm.pdf.
406. Walterscheid EC (2003) To Promote the Progress of Science and Useful Arts: The Anatomy of a Congressional Power. 43 IDEA: The Journal of Law and Technology p 1.
407. Walterscheid EC (1998) To Promote the Progress of Useful Arts: American Patent Law and Administration, 1798-1836. F.B. Rothman, Littleton, Colo.
408. Weatherill S (2005) EU Consumer Law and Policy. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham Northampton.
409. Weinberg J (2000) Hardware-Based ID, Rights Management, and Trusted Systems. 52 Stanford Law Review p 1251.
410. White JJ (1997) Form Contracts under Revised Article 2. 75 Washington University Law Quarterly p 315.
411. White JJ, Summers RS (1980) Handbook of the law under the uniform commercial code, 2nd edn. West Publishing, St. Paul.
412. Wiese H (2002) The Justification of the Copyright System in the Digital Age. 24 European Intellectual Property Review pp 387-396.
413. Williams A, Calow D., Higham N. (1998) Digital media : Contracts, Rights and Licensing, 2nd edn. Sweet & Maxwell, London.
414. Winn JK (ed)(2006) Consumer Protection in the Age of the Information Economy. Ashgate, Aldershot Hants Burlington.
415. Winn JK (2006) Is Consumer Protection an Anachronism in the 21st Century? available at http://www.law.washington.edu/Faculty/Winn/Documents/Winn- Consumer-Anachronism-Intro.pdf.
416. Winn JK, Bix BH (2006) Diverging Perspectives on Electronic Contracting in the U.S. and the EU. Minnesota Legal Studies Research Paper No. 06-15, available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=893144.
417. Xalabarder R (2003) Copyright and Digital Distance Education: The Use of Pre- Existing Works in Distance Education Through the Internet. 26 Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts p 101.
418. Xalabarder R (2002) Copyright: choice of law and jurisdiction in the digital age. 8 Annual Survey of International & Comparative Law p 79.
419. Zepeda LM (2002) A&C Records, Inc. v. Napster, Inc.. 17 Berkeley Technology. Law Journal p 71.
420. Ziccardi G (2001) Il Diritto d'Autore nell'Era Digitale: Evoluzione Tecnologica e Copyright: Internet, Mp3, DivX; Open Source, Gnu/Linux, Free Software, Mezzi di Protezione. Il Sole 24 Ore, Milano.
421. Zittrain J (2005) Technological Complements to Copyright. Foundation Press, New York.