Hybrid energy-economy models and endogenous technological change

Energy and Environment

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 81-109

  Jaccard, Mark ^a  

^a SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84891393781     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/0-387-25352-1_4     Document Type: Chapter

References (38)

1. Analysis and Modelling Group (2000). An Assessment of the Economic and Environmental Implications for Canada of the Kyoto Protocol. National Climate Change Process, Ottawa.
2. Argote, L. and Epple D. (1990). Learning curves in manufacturing. Science, 247(1):920-924.
3. Arthur, B. (1989) Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lockin by historical events. The Economic Journal, 99(394):116-131.
4. Banerjee, A. (1992) A simple model of herd behavior. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(3):797-817.
5. Bohringer, C. (1998). The Synthesis of bottom-up and top-down in energy policy modeling. Energy Economics, 20(3):233-248.
6. Box, G. (1979). Robustness in the strategy of scientific model building. In: R. L. Launer and G. N. Wilkinson, eds., Robustness in Statistics. Academic Press, New York.
7. De Canio, S. (2003). Economic Models of Climate Change: A Critique. Palgrave MacMillan, New York.
8. Frei, C, Haldi, P.-A., and Sarlos, G. (2003). Dynamic formulation of a top-down and bottom-up merging energy policy model. Energy Policy, 31:1017-1031.
9. Grubb, M., Kohler, I., and Anderson, D. (2002). Induced technical change in energy and environmental modeling: analytical approaches and policy implications. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment, 27:271-308.
10. Grubler, A. (1998). Technology and Global Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
11. Grubler, A., Nakicenovic, N., and Victor, D. (1999). Dynamics of energy technologies and global change. Energy Policy, 27(5):247-280.
12. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2001). Climate Change, 2001, Third Assessment Report. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
13. 2 emission reduction costs in the residential sector: Behavioral parameters in a bottom-up simulation model. The Energy Journal, 17(4):107-134.
14. Jaccard, M., Loulou, R., Kanudia, A., Nyboer, J., Bailie, A. and Labriet, M. (2003b). Methodological contrasts in costing GHG Abatement policies: Optimization and simulation modeling of micro-economic effects in Canada, European Journal of Operations Research, 145(1):148-164.
15. Jaccard, M., Nyboer, J., Bataille, C, and Sadownik, B. (2003a). Modeling the cost of climate policy: distinguishing between alternative cost definitions and long-run cost dynamics, The Energy Journal, 24(1):49-73.
16. Jaccard, M., Rivers, N., and Home, M. (2004). The Morning After: Optimal GHG Policies for Canada's Kyoto Obligation and Beyond. CD Howe Institute, Toronto.
17. Jacobsen, H. K. (1998). Integrating the bottom-up and top-down approach to energy-economy modeling: The case of Denmark. Energy Economics, 20(4):443-461.
18. Jacoby, H. and Wing, I. (1999). Adjustment time, capital malleability and policy cost. The Energy Journal, Special Issue: The Costs of the Kyoto Protocol: A Multi-Model Evaluation, May: 73-92.
19. Kolstad, C. (1998). Integrated assessment modeling of climate change. In: W. Nordhaus, ed., Economics and Policy Issues in Climate Change, pp. 263-286. Resources for the Future, Washington, DC.
20. Koopmans, C. C. and te Velde, D. W. (2001). Bridging the energy efficiency gap: Using bottom-up information in a top-down energy demand model. Energy Economics, 23(1):57-75.
21. Loschel, A. (2002). Technological change in economic models of environmental policy: A survey. Ecological Economics, 43:105-126.
22. Louviere, J., Hensher, D., and Swait, J. (2000). Stated Choice Methods. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
23. McDonald, A. and Shrattenholzer, L. (2001). Learning rates for energy technologies. Energy Policy, 29:255-261.
24. Morris, S., Goldstein, G., and Fthenakis, V. (2002). NEMS and MARKAL-MACRO models for energy-environmental-economic analysis: A comparison of the electricity and carbon reduction projections. Environmental Modeling and Assessment, 17:207-216.
25. Neij, L. (1997). The use of experience curves to analyse the prospects for diffusion and adoption of renewable energy technology. Energy Policy, 23(13):1099-1107.
26. Norton, B., Costanza, R., and Bishop, R. (1998). The evolution of preferences: Why "sovereign" preferences may not lead to sustainable policies and what to do about it. Ecological Economics, 24(2-3):193-211.
27. 2 policies in Sweden. International Journal of Environment and Pollution, 12(2-3):323-342.
28. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (1999). Economic Instruments for Pollution Control and Natural Resources Management in OECD Countries: A Survey. OECD, Paris.
29. Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development (2003). Voluntary Approaches for Environmental Policy: Effectiveness, Efficiency, and Usage in the Policy Mixes. OECD, Paris.
30. Pindyck, R. (1991) Irreversibility, uncertainty, and investment. Journal of Economic Literature, 29(3):1110-1152.
31. Rivers, N. and Jaccard, M. (2004). Combining top-down and bottom-up approaches to energy-economy modeling using discrete choice methods. Forthcoming in The Energy Journal.
32. Stavins, R. (1999). The costs of carbon sequestration: A revealed preference approach. American Economic Review 89(4):994-1009.
33. Train, K. (1985). Discount rates in consumers' energy related decisions: A review of the literature. Energy: The International Journal, 10(12):1243-1253.
34. Train, K. (2002). Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
35. United Nations Development Program (2000). World Energy Assessment: Energy and the Challenge of Sustainability United Nations Development Program, New York.
36. Urban, G., Wienberg, B., and Hauser, J. (1996). Premarket forecasting of really-new products. Journal of Marketing, 60:47-60.
37. van den Burgh, J. and Gowdy, J. (2000). Evolutionary theories in environmental and resource economics: Approaches and applications, Environmental and Resource Economics, 17:37-57.
38. Wirjranto, T. (1999). Estimation of Import and Export Elasticities: A Report Prepared for the Economic and Fiscal Policy Branch at the Department of Finance. Department of Economics, University of Waterloo.