Openness to experience: Its lower level structure, measurement, and cross-cultural equivalence

Journal of Personality Assessment

Volumn 96, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 29-45

  Woo, Sang Eun ^a   Chernyshenko, Oleksandr S ^b   Longley, Andrew ^c   Zhang, Zhi Xue ^d   Chiu, Chi Yue ^e   Stark, Stephen E ^f  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (Singapore)

^c IBM   (United States)

^d Peking University   (China)

^e NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (Singapore)

^f UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CHINA; CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY; CULTURAL FACTOR; EXPLORATORY BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTELLIGENCE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERSONALITY; PERSONALITY TEST; QUESTIONNAIRE; UNITED STATES; VERY ELDERLY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CHINA; CROSS-CULTURAL COMPARISON; CULTURE; EXPLORATORY BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTELLIGENCE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERSONALITY; PERSONALITY INVENTORY; QUESTIONNAIRES; UNITED STATES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84891372509     PISSN: 00223891     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2013.806328     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Ashton, M. C., Lee, K., Vernon, P. A., & Jang, K. L. (2000). Fluid intelligence, crystallized intelligence, and the Openness/intellect factor. Journal of Research in Personality, 34, 197-207.
2. Cattell, R. B. (1945). The description of personality: Principles and findings in a factor analysis. American Journal of Psychology, 58, 69-90.
3. Cattell, R. B. (1966). The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1, 245-276.
4. Cheung, G.W.,&Rensvold,R.B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233-255.
5. Comrey, A. (1988). Factor-analytic methods of scale development in personality and clinical psychology. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56, 754-761.
6. Conn, S. R., & Rieke, M. L. (1994). Construct validation of the 16PF fifth edition. In S. R. Conn & M. L. Rieke (Eds.), The 16PF fifth edition technical manual (pp. 101-142). Champaign, IL: Institute for Personality and Ability Testing.
7. Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992a). Four ways five factors are basic. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 653-665.
8. Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992b). The revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO five factor inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
9. Costa, P. T., McCrae, R. R., & Dye, D. A. (1991). Facet scales for agreeableness and conscientiousness: A revision of the NEO Personality Inventory. Personality and Individual Differences, 12, 887-898.
10. DeYoung, C. G. (2006).Higher-order factors of theBig Five in amulti-informant sample. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 1138-1151.
11. DeYoung, C. G., Peterson, J., & Higgins, D. (2005). Sources of openness/ intellect: Cognitive and neuropsychological correlates of the fifth factor of personality. Journal of Personality, 73, 825-858.
12. DeYoung, C. G., Quilty, L. C., & Peterson, J. B. (2007). Between facets and domains: 10 aspects of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 880-896.
13. DeYoung, C. G., Shamosh, N. A., Green, A. E., Braver, T. S., & Gray, J. R. (2009). Intellect as distinct from openness: Differences revealed by fMRI of working memory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 883-892.
14. Digman, J. (1990). Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 417-440.
15. Digman, J. (1997). Higher-order factors of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1246-1256.
16. Dorans, N. J., & Holland, P. W. (1993). DIF detection and description: Mantel-Haenszel and standardization. In P. W. Holland & H. Wainer (Eds.), Differential item functioning (pp. 35-66). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
17. Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C., & Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4, 272-299.
18. Foldes, H. L., Duehr, E. E.,&Ones, D. S. (2008).Group differences in personality: Meta-analyses comparing five U.S. racial groups. Personnel Psychology, 61, 579-616.
19. Geisinger, K. F. (1994). Cross-cultural normative assessment: Translation and adaptation issues influencing the normative interpretation of assessment instruments. Psychological Assessment, 6, 304-312.
20. Goldberg, L. (1992). The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure. Psychological Assessment, 4, 26-42.
21. Goldberg, L. R. (1999). A broad-bandwidth, public domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models. In I. Mervielde, I. Deary, F. De Fruyt, & F. Ostendorf (Eds.), Personality psychology in Europe (Vol. 7, pp. 7-28). Tilburg, TheNetherlands: TilburgUniversity Press.
22. Gough, H. G. (1987). California Psychological Inventory administrator's guide. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
23. Guttman, L. (1954). Some necessary conditions for common-factor analysis. Psychometrika, 19, 149-161.
24. Hampson, S., John, O., & Goldberg, L. (1986). Category breadth and hierarchical structure in personality: Studies of asymmetries in judgments of trait implications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 37-54.
25. Herńandez, A., Drasgow, F., & Gonźalez-Roḿa V. (2004). Investigating the functioning of a middle category by means of a mixed-measurement model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 687-699.
26. Hofstee, W. K. B., De Raad, B., & Goldberg, L. R. (1992). Integration of the Big Five and circumplex approaches to trait structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 146-163.
27. Hogan, R., & Hogan, J. (1992). Manual for the Hogan Personality Inventory. Tulsa, OK: Hogan Assessment Systems.
28. Homan, A. C., Hollenbeck, J. R., Humphrey, S. E., Van Knippenberg, D., Ilgen, D. R., & Van Kleef, G. A. (2008). Facing differences with an open mind: Openness to experiences, salience of intragroup differences, and performance of diverse work groups. Academy of Management Journal, 51, 1204-1222.
29. Horn, J. (1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30, 179-185.
30. Hough, L. M., & Ones, D. S. (2001). The structure, measurement, validity, and use of personality variables in industrial, work, and organizational psychology. In N. Anderson, D. S. Ones, H. K. Sinangil, & C. Viswesvaran (Eds.), Handbook of industrial work & organizational psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 233-277). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
31. Humphreys, L., & Montanelli, R., Jr. (1975). An investigation of the parallel analysis criterion for determining the number of common factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 10, 193-205.
32. Jackson, D. N. (1994). Jackson Personality Inventory-Revised manual. Port Huron, MI: Research Psychologists Press.
33. Johnson, J. A. (1994). Clarification of factor five with the help of the AB5C model. European Journal of Personality, 8, 311-334.
34. Kaiser, H. (1960). The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 29, 141-151.
35. LePine, J. A., Colquitt, J. A., & Erez, A. (2000). Adaptability to changing task contexts: Effects of general cognitive ability, conscientiousness andOpenness to experience. Personnel Psychology, 53, 563-593.
36. Leung, A., & Chiu, C. (2008). Interactive effects of multicultural experiences and Openness to experience on creative potential. Creativity Research Journal, 20, 376-382.
37. McCrae, R., & Costa, P. (1997). Personality trait structure as a human universal. American Psychologist, 52, 509-516.
38. McCrae, R. R., & Sutin, A. R. (2009). Openness to experience. In M. R. Leary & R. H. Hoyle (Eds.), Handbook of individual differences in social behavior (pp. 257-273). New York, NY: Guilford.
39. McDonald,R. P. (1999). Test theory:Aunified treatment.Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum.
40. Mischel, W., & Peake, P. (1982). Beyond d́ejà vu in the search for crosssituational consistency. Psychological Review, 89, 730-755.
41. Nasser, F., & Wisenbaker, J. (2003). A Monte Carlo study investigating the impact of item parceling on measures of fit in confirmatory factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63, 729-757.
42. Ployhart, R. E., & Oswald, F. L. (2004). Applications of mean and covariance structure analysis: Integrating correlational and experimental approaches. Organizational Research Methods, 7, 27-65.
43. Raju, N. S., Laffitte, L. J., & Byrne, B. M. (2002). Measurement equivalence: A comparison of methods based on confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 517-529.
44. Roberts, B. W., Chernyshenko, O. S., Stark, S., & Goldberg, L. R. (2005). The structure of conscientiousness: An empirical investigation based on seven major personality questionnaires. Personnel Psychology, 58, 103-139.
45. Saucier,G. (2003). Factor structure of English-language personality type-nouns. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 695-708.
46. Saucier, G., & Ostendorf, F. (1999). Hierarchical subcomponents of the Big Five personality factors: A cross-language replication. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 613-627.
47. Stark, S., Chernyshenko, O. S., & Drasgow, F. (2006). Detecting DIF with CFA and IRT: Toward a unified strategy. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 1292-1306.
48. Tellegen, A. (1982). Brief manual for the multidimensional personality questionnaire. Unpublished manuscript. Minneapolis, MN: Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota.
49. Vandenberg, R., & Lance, C. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 4-69.