Assessing the possible direct effect of birth weight on childhood blood pressure: A sensitivity analysis

American Journal of Epidemiology

Volumn 179, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 4-11

  Chiolero, Arnaud ^a   Paradis, Gilles ^b   Kaufman, Jay S ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LAUSANNE   (Switzerland)

^b MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

birth weight; blood pressure; collider stratification bias; direct effects; sensitivity analyses

Indexed keywords

ASSESSMENT METHOD; BIRTH RATE; BLOOD; CHILD HEALTH; DISEASE PREVALENCE; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; WEIGHT;

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; BIRTH WEIGHT; BLOOD PRESSURE; CHILD; CHILD BEHAVIOR; HUMAN; LOW BIRTH WEIGHT; SCHOOL CHILD; SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE;

BIRTH WEIGHT; BLOOD PRESSURE; COLLIDER-STRATIFICATION BIAS; DIRECT EFFECTS; SENSITIVITY ANALYSES;

BIRTH WEIGHT; BLOOD PRESSURE; BODY WEIGHTS AND MEASURES; CHILD; DIET; FEMALE; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HUMANS; MALE; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PREVALENCE; SEDENTARY LIFESTYLE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

SWITZERLAND;

EID: 84891370919     PISSN: 00029262     EISSN: 14766256     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwt228     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Huxley R, Neil A, Collins R. Unravelling the fetal origins hypothesis: Is there really an inverse association between birthweight and subsequent blood pressure? Lancet. 2002; 360(9334):659-665. (Pubitemid 35232333)
2. Lawlor DA, Leon DA, Rasmussen F. Growth trajectory matters: interpreting the associations among birth weight, concurrent body size, and systolic blood pressure in a cohort study of 378,707 Swedish men. Am J Epidemiol. 2007;165(12): 1405-1412. (Pubitemid 47234307)
3. Lucas A, Fewtrell MS, Cole TJ. Fetal origins of adult disease-the hypothesis revisited. BMJ. 1999;319:245-249. (Pubitemid 29338697)
4. Weinberg CR. Invited commentary: Barker meets Simpson. Am J Epidemiol. 2005;161(1):33-35.
5. Arah OA. The role of causal reasoning in understanding Simpson's paradox, Lord's paradox, and the suppression effect: covariate selection in the analysis of observational studies. Emerg Themes Epidemiol. 2008;5:5.
6. Geelhoed JJ, Fraser A, Tilling K, et al. Preeclampsia and gestational hypertension are associated with childhood blood pressure independently of family adiposity measures: the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children. Circulation. 2010;122(12):1192-1199.
7. Cole SR, Hernán MA. Fallibility in estimating direct effects. Int J Epidemiol. 2002;31(1):163-165. (Pubitemid 34284920)
8. Kaufman JS, Maclehose RF, Kaufman S. A further critique of the analytic strategy of adjusting for covariates to identify biologic mediation. Epidemiol Perspect Innov. 2004;1(1):4.
9. Petersen ML, Sinisi SE, van der Laan MJ. Estimation of direct causal effects. Epidemiology. 2006;17(3):276-284.
10. Schisterman EF, Cole SR, Platt RW. Overadjustment bias and unnecessary adjustment in epidemiologic studies. Epidemiology. 2009;20(4):488-495.
11. Wilcox AJ,Weinberg CR, Basso O. On the pitfalls of adjusting for gestational age at birth. Am J Epidemiol. 2011;174(9): 1062-1068.
12. VanderWeele TJ, Hernández-Diaz S. Is there a direct effect of pre-eclampsia on cerebral palsy not through preterm birth? Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2011;25(2):111-115.
13. VanderWeele TJ, Mumford SL, Schisterman EF. Conditioning on intermediates in perinatal epidemiology. Epidemiology. 2012;23(1):1-9.
14. Erratum in: Epidemiology. 2012;23(3):507.
15. Banack HR, Kaufman JS. The "obesity paradox" explained. Epidemiology. 2013;24(3):461-462.
16. Chiolero A, Kaufman JS, Paradis G. Why adjustment for current weight can bias the estimate of the effect of birth weight on blood pressure: shedding light using causal graphs. J Hypertens. 2012;30(5):1042-1045.
17. VanderWeele TJ. Bias formulas for sensitivity analysis for direct and indirect effects. Epidemiology. 2010;21(4): 540-551.
18. Chiolero A, Cachat F, Burnier M, et al. Prevalence of hypertension in schoolchildren based on repeated measurements and association with overweight. J Hypertens. 2007;25(11):2209-2217. (Pubitemid 47537913)
19. Lasserre AM, Chiolero A, Cachat F, et al. Overweight in Swiss children and associations with children's and parents' characteristics. Obesity. 2007;15(12):2912-2919. (Pubitemid 351256651)
20. Topouchian JA, El Assaad MA, Orobinskaia LV, et al. Validation of two automatic devices for self-measurement of blood pressure according to the International Protocol of the European Society of Hypertension: the Omron M6 (HEM-7001-E) and the Omron R7 (HEM 637-IT). Blood Press Monit. 2006;11:165-171. (Pubitemid 44084767)
21. Cole TJ, Bellizzi MC, Flegal KM, et al. Establishing a standard definition for child overweight and obesity worldwide: international survey. BMJ. 2000;320:1240-1243. (Pubitemid 30240471)
22. Chiolero A, Bovet P, Paradis G. Screening for elevated blood pressure in children and adolescents: a critical appraisal. JAMA Pediatr. 2013;167(3):266-273.
23. Kramer MS. Determinants of low birth weight: methodological assessment and meta-analysis. Bull World Health Organ. 1987;65(5):663-737. (Pubitemid 18061811)
24. Janssen I, Katzmarzyk PT, Boyce WF, et al. Comparison of overweight and obesity prevalence in school-aged youth from 34 countries and their relationships with physical activity and dietary patterns. Obes Rev. 2005;6(2):123-132. (Pubitemid 40604421)
25. Greenland S, Pearl J, Robins JM. Causal diagrams for epidemiologic research. Epidemiology. 1999;10(1): 37-48. (Pubitemid 29014427)
26. Howards PP, Schisterman EF, Poole C, et al. "Toward a clearer definition of confounding" revisited with directed acyclic graphs. Am J Epidemiol. 2012;176(6):506-511.
27. McCrindle BW. Assessment and management of hypertension in children and adolescents. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2010;7(3): 155-163.
28. He FJ, Li J, Macgregor GA. Effect of longer term modest salt reduction on blood pressure: Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials. BMJ. 2013; 346:f1325.
29. Musini VM, Rezapour P, Wright JM, et al. Blood pressure lowering efficacy of loop diuretics for primary hypertension. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;8: CD003825.
30. Kaufman S, Kaufman JS, Maclehose RF. Analytic bounds on causal risk differences in directed acyclic graphs involving three observed binary variables. J Stat Plan Inference. 2009; 139(10):3473-3487.
31. Huxley RR, Shiell AW, Law CM. The role of size at birth and postnatal catch-up growth in determining systolic blood pressure: a systematic review of the literature. J Hypertens. 2000;18(7):815-831. (Pubitemid 30459482)
32. Freese J, Kevern JA. Type of causes. In: Morgan Stephen L., ed. Handbook for Causal Analysis for Social Research. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer; 2013:27-41.
33. Hernán MA, Taubman SL. Does obesity shorten life? The importance of well-defined interventions to answer causal questions. Int J Obes (Lond). 2008;32(suppl 3): S8-S14.
34. Hernán MA, VanderWeele TJ. Compound treatments and transportability of causal inference. Epidemiology. 2011; 22(3):368-377.
35. Högberg L, Cnattingius S, Lundholm C, et al. Effects of maternal smoking during pregnancy on offspring blood pressure in late adolescence. J Hypertens. 2012;30(4):693-699.
36. Fraser A, Tilling K, Macdonald-Wallis C, et al. Association of maternal weight gain in pregnancy with offspring obesity and metabolic and vascular traits in childhood. Circulation. 2010;121(23):2557-2564.
37. Hafeman DM. "Proportion explained": a causal interpretation for standard measures of indirect effect? Am J Epidemiol. 2009;170(11):1443-1448.