Vaginal birth after a caesarean section: The development of a Western European population-based prediction model for deliveries at term

BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Volumn 121, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 194-201

  Schoorel, E N C ^a   Van Kuijk, S M J ^b   Melman, S ^a   Nijhuis, J G ^a   Smits, L J M ^b   Aardenburg, R ^c   De Boer, K ^d   Delemarre, F M C ^e   Van Dooren, I M ^f   Franssen, M T M ^g   Kaplan, M ^h   Kleiverda, G ⁱ   Kuppens, S M I ^j   Kwee, A ^k   Lim, F T H ^l   Mol, B W J ^m   Roumen, F J M E ^c   Sikkema, J M ⁿ   Smid Koopman, E ^o   Visser, H ^p   Woiski, M ^q   Hermens, R P M G ^q   Scheepers, H C J ^a   more..

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c Sittard Geleen Heerlen   (Netherlands)

^d RIJNSTATE HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

^e ELKERLIEK HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

^f Weert   (Netherlands)

^g UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^h Röpcke Zweers Hospital   (Netherlands)

ⁱ Flevo Hospital   (Netherlands)

^j CATHARINA HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

^k UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

^l IJSSELLAND HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

^m UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

ⁿ Atrium Medical Centre ^*  (Netherlands)

^o Ruwaard Van Putten Hospital   (Netherlands)

^p TERGOOI HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

^q RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

more..

Author keywords

Personalised decision making; prediction model; vaginal birth after caesarean; VBAC

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; CESAREAN SECTION; COHORT ANALYSIS; COUNSELING; DIABETES MELLITUS; FEMALE; FETUS DEATH; FETUS WEIGHT; GESTATIONAL AGE; HELLP SYNDROME; HUMAN; HYPERTENSION; LABOR INDUCTION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MATERNAL AGE; MEDICAL HISTORY; NETHERLANDS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PARITY; POPULATION MODEL; PREDICTION; PREECLAMPSIA; PREGNANCY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; TERM BIRTH; THIRD TRIMESTER PREGNANCY; VAGINAL BIRTH AFTER A CESAREAN SECTION; VAGINAL DELIVERY; VALIDATION STUDY; WESTERN EUROPEAN POPULATION BASED PREDICTION MODEL; ALGORITHM; FAMILY SIZE; LABOR; LARGE FOR GESTATIONAL AGE; NOTE; PATIENT COUNSELING; POPULATION BASED CASE CONTROL STUDY; RISK FACTOR; WESTERN EUROPE;

EID: 84891354399     PISSN: 14700328     EISSN: 14710528     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.12539     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Bujold E,. Evaluating professional society guidelines on vaginal birth after cesarean. Semin Perinatol 2010; 34: 314-7.
2. McMahon MJ, Luther ER, Bowes WA Jr, Olshan AF,. Comparison of a trial of labor with an elective second cesarean section. N Engl J Med 1996; 335: 689-95.
3. Shorten A, Shorten B, Keogh J, West S, Morris J,. Making choices for childbirth: a randomised controlled trial of a decision-aid for informed birth after cesarean. Birth 2005; 32: 252-61.
4. Shorten A, Shorten B,. The importance of mode of birth after previous cesarean: success, satisfaction, and postnatal health. J Midwifery Womens Health 2012; 57: 126-32.
5. Guise JM, Eden K, Emeis C, Denman MA, Marshall N, Fu RR, et al. Vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep) 2010; 191: 1-397.
6. Grobman WA,. Rates and prediction of successful vaginal birth after cesarean. Semin Perinatol 2010; 34: 244-8.
7. Smith GC, White IR, Pell JP, Dobbie R,. Predicting cesarean section and uterine rupture among women attempting vaginal birth after prior cesarean section. PLoS Med 2005; 2: e252.
8. Eden KB, McDonagh M, Denman MA, Marshall N, Emeis C, Fu R, et al. New insights on vaginal birth after cesarean: can it be predicted? Obstet Gynecol 2010; 116: 967-81.
9. Grobman WA, Lai Y, Landon MB, Spong CY, Leveno KJ, Rouse DJ, et al. Development of a nomogram for prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 109: 806-12.
10. Grobman WA, Lai Y, Landon MB, Spong CY, Leveno KJ, Rouse DJ, et al. Does information available at admission for delivery improve prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean? Am J Perinatol 2009; 26: 693-701.
11. Schoorel ENC, Melman S, van Kuijk SMJ, Grobman WA, Kwee A, Mol BWJ, et al. Predicting successful intended vaginal delivery after previous caesarean section: external validation of two prediction models in a Dutch nationwide registration-based cohort with a high intended vaginal delivery rate. BJOG 2013. Accepted for publication (BJOG 2013-OG-12063).
12. Steyerberg EW,. Clinical Prediction Models. New York, NY: Springer; 2009.
13. Harrell FJ,. Regression Modeling Strategies. New York, NY: Springer; 2001.
14. Steyerberg EW, Moons KG, van der Windt DA, Hayden JA, Perel P, Schroter S, et al. Prognosis Research Strategy (PROGRESS) 3: prognostic model research. PLoS Med 2013; 10: e1001381.
15. National Institutes of Health,. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights March 8-10, 2010. Semin Perinatol 2010; 34: 351-65.
16. Snijders RJ, Nicolaides KH,. Fetal biometry at 14-40 weeks' gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1994; 4: 34-48.
17. Yudkin PL, Aboualfa M, Eyre JA, Redman CW, Wilkinson AR,. New birthweight and head circumference centiles for gestational ages 24 to 42 weeks. Early Hum Dev 1987; 15: 45-52.
18. Hadlock FP, Harrist RB, Sharman RS, Deter RL, Park SK,. Estimation of fetal weight with the use of head, body, and femur measurements-a prospective study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985; 151: 333-7.
19. Peduzzi P, Concato J, Kemper E, Holford TR, Feinstein AR,. A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis. J Clin Epidemiol 1996; 49: 1373-9.
20. Kwee A, Bots ML, Visser GH, Bruinse HW,. Obstetric management and outcome of pregnancy in women with a history of caesarean section in the Netherlands. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2007; 132: 171-6.
21. Donders AR, van der Heijden GJ, Stijnen T, Moons KG,. Review: a gentle introduction to imputation of missing values. J Clin Epidemiol 2006; 59: 1087-91.
22. Rubin DB,. Inference and missing data. Biometrika 1976; 63: 581-92.
23. Naji O, Wynants L, Smith A, Abdallah Y, Stalder C, Sayasneh A, et al. Predicting successful vaginal birth after cesarean section using a model based on cesarean scar features examined using transvaginal sonography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013; 41: 672-8.
24. Verhoeven CJ, van Uytrecht CT, Porath MM, Mol BW,. Risk factors for cesarean delivery following labor induction in multiparous women. J Pregnancy 2013; 2013: 820-92.
25. Brennan DJ, Murphy M, Robson MS, O'Herlihy C,. The singleton, cephalic, nulliparous woman after 36 weeks of gestation: contribution to overall cesarean delivery rates. Obstet Gynecol 2011; 117: 273-9.
26. Van Kuijk SM, Sep SJ, Nelemans PJ, Smits LJ,. How long do preconception risk prediction models hold? Influence of selective fertility on model performance. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2010; 24: 602-7.